- This topic is empty.
- AuthorPosts
- June 22, 2010 at 2:13 am#199060NickHassanParticipant
Hi MB,
Ignatius is as credible as WJ.
We do not take his ideas too seriouslyJune 22, 2010 at 3:57 am#199085mikeboll64BlockedQuote (Nick Hassan @ June 22 2010,13:13) Hi MB,
Ignatius is as credible as WJ.
We do not take his ideas too seriously
I don't think that is a totally fair assumption. Webster's Dictionary is credible as far as finding definitions of words. But I wouldn't let old man Webster's personal beliefs about God sway me in any way.I know you have to understand this by now, Nick. I've said it over and over. Eusebius and Ignatius are definitely credible for finding out how the Greek language was understood by early Greeks, right? It is not their ideas about God that I care about, just how they used the words.
mike
June 25, 2010 at 6:43 am#199813SimplyForgivenParticipantQuote (mikeboll64 @ June 20 2010,01:10) Quote (SimplyForgiven @ June 19 2010,19:37) Quote (mikeboll64 @ June 19 2010,15:19) It gives me back “monogenes” AND “prototkos pasa ktisis” that they were trying to take away from me.
Mike!They stole your monogenes!!!
It's okay now, Dennison. Ignatius and Eusebius found it and brought it back to me.mike
lol Tell that to a teenager and see them burst out laughing. - AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.