- This topic has 19,164 replies, 120 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 2 months ago by
.
- Posts
Hi t8,
Acts 17
And also some of the Epicurians and Stoic philosophers were concerning with him.
Some were saying
“What would this idle BABBLER wish to say”
Interesting.
No Nick, I can offer much more than saying you are blabbering. Perhaps you are not reading my posts to you. I guess it has come to the stage of putting you on the Hot Seat.
Hi T8,
All questions answered so what is your justification?
This could be a good time to take a break.
It seem you want to have only folk here who agree with you.
When you cool down I may return.
You still sit with the philosophers and Nicodemus.
Where did Nicodemus say this?
Luke 2:10-11
But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid; for behold, I bring you good news of great joy which will be for all the people; for today in the city of David there has been born for you a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.Hi T8,
All questions answered so what is your justification?
This could be a good time to take a break.
It seem you want to have only folk here who agree with you.
When you cool down I may return.
I’ll set it up anyway. If you run away, that is your choice.
Hi T8,
Nicodemus was ignorant about spiritual rebirth.
The philosophers thought spiritual teaching was babbling.
Right, so you are spiritual and your teaching is spiritual. And Jesus was not the Christ, savior, or Lord until he was about 30 years of age. He was just a man like us before that. No history whatsoever. And this is the spiritual Jesus? Sounds like a physical man who was saved by God to me. That explanation should be reserved for sinful man, not the one who was born Christ.
Your spiritual teachings is another name for false teachings. You deny the message of the angel who declared that Jesus was born as the Christ and Lord. This is not spiritual Nick. That is blindness.
Hi t8,
Nonsense.
The appointed Christ was born in Bethlehem.
And Jesus of Nazareth was anointed with the Holy Spirit.acts 10
Yes and that is not what is being disputed. You deny that Jesus the Nazarene was born as the Christ and Lord.
You are doing your best to dodge this, but no point in doing that Nick. You are on the Hot Seat. You cannot dodge.
T8….Jesus was an ordinary man saved by GOD the Father. BY not seening that only shows your deception. IMO
peace and love to you and yours. …….gene
Hi T8,
You fall into the same trap the men of the world fell into when Jesus walked the earth.
Blind to the Spirit you ascribe to men what is from God.
Hi T8,
You fall into the same trap the men of the world fell into when Jesus walked the earth.
Blind to the Spirit you ascribe to men what is from God.You’re blabbering again Nick.
Gene, Regarding this Jesus you talk about who was saved. Who died for this sinful creature so he could be saved?
Hi T8,
Please explain how much you think men contribute to the work of God.
Was Jesus led by the Spirit or did he do the work alone with just get an occasional inspiration?
T8…..Not could he be saved, he was saved by the power of his God and our God his Father and our Father. scripture say it was God that raised him from death . Now “if the spirit of HIM THAT “RAISED” Christ Jesus from the grave be in you, he will “also” (like he did Jesus) quicken your mortal body”.
T8…. You are ascribing powers to Jesus “himself” which he did not have, ” the son of man can do “nothing” of “himself”, the Father who is in him “he”, “does the works”, T8 what part of those words of Jesus you fail to believe. JESUS WAS LIKE MOSSES, GOD DID GREAT WORKS THROUGH THEM BOTH, BUT NONE OF THOSE WORKS WERE BY MOSES NOR JESUS.
You are not identifying yourself with Jesus as another human brother, even though he is our lord (“adoni” human ruler) not “adonia” (Almighty God), he is a human being, a son of man, whose was fathered by God, begotten through a human berth process exactly as we are. GOD THE FATHER SUPPLIED HIS HUMAN MALE DNA. HE did not PREEXIST his berth on this earth as you falsely assume T8.
peace and love to you and yours. …….gene
Nick you seem to fit the definition of a troll. No matter the answer, you troll. Is it worth conversing with a man who acts this way?
Gene you are no better. You repeat your doctrines even after people have proven them wrong. I believe you do this partially because you actually do not read other people’s posts properly, thus you never address the points that are expressed that disprove your position. A bit like a turkey with his head in the sand. He doesn’t see that which threatens his position. Ignorance is bliss as the saying goes.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
