So if God blinds someone through the agency of someone or something, then God is the one ultimately doing the blinding. See

Another crackpot doctrine newly surfaced:”Even Believers in Christ can be worshiped too.”

Quote Who for example who doesn't believe that Jesus was not worshiped.Do you mean to say:Who for example doesn't believe that Jesus was worshiped?If so, the answer is Mike for one.The second 'the theos' is worshiped. I rest my case!

Good post Charles!

Bo,I believe that the Father, who is greater in position than any, is mightier with His Son rather than apart from His Son. So, that is why I say, together they form the Almighty God in the corporate sense.Do you agree with this statement:the Father, who is greater in position than any, is mightier with His Son rather than apart from His Son.

Your problem is with the word of God and His justice, not me.

I like facts too and to research topics that interest me. Back to the eternal sonship of Jesus Christ…

Bo, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob knew Him as God Almighty. They did not know to call Him by the name Jehovah. They referred to Him as God Almighty or Lord and probably other names but I don't see where they called His name YHWH even though it was YHWH that had been appearing to them.I believe that both the Father and the Son are together the Almighty…[Read more]

Mike,I looked at Romans 5:12. I don't know enough Greek to understand why there is an indirect neuter pronoun used at all. In John 17:11, it is plain that 'which' is the pronoun for 'name.'The NT writers call him LORD, you just don't want to see it. Jesus is the name given the man that YHWH the Son became. YHWH is the name given the pre-existent…[Read more]

Ok Pierre, you are certainly making an assumption based on ignorance then. Maybe you should research the guy. He is mentioned a lot in the writings of the early church fathers.

Why are you so concerned with Paul of Samasota? Do you think that you were in agreement with him?

Yes, but they didn't make there decision because of a contemporary surviving document.

Pierre, the document mentioned is a contemporary document that has survived. That is not what the synod went by in condemning him. Read more carefully.

Pierre, What I understand is that God blinds the eyes so they cannot see and that proves you to be incorrect.

Keith,I think it is because of a lack of belief and spiritual blindness resulting in delusion and false teaching.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 09 2012,01:28)Quote (Lightenup @ Dec. 08 2012,22:35)No, Moses was not the god of Aaron. Moses was his brother. Aaron was not his prophet, he was God's prophet.Hmmm…………But Jehovah surely said he would make Moses a god to Aaron, and Aaron would be his prophet.Perhaps Jehovah just didn't know what He was talking…[Read more]

Pierre, the synod of Antioch condemned Paul of Samasota. I agree with what the synod agreed upon, not Paul of Samasota. Fyi, just in case you thought otherwise.

Only two groups…the disciples grew in numbers but weren't a separate group. The disciple group just got fuller.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 09 2012,04:30)Hi KathiI think that your natural concept of a Mother bringing birth to a son plays way to much in your understanding of the relationship of the Father and Jesus.To say that God the Father literally brought birth to a spiritual son in procreation in itself is contrary to the general order of things.…[Read more]

YHWH is both the God of gods and the Lord of lords…so the Father and the Son are both the Most High God.