mikeboll64 replied to the topic The soul in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 03 2011,08:59)Mike………..MIke good then Don't discourse with meFair enough.
mikeboll64 replied to the topic The soul in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (Baker @ Mar. 03 2011,14:52)Gene! On the Blue letter Bible of KJ I found this about the Soul and the Spirit. neh'·fesh Soul, life, person, mind, heart, creature, body, himself, yourselves, will, desire, man, themselves, any, appetite. The Greek. psü-khā' Soul, life, mind, heart, heartily, I will do some more research on it, since I kno…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Do spirits have bodies? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (terraricca @ Mar. 03 2011,19:24)as for the body there is plenty said about it ,so we start over again ,not for me.I'm with you on this one, Pierre.We've been down this road for 213 pages now. On a topic that should have lasted 2 pages.
Kar is quoting posts from JA as a favor to him. I have no problem with this, for she apparently edits…[Read more]mikeboll64 replied to the topic Attention wj in the forum Debates 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (t8 @ Mar. 02 2011,22:02)I am afraid that I have to break this to you Mike, but WJ or KJ won't answer you on this. I have never had an answer from what I have read. Although they might attempt it now in their zest to prove my assumption wrong. Either way is good for me though.Hey t8! Keith took the bait and responded to the taunt!
We h…[Read more]mikeboll64 replied to the topic Attention wj in the forum Debates 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 03 2011,14:08)Hi mikeThe answer is “YES” you are exactly and equally Adam because “Adam” is all humanity, therefore Adam is also adam and equal to adam as a human.Go ahead and play it up, Keith.
The more stuff like this you post, the more deranged you sound. You are pressing dangerously close to Kangaroo Jack a…[Read more]mikeboll64 replied to the topic Attention wj in the forum Debates 15 years, 8 months ago
Keith said:Quote We reflect the light but we are not the light as John the Baptist said…The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe. “He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. THAT WAS THE TRUE LIGHT, WHICH LIGHTETH EVERY MAN THAT COMETH INTO THE WORLD. John…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Attention wj in the forum Debates 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 03 2011,09:54)Note that Genesis 6:7 says, “I will destroy THE ADAM which I have created….” Therefore, Adam's progeny are not duplicates of an original but the original REPEATED. Thus the IDENTITY of Adam's progeny is “THE ADAM WHICH I HAVE CREATED” the same as the first Adam.t8 and Mike are simpletons. They do not…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Do spirits have bodies? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (karmarie @ Mar. 03 2011,17:21)Jesus was raised in a Spiritual Body… And he Proved that Body to Thomas and all the disciples. Nothing is written by accident. The Thomas incident was written specifically to defend what Paul would later say because God knew that would happen, and that WE would question exactly as we are today!Hey Wiz,I blew…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Adam (gollamudi) in the forum Chatroom 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (kerwin @ Mar. 03 2011,05:00)Mike,I noticed some off topic posting but actually it is the moderators job to correct that.Hi Kerwin,The moderators don't read every post in every thread. We need the help of everyone. If you notice a post that is off topic, click the “report post” link at the bottom of the post.Put in a quick note that the…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Adam (gollamudi) in the forum Chatroom 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (Tim Kraft @ Mar. 03 2011,09:25)My response was to “cutting athiests and “non-christians” as good.Hi Tim,I had nothing to do with “banning” Adam to the sceptics section. That move was performed by the one who started this forum, owns the site, and runs things here. Although, I do wholeheartedly agree with his decision.And I don't know a…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
For all:Especially take note of the quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia at 2 minutes and 30 seconds into the video.And the quote from Pope Benedict XVI located at 7 minutes, 45 seconds into the video.peace and love,mike
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 03 2011,17:21)Then why do you have such a problem with it being Jesus words?Really Keith? Isn't it fairly obvious the “problem” we all have with it?Eusebius shows a different wording. No disciple in scripture baptized into any name except for Jesus'. And even as it is, it doesn't prove diddly squat.So the…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 03 2011,14:34)David The point is Jesus mentions “Three” all having the definite article and sharing a “singular name”.Keith, what exactly IS this “mystery name” that the disciples were told to baptize into? We already know Jehovah's name. We know Jesus' name. And we know the Holy Spirit has no name because it is…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 03 2011,14:26)MikeProve it is corrupt big boy!WJKeith, don't you get it yet? I don't have to “prove it corrupt”, although Eusebius' own unrefuted words do a good job of that.
But even as it is, it says ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about any “triune Godhead”. Don't you get that?
mikemikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Hi Keith,The following is from your own source:Matthew 28:19eij~ to; o[noma tou` patro;~ kai; tou` uiJou` kai; tou` aJgivou pneuvmato~A Text-Critical Investigation—————————————————————Tim Hegg • TorahResource • 2006In some recent Christological discussions, the tripartite designation included in the sta…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Tbeing = essence and substance in the forum The Hot Seat 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 01 2011,20:00)Hey Keith, I'm not rushing you. I've read that you are busy right now. I'm just trying to keep these last posts in the forefront.mikeQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 25 2011,13:18)Mike No because if I say you are the “Exact representation of a human being” am I saying that you are not a human being?Keith,…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Tbeing = essence and substance in the forum The Hot Seat 15 years, 8 months ago
Bump for KeithQuote (WorshippingJesus @ Feb. 26 2011,13:42)I have answered you but you don't like the answer so one more time I will answer then please don't ask me to change my answer to match yours.The answer is “NO” Cain is not the person “Adam”I believe if you look back, you'll find that you DIDN'T actually answer it the first time. Now you…[Read more]
mikeboll64 replied to the topic Test in the forum Test Posts 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (karmarie @ Mar. 03 2011,15:40)Haha. Mike, what goes with purple?Gold and cream and white. Well thats with furniture and things anyway?

mikeboll64 replied to the topic Test in the forum Test Posts 15 years, 8 months ago
Quote (Baker @ Mar. 03 2011,15:06)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 14 2011,10:39)youtube videoYou have this,OK got it…,..don't like those colors, especially the light ones, they are hard to read, for this old lady…..
Hi Irene,Yeah, teal and orange proved to be to light to read well.
mikemikeboll64 replied to the topic Matthew 28:19 authentic or not? in the forum Truth or Tradition 15 years, 8 months ago
Really Keith? What about 1 John 5:8? Wasn't that found to be a “corrupt scripture”? How about the word “God” in Jude 1:4? Wasn't that scripture WITH the word “God” in it found to be “corrupt”? Are you seeing a pattern here? It seems to me that trinitarians have been trying to “doctor” the Good Book for centuries.
They just haven't yet bee…[Read more]- Load More

