Your not reading my posts or you are just not smart enough to debate this topic. Read my lips.

Low res shots are high res shots that you are zooming in on. Screen capture a high res image from GE that shows streets and houses and zoom in on a house using photoshop. Notice that it now looks low res due to pixelation?

Btw, how high are the hills in the foreground of Ruapehu in your photo?  More or less than 900 meters tall?  Tick tock….

You can find that info out using Google Earth. Remember that from the coast, there is a gradual rise in elevation because the base of Ruapehu sits on a high plateau. Further proof of the high plateau is you get snow at gro…[Read more]

Are you seriously saying that these thousands of satellites can take good photos of everywhere on earth except Antarctica?

Wrong. I’m saying lots of places have bad quality low res shots and they are mostly low in population. Antarctica should fare worst given that it has zero citizens or close to zero. And it makes perfect sense.

Mike, it’s not a point related to Antarctica so what is being hidden in other areas like the area 8 live in.

And your point about high res and low res is moot. The reason for pixelation is mostly because some areas do not have low altitude satellite footage so you are zooming in on an image at higher altitude. And why is that?

My guess is it…[Read more]

Debunk Log
It’s a fact. the more humans there are, the greater the quality of images. It’s obvious. You can see it for yourself. Case closed. Another debunk.

I think all arguments are debunked. Anythings outstanding. And I am not talking about a particular lighthouse in England or whatever because obviously I cannot check every claim out. But…[Read more]

Contrary to what you might think Mike, Google doesn’t have satellites or take the photos themselves.  They get the satellite imagery from third party providers. Google Earth is wasn’t designed for UFO hunting or flat earth clues. My guess is satellite image providers concentrate their content on populated areas and less so in areas of zero p…[Read more]

Do YOU have a setting on YOUR camera that allows you to shoot higher quality only where the subject is in the viewfinder? And everything else just gets filled in with crappy 1980s style pixels?

This argument falls flat like your earth when you consider one simple thing. Pixelated images still exist all over the globe. Not just an Antarctic thing.…[Read more]

Quick question.

Can lizard people be saved? Or are they 100% the spawn of Satan?

Read my post again. Flat white plains is not high priority on image upgrades when populated areas are in need of attention.

If you can’t see that, then you have to be blind. It’s obvious.

See, you picked a spot on the edge.  We all agree the edge exists.  Flat earthers believe that edge forms a great circle that encompasses the earth – the “outer ring” of earth.

With the trillions spent by the lizard people on keeping the conspiracy alive you would think they could CGI in the centre of Antarctica. But no, they screwed up and now…[Read more]

So you have no proof that Australia exists Mike. Yet you believe it exists despite no proof. You are not adhering to your own standards.

Yep, just zoomed in on a little town called Warburton in the middle of nowhere. Real houses, roads, rocks and trees.  Now let’s do Antarctica.

Yep, just zoomed in to Antarctica on Google Earth because it shows the continent in the correct projection and saw mountains, glaciers, flat ice plains, areas with no ice, icebergs, and even roads, bu…[Read more]

Yep, just zoomed in on a little town called Warburton in the middle of nowhere. Real houses, roads, rocks and trees.  Now let’s do Antarctica.

I see. So Google up the image quality depending on population density and the Outback while not that great still out does the Antarctica that has zero population in the areas without imagery. Hmm what is go…[Read more]

I see. So you give this as proof that Australia exists and when we show videos or photos of the globe and of Antarctica, they don’t exist.

Got it mate. Lol.

Great.  Now pick ONE of them, and let’s actually confirm it happened.  Let’s start by finding aerial or satellite footage of this person in the interior of Antarctica.

Great. You can do Australia. You first.

US man finishes solo race across Antarctica – BBC News

In all your decades of watching nature adventure shows where people go to the most extreme places on earth (like to the bottom of the ocean and trekking across the Sahara or the outback), don’t you find it at least intriguing that NOBODY has ever done a Nat Geo or BBC show about trekking a…

[Read more]

People Cross Antarctica All the Time. It’s Still Crazy Hard
Two men are walking across Antarctica alone, together. Both are adventurous and fit: Louis Rudd, 49, a British Royal Marine combat veteran who has hiked to the South Pole before; Colin O’Brady, 33, a US adventurer who survived severe burn injuries to become a mountaineer and professional…[Read more]

What are they trying to hide in the Sahara Desert?
Could there be an entrance to the Hollow Earth?

In all your decades of watching nature adventure shows where people go to the most extreme places on earth (like to the bottom of the ocean and trekking across the Sahara or the outback), don’t you find it at least intriguing that NOBODY has ever d…[Read more]

In all your decades of watching nature adventure shows where people go to the most extreme places on earth (like to the bottom of the ocean and trekking across the Sahara or the outback), don’t you find it at least intriguing that NOBODY has ever done a Nat Geo or BBC show about trekking across the Amazon Rainforest or something… with overhead vie…[Read more]

First man to hike the Amazon Rainforest was in 2010

First man to hike Amazon River ends two-year, 4,000-mile trek

British explorer Ed Stafford finished his two-year, 4,000-mile trek along the Amazon River on Monday, completing a feat never before accomplished, his publicist said.

The hike, which he started at Camana, Peru, on April 2, 2008,…[Read more]