Here’s a chart from Wiki…

Note that “Extremely high vacuum” is still 5 orders of magnitude less than “Outer space”.  And extremely high vacuums like ones created on earth by NASA and CERN require concrete and steel walls at least 8 feet thick.  What does the ISS require, with a pressure differential 5 orders of magnitude greater than  “E…[Read more]

T8:  …my car tyres have air pressure of 32 PSI and the difference is more than the pressure from sea level to a vacuum…

NASA built the strongest vacuum chamber in the world.  The concrete and steel walls are 8 FEET thick, and had to have other airtight layers built into them during construction so the powerful vacuum wouldn’t suck air m…[Read more]

My latest…

https://youtu.be/CRZCqR9lBmc

Hey T8, please, please, please watch this video all the way to the end…

T8:  The very term air pressure means more air molecules which in turn put more pressure on each other.

No, the term air PRESSURE means there must be something for the air to PRESS against, ie: a container.  Why is that so hard for you to understand?  Remember, your car tire is the CONTAINER, within which you can PRESSURIZE the air because the con…[Read more]

Those who do not believe scripture should not quote it to others.  You make the same mistake that Richard Dawkins does when he says if God created the eye it would have been a much better design, or when other atheists say if God created humans, we’d be able to fly like birds, and have a sense of smell superior to dogs and bears.

😁

T8:  Besides the problems I have just posed for the Flat Earth in this post, another problem for the Flat Earth needs to be addressed. The Flat Earth model suggests that the Earth is a disk contained within a dome of some kind. Some people like Mike think it is made of something like glass. If this were true and there was no gravity, then air m…

[Read more]

T8:  Dig

Jeranism = Scientism.

I guess T8 couldn’t even make it to the 5:40 mark of the video, where we see an MIT professor explaining this very situation.

T8:  …L4 so to speak has more molecules because of gravity and L3 even more for the same reason. Sea level is closest to Earth’s centre, so would have the most air mole…

[Read more]

T8:  I don’t think that is the water…

The fact is that the stripes on the flag ARE disappearing, but the boat is clearly NOT going over some curved horizon.  Neither is ANY boat going “over the horizon” in any case.  Things disappear from the bottom up because of perspective, atmospheric distortion, and the way our eyes work.  You saw this s…[Read more]

Hey guys, I’ve been keeping up with your back and forth daily, but haven’t had time to pipe in.  I’ve been more focused on research and making videos.  Here are my last two.  The first is less than a minute, and the second is a minute and a half…

T8, what about my eclipse drawing?  Do you agree that – according to your belief – the sun, earth and moon have to be directly in line (syzygy) for a lunar eclipse to occur?

T8, what about my last Ruapehu point?  If the bottom 50% is refracting up from behind the curve, why would the upper 50% – which is already visible above the curve – also re…[Read more]

LOL!  I’ll gladly pay him the $65 if he can produce the actual, one and only answer to the question I asked.  😀  (Good luck with that, T8!)

You video appeals to gravity holding gas molecules to the earth.  Of course gravity is a theory that has never been verified – and has actually been refuted by light gases such as helium.  And consider that air pressure at sea level is about 15 psi.  So not only is gravity attracting gas molecules to earth, but it is attracting them with such fo…[Read more]

Hmm… still no PRO flat earth videos you’d like to present and discuss, huh?  You mentioned Newton’s 1st Law – which I’ve already told you is destroyed by light slowing down in water, but then picking right back up to it’s “constant” speed upon exiting the water.  What force acted upon that light to speed it back up?  You also mentioned the ba…[Read more]

Hey T8, I’m still waiting for answers to my post with the sun, moon and earth artwork I did, and my latest one concerning Mt. Ruapehu.  I’ve asked some simple questions in both of those posts, but haven’t heard any response from you yet.

T8:  A lesson in Newton’s first law…

What was the lesson?

T8:  Mike, I often work with JPGs in Photoshop…  This FE point is done for me.

About the time you were making this post, I was watching this live stream…

I’m sure you won’t spend an hour and ten minutes learning some truth, so I’m going to snip out some relevant parts and package it into a 1 or 2 minute video fo…[Read more]

T8:  But they are being debunked one at a time.

You have yet to debunk even one of them.

T8:  And you ignore all experiments that lead to the realisation of globe earth.

I wasn’t aware such a thing existed.  Please enlighten me.

T8:  And that doesn’t even include sending up craft to photograph and video what the earth really looks like.

D4T alread…[Read more]

Mike:  …when I’ve repeatedly stated that refraction is a very real thing. It’s been many months now that you keep making that claim, despite me repeatedly talking about the effects of refraction. Time for you to learn a new song, T8.

T8:  Fantastic. So you understand that Ruapehu can be explained by Taupo Plateau and refraction alone. Good…

[Read more]