Mr Ed,

I do believe that evil was separated on the cross FROM US AT DEATH, NOT JESUS.

Hi Mark,

Great, with this sentence you are a bit more on track! Now go back and re-read
HCBC chapters 7, 8, 9, & 10, you may yet be able to ascertain what I said.

_______________
God bless
Ed J

Mr Ed,

I do believe that evil was separated on the cross FROM US AT DEATH, NOT JESUS.

Hi Mark,

Great, with this sentence you are a bit more on track! Now go back and re-read
HCBC chapters 7, 8, 9, & 10 and you may yet be able to understand what I said.

_______________
God bless
Ed J

Mr Ed,

I do believe that evil was separated on the cross FROM US AT DEATH, NOT JESUS.

Hi Mark,

Great, with this sentence you are a bit more on track! Now go back and reread
Chapters 7, 8, 9, & 10 and you may yet be able to understand what I said.

_______________
God bless
Ed J

There has never been evil in any attribute or part of God. And to say that, IMHO, is Blasphemy.

He was born of The holy spirit perfect and without sin or blemish, separate from any other man in history. thats why his sacrifice saved us.

For you to even imply otherwise, you would have to show in scripture, how evil is associated to Jesus before…

[Read more]

There has never been evil in any attribute or part of God. And to say that, IMHO, is Blasphemy.

He was born of The holy spirit perfect and without sin or blemish, separate from any other man in history. thats why his sacrifice saved us.

For you to even imply otherwise, you would have to show in scripture, how evil is associated to Jesus before…

[Read more]

There has never been evil in any attribute or part of God. And to say that, IMHO, is Blasphemy.

He was born of The holy spirit perfect and without sin or blemish, separate from any other man in history. thats why his sacrifice saved us.

For you to even imply otherwise, you would have to show in scripture, how evil is associated to Jesus…

[Read more]

Ed, (1)reg your post pg.2, context changes nothing. (2a)You are using the situation to draw Kerwin to read your book, (b)were you once in sales? (3)I like you, but lately you have been bothering me. (4)If I were you I would be curious ‘why’.

Hi Miia,

1) Context gains comprehension, and comprehension gets understanding.

2a) “A wise man will hea…[Read more]

Ed, (1)reg your post pg.2, context changes nothing. (2)You are using the situation to draw Kerwin to read your book, were you once in sales? (3)I like you, but lately you have been bothering me. (4)If I were you I would be curious ‘why’.

Hi Miia,

1) Context gains comprehension, and comprehension gets understanding.
2) No
3) You should not let the…[Read more]

Ed, (1)reg your post pg.2, context changes nothing. (2)You are using the situation to draw Kerwin to read your book, were you once in sales? (3)I like you, but lately you have been bothering me. (4)If I were you I would be curious ‘why’.

Hi Miia,

1) Context gains comprehension.
2) No
3) You should not let the fact that I rebuke false doc…[Read more]

Sunday, Valentines day, I hadn’t got my wife anything, and had been busy last week. I knew the pickings at Kroger would be thin at best. I got her a three rose arrangement, and went to the card section. As I feared , the “wife”section was almost bare and several happless fellows like me going over what little was left. I thought, “I hope she lik…

[Read more]

Sunday, Valentines day, I hadn’t got my wife anything, and had been busy last week. I knew the pickings at Kroger would be thin at best. I got her a three rose arrangement, and went to the card section. As I feared , the “wife”section was almost bare and several happless fellows like me going over what little was left. I thought, “I hope she lik…

[Read more]

Ed,

I am well aware of pulling words out of context but you refusal to defend your words sound like arrogance. It also misses a teaching moment.

Hi Kerwin,

You say repeatedly you are “a student”. A teaching moment, as stated before,
is available to you; but your refusal, would mean you missed a learning moment.

_______________
God bless
Ed J

So unless you believe ‘Christ maketh himself’ – “The Word” cannot be Christ!

Hi T8,

And there is another verse that states this point.
Framed here means fashioned (as in formed or made).

“(a)Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed (made) by “The Word” of God,
(b)so that things which are seen were not made of things which do…[Read more]

So unless you believe ‘Christ maketh himself’ – “The Word” cannot be Christ!

Hi T8,

And there is another verse that states this point as well. Framed here means fashioned as in made.

“(a)Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed (made) by “The Word” of God,
(b)so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear…[Read more]

So unless you believe ‘Christ maketh himself’ – “The Word” cannot be Christ!

Hi T8,

And there is another verse that states this point as well. Framed here means fashioned as in made.

“(a)Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by “The Word” of God,
(b)so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.”…[Read more]

But he doesn’t draw Jesus origin back to the Word that was with God, the one that became flesh.

Hi T8,

Neither do I. And one reasons is because of what Heb 7:28 says.

For the law maketh men high priests,
but “The Word” maketh the son, who is
consecrated for evermore” (Hebrews 7:28)

“The Son”, in this verse, is obviously “Christ”.
– and -…[Read more]

But he doesn’t draw Jesus origin back to the Word that was with God, the one that became flesh.

Hi T8,

Neither do I. And one reasons is because of what Heb 7:28 says.

For the law maketh men high priests,
but “The Word” maketh the son, who is
consecrated for evermore” (Heb 7:28)

“The Son”, in this verse, is obviously “Christ”.
– and –
“The W…[Read more]

But he doesn’t draw Jesus origin back to the Word that was with God, the one that became flesh.

Hi T8,

Neither do I. And one reasons is because of what Heb 7:28 says.

For the law maketh men high priests,
but the word maketh the Son”, who is
consecrated for evermore” (Heb 7:28)

“The Son”, in this verse, is obviously “Christ”.
– and -…[Read more]

Hi Nick,

Did you even read my post?

Because you have completely ignored my point,
and instead you just reiterate YOUR BELIEF.
Please man up and address my point.

_______________
God bless
Ed J

Hi Nick,

Did you even read my post?

Because you have completely ignored my point,
and instead just reiterated YOUR BELIEF.
Please man up and address my point.

_______________
God bless
Ed J