Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,22:10)Mike,This actually seems the most explanative about the MarYah name in the Aramaic. You should read this one.http://ebookbrowse.com/underst….5667985On page 9, the author says:”In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH!…[Read more]

Mike,Quote Is there a particular translation with which you agree on every single word and verse interpretation? Which one?The Aramaic Bible in Plain English looks pretty good so far. Quote And so far, you have mostly used the Aramaic NT only to bolster support of your belief that Jesus IS Jehovah. Well, it has become apparent from dictionaries…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 09 2012,19:13)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,21:10)“In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH! Furthermore, the Peshitta New Testamentalways renders Tanakh passages that it quotes from YHWH to MarYah.”Okay Kathi,Let me mess with the…[Read more]

Quote (bodhitharta @ Aug. 09 2012,22:11)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 09 2012,14:29)BD,Perhaps the role of parents in the family would help you understand what I am saying. The husband is the head of the wife, yet they are considered one flesh…right?The husband and wife are equally human…right?The husband and wife are together the supreme human…[Read more]

BD,you said:Quote Brought forth from where? You keep insisting there are two different states or positions of Jesus but yet you keep saying his status is Eternal.You don't say the Father was brought forth, do you? Kathi The Father IS GOD, The One and Only any other god or sons of God is an appointing, anointing or some other God Given designation.…[Read more]

Ahhh, sweet revenge! That's a thought though…aromatic curtain rods. I wonder if I can put potpourri in mine and have it smell real nice all the time?? I could change it for the seasons-Apples n cinnamon for the fall maybe!!Regarding the Purina diet…I think that I would prefer the Kibbles 'n bits diet Thanks for the great ideas…[Read more]

William,Those were funny…that would cure my hiccups too!

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,23:02)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:00)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can…[Read more]

Mike,Jesus is called LORD YHWH in the Aramaic language. Anyway, let's keep this discussion in the Peshitta thread or the discussion with BD thread, ok.

Don't worry about it William. I luv ya, Bro!

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:59)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:24)Begot means to bring forth into existence that which was in existence within when 'begot' refers to birth.And what thing was ever brought forth into existence which had already existed from eternity?Any examples?Kathi, this grows tiresome after a while.  It is clear that…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:51)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:17)Mike,What you see in John 1:18 is THE only begotten God. Not 'a' begotten God.Yes, in SOME mss, we see “the only begotten god”.  (In others, we see “the only begotten son”.)But what do you see in 2 Corintians 4:4?  Do you see “THE god of this world”?  Shall we equate Sa…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:00)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can you give an example where the one who…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,18:56)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,15:06)Gee, off the top of my head,I have shown you this:Quote Here is what page 54 and 55 from the intro of the Hebraic Roots Version says about the placement of the name YHWH and how it is objective and not subjective:The Sacred NameIn the past, sacred name versions of the New…[Read more]

BD,Perhaps the role of parents in the family would help you understand what I am saying. The husband is the head of the wife, yet they are considered one flesh…right?The husband and wife are equally human…right?The husband and wife are together the supreme human authority of their children…they are to present a united front to their…[Read more]

Hi William, I just felt like I walked into the wrong locker room, that's all. I am glad you are contributing and that you got a good laugh from it.

t8,No problem, I have enough to keep me busy here! Take your time…work and family come first.

Mike,This actually seems the most explanative about the MarYah name in the Aramaic. You should read this one.http://ebookbrowse.com/underst….5667985On page 9, the author says:”In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH! Furthermore, the Peshitta New…[Read more]

Mike,Since you do not accept any translation and we don't agree on which language the original NT was written it, it is hard to see an end to this. I do think that finding out if the Eastern Peshitta is the original is a worthwhile pursuit. I also think that comparing it to the other translations are a good idea and then if there is a notable…[Read more]

Mike,More info:Jesus is MarYahThis word is ‘MARYAH’. MarYah literally means Mar (Lord) Yah (name of God in the singular). YHWH,arguably Yahweh, is one of the names of God. 0yrm (MarYah) is a compound name made from rm(“Lord”) and 0y (“Yah”, the accepted Aramaic shortened form of YHWH). YHWH is plural, while Yah issingular. Different groups of Jud…[Read more]