Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 22 2011,17:23)We shall see how you are going to disprove a truth that has been taught for centuries especially when there is miles of evidence stacked against you.Taught for centuries? Sure. Miles of evidence? Not a chance. In fact, there is ZERO. Stick around Keith, you're about to learn some things finally.mike

You need to worry about yourself, and not me. When will you answer my question with the only HONEST answer, Jack?mike

Yeah Gene,But who did God say this to:Genesis 3:14So the LORD God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, “Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life.mike

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 21 2011,14:23)Are you talking about that fathom manuscript that no one has never seenDid you mean “phantom”?

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 21 2011,17:24)Mike.Get WJ. I want him taken out.You want me to “rub him out”?  “Fit him for cement boots”?  “Put him to sleep with the fishes”?  Consider it done, Bugsy.  Keith and Jack, I'm not allowed to say “liar” anymore, but check out this example I posted for D in the “God among gods” thread:Quote Here's a fake exa…[Read more]

Quote (Paladin @ Mar. 21 2011,16:24)How is that reward not real? I haven't tasted its fruit, nor smelled its flavour, nor yet counted its facets; but it is so real to me that I can cringe at the thought of losing it; yet it is not in my hands till after that judgement that also exists only in prophecy.Hi Paladin,You own words say it all.  You can…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Mar. 21 2011,20:54)Mikeonly a honest person can give a honest answer.PierreHi Pierre, You know, Kathi and I have gone round and round about many subjects we disagree on.  We've gotten to the point that we had to break away from the discussion for awhile because we were both getting so mad and frustrated with each other.But in…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ Mar. 21 2011,18:34)We have also presented our evidence and some scholars say that it is NOT grammatically possible to to translate 1:1c 'a god.'Jack,You have produced no such evidence, because none exists.But check out Kathi's answer to the same question, from the “God among gods” thread:Quote Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 21…[Read more]

Quote (t8 @ Mar. 21 2011,16:32)However, I think that it is better to say “either you are not not being truthful in this issue” … Why? Because a liar is someone who practices lies, not a person who tells a lie. Just as a fisherman is someone who practices fishing as opposed to someone who caught a fish.Fair enough.

Quote (terraricca @ Mar. 21 2011,13:55)if angel can take a human body for the sake of there mission,would this not mean that they themself as a angel are individuals with a limited boundary body(body means not flesh but limits of yourself,)just as all creatures are who are in creation.NO ?That's what I was thinking, Pierre.Theo, I never meant to…[Read more]

It's really just that simple Pierre. Why confuse things by teaching that the Son OF God is actually the God he is the Son OF? mike

Okay t8,Thanks anyway.

From the “God among gods” thread:Quote Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 21 2011,19:37)Mike, Mike, Mike,Looking at your question more closely, you are asking what your quoted 'experts' say about the 'a' being grammatically possible and not my opinion.  Obviously, they say that it is…so yes, the 'experts' you quoted say that it is grammatically…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 21 2011,19:37)Mike, Mike, Mike,Looking at your question more closely, you are asking what your quoted 'experts' say about the 'a' being grammatically possible and not my opinion.  Obviously, they say that it is…so yes, the 'experts' you quoted say that it is grammatically possible.Praise Jah!  Two weeks I've been a…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 21 2011,08:33)MikeAnd you are a liar to be calling me dishonest when you have not proven anything except the opinions of a couple of scholarsNo Keith,An OPINION is when those scholars tell us why they chose NOT to use the “a god” translation.A FACT is when there is no rule of Greek grammar PROHIBITING the use of “a…[Read more]

Once again Jack,You are posting the same things you've been posting.  And not one of the things you've posted mentions any Greek rule of grammar that would PROHIBIT the indefinte article in 1:1c.On the other hand, I have posted three very accomplished, learned and published scholars who say the indefinite article IS grammatically possible in…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 21 2011,08:25)Prove the claim that every Greek Scholar teaches the “a” in grammar which includes context is possible in John 1:1c.NO KEITH!   Grammar does NOT include context.  I posted the definition of grammar from Dictionary.com, and no mention of “context”.  Not to mention that Murray Harris says it IS grammatical…[Read more]

Quote (mikeangel @ Mar. 21 2011,08:02)But those trinitarian scholars, are indicating “a god” as a possibility as in the context of a triune God imo.That's fine.  I'm asking if they're admitting it's possible PERIOD.  I'm not asking why, or whether you agree with them.  I'm asking if THEY are saying “a god” is GRAMMATICALLY POSSIBLE in 1:…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64@Mar. 20 2011 @ 13:30)And to answer your question the FIRST time with the ONLY HONEST ANSWER there is………….”YES”, “THE God” is also GRAMMATICALLY POSSIBLE from the Greek words,Do you see how I answered your question, D?  Did I say, “IF one believes it”?  You asked a DIRECT question, and I gave a DIRECT and HONEST answer, t…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Mar. 20 2011,22:56)My conclusion is that it may be grammatically ok to consider an 'a' and a small 'g,' but in light of the rest of the book and how John writes, contextually it would be incorrect.Hi Kathi,Thanks for your input.  I'm aching to discuss the CONTEXTUAL possibilities, and blow you “Jesus is God” people right out of…[Read more]