- This topic has 6,414 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 3 weeks ago by
.
- Posts
According to ball earth theory, what is cutting off the legs of the closer platform? Well, it’s obviously the horizon you stupid flattard!
And what is cutting off the legs of the more distant platform? Um… the horizon?
And what is that line well beyond the more distant platform that is separating sea from sky? The line that separates sea from sky is supposed to be the horizon, isn’t it?
3 different horizons in one photo? Yeah well… REFRACTION! So there!
😂🤣😅
D4T: …we couldn’t have been in space simply wrapped up like a kitchen leftover.
Beware Jedi warrior… the force of indoctrination is strong with Tater. 😎
He can’t even bring himself to ponder those lunar lander photos for even a second, and contemplate whether or not crumpled up construction paper, cardboard, Scotch tape, curtain rods, hot glue, and a bunch of aluminum foil could withstand the vacuum of space… let alone a 240,000 mile journey through the most intense heat and cold there is. But when an opened minded person sees that homeless tweaker shelter, they immediately know for a fact that this piece of crap didn’t land on the moon. I still bust out laughing every time I see it! 😂🤣😅
Apollo 13 astronauts have even said that it was so thin they had to be careful not to drop a screwdriver or it’d go right through the floor! Seriously! One of the astronauts said those exact words in an interview! Yeah… that’s going to hold out the vacuum, heat, cold and meteors of space. 😏🙄😣
I looked the the whole moon conspiracy way before Nikon started the flat earth campaign to sell more cameras. (joke).
After watching the case against the lunar landings, I watched the rebuttal. The latter won hands down for me.
As for not believing man went to moon, it is not half as bad as believing the earth is flat. I mean that conspiracy is the most paranoid of all given the evidence against it. Even the Hollow Earth is way more possible.
Flat Earth relies on faulty calcs, huge misunderstandings, and taking multitudes of globe earth proofs out of context. It then replaces all that with specs OS so-called evidence like hey that building should be more hidden than that over water or hey that eclipse is ever so slightly off if the heliocentric model is true. Nevermind that the flat earth has not clue about eclipses and can predict nothing about anything we see in reality regarding the stars, sunlight, Antarctica, etc…
So you were stumped about why 3 people in the Southern Hemisphere, each on the same latitude but a different continent, see the same stars, only rotated.
Your answer, a dome in a dome. The perspective dome causing a refraction type effect you call perspective. And that includes the sun. Oh boy.
When was the last time a plane stayed at scale and sunk below the horizon bottom first because of perspective.
And you really expect me to believe that the stars being rotated isn’t a problem for a flat earth.
Wow. Really, know your limitations. You guys are like a singer on X Factor who thinks he is going to win the competition, but in reality is useless.
Seriously, it is that bad. And it is sad to think that you actually knew this once. But like all cults, you were led astray by doctrines of liars and got suckled in. The term ‘sucker’ applies here.
So now there are two topics for you to discuss, why use a flat non-rotating earth for scientific research and how could it be possible to survive in the vacuum of space in just 2 sheets of tinfoil?
Righto! Let’s make that 3 topics!
NASA, et al, documents using flat earth as a go-to for equations
Vacuum of space against the tinfoil of NASA
Using our own eyes and God-given senses to evaluate the distance of objects in front of the horizon with the horizon behind them (disproving by mathematical means the curve we’ve been lied to about)
Ready set go!
What!? We can see objects that are supposed to be beyond the curve AND we can even see the horizon beyond these objects?!
What kind of magic is this or is it just normal science? Can’t really say it’s coming up and over the horizon because the horizon is in view behind the objects. Can’t say it’s just not that far because these are verified distances. But there it is, an object beyond the curve of the earth.
If we compare several of our topics we can see that this would make sense given the fact that NASA et al uses a non-rotating flat earth to do calculations, you know like rocket science.
As Mike and I have pointed out this is something that we CAN do to verify facts rather than some experiment that only the military or NASA can fake, I mean attempt.
D4T: What!? We can see objects that are supposed to be beyond the curve AND we can even see the horizon beyond these objects?!
What kind of magic is this…
No magic at all… just observable, testable, and repeatable science. Just those two photos of platforms above absolutely destroy the globe. It is no longer even a debate. In the ball model, the ONLY thing cutting off the legs of the closer platform is the horizon. This absolutely MUST BE the case, because the platform is too far away on the ball model to see the entire thing, and so some of it (the bottom of the legs) ABSOLUTELY MUST BE hidden behind the curve/horizon. The ball model makes it a mathematical impossibility that we are seeing where the actual legs meet the actual water. And so the legs of the closer platform MUST BE partially hidden behind the curve of the earth.
But once we apply that mathematical NECESSITY, there is no longer any horizon left to be cutting off the legs of the more distant platform – because there is only one horizon in their model (the physical point where we can no longer see beyond the curve of the ball). So just the combination of both platforms together absolutely eliminate any notion that we live on a globe.
But then there is that pesky THIRD horizon that is well beyond BOTH platforms! It is truly game over, ball believers. And the decisive victory came from REAL science – as opposed to scientism. Thanks for playing. 😎
I am glad I never wasted my time challenging this video. SciManDan eventually got around to it and debunked it.
Another debunk done.
Are there any points left in an undebunked state?
Mike, I’m guessing the removed videos from your channel as evidenced by the videos you linked in this discussion that no longer exist are the ones you were most embarrassed about because they were thoroughly debunked.
So Flat Earthers go to Salton Sea with their $2000 Nikon cameras that globers built to try and see over the curve.
Meanwhile, in the 21st century, Globers will be launching the James Webb telescope to see close to the beginning of the universe.
Bahahaha!
I’m guessing that Chinese electronics firm Xiaomi and Chinese-made cubesat are run by shape-shifting lizards who are lying to us about the flat earth. Either that or the earth is a globe. Hmm. Hard deciding about that one.
https://www.space.com/chinese-smartphone-camera-images-earth-from-space.html
By all means carry on using your 18MP cameras built by globers to fudge or mistake so-called evidence for a flat earth at Salton Sea. And we will continue understanding the Eternal nature of God through the magnificent work of his hands leaving us no excuse in denying the Creator. As it is written, knowledge shall increase and in deed it has. If you choose to live in the stone age then go right ahead, but font blame others when they look at you and roll their eye balls.
t8, you do know that’s not a real video of space right? It’s all make believe, CGI or whatever you want to call it.
However, you choose to reject the Word of God which says specifically that the sun has a circuit and that the sun was commanded to stop for a time.Well, I’ll leave you to your cartoons.
That level of paranoia would have people asking if Australia is not all cgi.
I bet you believe that Australia exists.
It’s the same thing.
You believe Australia exists because there would be too many people involved in the conspiracy and there is no justified reason to BS people regarding Australia’s existence. Same for the Flat Earth.
Too much evidence and too many lying shape shifters involved in the coverup.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
