Ed,How come everybody seems to get this except for you?Why can't you just answer with one of the two choices that are listed in each of those last four posts?Is it because of pride? Is because you think the rest of us are too stupid to recognize the game you're playing to get out of answering the question?I don't get it. We can all easily see…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2014,19:37)Edited James Version (EDJV interpretation):Jesus was NOT calling Judas 'the devil' nor was Jesus even calling Judas 'a devil'Authorised King James Version (AKJV):Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?Obviously both your interpretation and the AKJV cannot be correct.My question:…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 20 2014,17:38)Ed,The only HONEST and DIRECT answers are:1.  MY interpretation is the correct one, and therefore the AKJV is wrong.2.  THE AKJV's interpretation is the correct one, and therefore my interpretation is wrong.Answer with one of those two, and I'm sure t8 will remove the tile.See Ed? Mike knows the choice y…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ April 20 2014,16:54)1. MY interpretation is the correct one.2. THE AKJV's interpretation is the correct one.show me where you answer any of those two question if you have done this it would be easySee Ed? Pierre knows the choice you must make, and the answer you must give.

Quote (journey42 @ April 19 2014,21:03)This debate is really hard for me to follow because you keep taking it off subject. Look at the 1st post?but what I see, is that you have two choices.The AKJV is wrong,or your statement was wrong.See Ed? journey knows the choice you must make, and the answer you must give.

Quote (t8 @ April 20 2014,17:44)Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,11:38)Quote (Ed J @ April 20 2014,16:28)Mike, it seems you are now getting cold feet to speak out against YOUR BOSS.Mike's boss is God and his son.

Quote (Ed J @ April 20 2014,17:46)It ONLY exposes him here as an unrighteous Judge who needs to be impeached.But Ed,This thread of yours has only served to expose YOU as the “unrighteous” one……… not t8.If your plan was to expose t8, then you have failed. Haven't you noticed that most people who have posted here have basically said, Come on,…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 20 2014,17:46)Hi Mike,  I told you what the issue was, but you seem to be avoiding it.T8 wanted to use John 6:70 of the “AKJV Bible” so authenticate his view that Jesus is called 'a god'.No Ed,The “a god” thing in John 1:1 is one of the few things t8 and I DISAGREE about. T8 has never argued for a translation of “a god” in…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ April 20 2014,17:36)Yes, Mike, technically not the exact same question, but a good answer would wrap the whole thing up because the essence of what we are asking is not being addressed. We are asking the same question in different ways so that he understands what it is we are trying to get him to answer.journey popped into the thread,…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 20 2014,16:28)Mike, it seems you are now getting cold feet to speak out against YOUR BOSS.Ed,The only HONEST and DIRECT answers are:1. MY interpretation is the correct one, and therefore the AKJV is wrong.2. THE AKJV's interpretation is the correct one, and therefore my interpretation is wrong.Answer with one of those two,…[Read more]

No Ed,I guess it's NOT actually the same question. I was WRONG to say it was the same exact question. I should have said that it was the same basic thing t8 has been asking you all along.(Ed, it's not that hard to say you were wrong when you were.)

Quote (carmel @ April 20 2014,10:40)ISN'T IT SCRIPTURAL THAT GOD ALMIGHTY HAS NO DAUGHTERS!ALSO SINCE HE HAS NO DAUGHTERS, ONLY SONS, HOW COULD GOD ALMIGHTY BE:THE FATHER OF ALL ? OBVIOUS OF SONS AND DAUGHTERS!Charles,This is why my patience has run out with you.  Your “points” are always nonsensical, and lead to nothing but empty rabbit…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 19 2014,22:34)I prefer to stick to the facts OK?  The Greek language has NO indefinite articles – so there is no wrong in what I said.Okay Ed,Since you ignored my first post from yesterday, I will lay out those FACTS for you again.Forget the language barriers, and let's just focus on the TEACHING.The AKJV TEACHES that Jesus…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ April 19 2014,22:22)Quote (Ed J @ April 19 2014,02:29)B. Would I say the editors were ‘wrong’ for NOT italicizing it?     Wrong is not the word I would use, neglectful perhaps.Hi Journey42,Here is my answer to T8's question.Look at your answer, Ed. First, if the KJV translators ended up with an inaccurate translation because of “n…[Read more]

Quote (journey42 @ April 19 2014,21:03)This debate is really hard for me to follow because you keep taking it off subject.  Look at the 1st post?but what I see, is that you have two choices.The AKJV is wrong,or your statement was wrong.Now what I have a problem understanding is that you put the Word of God on the line, just to save your own…[Read more]

Quote (david @ April 19 2014,23:23)I am not aware of where I stepped into your conversation with KERWIN.  This entire conversation between me and you seems to be me trying to point out the differences……….David,My comment to Kerwin was in the 6th post of page 44. You butted into that conversation in the 6th post of page 45 – telling me that…[Read more]

Wakeup,I AM able to absorb clear and direct ANSWERS to my questions.1.  The child who was born to us was NOT the everlasting Father, Jehovah.2.  The child who was born to us never BECAME the everlasting Father, Jehovah.Why then would one of the titles of this child who was born to us be “The Everlasting Father, Jehovah”?Do you understand the q…[Read more]

Quote (carmel @ April 20 2014,06:44)YOU STILL DIDN'T TELL ME THE DIFFERENCE!SO IF THE WORD CAN DWELL IN THEIR HEART, AND THE WORD IS GOD, THEN WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?ANSWER MIKE NOWWHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE!That was MY question to YOU, Charles.You said God couldn't dwell in us as He was, so He had to put on a “Word costume” in order to do it.But if it…[Read more]

Charles,The Word OF God is not God Himself.The Word is the spokesman God sent into the world.Can't you understand the words “of” and “sent”?A person is not their own possessions – nor can a person send themselves.God did not send Himself into the world as a flesh being.  God sent His Son into the world as a flesh being.It has nothing to do with…[Read more]

Charles,I don't have the time or patience to respond to the many unscriptural and bizarre claims you made in those last two posts.Jesus ascended back to heaven where he now sits at the right hand of his Father and our Father – his God and our God.He did not become that Father and God – but sits at the right hand of that Father and God.