- This topic has 19,164 replies, 120 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
- Posts
Hi MB,
Why would you give an ear to the deceived?
Using their folly to justify yours is more uselessness.Nick,
Do you believe the Trinitarians are right about Jesus being the very God he is the Son of? YES or NO?
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 17 2012,15:06) Hi MB,
Then do tell us when God spoke through Jesus.
Jn 7.16
Nwhen Jesus was 12 years old and he argued with the priest about his father words ;did he spook from himself or was it his father that give him the words to say
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 19 2012,00:33) Hi MB,
Why would you give an ear to the deceived?
Using their folly to justify yours is more uselessness.
Nwhen your foundation are clearly set in scriptures ,no one can deceive you ,
Nick,
You always chastise others here about using our God-given logic and understanding. You say things like, “the Spirit must show you this”.
Well, that is also what the Trinitarians say to divert away from the fact their doctrine is not only unmentioned by any scripture, but also that it makes absolutely no sense for the Son of God to be the God he is the Son of.
I want to know if you've used your LOGIC, combined with God's written word, to refute Trinitarianism in the past.
Or do you agree with them that it is the truth, and the Spirit just hasn't shown this truth to YOU yet?
Quote (Nick Hassan @ June 19 2012,19:20) Hi MB,
God is the son of God?
Hmmmm………… doesn't sound LOGICAL at all, does it Nick?Do you see how YOU used your God-given LOGIC to make your response?
But now let me pretend I'm a Trinitarian, and answer your logical point with this:
Nick, you must be shown this truth by the Spirit. God will only call those who are His own, and apparently, you are not one of those yet.
Now what, Nick?
But, as a “Trinitarian”, I DO have more, Nick. I just told you that “the Spirit showed me” that the Son of God is the very God he is the Son of.
Perhaps you need to get the Spirit, huh?
Hi MB,
Yes you stepped out of that hole but fell into another where you can make up what you like and tell folk it is truth.
Jesus is not said to be an angel or a lesser god in scripture so that stuff came from you.Nick, when will you learn?
If Jesus IS said to be a god in scripture (which he is), and he is NOT the Most High God (which he isn't), then he has no choice but to be a lesser god – or as the 25 scholars from NETNotes worded it, “a lesser diety”.
And if “angel” is the word used for a SPIRIT BEING messenger of God, and Jesus IS a spirit being messenger of God, then you can't possibly deny that Jesus is an angel of God.
Now, do you have scriptures to REFUTE the things I claim? If not, shhhhh…………….
Btw, what does your response have to do with the last post on the previous page…………….the one you should be addressing?
Hi Mike: I hate to burst your bubble, but this verse
says Jesus didn't take the form of an Angel:“For verily he took not on him the nature [as in the form of]
angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.” (Hebrews 2:16)
Paraphrase: He didn't become an angel, but of the seed of Abraham.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgHi Mike, And this verse says he didn't become
an Angel in the resurrection either.Heb 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put
in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgBottom line is: Jesus was never an Angel.
Messenger yes, but Angel… NO!
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgHi MB,
Why have you then not answered the three questions on the last two pages and hundreds of others I have posed?
Tunnel vision seems to limit you does it not?
Please answer this.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
