Mike Versus Kerwin

[mikeboll64]

Hi Kerwin,

In this debate, we each have a chance to ask ONE question per post.  The other MUST DIRECTLY answer that question or point in their response.  We can post as much other stuff as we'd like, as long as the ONE BOLDED question get DIRECTLY addressed.  And as long as we are only obligated to answer the ONE BOLDED question.

First up:
God is a Spirit Being.  He is the first spirit being to ever exist, as He has no beginning.  He has subsequently brought forth many other spirit beings into existence.  We generally call them “angels”, but scripture calls them “sons of God” and “morning stars”.  Scripture also tells us that Jesus is the “Bright Morning Star”.  

So the scriptural FACT of the matter is that the One Spirit Being who created all things has brought forth spiritual sons unto Himself.

Kerwin, knowing that God has brought many spiritual sons into existence, and that they are called “morning stars”, is it POSSIBLE that Jesus was the first of these spiritual sons of God, and is therefore distinguished as the “BRIGHT” morning star?

That should get us started off on a long, solid, and SCRIPTURALLY backed discussion.

peace,
mike

[mikeboll64]

Kerwin? I've placed you on the Hot Seat so that you can stand and scripturally defend the things you teach. Will you do it?

[Author]

Posts