Was the Islam Caliphate the seventh kingdom?

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 650 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #787206
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    There maybe empires alive today such as the American empire, but I don’t believe that there is a head of the Beast alive today. That said, what we see in the Middle East now may well give rise to an Islamic Empire.

    One of the heads received a deadly wound and then came back to life. The eighth Kingdom will be of the seventh.

    #787207
    Proclaimer
    Participant
    #787212
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi

    simple question ;what is a empire ? why do we call it an empire ?

    this is what God told Daniel about Babylon empire;

    Da 2:38 in your hands he has placed mankind and the beasts of the field and the birds of the air. Wherever they live, he has made you ruler over them all. You are that head of gold.

    Da 4:11 The tree grew large and strong and its top touched the sky; it was visible to the ends of the earth.
    Da 4:12 Its leaves were beautiful, its fruit abundant, and on it was food for all. Under it the beasts of the field found shelter, and the birds of the air lived in its branches; from it every creature was fed.

    Da 4:20 The tree you saw, which grew large and strong, with its top touching the sky, visible to the whole earth,
    Da 4:21 with beautiful leaves and abundant fruit, providing food for all, giving shelter to the beasts of the field, and having nesting places in its branches for the birds of the air—
    Da 4:22 you, O king, are that tree! You have become great and strong; your greatness has grown until it reaches the sky, and your dominion extends to distant parts of the earth.

    well now if we believe those scriptures about the third empire would this not reflect to all the others ? I think so what about you guys ?

    #787215
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Thanks for posting this scripture.

    First thing that I noticed is the term: ” it was visible to the ends of the earth”. In another scripture regarding Rome it said, it will trample the whole Earth. This opens up the flood of Noah as being local to that area of the world if the whole Earth is that region where the Beast sits.

    Second thing is that its dominion extends to distant parts of the earth. In that sense, the Ottoman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire both had a dominion bigger in area than Babylon.

    It seems that the Whole Earth in the Old Testament doesn’t include Australia for example and the most distant part of the Earth doesn’t include New Zealand even though it is the most distant place from Jerusalem.

    As for the definition of an empire, it is usually run by an emperor, a kingdom has a king, and a Caliphate has a caliph. They are probably all the same thing, but I would need to look up the definitions to be exact. This scripture doesn’t really define what an empire is except to say that it is great and extends over large swathes of land.

    #787216
    terraricca
    Participant

    t8

    I think you mist the point of the scriptures ;it also talked about its influence on the earth ,read those scriptures again

    #787217
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    I agree. All these empires had great influence. No debating that. I assumed that we would all be on the same page with that one. It wouldn’t be an empire if it didn’t have great influence.

    #787219
    Wakeup
    Participant

    Commonsense in this world will tell us; the LENDER is the MASTER over the BORROWER.
    The lenders are Europeans. Called the world monetary bank.
    Australia owes them one hundred billion dollars; so they say. America even ten times over.
    Islam is set up by the British empire to divide the middle eastern nations, and are still doing it today.
    Non other than the British empire did divide the land for own gain.
    The ottoman empire is dead and buried; the breath is taken out of it.
    The 7th beast is non other than the British empire.
    The 7th; the NWO will be the 8th. The false prophet will declare himself god
    . In other words: there is no allah but him.

    Daniel 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of HIS FATHERS, nor the desire of women, nor regard ANY GOD: for he shall magnify HIMSELF above all.

    Daniel 11:38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces: and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.

    Daniel 11:39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many, and shall divide the land for gain.

    wakeup.

    #787228
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Islam is set up by the British empire to divide the middle eastern nations, and are still doing it today.

    The Islamic Empire and Islam predate the British Empire. Did the British travel back in time?

    How about some decent discussion on this view. If I hear one more comment like this, I will… I don’t know what I will do. But something has to be done. This is crazy. Opening your view on the seventh and eighth kingdoms with a statement like that ruins your theory from the start.

    And notice how you teach it as truth when it is really not only a theory, but actually impossible that the British Empire setup Islam.

    You couldn’t have discredited your own theory if you tried.

    But you are free to teach your views, but please label them as views, otherwise we have no choice but to say you are a false teacher.

    #787229
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The ottoman empire is dead and buried; the breath is taken out of it.

    You say this as if to mean that I am teaching that it is alive and well. Again you could not be more wrong.

    This topic is putting forward a theory that says that this head received a deadly wound.

    Could I ask that both yourself and Kerwin read the theory first before asking all these silly waste of time questions.

    I would certainly appreciate well thought out questions as opposed to misconceptions and ridiculous statements that no one is promoting.

    Please. You guys have me thinking about putting in some rules to weed out such foolishness. I would like to see quality discussion and you guys are probably putting off such people from joining in the first place.

    Here is the theory:

    Is Islam the Beast?

    Please read it before you embarrass yourself further.

    #787310
    kerwin
    Participant

    To whomever it may concern,

    The bible seldom gives details about the future.  It deal is patterns, pasterns that can fit more than one thing.  Individuals guided by their flesh nature take these patterns and fit things into them.  For example those hate the Catholic church have interpreted the Catholic Church to be Babylon the Whore.   There are those that hate Muslims.

    The question is we as Godly individuals are supposed to view these patterns.

    #787312
    kerwin
    Participant

    @T8,

    As for a new empire, would it not be strange that it was located in a different part of the world to all the others?

    You are unclear what you are speaking but if you are speaking of the statue that is spoken in of Daniel that we the Babylonian Empire, Media-Persian Empire, Greek and its successor Empires, and the Roman and its successor Empires.  The feet made of clay and iron may or may not have been an Empire but seem instead to be the empires, nations, and so forth that have arisen in the same area of the Babylonian Empire since that day.

    There is no individual new empire according that prophecy.

    #787315
    kerwin
    Participant

    @T8,

    It was the Ottoman Empire which was actually the first Islamic Caliphate.

    This claim is false.

    Rashidun Caliphate is the first caliphate. Umayyad Caliphate was the second major one and the Ottoman was the last one before ISIS declared itself to be one.  All have risen and fallen.

    #787369
    Grasshopper
    Participant

    OK, as I mentioned earlier (in another topic), I found this on the web and am re-posting this in 3 areas because this writing has pertinent information/ideas that deals with more than just one topic.

    It’s VERY interesting and should give you plenty of fodder for the mind.

    ~~~~~~~~~~
    Grasshopper

    ========================================================

    MidnightWatcher’s Blogspot
    1 Thess 5:6, “Therefore let us not sleep, as others do, but let us watch …”

    Home
    About
    Articles: Theology and Eschatology
    A Few Simple Questions for Muslim Visitors

    Home > Radical Islam, Theology and Eschatology> The Mark of the Beast – What Your Church May Not Be Telling You
    The Mark of the Beast – What Your Church May Not Be Telling You
    03/22/2011 ICALeave a comment Go to comments

    By ICA

    Revelation 13:16-17, “He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

    A literal and physical mark, or something else?The most popular view today regarding the Mark of the Beast in Revelation 13 is that it is a literal mark physically placed in the forehead or right hand of those who worship Antichrist. Many teachers of Biblical eschatology will even refer to modern 21st century technology and point to some type of tattoo or implantable microchip under the skin when attempting to explain the mark. But why? What is in the text that leads many to believe that this mark must be physical when, after all, virtually every one of us would agree that while the book of Revelation speaks about the dragon, the Beast, the “Whore of Babylon” or the mark of Christ upon the elect etc. that these descriptions are not referring to a literal dragon, a literal animal, a literal prostitute or a literal seal of Christ? This is obviously figurative language pointing to something completely different. On the other hand, so to speak, is there anything from Scripture to indicate for us that this mark need not be a physical mark at all, but could instead be something else entirely?

    After careful consideration, I believe that the Mark of the Beast is very likely a spiritual mark just as the mark of Christ upon the elect is spiritual. Since many will resist the suggestion that a figurative Beast will also have a figurative mark, despite the fact that there is nothing in the text stating that the Mark of the Beast must be physical, it is important to rightly divide the Word of God and study, from the whole of Scripture, the significance of the hand and head and how it often relates to man’s condition in the Biblical text.
    Arguments Against a Figurative or Spiritual Mark

    First, however, let’s begin with arguments that are often issued against a figurative or spiritual mark. Some will contend that if John literally saw a mark in the forehead and hand of those who worshiped the Beast then it must therefore have been literal and physical. This, however, is a poor argument considering that John “saw” the seal of God upon the foreheads of the elect as well, yet everyone agrees this seal is spiritual in nature. Since we know that the seal of God is not literal, “seeing” the mark in the forehead of those who worshiped the Beast likewise does not mean that it must be a physical, literal mark.

    Others may argue that because John used the word “charagma” (G5480) for “mark” which means “a stamp, an imprinted mark” that it must refer to a literal mark because it is physical by definition, but this — again — is another example of poor argumentation because John employs many other words throughout Revelation that refer to something physical by definition yet uses them figuratively as symbols of something else entirely. For example:

    Revelation 13:17 – the beast – “therion” G2342 – an animal, a wild beast
    Revelation 12:3 – Dragon – “drakon” G1404 – a dragon, a great serpent
    Revelation 12:3 – horns – “keras” G2768 – a horn; of animals
    Revelation 12:3 – crowns – “diadema” G1238 – a diadem; a kingly ornament, crown
    Revelation 14:4 – Lamb – “arnion” G721 – a little lamb, a lamb
    Art used by Pat Marvenko Smith, copyright 1992.

    Art used by Pat Marvenko Smith, copyright 1992.

    According to the “charagma = physical mark” argument, the Beast should be literal. The dragon should be literal. The ten horns on the head of the dragon, the crowns, the lamb, etc. etc etc. should all be literal because the words that John used refer to things that are physical by definition. We would all agree, however, that these are figurative. It does not stand to reason that the figurative dragon, with the seven figurative heads, ten figurative horns and a figurative crown upon each figurative horn — a figurative dragon who hates the figurative woman and who gives power to the figurative Beast that opposes the figurative lamb (a figurative lamb who figuratively marks those who follow the figurative lamb with a figurative seal) — puts a literal, physical mark upon those who worship the figurative Beast. The song “One Of These Things (Is Not Like The Other)” comes to mind, doesn’t it? It makes much more sense that the word “mark (charagma)” is used figuratively by John, just as “lamb (arnion)” and “crowns (diadema)” and “horns (keras)” and many others all refer to something physical and tangible that we can identify with. All are symbolic or spiritual, not literal and physical.

    The Significance of the Head and Hand, and Being ‘Marked’ in Scripture

    As for the significance of being ‘marked’ in the head or hand, let’s review a few portions of Scripture that refer to the head and hand and what these terms mean in those specific contexts.

    Exodus 13:9 says, “And it shall serve AS A SIGN to you on your hand, and AS A REMINDER to you on your forehead, that the law of the LORD may be in your mouth; for with a powerful hand the LORD brought you out of Egypt.”

    The Lord said that His words are to be as a sign on our hand, and as frontals on our foreheads. The word “as” is “used to express similarity or equality in a specified characteristic, condition, etc., as between one person or thing and another.” It means “like” or “similar to.”

    Sign: H226 Strong’s Bible Dictionary “ôth” – Probably from H225 (in the sense of appearing); a signal, as a flag, beacon, monument, omen, prodigy, evidence, etc.: – mark, miracle, (en-) sign, token.

    Deuteronomy 6:5-8, “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. These words, which I am commanding you today, shall be on your heart. You shall teach them diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house and when you walk by the way and when you lie down and when you rise up. You shall bind them AS A SIGN ON YOUR HAND and they shall be AS FRONTALS ON YOUR FOREHEAD.”

    Deuteronomy 11:18, “Therefore you shall lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and bind them AS A SIGN ON YOUR HAND, and they shall be AS FRONTLETS BETWEEN YOUR EYES.”

    James 4:8, “Come near to God and he will come near to you. WASH YOUR HANDS, you sinners, and purify your hearts, you DOUBLE-MINDED.”

    Psalms 119:48, “My HANDS ALSO I WILL LIFT UP to Your commandments, Which I love, And I will MEDIATE ON YOUR STATUTES.”

    Instead of interpreting Scripture to conform to our understanding, we must allow our understanding to conform to Scripture. When Scripture is permitted to interpret itself we’ll then begin to see why the Mark of the Beast need not be literal at all, but is instead simply an identifying mark upon the head or forehead to represent the mind, what you believe, your faith, how you think, and in the right hand to represent actions, works, what you do. There is nothing in the text necessitating a physical and visible mark upon the forehead or right hand as in a microchip or tattoo or anything else that a people or government can physically place therein or upon. It just doesn’t exist.
    The Mark of the Beast – A Closer Look

    Aside from those who worship the Beast, the only other figure in the book of Revelation directly related to the Beast and described as having a mark or name upon their forehead is one who many Bible scholars and prophecy teachers refer to as the “Whore of Babylon.” This “woman” is described as being carried by the Beast (17:7), and all agree she is figurative and identified by the name upon her forehead. This alone should beg the question: If the name marked upon the forehead of this “woman” is figurative to designate identity, would this not then infer that the Mark of the Beast is itself also a figurative mark to designate identity, especially considering the fact that the mark of God upon the foreheads of the elect is itself also figurative to designate identity (Rev 7:3, Rev 9:4, Rev 14:1, Rev 22:3-4)? Common sense would dictate that, yes, it would.

    In Scripture, the seal of God upon the forehead of the elect refers to those who keep the commandments of God and who do not worship the Beast. Conversely, those who have the Mark of the Beast would therefore be identified with those who worship the Beast and do not worship God. This would be the direct antithesis to the mark of Christ and symbolic of worship, of allegiance, of identity to permit all readers of Revelation to know to whom the individual or group belongs to and to whom their allegiance lies. And for those with the Mark of the Beast, it is not with YHWH the God of Israel. Just as those who worship Christ receive the mark of Christ and are “sealed for the day of redemption” (Eph. 4:30), those who worship the Beast receive the Mark of the Beast and will “drink of the wine of the wrath of God” (Rev. 14:9-10) and suffer the same fate as the “Whore of Babylon”: destruction.

    The Beast Carries the “Whore of Babylon” – Who Is She?

    In chapter 5 of the book of Zechariah we read about a vision that Zechariah was given of a flying scroll and a “wicked woman”. An angel tells Zechariah that “This is the curse that is going out over the whole land” at the appointed time (5:3,11). The Prophet Zechariah then writes that “the angel who was speaking to me came forward and said to me, ‘Look up and see what this is that is appearing.’ I asked, ‘What is it?’ He replied, ‘It is a measuring basket.’ And he added, ‘This is the iniquity of the people throughout the land.’ Then the cover of lead was raised, and there in the basket sat a woman” (Zech 5:5-7). Zechariah continues, “He said, ‘This is wickedness,’ and he pushed her back into the basket and pushed the lead cover down over its mouth. Then I looked up–and there before me were two women, with the wind in their wings! They had wings like those of a stork, and they lifted up the basket between heaven and earth. ‘Where are they taking the basket?’ I asked the angel who was speaking to me. He replied, ‘To the country of Babylonia to build a house for it. When it is ready, the basket will be set there in its place.’” (Zech 5:8-11).

    Of particular interest here is the fact that this “curse” is described as a “woman” who would be set up in “Babylon” (Shin’ar). The Babylonian Empire encompassed areas of Saudi Arabia (the birthplace and spiritual homestead of Islam) to the south, to parts of Asia Minor (Turkey) in the north, and from Egypt in the west to Persia (Iran) in the east. This area is today the regional epicenter of Islam. Additionally, one intriguing aspect to the “curse” that goes out over the whole land is that the word for “curse”, and even how it is pronounced, is the Hebrew word “alah”. The Prophet Isaiah, in describing the condition of the earth at the time leading up to the Second Coming of Messiah, says that “the curse [alah] has devoured the earth, And those who dwell in it are desolate” (Isa 24:6). To dwell in the earth does not in and of itself make one “desolate”. But the same cannot be said for those who dwell in the “curse.”

    There should be little doubt that the “woman” of Zechariah 5 that would have a house built for it in Babylon directly represents the “Whore of Babylon” referred to earlier. Over 600 years after Zechariah’s vision of the end times, John in Revelation 17 is given a vision of the future and of “the great harlot who sits on many waters … And on her forehead a name [was] written: MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” (17:1,5). Given the fact that the “Whore of Babylon” directly represents the curse (alah), is being carried by the Beast, and is herself marked with a name upon her forehead, does it not stand to reason that the Mark of the Beast would therefore be associated with, or directly related to, the “woman” and “curse” (alah) prophesied by Zechariah and John?

    Narrowing It Down and Zooming In

    Moreover, let’s also consider the following. The Church of God — the assembly of His people — is called the “Ekklesia” in Scripture and in terms of location is identified with Jerusalem, Israel. This is the epicenter of the Judeo-Christian faith. If the “Bride” of the Lamb is identified as a city called “Jerusalem” (Rev. 21:9-10, “Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife… and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God”) then does it not stand to reason that the “Whore of Babylon” would also be associated with a city of its own? From the preponderance of the evidence that we are given throughout Scripture, the “whore” identified by John in Revelation is associated with the epicenter of Islam itself. And what would that be? The city of Mecca. Whereas the Judeo-Christian faith came out of Jerusalem, Islam came out of Mecca, the birthplace of “Allah’s religion” and the spiritual city of the “Ummah”. She is the “whore of Babylon”. “Babylon” is the Islamic kingdom. The Islamic kingdom is the Beast. (And for what it’s worth, Mecca is known as a “city of seven hills” in the Muslim world).

    Babylon: Spiritual Confusion and the Quagmire of Islam

    The name Babylon written upon the forehead of this “woman” comes from the Hebrew word Babel, which means “confusion (by mixing)”. Since the region of ancient Babylon is today the epicenter of Islam and its god “Allah”, it is befitting to note a brief history of the founder and ‘prophet’ of Islam, Mohammed, and his self-proclaimed holy book, the Qur’an.

    In an effort to entice Jewish and Christian converts to Islam, Islam’s ‘prophet’ incorporated a twisted mix of Jewish and Christian teachings with the existing Babylonian religion of Arabia early in his campaign to gain adherents to his “new” monotheistic Arab religion (formerly polytheistic), even going so far as to claim that “Allah” was the same god that Jews and Christians worshiped [1]. But Jews and Christians would not be deceived and, already familiar with the polytheistic religion of the Romans and their Greek gods, understood full well that just as abolishing all other Greek gods except Zeus would not suddenly make Zeus the God of Israel, neither would abolishing all Babylonian gods except for the moon god “Allah” suddenly make Mohammed’s god the God of Jews and Christians. This complete rejection of Mohammed and his teachings infuriated the ‘prophet’ of “Allah”, resulting in subsequent “revelations” for the Qur’an for the next 20 or so years that grew increasingly hateful and violent against Jews, Christians and all non-Muslims in general. This twisted mixing of Judeo-Christian teachings, Babylonian paganism and vengeful anti-Semitic and anti-Christian hatred is what permeates every crevice of Islam, even today.

    The Curse of the “Whore of Babylon”

    “In examining ‘curse’ (אלה , alah), its first use appears in Numbers 5 in ‘the adultery test’, the Mosaic methodology for determining the faithfulness of a wife to her husband. If the man suspects adultery, the wife is made by the priest to drink bitter water. If she’s innocent, she will be immune, but if guilty, the ‘water that brings a curse shall go into your stomach, and make your abdomen swell and your thigh waste away.’ (Num 5:21) The actual first occurrence in v19 reads: ‘If no man has lain with you and if you have not gone astray into uncleanness, being under the authority of your husband, be immune to this water of bitterness that brings a curse‘. I think its more than a coincidence to see that first use of the word ‘alah’ in scripture is in connection with an unfaithful woman – is this not perhaps a foreshadowing of the Revelation Harlot riding the Beast?” [2]. And indeed, there should be no doubt. This is a reoccurring theme regarding the “Whore of Babylon”:

    Revelation 14:8, “A second angel followed and said, ‘Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great, which made all the nations drink the maddening wine of her adulteries.”

    Revelation 17:2, “With her the kings of the earth committed adultery and the inhabitants of the earth were intoxicated with the wine of her adulteries.”

    Revelation 17:4, “The woman was dressed in purple and scarlet, and was glittering with gold, precious stones and pearls. She held a golden cup in her hand, filled with abominable things and the filth of her adulteries.”

    Revelation 18:3, “For all the nations have drunk the maddening wine of her adulteries. The kings of the earth committed adultery with her, and the merchants of the earth grew rich from her excessive luxuries.”

    Revelation 19:2, “for true and just are his judgments. He has condemned the great prostitute who corrupted the earth by her adulteries. He has avenged on her the blood of his servants.”

    This is obviously spiritual adultery/fornication. Daniel 11:37-38 reveals that a Last Days ‘Antichrist’ will not regard “the God of his fathers” but instead “shall honor a god of fortresses; and a god which his fathers did not know he shall honor with gold and silver, with precious stones and pleasant things.” Many Arabs and Muslims are descendants of Ishmael, whose father was Abraham. To not regard “the God of his fathers” implies that this Last Days ‘Antichrist’ will do precisely what the Islamic world does today — disregard completely YHWH the true God of Abraham (and Ishmael, whom God took care of after he and Hagar were sent away), and instead honor a god whom they never knew, one that is forced upon the inhabitants of all nations surrounding Israel in the eschaton, and in increasing measure upon the world, whom they refer to as “Allah”. And today in increasing measure the West, virtually lobotomized by the scalpel of political correctness, bends over backwards to accommodate and embrace her, and have indeed become intoxicated with the “maddening wine of her adulteries.”
    Islam – Belief, Behavior, Bureaucracy, and Business

    According to Islam, anyone who believes that Jesus was God in the flesh who died on the cross for the sins of mankind, a foundational tenet upon which Christianity is built, is accused of committing the worst of all possible sins called “shirk”. In Islam, this is an unpardonable sin that “Allah” will never forgive. In Christianity it is the key to everlasting life. But although Islam includes religious teachings as a vital, integral part of its core — Muslims must pray five times a day, and the only way for any Muslim to guarantee Paradise after death is to wage Jihad and be killed for the cause of “Allah” — it is not just simply a religious ideology that seeks to assert itself in place of Christ and all other religions. It is also a works-based system that completely encompasses legal, political, economic and even military components as well that seek to replace all other non-Islamic religions, values, laws, governments and economies until only Islam reigns supreme throughout the world [3]. Not only does Islam force its adherents to submit to “Allah” and his ‘prophet’ and demand that you reject any belief that Jesus is the Son of God and all other non-Islamic teachings, it also teaches that “Allah” weighs the good deeds and bad deeds of Muslims on a scale to determine who makes it into Paradise, and who does not.

    In contrast, notice how we as Christians only receive a mark on our foreheads when we are sealed by God. Why not in our right hand as well? Unlike Islam, which is based upon works, Christians are saved by grace through faith, by being born again, by believing in the true Jesus of Biblical Scripture who died upon the cross, by being transformed by the renewal of our mind. We are not saved by works, lest any one should boast (Eph 2:9).

    No One Can Buy or Sell Unless They Have the ‘Mark’

    The biggest question that many will have regarding a symbolic mark is, “If the Mark of the Beast is only symbolic, how can those who do not have a literal mark not buy or sell?” This is often used as well by some as an argument against a figurative mark, arguing that any such mark must be visible and/or physical if it is required in order to buy or sell. However, the answer to this question is much simpler than many may think.

    When it comes to the conditions that exist in many Islamic nations for Christians, Dr. Labib Mikhail, a former professor of homiletics from the Faith Mission Bible College in Cairo, Egypt, states that one reason why people are forced to embrace Islam is because of the poverty they will assuredly find themselves in if they do not. “If you don’t embrace Islam you may not find a job; you may not find an apartment, and you’ll be in financial trouble” [4]. Non-Muslims, particularly Christians and Jews, living in Muslim-dominated countries are finding themselves subjected to an ever increasing wave of discrimination, oppression and persecution at the hands of the Ummah (Islamic Community). Even today a Christian in a Muslim country is often treated as a second-class citizen or worse, unable to serve in the military or police, many cannot work or own a business, or even find a place to live. They cannot own a weapon to defend themselves, nor can they testify against a Muslim in court, etc. etc. etc. [5]. And this type of treatment is getting worse, not better. (Update: Read here to find out just how much worse this has become in 2011 alone).

    According to NIFCON (Network for Inter Faith Concerns) in Iraq, for example, minorities have faced a tremendous crisis due to their religious identity and are increasingly becoming targets of unprecedented terror. Canon Andrew White, vicar of St. George’s Anglican Church in Bagdad and head of the Foundation for Reconciliation and Reconstruction in the Middle East, testified as a witness in 2007 at a hearing that Christians, in particular, “are being disproportionately targeted” and many Christians are being threatened either to convert to Islam or face execution [6]. In fact, in April 2011, “an Iraqi Muslim scholar issued a fatwa that, among other barbarities, asserts that ‘it is permissible to spill the blood of Iraqi Christians.’ … Among other atrocities, beheading and crucifying Christians are not irregular occurrences; messages saying ‘you Christian dogs, leave or die,’ are typical. Islamists see the church as an ‘obscene nest of pagans’ and threaten to ‘exterminate Iraqi Christians.’” [7].

    Think about this very carefully. According to the Greek text of Revelation 13:17-18 it isn’t just someone who hasn’t received the “Mark of the Beast” on the right hand or forehead that cannot buy or sell. In order to buy or sell they must have the Mark of the Beast *or* the name of the Beast *or* the number of its name. In other words, those able to buy or sell are counted among the number of they who submit to the authority of the Beast empire or kingdom, not because they have been physically marked in the right hand or forehead for all to see, but because they are considered one of them ideologically or culturally or religiously in speech and practise. Consider these recent new stories, for instance:

    ‘Islamic State’ Orders Muslim Employers To Fire All Christians
    Egypt: Businesses Told Not To Sell To, Or Buy From, Christians
    Muslims Demand Christian Bookstores Stop Selling Christian Material
    Muslim Mobs Attacking Christian Businesses And Pharmacies In Egypt
    Iran Refusing Business License For Christians, ‘Do Not To Employ Them’
    Pakistan: Armed Muslims Attack Money-Making Christians In Sheikhupura
    Say The Islamic Statement Of Faith, Or You Cannot Buy From Muslim Stores
    Syrian Rebels To Christians: Comply With Islamic Law, Otherise It’s No Jobs, Death
    Egypt: No Business, No Money, No Home: Christians Flee As Islamists Seek Take Over
    Egypt: ‘When I Apply To Any Job And They Know That I’m Christian, They Refuse Me’
    Iraq: Islamists Destroy Christian Businesses, ‘If Anyone Reopens His Store, We’ll Kill Him’
    Iraq: ISIS Terrorists Stop Christians From Selling Homes, Kill Real Estate Agents For Doing Business With Them

    And these are simply some of the incidents that we know about.

    On one hand, while many are coming face to face with the threat of death for not converting to Islam, other Christians elsewhere are threatened to convert in other ways that, for some, make life extremely difficult. In many Islamic nations, for instance, everyone must be given an ID card and this ID card specifies what religion you are, such as “M” for Muslim or “C” for Christian or “J” for Jew. For example, “Christian converts and members of minority religions suffer daily discrimination in Egypt, which restricts their access to work, education, travel and healthcare… Every Egyptian over 16 years old must have an ID card which mentions religious belief”. In fact, “an ID card is required for the most basic needs in Egypt — to open a bank account, get a driver’s licence, obtain a pension cheque, enrol at school, get a job, and even for childhood immunisations…” Some Muslims will convert to another faith other than Christianity, but “Muslims who convert to Christianity account for many more and their treatment is often harsher as they are considered to be apostates, which some Muslims see as punishable by death” [8]. And now, since the fall of Hosni Mubarak and the rise of the ‘Egyptian Revolution,’ the situation has worsened dramatically for Jews and Christians. This is where Islamic supremacy veiled in a cloak of ‘democracy’ will take you in a country where Islam is the overwhelming, dominant religion. It’s like Sunni and Shia. It’s like iron and clay. Democracy and Islamism will never fully mix.

    These sort of conditions exist for Jews and Christians all throughout North Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere where Islam dominates or seeks domination, from the Ivory Coast to Nigeria, Sudan, Ethiopia, Tunisia, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Pakistan, Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia, The Maldives, Bangladesh and others.

    When we begin to understand the dire social and economic conditions that Christians are increasingly facing in Islamic nations we then begin to understand that they who will not be able to buy or sell, or are targeted for execution, are those Christians that refuse to submit to Islam both in mind (forehead) and in deed (right hand) yet are forced to remain in Islamic nations during the rise of the Beast. How can a non-Muslim “infidel” — who is often threatened with death — buy or sell if they are not permitted to work and earn money, if they are not granted permits to open a business, if the superior Muslim will refuse to sell to the inferior “dhimmi”? As bad as this situation is now, it is only going to get worse.
    Chi-Xi-Stigma — In The Name of Allah?

    Revelation 13:18, “Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number [is] Six hundred threescore [and] six.”

    Someone asked me once if I believed Walid Shoebat’s theory regarding Revelation 13:18 and “666”. Shoebat says that when he first saw the Greek symbols that are often translated as “666” he immediately recognized that the Greek text closely resembled the Arabic text for “Bismillah”, which translates to “In The Name Of Allah.” His theory is interesting and is something to consider. At the very least, it is prudent to have an open mind to this position, especially given the likelihood that the Mark of the Beast is, in some way, directly related to Islam. Mr. Shoebat and Chuck Missler speak about this possible aspect of chi-xi-stigma here in the following two videos, respectively:

    Sunan Ibn Majah 2763, “The Messenger of Allah [Mohammed] said: ‘Whoever meets Allah with no mark on him (as a result of fighting) in His cause, he will meet Him with deficiency.”

    Although I believe that the Mark of the Beast is primarily a spiritual designator, much like the mark of Christ that is upon the foreheads of the elect, that is not to say, however, that there cannot or will not at times also be a physical indicator that could identify the spiritual designation. In addition to the “battle marks” received while waging Jihad or the “zebibah” (prayer mark) on the foreheads of many devout Muslims, Jihadists typically wear the “Bismallah” on the forehead and on the right arm, which itself is significant because the Greek word translated as “right hand” is dexios which not only means the right hand, but also the right side (the right hand side). In fact, even the Hebrew word “yad” means both hand and arm [7].

    Exegetically and hermeneutically, the “number” (arithmos) of the beast does not necessitate the use of mathematics or gammatria to “reckon” (understand) what it is, something that many prophecy teachers often fall into. The word “arithmos” is used a total of 18 times in the NT, and aside from Rev 5:11 when John refers to the number of living beings he witnesses around the throne of God, every other time “arithmos” is used it is always referring to a group of people. This is significant because it therefore means that the Greek text is better understood as “the multitude of the beast: for it is the multitude of a man.” But what multitude of people would that be and what man are they all following? There is nothing in the text telling us that the man referred to here must be someone alive at that specific time or an end-of-days Antichrist. So what and who is John the Revelator referring to? Significantly, as noted above, “chi-xi-stigma” (often translated as “666”) closely resembles the Arabic Bismallah, which translates to “In The Name Of Allah”. In order to convert to “Allah’s” religion, however, one must recite the Islamic statement of faith, called the Shahada, by declaring that “There is no god but Allah, and MOHAMMED is his messenger.” Without Christ, there can be no Christianity. Likewise, without Mohammed, there can be no Islam.

    Think about it.

    One of the reasons why Muslims hate Christianity is because Christianity associates Jesus with God, making Jesus a co-equal partner with the Almighty. According to Islam, this is called “shirk” and is an unpardonable sin that “Allah” will never forgive. The truth of the matter, however, is that Islam itself also associates the “prophet” Mohammed — whom Muslims claim to be the most “perfect man” to ever walk the face of the earth — with “Allah” himself. On one hand, Islam teaches that “Allah” has no partners, but then contradicts itself by teaching that someone cannot become a Muslim unless they acknowledge that “There is no God but Allah and Mohammed is his messenger” per the Shahada. Unless one acknowledges Mohammed they cannot become a Muslim. In Islam, a Muslim’s “salvation” is therefore entirely determined by their obedience and devotion to Mohammed, effectively elevating the “prophet” of Islam to the same co-equal status of Islam’s own deity. To acknowledge “Allah” is not enough. You MUST acknowledge the “perfect man” Mohammed as well, and failure to do so means that they cannot be counted as part of the Ummah of Islam (Islamic community or nation).

    The multitude of the Beast, which is the multitude of a man, are those who receive the “Mark of the Beast” upon their “foreheads” and are destined for destruction. This is the direct antithesis to the “great multitude” of Rev 7 and 14, which is the multitude of the Lamb that receives the seal of God upon their “foreheads” (Rev 7:3, 14:1) and are destined for redemption (cf Eph 4:30). One multitude is lost and separated from Christ forever (Rev 14:11), the other is saved and received unto Christ (Rev 7:15-17, 19:6-9, 22:2-5) to be with Him always. In light of what we have just learned, it therefore stands to reason that “the multitude of a man” is not referring to an eschatonic Antichrist, but rather to Mohammed — the founder and “prophet” of Islam — and those who follow him whose teachings even today continues to force all those under Islamic rule to worship “Allah” who should otherwise be killed if they refuse.

    Revelation 13:15, “The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed.”

    Knowing that the mark of Christ includes a name upon the seal, it therefore makes sense that the Mark of the Beast could also have a name upon its seal as well. If it is plausible that what John saw was Arabic for “In The Name of Allah” for those who worship the Beast — the antithesis of those who worship God and are sealed with the name of Christ written on their foreheads — then in stark contrast those who worship the Beast and follow the religion of Mohammed could have the name of “Allah” upon theirs, and there would be no doubt about who belongs to who.
    To Whom Do You Belong?

    Revelation 22:3-4, “And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him: And they shall see his face; and his name [shall be] in their foreheads.” (See also Rev 14:1).

    The Ekklesia is “Jerusalem” — the Bride of Christ — and is identified with the kingdom of God. The Ummah is “Mecca” — the “Whore of Babylon” — and is identified with the kingdom of the Beast. It is no secret that al-Qaeda and all like-minded Sunni and Shia terror organizations despise the “apostate” kingdom of Saud, not to mention Iran — a state-sponsor of terror — that is well on its way to obtaining nuclear weapons. These are they who “hate the harlot and will make her desolate and naked, and will eat her flesh and will burn her up with fire” (Rev 17:16). The “Whore of Babylon” has spread radical Islamic ideology throughout the earth and the Beast that she has ridden throughout the centuries will soon turn on her to devour the hand that fed it.

    New insights into Scripture and a review of developments being witnessed on a near daily basis in the Muslim world has lead a growing number of Christians to now recognize that Islam is the religious system of the Last Day’s Antichrist [be it a man or a system] and ideology of the Beast. It is the Adversary’s aim to corrupt and destroy anything that God has created, and this “curse” [alah] is his weapon of mass destruction. There should be no doubt today that we are in the last of the Last Days and as we can see every day in the media, the Judeo-Christian West is being bombarded by the steadily encroaching tentacles of Sharia influence as Islamists take advantage of the West’s accommodating naivete and political correctness by using and abusing the very same democratic freedoms they seek to destroy. While seeking the destruction of the West from within, it is getting increasingly dire for Jews and Christians in the Islamic world. The Beast of this Islamic Empire is coalescing. It is gaining in strength militarily. The Islamist ideology espoused by Al Qaeda and its ilk has metastasized since 9/11 throughout the Muslim world and is seeking to force as many non-Muslims as possible into Islamic submission. Within this kingdom, laws are being enforced or implemented in accordance to Sharia Law to produce your ID card and/or prove you are Muslim in order to buy or sell. If anyone wants to have any semblance of a life they will be forced to convert to Islam if they have not already done so. It may even get to the point where one will be unable to obtain an ID card if they are not Muslim. Want a job? Prove you’re a Muslim. Want a bank account? Prove you’re a Muslim. Want a credit card? A business? A place to live? Prove that you are a Muslim. As radicalization continues to take hold it will also get to the point where either you convert, or you are killed. Indeed, many areas are already at this point today.

    Revised 7/13/2012

    ========================================================

    #787374
    Wakeup
    Participant

    The mark has to be a physical mark, because one can not go shopping using a spiritual id card.
    The bank card we have today is physical; The improved version must be physical.
    Plus the numbers can be counted to add up to 666. Plus also it can be placed into the right hand or into the forehead.
    Watch for them that try to teach that the mark is a spiritual mark; to deliberately deceive the many.
    The sealed are spiritually sealed by the spirit. The deceived will be physically sealed with the mark.

    Who are the greatest antiChrists on this planet?
    The jews; or the muslems?

    wakeup.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 11 months ago by Admin.
    #787395
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    To swear allegiance to a future Islamic Empire, it is not hard to imagine that adherents would wear some kind of badge or distinguishing mark that says, “in the name of Allah”. Christians or Jews wouldn’t want to wear it, thus they could not buy or sell and consequently starve to death or be killed for not wearing it. But of those who did wear it, they would be denying God and the messiah and thus would be eligible for the punishment we read about in scripture.

    We are perhaps witnessing one of the great religious genocides in history. The seven churches of Revelation are now Muslim areas. What happened to the Believers in Jesus Christ? They are all dead. Where are the Christians in the Middle East today? They are small in number and suffering daily great persecution. They are being killed, thrown into prison, and persecuted as they were at other times of tribulation. Pray that they will remain true even unto death.

    An Islamic mark would help an Islamic Kingdom rid themselves of what they consider to be infidels, but in reality are the children of God. A final genocide of Christians in that part of the world.

    Revelation 6:9 
    When the Lamb broke the fifth seal, I saw underneath the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God, and because of the testimony which they had maintained; and they cried out with a loud voice, saying, “How long, O Lord, holy and true, will  you refrain from judging and avenging our blood…

    John 16:2
    They will put you out of the synagogue; in fact, the time is coming when anyone who kills you will think they are offering a service to God.

    #787396
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    You cannot deny the historical facts, no matter how hard you wish this is not true.

    The above pic is historical fact. These are the empires that ruled one after another. There are seven of them.

    The last one died and the end of these empires came to pass. However, there is a concerted effort to resurrect the Islamic Caliphate and we know that the eighth kingdom is of the seventh. A resurrected Jesus told us that this was where Satan’s seat was. Is it a coincidence that the next empire was there? An empire and a religion that denies the Father and the Son as one of their main tenets.

    This is fact and history testifies that this has already happened. No one can disprove it. But even given all that, it is no absolute proof that the Ottoman Empire is one of the heads. Not being able to disprove something doesn’t mean it is true, rather that it could be true.

    If you are a watchman we need to watch. We need to understand the season we live in to know when the Bridegroom is coming. To many he comes as a thief because they were not expecting him in that hour obviously.

    If this is right, we are awaiting the rise of the eighth kingdom that will rule for a very short time.

    #787399
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Thanks Grasshopper. Your post is too big to read now as it is late, but look forward to tomorrow so I can read it.

    🙂

    #787408
    kerwin
    Participant

    @t8,

    The Ottoman/Islamic Empire suffered a deadly wound in the wake of WW1 meaning it ceased to exist as an empire

    The way they set this up makes it seem they believe the other heads are Egypt, Assyria, Babylonia, Media/Persia, Grecian,  and Roman Empire and yet the beast comes out with six heads that have not received a mortal wound even though it is a fact they each of the six like the Ottoman Empire has ceased to exist except for successor states.

    The six heads are not dead but living and the seventh head does not die but is wounded unto death and then escapes death to live again.

     

    #787416
    Wakeup
    Participant

    Kerwin; let me add to your comment.

    1.The big money lenders are NOT muslems, but the antichrists Talmudist Zionists jews.
    2.The UN is not of muslem.(united nations).
    3.The EU are not muslems.(European union).
    4.The CFR is not of muslems.(councel of foreign relations).
    5.The WMF,(world monetary fund) is not muslem.
    6.The bank card system is not brought forth by muslems; but by the west.
    7.The west are the givers; the muslems are the receivers.
    8.The big money lender are the masters over the borrowers.(the nations).
    9.We are paying our tax money to the lenders, to pay the interest of the money borrowed.
    1o.Part of the money goes to Israel, yearly.
    11.The Talmudist Zionists are planning a NWO for the Talmudist Israelis, not Israeli Christians.
    11.The greatest antichrists are the Zionists Talmudist jews, not the muslems.
    The muslems believe in Jesus as a prophet; And Mary as His mother. BUT NOT the Zionists jews.
    12. The Zionists jews are the killers of Christians; by creating wars for profit; They killed prophets: apostles; and the Lord Himself.
    They are still after Christians today; (1).by infiltrating the churches; (2). by brute force, coming to us soon.
    13.We are now under the British empire controlled by Zionists jew bankers; the big money lenders.
    It took them 200yrs to achieve this. The big plan is, to be the masters on this earth; and the goyems(gentiles) their slaves.
    They only need a half a billion slaves. The rest will be culled. But God has His own plan.

    Don’t focus on the muslems; that is just a diversion: focus on the 10 big money lenders, ruling *AS* kings on this earth.
    The Lucifer worshippers. The false prophet will come out of them; appearing as Christ, to deceive Christians and the world.
    Lying wonders(technology) takes a lot of money to develop; muslems don’t have that money, they are just the receivers.

    Please ponder on it. This will make me an enemy to the many of this world, because I am not of this world.
    wakeup.

    #787417
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Kerwin, they are not part of the statue because the vision was given after these first two had past. i.e., two have fallen, five to go.

    John then says that five have fallen, one is, and one to go.

    Today we can say with certainty that six have fallen.

    However, 2000 years or so after his prophecy, it seems that seven have fallen if you count the next kingdom in succession to rule that area.

    We await the rise of the seventh to become the eighth which will rule for a short time and go into perdition.

    Revelation 13:1
    And I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names.

    This single Beast has 7 Heads and the 10 Horns. So what is the meaning of the heads? To save me time writing this down, I conveniently googled this which I think lays it out clearly.

      “After this I kept looking, and behold, another one, like a leopard, which had on its back four wings of a bird; the beast also had four heads, and dominion was given to it.” Daniel 7:6

    As previously mentioned, most students of prophecy are agreed that this beast represents the kingdom of Greece after it was divided into four parts following the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC. This agrees with the prophecy in Daniel 8 which also shows the four fold division of the Greek Empire in the form of 4 Horns on a goat, and specifically identifies Greece (vv. 21-22). In the case of chapter 7’s 4-Headed leopard, then, the Heads are kingdoms.

    As we survey the four kingdoms of both Daniel 2’s statue and Daniel 7’s beasts-that is, Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece, and Rome- we find other references which connect the Heads to kingdoms. Where Revelation 17:9-10 says specifically that the 7 Heads of the Beast are “seven mountains on which the woman sits, and they are seven kings,” we can let scripture interpret scripture by going to Jeremiah 51:25 and find that the “mountain” described in that passage is actually a kingdom!-specifically Babylon. Behold, I am against you, O destroying mountain, Who destroys the whole earth,” declares the LORD, “And I will stretch out My hand against you, And roll you down from the crags And I will make you a burnt out mountain.

    The same result is found when checking out the symbol of the “great mountain” that struck the statue of Daniel 2 and destroyed it. The official interpretation that is given shows it to be the victorious and literal kingdom of Christ in verse 44. Thus the “Mountains” and “Kings” in Revelation 17:910 are seen as Mountain-Kingdoms elsewhere in scripture, with the further connection in the Revelation 17 passage to “Heads.”

    Source: http://focusonjerusalem.com/theidentityofthe7.html

     

Viewing 20 posts - 181 through 200 (of 650 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account