i have a question. I'm not sure where on this forum it belongs. Maybe I could be directed. Speaking of Giants and Flying Saucers…dianosaurs come to mind.Dinosaurs. Why?I'm wondering what people think.david.

If the government has no knowledge of aliens,then why does Title 14, Section 1211of the Code of Federal Regulations,implemented on July 16, 1969,make it illegal for U.S. citizens to have any contactwith extraterrestrials or their vehicles?OK there. Now that that's said, can we get back to discussing the Nephilim.Nick, you originally said that…[Read more]

If the tree falls on a squirel, it most definitely makes a sound. Kind of a sad shreeky sound. I hope this helps Soxon.david

It appears that this post was begun by a Witness.Anyway, you say “Yes, in my view” as though there are some who don't believe this, or you're uncertain. But I know you're not uncertain.In the Christian Greek Scriptures “the Word” (Gr., ho Lo´gos) does appear as a title. (Joh 1:1, 14; Re 19:13) The apostle John identified the one to whom this titl…[Read more]

Hey Nick, I don't understand.I agree with you, but don't understand what you mean when you say “the terms are interchangeable” and conclude that the Fatherhood of God preceded the conception of Jesus.

Eliyah, in order to get the right answers, you can't ask wrong questions. Stop asking questions that are false because they can't be answered.It's like me repeatedly asking: Have you stopped stealing or murdering or lying yet?You can't say “yes” and you can't say “no” to that question because it's based on a false premise, right?Do some more…[Read more]

Hey Nick, In the trinity forum, or one of them you stated: “The most popular bibles atr present here sadly are NIV and KJV.”The KJV, which has been around for centuries, has “Jehovah” in a few places, Ps 83:18, Exodus and a couple others. The NIV uses LORD in place of God's name I believe.If these are the two most common Bible's in New Zealand,…[Read more]

Eliyah wrote:”You brought this up on purpose TWICE David, and what did this have to do with the forum subject here?Now, like I said, your are a liar, because you denied this twice already, your not also that but a slanderer as well.”What did I deny? I've openly said that I have misposted in the wrong topics before. So?Yes Eliyah, wanting to…[Read more]

Again, I must be a little slow. Where did I lie? What did I SAY that was a lie?Who cares how many times I brought up the baal gad topic?1. An adminstrator tells you to not post unrelated comments in specific topics.2. So you accuse me of doing the same.3. I concede that I have done so, but not at all to the extent you have done.And this makes…[Read more]

Does that have anything to do at all… anything at all to do with what I just said? Anything? After writing what I did in the last post TO NICK, about how NICK asked me why I use Jehovah, I seriously considered explaining and making it clear for YOU ELIYAH that I was simply discussing the usage of Jehovah and Yahweh. Not pronunciation. I was…[Read more]

MORE WASTED TIME:Because although it was 'your' post to Heaven, in that post you said that I (david) was trying to “coax” you into repeating your baal gad theories and asked why I (david) didn't stick to the topic at hand. That's why I commented. You seemed to be pulling me in TO YOUR RIDICULOUS discussion with Heaven. Defending your off topic…[Read more]

A SUBJECT IN FUTILITY. (Oh well. I get to practice my typing.)1. Believe me Eliyah, I'm not wanting to converse with you. I certainly didn't lie about that. I don't. There. So that's not a lie. So you are definitely WRONG about that for starters. WRONG! Sometimes we do things we don't enjoy. What I said in the comment above is: “I'm…[Read more]

Hey Nick.I don't think this is where we discussed it, but I think maybe that thread is closed.A week ago, a friend was selling their 1959 Encyclopedia Britannica's, among other things. I flipped through them. Looked up Jehovah and Yahweh as I always do when confronted with a dictionary or encyclopedia. Nick, we had been discussing how I use…[Read more]

Hey, don't you guys (administrators) have pages and pages of scriptures somewhere (maybe in the trinity thread) that show that Jesus and Jehovah are separate and distinct.Couldn't you just point him to one of those?

Whether I did that or not (and I said I have posted non topic comments before) my point has just been proven. As I read your last comment, the word “ridiculous” came to mind. You can't possibly believe what you're saying.The more you argue this the more foolish you become.I've several times pointed out to you and others, even administrators that…[Read more]

Eliyah, you turn half the topics being discussed into baal gad, or No “god” discussions. Sometimes, it seems you start topics just to change them into those discussions as fast as you can.We all see this. It's completely obvious. Trying to argue this will just make you look foolish. YES, it's true, others including myself have posted non topic…[Read more]

Casiphus is right.Actions do speak louder than words. THE HISTORY OF CHRISTENDOM SPEAKS pretty loudly to those with ears. Many turn away from the Bible because they believe Christendom represents the Bible. It does not. People should turn away from Christendom though and those who do not truly follow the Bible.THE HISTORY OF ISLAM SPEAKS…[Read more]

I was just reading and came across those verses again in Rev 6.Something I don't think we mentioned was the colors of the horses.THE COLOR OF THE HORSES ALSO SEEMS TO BE REPRESENTATIVE.Red horse, to take peace away. Red is a color of intensity, fire, blood, etc.The same is true of the pale horse and the black horse. These colors both fit the…[Read more]

As far as I can tell, we believe exactly what Nick, t8 and you believe on the “nature of Yahshua Messiah.” We believe what the Bible says. If you wish to “dis-prove the JW's own position on the Nature of Yahshua Messiah” I'll just let Nick or t8 or whoever respond, because frankly, I've given up on you a while ago.Or, am I wrong on you Eliyah?…[Read more]

OK, I understand why you reason that way. But nowhere does it say all those four horsemen of the apocalypse are bad. It's a common belief. (Apocalypse simply means unveiling or uncovering by the way, even thought that's not how it's thought.)There aren't many references to people on white horses in the Bible. There's one in Zechariah were…[Read more]