• Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Paladin @ Mar. 13 2011,19:44)Only if you get ahead of the story and don't begin at the beginning. “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Here, God tells us “man” is a “them” not just a “Him.”No, here we learn that the word “adam” is used to identify both the first man…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,20:53)Your answer is right there in your own words. If Jesus is LIKE the Father, then Jesus is NOT the Father, right?Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:40) Of course he is not the FatherOkay Keith, we're half way home.Keith, who does John 17:3 and 1 Cor 8:6 specifically say our only God is?Please give a…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:47)What difference does it make, he is still the “Only Begotten Son of God” meaning there is no other kind like him for he is the Godkind.The difference is that Jesus was “yalad”, or “brought forth FROM” his God.  He was begotten by God, and it's both sad and maddening that the trinitarians are now trying…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:47)MikeI am using Strongs…Strong's G3439 – monogenēs 1) single of its kind, onlya) used of only sons or daughters (viewed in relation to their parents)b) used of Christ, denotes the only begotten son of GodFound Here!No Keith,What you're using is a compliation of Strong, Thayer's Lexicon and Brown and…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:40)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 10 2011,20:53)Your answer is right there in your own words.  If Jesus is LIKE the Father, then Jesus is NOT the Father, right?Of course he is not the Father, but Father does not “identify” his nature does it?You are spinning because you are not answering the quesiton.Mike tell…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64
  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (t8 @ Mar. 08 2011,17:34)Good post Mike.You think so, t8? Well, in that case, let's bump it for them. :)Jack and Keith,There's really nothing more to be said on the matter of John 1:1, is there?You both agree that being called “god” does not make that one God Almighty. Add to that the fact that one is called “god” while the other is called…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Okay Pierre.  But read Hebrews 4:12, and see if you still think the soul IS the spirit.peace and love,mike

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Baker @ Mar. 10 2011,07:54)Mike! You know we have a perfect Scriptures that shows who The Word of God is.Yeah, I know. :) I listed two German translations in the post above………..would you translate for us? :)peace and love,mike

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 10 2011,07:06)Mike what you really mean is not do i accept scripture , is is do i accept your rendition of what scripture is saying right.Gene,Your whole post was nonsense and just goes to prove that you would rather get up on your soapbox and tell us all YOUR UNDERSTANDING than to address and accept the scriptures as…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:24)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 12 2011,10:03)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 09 2011,19:58)You're welcome Jack.  :)  I also admit that the word “god” in reference to Deborah can mean SHE is the True God.Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 11 2011,12:23)Whats this? “..the word “god” in reference to Deborah can mean SHE is t…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 12 2011,12:13)Exactly MikeWhich means that she is a “Judge” and not a “god” or else the Hebrews would have called them “their God” and not “their Judge”, man you are dense.Really Keith?I wasn't aware that the Hebrews used different forms of “elohim” to distinguish between the times they were referring to God Almighty…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 13 2011,06:31)Hi Mike,Let's turn your question around; OK? …looking forward to your answer!Looking at John 1:1, is it possible John is calling the HolySpirit “The Word”?Hi Ed,Sorry but I must have overlooked this post. I'm just now seeing it. :)Absolutely YES! If we took 1:1 in and of itself, it very well could be speaking…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (terraricca @ Mar. 12 2011,22:46)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Mar. 13 2011,21:54)Hi Gene,Also, what do you make of the phrase “heart and soul”?  Why the distinction if the soul actually INCLUDES the heart?mikeMikePr 4:20 My son, attend to my words; incline thine ear unto my sayings. Pr 4:21 Let them not depart from thine eyes; keep them in the midst…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Mar. 13 2011,17:08)But one thing i want you to do for me  OK?, go and check out the word SOUL used in the New Testament and please notice it is the same word used as Spirit, I find “psuche” for soul and “pneuma” for spirit.  In fact, the 1 Thess 5:23 scripture I gave for your consideration lists them both side by side.  …[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Ed J @ Mar. 13 2011,12:13)There were no truth police to prohibit the N.W.T. translators from adding the indefinite article “a” where it was not needed to John 1:1.The fact that they put it in there, proves in and of itself it is possible to put it where it is not needed.I guess that's as close as I'm going to get from you, Ed.  :)Now that…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (SimplyForgiven @ Mar. 13 2011,11:44)MikeIf your still around, floating in cyberspace with your old white beard coughing nonesense.  (Just kidding, literally, i thought it was funny)Can you review this arguements, and add your thoughts.Yeah that's me, D-Linquent,The old white bearded man coughing scriptural “nonsense”.  :)I agree with P…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 13 2011,04:23)Keith,Good point bro! We are giving scholarly replies to Mike's freak Greek and all t8 has to give us is ad hominens.“Scholarly replies” my butt.You are going scripture by scripture saying, “Nope!  No 'a' added in this one!”I know, deal with Acts 12:22 and Acts 28:6 next.  Show me the “syntax rules” t…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 13 2011,04:05)I am a REAL student of GreekSo why is it so hard for you to answer a basic Greek grammatical question? You KNOW there is no “rule” that prohibits a translator from adding the “a” in 1:1c. Yet you won't come out and admit that. Is there a rule Jack? Tell me what it is. Show me the expert evidence…[Read more]

  • Profile picture of mikeboll64

    True dat, as the young kids say. :)

  • Load More

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account