Mike,Your first quote is not valid. I was posting to Kathi concerning the issues as to why I didn't get back to her for my (half) mistake.You cannot quote that as personal for it is FACT.And in what way did I insult Kathi – did Kathi report an insult?You cannot take it upon yourself to judge for others : A crime is not a crime until it is reported…[Read more]

Kathi,Why is it that Scriptures only says explicitly that Angels are to Worship Jesus Christ?Why were the Angels instructed to Worship Jesus Christ?Kathi, is Jesus an Angel or a Man NOW?If Angel, how does Angel worship Angel? Oh and doesn't Scriptures that God(!!) placed him high above all powers, principalities, ANGELS, and all names ever before…[Read more]

Mike,My response that you ignored asked for clarification on 'Son of God' because there are three occasions for Son of God.I am amazed that you cannot yet understand this and the only conclusion is that you do so to try and retain your Only Begotten stance.I enumerated three occasions yet to ask an open One!I reply stating How but you ignore the…[Read more]

Kathi,I'm sorry for that… I posted before I looked it up. Then all this nonsense with Mikeboll and SF kicked off so I didn't get back.However, the essence of what I wrote was there : Worship God; glorify the Son.The text does not say 'worship in the Spirit of God'.Kathi, what does that mean? Worship in the Spirit of God ? There is no …Worship…[Read more]

Also,Mikeboll defends SF's abusive posts showing that he is not impartial even to those who post against him.Can anyone tell me what qualities they imagine a MODERATOR should have?

This is amazing…I reported two posts for abuse, one from SF and one from Mikeboll only to find that the reports go to Mikeboll for moderating … No wonder Mikeboll never gets tiled and others don't get tiled…How can a Moderator who is partial be a moderator of his own abusive posts – will he give himself a tile?What kind of place is this…[Read more]

Mike and SF,I am reporting your posts to Heaven as abusive…If this is how T8 wants his forum run – by a childish ignoramus who feels he alone has all Scriotures – who says Jesus is God and argues against those who say Jesus is God!! But can't stand up to rigorous debate because he lost a point – oh poor him! A wetsop wielding a shotgun given…[Read more]

Sf,Nah…!

Is this guy (sf) for real: who is this person?SF, what is yOur problem. Who are you,,, no, what are you!you and mike make perfect companionsWhats your beef dude?

Mikeboll,It is you who cannot hold to scriptures. You torture them for your own purpose until they are unrecognisable.You delude yourself because of your own selfishness turning every good thing into dispute wishing only to hear your own view which are only distortions of reality.Time and time again I ask you to measure your ideas against…[Read more]

To everyone,Please see Mikeboll's post above concerning him wanting to give me a block.This is how he acts toward those who post good posts against him.He asked for an answer to his question and then ignores the response answer. Then accuses the other of not answering but – when he is embarrassed to find that the question is in fact answered he…[Read more]

Kathi,I was not stating that there were no verses saying 'Honor the Father' for Honor is embodied in Worship: one cannot Worship without also first honouring.The verse was there but it seemed you deliberately 'Missed it' so you did not have to answer it.Here it is again:Phil 3:3 'We..worship God in the Spirit rejoice in Christ Jesus…'''Honor…[Read more]

Irene,I am amazed that you ask me to 'prove' this to you.Is the forum so fickle that it needs reminders from every moment to every other moment?Is this why people accuse me for not posting verses: sorry, but I thought after all this time that such 'proofs' were obvious; that you knew the Scriptures, else how do you all dispute so vigourously over…[Read more]

Notice also that Mike's questions to me get more finicky each time until they delve into pointless dispute over EXACT DEFINITION and IS IT IMPOSSIBLE that such and such COULD MEAN this or that.What should happen at this point is Mike should just say (As he ONCE did) 'I will accept your answer for the time being as, although I do not agree with it,…[Read more]

Will everyone please take note:Mike has accused another poster (me) of not responding to his question.This has now become an infamous 'Mikebollism'.Please see Mike's question in Bold to me on page 29… And my response to that question ON PAGE 29!(Last post)If Mike would like to apologise then that might be a good thing – if not, then his error…[Read more]

Irene,You are right to believe that which you believe concerning Almighty God.The only time Almighty Jehovah God was NOT complete was when He, God the Father, handed over His KINGDOM to His ONLY BEGOTTEN SON to rule over. Also note that Almighty God salsa put HIS HOLY SPIRIT Under the Charge of the ONLY BEGOTTEN SON!When that rulership is…[Read more]

Oops,Mikeboll,I am happy that you so admirably demonstrate exactly what EVERYONE says about you.You ask a question but ignore the answer that is given because it doesn't say what you want it to say.Then you insult the person the responder by claiming that they have not responded to you even when a response is given (Apparantly YOU one of those…[Read more]

Mikeboll,I am happy that y

Mike,You really can test the patience of a Saint!!!Which one of the 'Sonships' are you referring to…?The Sonship that is Spiritual cannot be gained if one is sinful that is why one must put off the flesh and be reborn.This then makes one a Sinless SON, a Begotten Son, raised up, Reborn.Mike, you really are not trying to get it, are you, you are…[Read more]

Mike,Since when has any of your 'One question at a time' ever amounted to anything.You are so easy. WJ and KJ and SF have your measure and simply ask another question and it starts a whole new 'One question at a time from you'…ask your ONE QUESTION and don't deviate from an expected answer…And don't bother with 'Yes' and 'No' answers, only an…[Read more]