Quote (942767 @ June 20 2013,07:52)Quote (terraricca @ June 20 2013,15:21)I have a copy of the Hebrew gospel of Matthew in Englishthat I got from the “amazon.ca  “Thanks Pierre, I did not know that this gospel was available in English.  I will see if I can get a copy.Love in Christ,MartyAnd what does Matthew 28:19 say in that version, Pierre?

Yeah, but ARE you saying that the Word CREATED flesh?

Quote (2besee @ June 20 2013,18:25)Mike,Here is one example of the latest false statement from Terraricca, quote:Terraricca,Quote when you say that we have no truth I have not ever said that. You on the other hand say that constantly to people.Unquote.Terraricca also constantly tells us that we follow “man made religious denominations” etc when…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ June 20 2013,18:07)Mike,They are only a few random pages. You KNOW there are plenty more, months if not years. Can you not sense the rude and vindictive spirit behind that?Do I need to go through other threads?No, you don't need to go to other threads, because I already told you we're not interested unless you report the post WHEN…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ June 20 2013,11:15)Mike,I wrote it that way because I understand that is appropriate when speaking of an action that is completed.Actually Kerwin,John 1:14 describes TWO completed actions. The two actions are separated by the conjunction “and”.The Word was made flesh = the first completed action.and = the conjunction between the…[Read more]

Quote (Gene Balthrop @ June 20 2013,07:52)In that way the Word who is GOD, became (came to be ) in flesh.Hi Gene,The word “IN” is not in John 1:14.  You have to add that word to the scriptural text for your understanding to be realized.  Instead of changing the scriptural words so they conform to your understanding, why not try changing your u…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ June 20 2013,10:37)you coming close for me to complain that you are harassing me without any real reason ,and so attacking,my character with false accusations ,so prove your point or stop what you are doing ,I agree with this, 2B. You are dragging Pierre through a lot of mud here, without showing one offense that deserves a…[Read more]

I didn't see one single thing in the quotes of Pierre you posted that break any forum rules.In fact, this quote………you cannot make scriptures fight against each other ,but they all have to comply with the truth within them ,IF SOMEONE CANNOT DO OR UNDERSTAND THIS ,HE BECOMES A DOUBLE MINDED PERSON……… was in response to Abe telling me I…[Read more]

There you go, Marty. I'll watch when I get some time.

Quote (2besee @ June 19 2013,20:07)And the last time that I looked, Gene had two tiles, and jammin had one.I didn't do my research on that one very well, did I?  I don't know why Gene got his tiles, but they weren't from me.  And now that you bring it up, I remember why I tiled jammin.  Do you want to know?Quote (2besee @ June 19 20…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ June 19 2013,20:04)…..the evidence is in the fact that you are now going out of your way to NOT do it….Okay then.  Problem solved.

Quote (4Thomas @ June 19 2013,00:58)When i say a man of flesh, what i mean is a human.So, just to be clear, you DON'T believe Jesus was “God in the flesh”?  YES or NO?Quote (4Thomas @ June 19 2013,00:58)Please read that in context, scripture is clear that this is a revealtion ABOUT “the word” becomming fleshOkay, I agree with that.  But that d…[Read more]

A completed action? Then why all this fuss? Of course “the Word became (or “was made”) flesh” describes a completed action. It describes the action of a person who WASN'T at first flesh, but then WAS MADE flesh.So if you and I have been agreeing to the same thing all this time, something must have got lost in translation a long time ago. Also,…[Read more]

Quote (kerwin @ June 18 2013,20:10)Mike,I already conceded Paul may have just been speaking of the chief spirit of God.Sorry. I must have missed that post.

Quote (Lightenup @ June 18 2013,20:54)Mike,Aramaic is a family of dialects and all the dialects can be said to be Aramaic.But unless only ONE of those many dialects is actually CALLED “Aramaic”, and the others are NOT – your point is moot.

Quote (Lightenup @ June 18 2013,20:26)Both Judean and Galilean Aramaic are two very similar dialects of Aramaic which were spoken in Israel in the 1st century.But they are both Aramaic, right? So one wouldn't write in Aramaic, and then add, “which means in Aramaic…….”.They could write in GALILEAN Aramaic, and add, “which means in JUDEAN…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ June 18 2013,22:16)Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 18 2013,18:56)Quote (Lightenup @ June 17 2013,22:44)Well, we are making progress!How so?You agree that Jesus is the theos that is our righteousness.I don't see how that is “progress”, but okay.

2B,What about jammin?  He and I have gone to war since he got here.  He has repeatedly called us all “boy”, told us we need to stop “sniffing mosquito coil”, and told us we need to get off our medication, or whatever.He is not usually polite and courteous to those who disagree with his Trinitarian views.  He is more like an attack dog.    Yet look…[Read more]

I'm just saying that if I'm writing IN English, I wouldn't say, “which in English, means 'I'm writing in English' “. If it was written IN Aramaic, then why say, “which in Aramaic means………” ?(Also, your analogy doesn't work because, northern or southern, it is still ENGLISH. So I could say, “which means IN THE SOUTH…..”, or “which means…[Read more]

Quote (4Thomas @ June 18 2013,00:40)Hi Mike,Question:  Who does Jesus mean when he says “my Father” and “my God”?B) By God as his relationship to his God as a man of flesh. A “man of flesh”?  So then you DON'T believe Jesus was “God on earth”, and “God in the flesh”?  That's a good start, Daniel.Anyway, I was looking for a name.  Who (by name or…[Read more]