- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- April 22, 2014 at 12:54 am#378901ProclaimerParticipant
Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 21 2014,12:09) Quote (t8 @ Jan. 26 2014,19:37) Edited James Version (EDJV interpretation):
Jesus was NOT calling Judas 'the devil' nor was Jesus even calling Judas 'a devil'Authorised King James Version (AKJV):
Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?Obviously both your interpretation and the AKJV cannot be correct.
My question: Which is correct?1) Your interpretation of John 6:70;
2) The AKJV translation of this verse.1 or 2.
Not a hard question.
See Ed?t8 knows the choice you must make, and the answer you must give.
Thanks Mike. Ed J is trying to tire me with this and hope that I forget the real question asked.I will copy and paste it here below for Ed J once again. Yet I know he will entertain us further with more dishonest statements to the tune that he has answered the question. But Ed J, there is a contradiction that you need to address. Both your views contradict. Fix it.
QUOTE:
==============
Edited James Version (EDJV interpretation):
Jesus was NOT calling Judas 'the devil' nor was Jesus even calling Judas 'a devil'Authorised King James Version (AKJV):
Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil?Obviously both your interpretation and the AKJV cannot be correct.
My question: Which is correct?1) Your interpretation of John 6:70;
2) The AKJV translation of this verse.1 or 2.
Not a hard question.
==============Quote (Ed J @ April 22 2014,01:47) 1 now please remove the tile
April 22, 2014 at 12:56 am#378902ProclaimerParticipantOkay, tile will be removed in the next 5 minutes.
Next (must answer) question.
Because the AKJV incorrectly (according to your view) adds in an indefinite article, does this mean that this translation is not perfect?
1) Yes, it is not perfect.
2) It is still perfect despite this.April 22, 2014 at 4:46 am#378984Ed JParticipantQuote (t8 @ April 22 2014,11:56) Okay, tile will be removed in the next 5 minutes. Next (must answer) question.
Because the AKJV incorrectly (according to your view) adds in an indefinite article, does this mean that this translation is not perfect?
1) Yes, it is not perfect.
2) It is still perfect despite this.
(Link) - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.