@edj

Could you keep your 5-fold doctrine out of this topic and leave it in one of the dedicated topics instead. I think it will only confuse things here and force people off topic. Thanks.

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs

JWs say: ‘a god’
Trinitarians basically say ‘th…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

@miaa

Adding the “a” (as the JW “New World Translation” does) and turning the subject (The only true God and His spoken word) into a second smaller god seems wrong somehow. Since when is someones spoken word a separate being? Just as the Spirit.

An error is made on both sides of the argument.

JWs say: ‘a god’

Trinitarians basically say ‘the Go…[Read more]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Jehovah Witnesses re-interpret this verse to say, “…and the Word was a god” to suit their own teaching…. (that Jesus was really Michael the archangel)…

If you don’t agree with this definitive verse, how would you re-word it to explain what you believe concerni…

[Read more]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Jehovah Witnesses re-interpret this verse to say, “…and the Word was a god” to suit their own teaching…. (that Jesus was really Michael the archangel)…

If you don’t agree with this definitive verse, how would you re-word it to explain what you believe concerni…

[Read more]

Yes, I know this is your verse of choice to use against the trinity, but again all you are doing is using the humanity of Jesus in an attempt to deny His deity…and thus slipping into the realm of teaching cult doctrine.

Although he existed in the FORM of God, he EMPTIED himself, took on flesh, died for humanity’s sins. then returned to the glory t…[Read more]

In the beginning was the Word.

Since when does eternity have a beginning.

lol.

Every son I have is a part of me yet distinct from me. Doctors usually understand this about sons.

So are the sons of God to God. But are they the one true God because of that? No.

Are you and your sons the one true LU.

For us, there is one God the Father.

Good. So let’s go through the events.

1) His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men.

2) Death and Hades were thrown into the Lake of Fire which is the Second Death.

If the first fire Hades? If so, Hades results in the destruction of heavens and earth and…[Read more]

Are you telling me this or repeating what I have said all along. lol.

Yes, Death and Hades end in the Lake of Fire, the Second Death.

Wicked souls existing in Hades for eternity is proven wrong by that scripture alone.

Do you believe that the wicked will suffer for all eternity in Hades given that you are aware of Hades fate?

Are you telling me this or repeating what I have said all along. lol.

Yes, Death and Hell end in the Lake of Fire, the Second Death.

Wicked souls existing in Hell for eternity is proven wrong by that scripture alone.

Do you believe that the wicked will suffer for all eternity in Hell given that you are aware of Hell’s fate?