Mike,you said:Quote Kathi apparently considers the act of conception to be the “begetting” of the child.Wrong…I believe the act of conception the beginning of new life but the birth is what I refer to as the begetting. The act of conception begins a new life with it's own set of chromosomes different than the mother and a separate DNA from the…[Read more]

BD,I think that it is you that confuses potentiality with actuality. For instance…when I was a teenager, I had the potential to be a mother. I had all the right parts. When I was married and conceived my first child, I changed from being a potential mother to being an actual mother since from the point of conception, a new life had begun within…[Read more]

t8,I'm glad that you are looking into this Aramaic primacy issue. Hold on to your seat because it gets very interesting.you said:Quote OK, I spent this morning looking around the web for people's views and ideas about the New Testament and the original languages likely used. Here is what I have gleaned.Most believe that the NT books were written…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 12 2012,00:35)So Mike show me the definition of EHEYEH in the four dictionaries you have been mentioning and also show me the interlinears that show Exodus 3:14 with EHEYEH as YHWH. When you can show me this, then you will be showing me in a way that you insist that I show you. Also, don't bother replying till you have…[Read more]

Mike,you said:Quote I know from much experience with Kathi that her secular information doesn't ever end up proving the point she was “slickly” trying to prove with it.Oh, really…do you still think that the child did not exist before he/she was born/begotten? I believe that I proved that he/she did. Approximately nine months he/she existed…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 12 2012,14:56)And now all YOU have to do is prove that claim.    Wasn't it you who once said that the “default understanding” will always take precedence UNLESS there is clear evidence to the contrary?Where is this “CLEAR evidence” that Jesus was the only being who was ever brought forth from his father without first b…[Read more]

Here, Mike, I brought this over from the Peshitta thread so that it can be with the other Mitosis info. Think of the mitosis single cell example. There is a parent cell with all that makes up its offspring within it. The offspring happens to end up exactly like the parent cell with the exception that one is the parent cell and the other is the…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 12 2012,14:59)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 12 2012,13:54)The cell containing ALL the 'puzzle pieces' would be the parent and the offspring within it would be the offspring.So then Jesus was also “divided” from God with the puzzle pieces for a THIRD God already inside him?Kathi, this is the wrong thread.  Let's keep this about…[Read more]

Ok Mike, it is working on the laptop…I had to download it first though. Now for the quote:Understanding why MarYah is the Aramaic Name for YHWHIntroductionThroughout both volumes of this work, I have been repeatedly making the assertion thatthe Peshitta Tanakh and New Testament usage of the phrase MarYah (ayrm) is neither atitle nor a…[Read more]

Ok, Mr. Cool, did you have to download it first? It won't download on my iPad. I'll try my Macbook Pro…hold on…

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 12 2012,14:44)Yes.  That is where the green quotes came from.Yes I realize that, Mike. I am having trouble copying and pasting from it, though but it seems that you were able to. I will try again.

Mike,You said:Quote It seems this info was put together by a man, who like you, isn't happy with Jesus being divine, but wants Jesus to be the very God he is the Son of.That is your consistent error that is contributing to keeping your intellect blinded. Think of the mitosis single cell example. There is a parent cell with all that makes up its…[Read more]

I am trying to copy something from this link, Mike. Were you able to copy and paste to quote part of this?http://ebookbrowse.com/underst….667985#

Mike, your answer is Yashua.

So Mike show me the definition of EHEYEH in the four dictionaries you have been mentioning and also show me the interlinears that show Exodus 3:14 with EHEYEH as YHWH. When you can show me this, then you will be showing me in a way that you insist that I show you. Also, don't bother replying till you have also read this evidence for MarYah found…[Read more]

Well Bd, mitosis is a reality and it is God's design and it does demonstrate the fact that one living organism becomes two equal living organisms through the development taking place of what was already within it. That is all I set out to demonstrate. I obviously did not set out to say God was a single celled organism. He is the creator of the…[Read more]

Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 10 2012,10:43)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,23:02)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 06 2012,19:00)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 05 2012,13:14)Mike,I would say that the rays came from within the sun and were always within the sun till the sun began to shine forth.Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was…[Read more]

BD,Mitosis answered these questions from Mike:Quote Can you give me an example from nature where the thing begotten was “ALWAYS” within the thing that begot it?Can you give an example where the one who was begotten wasn't also subject to a time when he did not exist?Would you agree that mitosis shows an example where the thing begotten was always…[Read more]

Mike,you said:Quote So? Read my post above this one. Kathi, if the Hebrews decided to substitute “YHWH” with “Adonay” so they didn't have to use the divine name, and some Hebrews later translated the NT into Hebrew, and used the word “Adonay” ever time “kurios” referred to Jesus, it still would not make the word “Adonay” MEAN “Jehovah”, nor…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 10 2012,18:36)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 10 2012,11:09)Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 09 2012,19:13)Quote (Lightenup @ Aug. 08 2012,21:10)“In 7,000 Aramaic Tanakh references there is not one instance of MarYah (in its singularform) applying to anyone other than YHWH! Furthermore, the Peshitta New Testamentalways renders Tanakh…[Read more]