Quote (2besee @ April 15 2013,19:14)Only God can reveal to you that God is love, and the meaning of it.Amen Kerwin and Abe.2B,Pierre and I have wholeheartedly acknowledged that God is love.It's Kerwin's claim that LOVE is GOD that we're having a problem with.Perhaps you could shed some light?(And I didn't personally address you on this last point…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ April 15 2013,19:45)1) 'a god' is saying that it could be any kind of god. Even a false god could not be ruled out by the sentence structure.Are you saying the rest of scripture isn't enough for us to figure out that Jesus is not a “false god”?  Quote (t8 @ April 15 2013,19:45)2) Qualitatively God specifies divine nature or same…[Read more]

And while you're at it, Gene, I'm still waiting for you to address the second post on this page.

Hi Daniel,You STILL didn't address Rev 3:12, where it is CLEAR that Jesus has a DIFFERENT name than the one he calls “my God”.  That is one point in my favor so far.This one time, I'm going to BRIEFLY address all of the points you made.  From now on though, only bring up ONE point per post, okay?  (Otherwise, BOTH of us will end up lost in no…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,16:07)There is nothing that states:Quote (mikeboll @ 64)Something must separate the BEING of God from His creationsHe is instead speaking of created beings and applying it to God, who is not created.Common sense states it, Kerwin. Is everything in existence the being of God? YES or NO?If not, then what separates the…[Read more]

Kerwin,I'm also waiting for you to explain away the word “AND” in John 1:14 – so your “Word-Made-Flesh” title thing works.Also, as an afterthought to my last post:God is power. Is power God Himself?God is just. Is justice God Himself?God is faithful. Is faithfulness God Himself?God is kind. Is kindness God Himself?God is forgiving. Is…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,23:50)Mike,You find my using a question as an answer challenging and so divert to what I suspect even you know is nonsense.Actually Kerwin, it is quite the opposite.  The truth is that I'm tired of YOU posting nonsense as a diversion.Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,23:50)Now you are denying that 1) God is love and 2)…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,11:45)Mike,I am convinced they have chosen to suspend disbelief as they mistake that action for having faith.Agreed.

Quote (carmel @ April 14 2013,09:36)BUT OBVIOUS JESUS FACED DEATH, TASTED DEATH, AND SUFFERRED DEATH…………Agreed. And until you can come up with a scripture that clearly teaches us that his death was different than the death we die, there is no use discussing it further.Charles, I want to see a post that lists only one scripture – a…[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ April 14 2013,01:26)ALLOWED SATAN TO MASTER HIM! NO?Hi Charles,You have answered your own question correctly. Satan did NOT have mastery over Jehovah in the story of Job, nor has he EVER had mastery over Jehovah, our one and only Almighty God.On the other hand, death DID at one time have mastery over God's Son, Jesus Christ.

Quote (jammin @ April 15 2013,00:43)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 14 2013,18:44)Quote (jammin @ April 13 2013,16:52)LOLdont you know how to use math?ok ill give a kindergarten example sunshine you and your father = 2that is 1 +1 =2That's right, jammin.  Kerwin + his father = 2 LIVING BEINGS.Why do you suppose you can understand that, but you can't…[Read more]

Quote (jammin @ April 13 2013,23:29)the bible said there were no people before adamActually, the Bible never does say that, jammin.  The Bible says Adam was the first “adam” – not the first “person”.Now, consider the following:”adam” = “human being” = “homo sapiens sapiens”In other words, what we call “modern man” is technically “homo sapiens…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ April 15 2013,09:24)What you are doing T8 is “FORCING” the text to meet your preconceived Ideologies…………..Gene, How do YOU explain the words, “Before Abraham was, I am” ?Let us hear YOUR explanation for those words, then we can decide who is doing the “forcing”.

Quote (Ed J @ April 14 2013,20:46)Good post. The entirety “of what God is” was in Jesus, but the entirety of what God is wasn't limited to Jesus;because God also exists outside of Jesus – “A Paradox”.Thanks Ed.I don't believe it is a paradox.I agree with you that “the entirety of what God is wasn't limited to Jesus”.I don't agree that “the…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,13:39)T,I am showing you an example of the pattern that applies to 1) “Hope is God”, 2)“Love is God” and 3)“the Word is God”.  These are three different but related concepts.1. 1 Timothy 6:10For the love of money is the root of all evil:Kerwin, is the “LOVE” of money “God”? It IS “love”, after all, right?2. I have…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,13:12)Hope is GodRidiculous!  Are you saying that as long as I have HOPE in the Devil, I have Jehovah God – since any “hope” is “God Almighty”?It is also said that God is light, Kerwin. Is the light radiating from the bulb in my lamb “God”?

Quote (kerwin @ April 14 2013,12:18)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 14 2013,09:47)Quote (kerwin @ April 13 2013,15:13)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2013,09:38)14 The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the only begotten Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.1.  If the Word was God…[Read more]

Quote (abe @ April 14 2013,11:49)Quote (Gene Balthrop @ April 14 2013,05:32)(Quote)Lets face the truth for a change you truly do not believe God the Father was indeed “IN” the Man Jesus as Jesus said He was. You only believe Just a Part of Him was , so Please tell us what “PART” was in Jesus' Mike and what Parts were not in him. Scripture say the…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ April 14 2013,07:45)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 14 2013,14:30)So then God was NOT “made flesh”, as Kerwin says?Mike ………No God was not “MADE” Flesh, and I do not believe that Kerwin Bleieves that either……….I don't know Gene. That seems to be what he's saying – and YOU keep agreeing with him.So it's at least good to…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ April 14 2013,07:32)Mike………And for the thousandth time that was a “title” affoded that servant, and had nothing to do with any real Kings word being the servant at all. It simply meant that the servant was relaying the Kings words, nothing more.Bingo! Now take that concept, that you clearly understand, and apply it to…[Read more]