- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- October 4, 2009 at 6:19 pm#148580NickHassanParticipant
Hi Con,
This site is not based on any denominational religion but studies scripture.
It aims to encourage men to develop a greater knowledge of scripture and learn how to align it to find truth.
Many come to defend their religion or personal ideas and to show how to support their myriad beliefs by using scripture but that is not the plan.October 4, 2009 at 8:08 pm#148604georgParticipantQuote (kerwin @ Oct. 04 2009,07:28) To all, I find a use in the “bickering” as it enables me to test my beliefs and strengthen my faith.
I am not sure that our debates qualify as bickering. I have posted on other forums where the discussions fit the definition better.
You are so right, when someone bickerers, I dig more into the
scriptures and show that one how wrong his or her doctrines are.
Really I like both types of people, to balance out the right and the wrong.
Since we have joined I have learned to take critism. Who knows why we have to endure these things. We don't know what God has in store for us.
Peace and Love IreneOctober 4, 2009 at 11:18 pm#148647GeneBalthropParticipantNick………..If you can't support what you are saying by scripture then you should not say it, and if you disagree with what is posted you need to show it in Scripture, not Just mouth off your disapproval of what you don't understand or disagree with, without scriptural support. And labeling is also wrong if a person has not joined him or Herself to that teaching or doctrine. You label people here as Gnostic's when in fact you hold onto some of their teachings yourself , like Preexistence of Jesus for instance. You also believe Jesus can from the place of GOD also as they did. So is it right to lable others as Gnostic's when in fact you yourself hold their believes?.
gene
October 5, 2009 at 12:26 am#148665NickHassanParticipantG,
We do not disapprove the presentation of personal opinions but presenting them as fact when they are not taught in scripture and deriding all who protest at such an approach as ignorant and lacking the Spirit is inappropriate.Similar to how the trinity idea was arrived at I guess.
October 5, 2009 at 9:10 pm#148775Jesus name follower of ChristParticipantok nick
October 5, 2009 at 9:29 pm#148784GeneBalthropParticipantNick………I hope all know, that what i Post is in fact what i think scripture is meaning or saying. Non of us have it all or how are we to GROW in KNOWLEDGE Then? I am only expressing what i think, and I hope and believe it is in line scripturally , but if it is not then (PLEASE) Show me you views and that goes for Everyone Here. I only see in Part and understand in Part, I am always open for other views or I would not be Here.
gene
October 6, 2009 at 8:48 pm#149034Jesus name follower of ChristParticipantIf it is my opinion I will let yall know
October 22, 2009 at 2:51 pm#152832Jesus name follower of ChristParticipantwe need not argue just explain what we know to be true
October 27, 2009 at 3:35 pm#153747Jesus name follower of ChristParticipantlets just get to know Jesus
November 2, 2009 at 9:36 pm#154743NickHassanParticipantHi JN,
Should should know him now and have entered through him into a relationship with his God.November 9, 2009 at 7:37 pm#155726Jesus name follower of ChristParticipantyes nh
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.