Quote (kerwin @ July 20 2011,04:06)Pierre,I agree he is controlling all things.  My question is he where those things are controlled?If not then how doess he do his work?No, the BEING of God is not where the things we can see with our eyes are taking place. I don't know how He controls those things from afar. But a human being in New Mexico can…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ July 20 2011,04:58)Quote (kerwin @ July 20 2011,21:06)Pierre,I agree he is controlling all things.  My question is he where those things are controlled?If not then how doess he do his work?Hi Kerwin,I believe Mike thinks he is “footstooling” from heaven.Your brother in Christ, Jesus!Ed J (Joshua 22:34)http://www.holycitybiblecode.org

Quote (kerwin @ July 19 2011,22:37)To all,If God is at work making “rain,storms,volcanoes action,and river flow ect” then is he where these events are going on?No. God dwells in heaven.

Quote (kerwin @ July 19 2011,22:35)Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 18 2011,10:11)In that case, I don't understand the question.  Why should Job have been able to see God anywhere?  No man has ever seen God, right?Mike Boll,That in itself is an answer to my question.  So what does that mean in relation to.Quote Genesis 3:8 (King James Version) 8And th…[Read more]

Quote (shimmer @ July 19 2011,03:50)You used the example of water droplets to show the Spirit being everywhere – all at the same time – throughout the galaxy.I understand. Thank you for that. I didn't quite get it the way Istari put it, but I do nowWhen I look at what you both say, I see, the same thing. Spirits are everywhere all the time.Then…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,20:23)Mike I wrote that to Pierre because he didn't attempt to change the verse…comma or word order like you have in mind doing.KathiWell, let's take a look at the facts:Greek from Biblos.com………..who over all God blessed forever…………..NIV:  Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,20:30)Mike,you said:Quote So, where is YOUR evidence that CLEARLY shows each of us from the words of the scriptures themselves that the Son of God was an exception to the rules of begetting?The Son has the exact representation of the Father's nature and the Father is eternal.  Human understanding does not offer a…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,20:16)Mike,Here is another example of a compound unity being referred to with a singular personal pronoun as a 'she and a 'her.'Isaiah 40:2″Speak kindly to Jerusalem; And call out to her, that her warfare has ended, That her iniquity has been removed, That she has received of the LORD'S hand Double for all her sins.”…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,16:57)PS…we made it to page 200!!  I don't know if that is good or bad.  Seems like this should be settled long ago and really not been an issue with such a wonderful Jesus that we have.Nobody is doubting how wonderful Jesus is, Kathi.  But you are right, this really should have been settled on page 1.  God say…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,17:06)Ok Mike,Since WJ gave it away, here is your example of a compound unity of persons referred to as a singular personal pronoun…look for the 'she' and 'her' in this passage and note that the church is a compound unity of many members, all with different positions.23 For the husband is the head of the wife, as…[Read more]

Hey Marty, Gene, Kerwin and Paladin,I was lead to this scripture a couple of nights ago, but didn't act on the “unction” or whatever until now:Hebrews 1:3 NIV © The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word.Can you guess if “word” here is “rhema” or “logos”?  Be hon…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 19 2011,23:12)Pierre,Congratulations, you understanding is ahead of Mike on this one:Quote the fact that God the father has a son that is the supremacy over all of creation I do not see what is wrong with the title of god for Christ he is after all the son of GodRaise the flag!!     Good job on that c…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ July 20 2011,19:24)Irene,How do you know that the Son wasn't eternally within the Father and when the Father wanted to bring Him forth, He then beget Him?A better question is, “How do YOU know he was, Kathi?”YOU are the one who made an excellent point about the “default” understandings holding true UNLESS there was evidence to…[Read more]

Quote (Pastry @ July 20 2011,09:52)Mike!  But that was after Paladin came on the scene…..That is my point I am making.  So now we all have to learn Greek in order to get the true meaning of any Scriptures.  That is what I got out of your and Ed's latest posts.Hi Irene,Like I said before, Kangaroo Jack got me into researching the original la…[Read more]

Quote (Ed J @ July 19 2011,23:42)Hi Mike,Here is another example why of we need to go back to the original texts…If any come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple. (Luke 14:26)On the onset this looks like a breach of the fifth…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 20 2011,13:13)Hi AllLets face it, I have been here for a long time and have never seen anyone have a problem with William until Mike came along.I wasn't aware that I had a problem with Wm.Wm, do I have a problem with you?

Quote (seekingtruth @ July 20 2011,14:36)I know Mike does not like it when he's told that he has the problem (any more then any of us would) but he needs to take a step back and pray about it.What I don't like is being accused of things I didn't do. Paladin will also testify to this. Because although his false accusations about me took many…[Read more]

Quote (Pastry @ July 20 2011,17:10)Quote (942767 @ July 21 2011,06:52)Hi Mike:I agree with what William and WJ have said relative to your accusation about someone not answering your questions, and I will add that I believe that Paladin has answered your questions.Love in Christ,MartyMarty!  And where do you see that?  Because I have not seen t…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 20 2011,13:06)It is a shame that you had to go all the way back and make that long post to prove Mikes claims are wrong.Well Keith,I've just shown Wm's accusation to be inaccurate, didn't I?  I didn't ONCE ask him the same question after he had answered it, did I?  So now it's your turn.  Show me how I kept asking th…[Read more]

Quote (seekingtruth @ July 20 2011,11:34)Mike,I may have been too hard on you, I think the problem is you analyse a response by the letter while I analyse a response on principles. So for me I see all your questions as being answered as I had explained the principles behind it, but you're not seeing the details needed to satisfy your thought…[Read more]