Hi Ed, English was not the language of Jesus and his disciples.

Hi Miia,

…and your point is… ???

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence
because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so alive – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so alive – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so alive – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so live – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so live – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so live – No?

Ed J,

The Heb…

[Read more]

Men, in the guise of trinitarian supporters, found that scriptures could not support their view and purposely decided to subtly alter parts of scriptures in order to attempt to pursuade readers, hearers and listeners that trinity was true. Unfortunately for them, and fortunately for us, scriptures is written in such a code that altering part of…

[Read more]

Hi Andrew,

We operate in the blind spot

“And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him,
that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not
worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. For the earnest expectation of
the creature waiteth for the…[Read more]

“And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him,
that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not
worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. For the earnest expectation of
the creature waiteth for the…[Read more]

“And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him,
that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not
worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. For the earnest expectation of
the creature waiteth for the…[Read more]

“And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him,
that we may be also glorified together. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not
worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us. For the earnest expectation of
the creature waiteth for the…[Read more]

Hi Andrew,

That is NOT what “I” was talking about. I was
talking about the roll we play towards others.

Nick understands that now; though I don’t think
he did when I first started posting on this board.

____________
God bless
Ed J

Hi Andrew,

That is NOT what “I” was talking about. I was
talking about the roll we play towards others.

Nick understands this now; though I don’t think
he did when I first started posting on this board.

____________
God bless
Ed J

Hi Andrew,

That is NOT what “I” was talking about. I was
talking about the roll we play towards others.

Nick understands this now. Though I don’t think
he did when I first started posting on this board.

____________
God bless
Ed J

Hi Andrew,

That’s not what I was talking about. I was
talking about the roll we play towards others.

Nick understands this now. Though I don’t think
he did when I first started posting on this board.

____________
God bless
Ed J

That’s right Nick,

Kerwin does not yet realize the important roll he plays in the story.

____________________________
Make it known brother
Ed J

Jael,

It is literally impossible to use just the Scripture as evidence because it was written in another language, a dead one at that.

Hi Kerwin,

The bible was not written in Latin. Not sure about Aramaic…
But Aramaic was only used in (most of) the book of Daniel.
Hebrew and Greek are still spoken today: so live – No?

____________
God bless
Ed J

“Never refer to scriptures if it proves to prove against your proof of proof!!!”

Hi Jael,

What is this suppose to mean ???
Can you re-translate it into English?
Oh, and by the way welcome to H-net.

____________
God bless
Ed J