- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- November 15, 2012 at 4:36 pm#320473Ed JParticipant
Quote (Wakeup @ Nov. 16 2012,00:57) Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 15 2012,20:57) Quote (Wakeup @ Nov. 15 2012,20:13) EDJ. Jesus will shake your hand and say Ed,my good servant,you have done very well in knowing me through your knowledge of the number codes of which my 12 apostles did not posses.
I should have told them to seek the codes,instead of seek
ye me.wakeup.
Hi Wakeup, (see Acts 12:25)Do you consider “Barnabas” to be a Disciple of Christ – yes or no? (<– please answer)
God bless
Ed J
EDJ.yes.
wakeup.
Hi Wakeup, Great!Barnabas also uses “Gematria”(74)
In “The GENERAL EPISTLE OF BARNABAS” (Link)
Barnabas 8:12-13:
12 Mark, first the eighteen, and next the three hundred.
For the numeral letters of ten and eight are I H. And these denote Jesus.13 And because the cross was that by which we were to find grace; therefore he adds, three hundred;
the note of which is T (the figure of his cross). Wherefore by two letters he signified Jesus, and by the third his cross.Now what do you have to say, MR. NAYSAYER?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgNovember 15, 2012 at 6:03 pm#320481WakeupParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Nov. 16 2012,02:36) Quote (Wakeup @ Nov. 16 2012,00:57) Quote (Ed J @ Nov. 15 2012,20:57) Quote (Wakeup @ Nov. 15 2012,20:13) EDJ. Jesus will shake your hand and say Ed,my good servant,you have done very well in knowing me through your knowledge of the number codes of which my 12 apostles did not posses.
I should have told them to seek the codes,instead of seek
ye me.wakeup.
Hi Wakeup, (see Acts 12:25)Do you consider “Barnabas” to be a Disciple of Christ – yes or no? (<– please answer)
God bless
Ed J
EDJ.yes.
wakeup.
Hi Wakeup, Great!Barnabas also uses “Gematria”(74)
In “The GENERAL EPISTLE OF BARNABAS” (Link)
Barnabas 8:12-13:
12 Mark, first the eighteen, and next the three hundred.
For the numeral letters of ten and eight are I H. And these denote Jesus.13 And because the cross was that by which we were to find grace; therefore he adds, three hundred;
the note of which is T (the figure of his cross). Wherefore by two letters he signified Jesus, and by the third his cross.Now what do you have to say, MR. NAYSAYER?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Hi mister the wanderer.I have optained my knowledge through the word of God.
I dont go shopping around the neighbourhood.You have been doing a lot of shopping around,and it shows
in your interpretations of scriptures, is all over the place.
You have got your self a fruit salad combination.
Go back to the word.wakeup.
November 15, 2012 at 6:23 pm#320486Ed JParticipantQuote (Wakeup @ Nov. 16 2012,04:03) You have got your self a fruit salad combination. December 23, 2012 at 9:39 am#3251242beseeParticipantWhere is EdJ these days? Hello EdJ…
December 23, 2012 at 4:31 pm#325139mikeboll64BlockedPersonally, I think Ed J is masquerading as 2besee.
December 23, 2012 at 4:55 pm#325142Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 24 2012,02:31) Personally, I think Ed J is masquerading as 2besee.
Hi Mike,No, I've been busy.
No end of the world either.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 23, 2012 at 5:05 pm#325145mikeboll64BlockedAre you saying that you are NOT also posting as 2besee?
I've noticed some interesting similarities in writing style and unique beliefs lately.
December 23, 2012 at 8:59 pm#325156WakeupParticipantQuote (Ed J @ Dec. 24 2012,02:55) Quote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 24 2012,02:31) Personally, I think Ed J is masquerading as 2besee.
Hi Mike,No, I've been busy.
No end of the world either.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Hi Ed J.I miss your chattering.
wakeup.
December 23, 2012 at 11:32 pm#325166Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 24 2012,03:05) Are you saying that you are NOT also posting as 2besee?
CorrectDecember 23, 2012 at 11:35 pm#325168Ed JParticipantQuote (Wakeup @ Dec. 24 2012,06:59) Hi Ed J. I miss your chattering.
wakeup.
Hi Wakeup,Chattering?
You mean showing you
things that you never considered?God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgDecember 24, 2012 at 10:48 am#3252022beseeParticipantHi Ed yes it was me that asked!
December 24, 2012 at 10:49 am#3252032beseeParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 24 2012,05:05) Are you saying that you are NOT also posting as 2besee? I've noticed some interesting similarities in writing style and unique beliefs lately.
That is really strange Mike.December 24, 2012 at 5:40 pm#325228mikeboll64BlockedNot so much, 2B. In the over three years I've been here, there has ONLY been Ed who doesn't understand the OBVIOUS fact that the Word of God in Rev 19:13 is Jesus.
No matter what else we all agree or disagree on in this site, it seems that ALL of us know that Jesus is the Word in 19:13, except for Ed, and now you.
Also, this is from the “Nutters” thread:
Quote (2besee @ Dec. 23 2012,03:53) Mike, your question doesn't make sense? I have never seen anyone but Ed put a question mark at the end of a STATEMENT like this. Ed does it frequently, and your STATEMENT (not question) from yesterday in the “Nutters” thread is the only other time I've ever noticed someone doing it on this site in three years.
And thirdly, I noticed that about the same exact time you started to post regularly here, Ed went on a hiatus.
If I'm wrong, then just plainly tell me that you are not the one we also know as Ed………… and I'll drop the subject – with apologies.
December 24, 2012 at 8:18 pm#3252542beseeParticipantMike, No, I am not EdJ. I am here to learn about the Scriptures and to discuss truth, that is all.
December 24, 2012 at 8:19 pm#3252552beseeParticipantIf you would like to discuss my personal life then that is a private matter is it not?
December 24, 2012 at 8:35 pm#3252572beseeParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 25 2012,05:40) Not so much, 2B. In the over three years I've been here, there has ONLY been Ed who doesn't understand the OBVIOUS fact that the Word of God in Rev 19:13 is Jesus. No matter what else we all agree or disagree on in this site, it seems that ALL of us know that Jesus is the Word in 19:13, except for Ed, and now you.
Rev 19:13.Then I saw heaven opened, and behold, a white horse! He who sat upon it is called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he judges and makes war.
His eyes are like a flame of fire, and on his head are many diadems; and he has a name inscribed which no one knows but himself.
He is clad in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God.
And the armies of heaven, arrayed in fine linen, white and pure, followed him on white horses.
From his mouth issues a sharp sword with which to smite the nations, and he will rule them with a rod of iron; he will tread the wine press of the fury of the wrath of God the Almighty.
On his robe and on his thigh he has a name inscribed, King of kings and Lord of lords.'I see the words robe dipped in blood as being the body of Jesus which the word was in.
God is called the King of kings and Lord of lords and Jesus is also called the King of kings and the Lord of lords.(1 Tim 3:16).December 25, 2012 at 2:05 pm#325304Ed JParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ Dec. 25 2012,03:40) Not so much, 2B. In the over three years I've been here, there has ONLY been Ed who doesn't understand the OBVIOUS fact that the Word of God in Rev 19:13 is Jesus. No matter what else we all agree or disagree on in this site, it seems that ALL of us know that Jesus is the Word in 19:13, except for Ed, and now you.
Also, this is from the “Nutters” thread:
Quote (2besee @ Dec. 23 2012,03:53) Mike, your question doesn't make sense? I have never seen anyone but Ed put a question mark at the end of a STATEMENT like this. Ed does it frequently, and your STATEMENT (not question) from yesterday in the “Nutters” thread is the only other time I've ever noticed someone doing it on this site in three years.
And thirdly, I noticed that about the same exact time you started to post regularly here, Ed went on a hiatus.
If I'm wrong, then just plainly tell me that you are not the one we also know as Ed………… and I'll drop the subject – with apologies.
2Be or not 2Be(see) that is the question?December 25, 2012 at 4:55 pm#325316mikeboll64BlockedGood one, Ed! Especially adding the question mark to your STATEMENT that wasn't a question – as is your way.
Okay guys, I was apparently wrong. I apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.