@Proclaimer,

Que?!!?

I didn’t say verse 4, but day 4 was when G-d created natural light; where HE placed the sun, moon, and stars to govern the day and the night. Nothing in the creation account does it speak of “clouds thinning out” and there being light. There’s a theory which states there was a “cloud” that covered the entire planet crea…[Read more]

@Lightenup,

Your original statement of G-d being “two persons” is false (some will say three – that trinity thing…huge false). I don’t understand how you come to that conclusion quoting Deut 10:17. This passage states G-d is G-d and Lord (don’t throw out the conjunction) and when read in context (verses 12-22) HE is telling Israel they are t…[Read more]

Using AI to answer your questions…what could go wrong!?!?

On the first day G-d created light and darkness, HE separated the two; can time, as we understand it, exist without “light”? Theoretically it can, but it would be unobservable. So, on the first day G-d created time when HE separated light from darkness and it was so man could observe it.

On the fourth day HE created heavenly bodies to govern the…[Read more]

@Berean,

“The Sabbath will be the great test of loyalty; for it is the point of truth especially controverted. When the final test shall be brought to bear upon men, then the line of distinction will be drawn between those who serve God and those who serve him not. While the observance of the false sabbath in compliance with the law of the S…

[Read more]

@Berean,

Did you just politicize the death of Charlie Kirk? Have you no shame!??!

How does a memorial service for a man gunned down in his prime suddenly being an event to enact a Sunday law? Your cult leader said this was going to happen in her time (150 years ago) and you’re still waiting. May want to reevaluate what you believe and begin…[Read more]

@Berean,

The article would have to be truth for truth to be understood.

Fact, G-d is addressing the king.

Fact, there is no transition to reference Satan; G-d is speaking to the king figuratively.

Fact, you still haven’t explained why Satan was wearing a covering of precious stones…what the what!?!

Fact, the cherub in this passage is a…[Read more]

@Berean,

Still stuck on what Ezk 28 is saying? You like “gotquestions” interpretation because it agrees with your religion, NOT because it’s truth. You just confirmed the interpretations of man is more to you than G-d’s words.

Did you read chapters 26 and 27 before you got to 28 and place this entire prophecy in context or did you parachute ont…[Read more]

@Berean,

I’m glad you found the number of times the term “Satan” occurred in the Tanakh, but the point of that exercise was what? What was asked was where does it state Satan rebelled against G-d?

In the Job passages we read Satan was only allowed to do what G-d said he could do; which sounds like he did as G-d commanded verses rebelled again…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

New Testament aside.

Yes, do this for about two months and study the Tanakh; if you can, set aside the Jesus biases that have been planted in your mind.

Logic tells you there is an original devil or original one who first rejected God by exercising free will.

Please give the passage from the Tanakh where Satan is said to have rebelled…[Read more]

@Berean,

If you believe churches recognizing workers on one Sunday is exalting Sunday worship law, I have some ocean front property in Switzerland you may be interested in.

My guess is you never went to the site speaking of the “event”; if you had, you would have read: “This August 31st, join faith communities across the country (note it…[Read more]

@Berean,

That entire post is a lie; read Gen 4:7!

Since you believe sin comes from Satan, you reject the words spoken to Cain by G-d and therefore reject G-d. G-d says we are to rule over sin and have power over it, which means we have power over Satan; G-d never said our power over sin was thru, of, by, or because of someone else, but that HE…[Read more]

@Berean,

One would have to believe what the NT says, I no longer do and completely reject it. Why you ask? Great question and glad you did, as I’ve explained the Jesus couldn’t possibly be the Messiah because he never fulfilled what was written the Messiah was to do. So everything after the first verse of the first chapter of the NT canNOT be…[Read more]

@Berean,

It wasn’t Proclaimer correcting you, he was responding to what I wrote to you. If it doesn’t make sense, you may want to backtrack to find where the comment/question originated.

Do you really think Islam is submitting to the Pope!??!!? A religion filled with violence. A religion that is allowed to lie and deceive those around them to…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

“how can the Jesus be of the line of David if she had never been with a man?”

Legally, through Joseph, since in Jewish tradition adoption or naming gave full rights to a father’s lineage; and possibly biologically, if Mary herself was also descended from David, as some believe Luke’s genealogy suggests.

Please site your source for…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

Concerning the Ezekiel 28 passage, you recognize a different title can be used to address the same person, just not in this case; why, because it doesn’t align with your belief system or I have to be wrong? You haven’t proved me wrong, just that you believe something different; who’s arguing?

I gave you a scriptural examples of bo…[Read more]

@Keith,

Judas served the true living God, then turned and sold Gods son–

When is it recorded Judas was serving G-d? What is recorded is he was a follower of the Jesus. There are a couple issues with the Judas narrative; first we get two separate accounts, did he hang himself or he fall headlong and his belly burst open. Why two different a…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

Satan appears rarely in the Old Testament, but the messiah had much to say about him.

Did the Jesus fulfill what was spoken about the Messiah in the Tanakh? If not, can he be called the Messiah; if so, what did he fulfill, please site the passage in the NT and the corresponding passage from the Tanakh?

The Old Testament also says…

[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

Been awhile for those questions; but your responses unfortunately are a prime example of what the church says when it can’t answer a question they aren’t prepared for or don’t have an answer to and that’s to provide vague, none answers. To say the end is a mystery and is revealed thru symbols that only at the “right time” true unders…[Read more]