- This topic is empty.
- Posts
Quote (carmel @ Dec. 31 2012,17:19) Quote we all know that scriptures follows up through man's offspring (male ) Terraricca,
You said it, but you don't know WHY AND HOW???
SO:
WHY THROUGH MAN ONLY???
GOD CREATED ADAM ONLY AS : MALE AND FEMALE!!! SCRIPTURE IS CLEAR !!!
REFLECT AND YOU WILL DISCERN THE TRUTH.
I WILL NEVER TELL YOU ,SINCE YOU ARE AFRAID OF THE TRUTH,
SO YOU KEEP ON REFLECTING WITH THE HOPE THAT YOU WILL DISCOVER THE TRUTH!!!
Peace and love in Jesus: MALE AND FEMALE???
Charles
Carmel.Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; MALE AND FEMALE CREATED HE THEM.(one male, and one female).
This can be misinterpreted; and you have done so.
Genesis 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from MAN, made he a WOMAN, and brought HER unto the MAN.
Genesis 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: SHE shall be called WOMAN, because she was taken out of MAN.
We will not have that unisex kind of doctrine.
Stay with the scriptures.wakeup.
Quote (carmel @ Dec. 31 2012,12:19) Quote we all know that scriptures follows up through man's offspring (male ) Terraricca,
You said it, but you don't know WHY AND HOW???
SO:
WHY THROUGH MAN ONLY???
GOD CREATED ADAM ONLY AS : MALE AND FEMALE!!! SCRIPTURE IS CLEAR !!!
REFLECT AND YOU WILL DISCERN THE TRUTH.
I WILL NEVER TELL YOU ,SINCE YOU ARE AFRAID OF THE TRUTH,
SO YOU KEEP ON REFLECTING WITH THE HOPE THAT YOU WILL DISCOVER THE TRUTH!!!
Peace and love in Jesus: MALE AND FEMALE???
Charles
carmelfor ;1Co 11:3 Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
1Co 11:8 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man;
1Co 11:9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.would this answer your question
Quote (Ed J @ May 27 2012,14:36) “The Word” is the really the “HolySpirit”, the traditions of men say otherwise.
So if the sword of the Spirit is the Word of God, then that means you are saying that the Sword of the Spirit is the Word of the Word.That is what you are saying.
The Johannine Comma is found in only eight Greek manuscripts of the New Testament. In four of these eight, the comma is found in the text, in the remaining four it is found in the margin. None of these eight manuscripts are from earlier than 1400 A.D. The King James bible is likely in error with the addition of the Johannine Comma.
Wikipedia:
There are a number of special manuscript notations and entries relating to 1 John 5:7. Vulgate scholar Samuel Berger reports on MS 13174 in the Bibliothèque nationale in Paris that shows the scribe listing four distinct textual variations of the heavenly witnesses. Three are understood by the scribe to have textual lineages of Athanasius, Augustine and Fulgentius.Wikipedia:
Erasmus is said to have replied to his critics that the Comma did not occur in any of the Greek manuscripts he could find, but that he would add it to future editions if it appeared in a single Greek manuscript.[115] Such a manuscript was subsequently produced, some say concocted, by a Franciscan, and Erasmus, true to his word, added the Comma to his 1522 edition, but with a lengthy footnote setting out his suspicion that the manuscript had been prepared expressly to confute him. This Erasmus change was accepted into the Received Text editions, the chief source for the King James Version, thereby fixing the Comma firmly in the English-language scriptures for centuries.Wikipedia:
In the 1808 New Testament in an improved version, upon the basis of Archbishop Newcome's new translation, which did not contain the Comma Johanneum, the editors explained their reasons for rejecting the Textus Receptus for the verse as follows: “1. This text concerning the heavenly witnesses is not contained in any Greek manuscript which was written earlier than the fifteenth century. 2. Nor in any Latin manuscript earlier than the ninth century.[n 69] 3. It is not found in any of the ancient versions. 4. It is not cited by any of the Greek ecclesiastical writers, though to prove the doctrine of the Trinity they have cited the words both before and after this text 5. It is not cited by any of the early Latin fathers, even when the subjects upon which they treat would naturally have led them to appeal to its authority. 6. It is first cited by Virgilius Tapsensis, a Latin writer of no credit, in the latter end of the fifth century, and by him it is suspected to have been forged. [n 70] 7. It has been omitted as spurious in many editions of the New Testament since the Reformation:—in the two first of Erasmus, in those of Aldus, Colinaus, Zwinglius, and lately of Griesbach. 8. It was omitted by Luther in his German version. [n 71] In the old English Bibles of Henry VIII, Edward VI, and Elizabeth, it was printed in small types, or included in brackets: but between the years 1566 and 1580 it began to be printed as it now stands; by whose authority, is not known.”Wikipedia:
- No Comma. μαρτυροῦντες, τὸ πνεῦμα καὶ τὸ ὕδωρ καὶ τὸ αἷμα. [… witnessing, the spirit and the water and the blood.] Select evidence: Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Alexandrinus, Codex Vaticanus, and other codices; Uncial 048, 049, 056, 0142; the text of Minuscules 33, 81, 88, 104, and other minuscules; the Byzantine majority text; the majority of Lectionaries, in particular the menologion of Lectionary 598; the Vulgate (John Wordsworth and Henry Julian White edition and the Stuttgart), Syriac, Coptic (both Sahidic and Bohairic), and other translations; Clement of Alexandria (died 215), Origen (died 254), and other quotations in the Church Fathers.
- The Comma in Greek. All non-lectionary evidence cited: Minuscules Codex Montfortianus (Minuscule 61 Gregory-Aland, c. 1520), 629 (Codex Ottobonianus, 14/15th cent.), 918 (16th cent.), 2318 (18th cent.).
- The Comma at the margins of Greek at the margins of minuscules 88 (Codex Regis, 11th cent. with margins added at the 16th cent.), 221 (10th cent. with margins added at the 15/16th cent.), 429 (14th cent. with margins added at the 16th cent.), 636 (16th cent.); some minority variant readings in lectionaries.
- The Comma in Latin. testimonium dicunt [or dant] in terra, spiritus [or: spiritus et] aqua et sanguis, et hi tres unum sunt in Christo Iesu. 8 et tres sunt, qui testimonium dicunt in caelo, pater verbum et spiritus. [… giving evidence on earth, spirit, water and blood, and these three are one in Christ Jesus. 8 And the three, which give evidence in heaven, are father word and spirit.] All evidence from Fathers cited: Clementine edition of Vulgate translation; Pseudo-Augustine's Speculum Peccatoris (V), also (these three with some variation) Cyprian, Ps-Cyprian, & Priscillian (died 385) Liber Apologeticus. And Contra-Varimadum, and Ps-Vigilius, Fulgentius of Ruspe (died 527) Responsio contra Arianos, Cassiodorus Complexiones in Ioannis Epist. ad Parthos.
Quote (t8 @ Jan. 10 2013,08:58) Quote (Ed J @ May 27 2012,14:36) “The Word” is the really the “HolySpirit”, the traditions of men say otherwise.
So if the sword of the Spirit is the Word of God, then that means you are saying that the Sword of the Spirit is the Word of the Word.That is what you are saying.
Hi T8,Jesus said that the words he spoke were the father's; ………………. (John 12:48-50)
and he also said that the words he spoke were “SPIRIT”. …………… (ref. John 6:63)
Remember, “The Word” is sharper than any two-edged sword. ……. (ref. Heb 4:12)
So the strength of God's Holy Spirit are the very words we speak. … (Luke 21:15)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Jan. 10 2013,11:19) Quote (t8 @ Jan. 10 2013,08:58) Quote (Ed J @ May 27 2012,14:36) “The Word” is the really the “HolySpirit”, the traditions of men say otherwise.
So if the sword of the Spirit is the Word of God, then that means you are saying that the Sword of the Spirit is the Word of the Word.That is what you are saying.
Hi T8,Jesus said that the words he spoke were the father's; ………………. (John 12:48-50)
and he also said that the words he spoke were “SPIRIT”. …………… (ref. John 6:63)
Remember, “The Word” is sharper than any two-edged sword. ……. (ref. Heb 4:12)
So the strength of God's Holy Spirit are the very words we speak. … (Luke 21:15)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
Hi Ed:Quote 1Cr 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. 1Cr 2:10 But God hath revealed [them] unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
1Cr 2:11 For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
1Cr 2:12 Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
1Cr 2:13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
Love in Christ,
MartyHi Marty,
Not sure what point you are trying to make?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote (Ed J @ Jan. 10 2013,14:19) Hi T8, Jesus said that the words he spoke were the father's; ………………. (John 12:48-50)
and he also said that the words he spoke were “SPIRIT”. …………… (ref. John 6:63)
Remember, “The Word” is sharper than any two-edged sword. ……. (ref. Heb 4:12)
So the strength of God's Holy Spirit are the very words we speak. … (Luke 21:15)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
He didn't say that the word he spoke was the Holy Spirit. He said they were spirit.Quote (t8 @ Jan. 13 2013,18:03) Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 10 2013,14:19) Hi T8, Jesus said that the words he spoke were the father's; ………………. (John 12:48-50)
and he also said that the words he spoke were “SPIRIT”. …………… (ref. John 6:63)
Remember, “The Word” is sharper than any two-edged sword. ……. (ref. Heb 4:12)
So the strength of God's Holy Spirit are the very words we speak. … (Luke 21:15)God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
He didn't say that the word he spoke was the Holy Spirit. He said they were spirit.
Hi T8,What “Spirit” do you think “The Word” of God is?
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd wrote:[/quote]
Quote Do you have any questions that you want me to answer? …if so. what are they? Edj,
This what I asked you!
Now since you committed yourself, and comfirmed that:
IN GENESIS 1:26
THE MALE IS 100% MAN
THE FEMALE IS 100% WOMAN
WHERE DOES IT SAY SO???
So I repeat WHY SCRIPTURE NEVER SAID MAN AND WOMAN
BUT
MALE AND FEMALE
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT SCRIPTURE WAS NOT REALLY REFERRING TO MAN AND WOMAN!
SINCE IT WAS A REFERENCE TO ADAM!
READ AND REFLECT:
Genesis 1:5 This is the book of the generation of Adam. In the day that God created man, he made him to the likeness of God. 2 He created them male and female; and blessed them: and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.
Notice: IT IS THE FIFTH CHAPTER, AND ALTHOUGH WE KNOW ALL ABOUT ADAM AND EVE, SCRIPTURE SUSTAINED THE TERM MALE AND FEMALE WHY?
THE GENERATION OF ADAM ONLY! WHY?
In the day God CREATED ADAM ONLY! WHY?
HE MADE HIM TO THE LIKENESS OF GOD! WHY ONLY HIM?
2 HE CREATED THEM MALE AND FEMALE. WHY MALE AND FEMALE, NOT MAN AND WOMAN? obvious he was talking about ADAM ONLY!
AND CALLED THEIR NAME ADAM WHY NOT ADAM AND EVE? because He was not talking about ADAM AND EVE!
SO SCRIPTURE IS REFERRING TO SOMETHING WHICH COULD ALSO SYMBOLICALLY MEAN MALE AND FEMALE.
SO MALE AND FEMALE MEAN BOTH MAN AND WOMAN, AND ALSO
???AND THAT'S WHAT YOU ALL HAVE TO DISCOVER IF YOU REALLY READ SCRIPTURE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AND NOT FOR THE LOVE OF OUR CORRUPTED MIND, AND FLESH!
WHICH IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT,IN FACT IT IS VERY SIMPLE!
I GIVE YOU A HINT:
JESUS DIED FOR THESE MALE AND FEMALE WHICH GOD CREATED ONLY IN ADAM!!!
Peace and love in Jesus
Charles
Hi Charles,
Please enlarge the question part you want me to answer; OK?
I don't have time to critique your understanding of Scripture.God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgEd wrote:[/quote]
Quote I don't have time to critique your understanding of Scripture.
Edj,
ONLY BECAUSE YOU LOVE YOUR FLESH BODY MORE THEN JESUS CHRIST YOUR MEDIATOR,YOUR SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS VERY SIMPLE!
WHAT DID JESUS DIE FOR,AND WHAT DID HE ACQUIRED THROUGH DEATH???
AREN'T THEY MALE AND FEMALE BOTH IN CHRIST HIMSELF THE NEW ADAM???
DIDN'T BOTH DIE IN THE FIRST ADAM???
AREN'T THEY SYMBOLICALLY CREATED IN MAN AND WOMAN, ADAM AND EVE???
ALSO AREN'T BOTH OF THEM FORM US HUMANS REDEEMED THROUGH JESUS'DEATH???
AREN'T BOTH OF THEM IN CONTINUOUS BATTLE DUE TO THIS FILTHY BLOOD, WHICH NEVER INHERITS GOD'S KINGDOM???
NOW YOU HAVE ALL CLRIFICATIONS TO DISCERN THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT MALE AND FEMALE ARE MEANT TO BE IN GENESIS 1:26
Peace and love in Jesus
Charles
Quote (carmel @ Jan. 27 2013,12:39) Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 26 2013,18:52) Quote I don't have time to critique your understanding of Scripture.
Edj,
ONLY BECAUSE YOU LOVE YOUR FLESH BODY MORE THEN JESUS CHRIST YOUR MEDIATOR,YOUR SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IT IS VERY SIMPLE!
WHAT DID JESUS DIE FOR,AND WHAT DID HE ACQUIRED THROUGH DEATH???
AREN'T THEY MALE AND FEMALE BOTH IN CHRIST HIMSELF THE NEW ADAM???
DIDN'T BOTH DIE IN THE FIRST ADAM???
AREN'T THEY SYMBOLICALLY CREATED IN MAN AND WOMAN, ADAM AND EVE???
ALSO AREN'T BOTH OF THEM FORM US HUMANS REDEEMED THROUGH JESUS'DEATH???
AREN'T BOTH OF THEM IN CONTINUOUS BATTLE DUE TO THIS FILTHY BLOOD, WHICH NEVER INHERITS GOD'S KINGDOM???
NOW YOU HAVE ALL CLRIFICATIONS TO DISCERN THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT MALE AND FEMALE ARE MEANT TO BE IN GENESIS 1:26
Peace and love in Jesus
Charles
CHARLESQuote AREN'T THEY MALE AND FEMALE BOTH IN CHRIST HIMSELF THE NEW ADAM??? ; the fact that there his no more female and male in Christ is because before under the law it was only the man that was the leader ;
but under Christ this as disappeared we are all looking to God as individuals facing our own live and so our redemption will be not according to our gender but according to our faith in Christ and his father ,
terraricca,Jan. wrote:[/quote]
Quote the fact that there his no more female and male in Christ is because before under the law it was only the man that was the leader ; Terraricca,
I appreciate your EFFORT, but I'm afraid it has nothing to do regarding the male and female in Genesis 1:26
BUT PERSEVER AND AT THE END YOU WILL SUCCEED???
Peace abd love in Jesus
Charles
Quote (Ed J @ Jan. 27 2013,18:10) Hi Pierre, Good post.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.orgQuote Hi Pierre, Good post.
Edj,
I am waiting for yours!
Don't forget this post
Edj,
You concluded that Jesus was 50% son of man and 50% son of God!
Now I asked whether the MALE is 100% human and the FEMALE is 100% human in Genesis 1:26!
I started from there purposely to establish if what you stated is true!
So:
IS THE MALE FULLY MAN
IS THE FEMALE FULLY WOMAN
AFTER ALL THAT IS THE MAN GOD CREATED NO???
Edj,
You also stated:
Hi Charles,
That is not what I said, no wonder you have difficulty
understanding Scripture. Here is a refresher course for you…You cannot have 200% of anything! DO'T FORGET THIS!!!!
Quote 1) OK
2) No
Jesus is “The Son”,
who is composed of
“The Spirit of Christ” …(Link)
and was baptized with
the “HolySpirit” at Jordan. …(See Acts 10:38)
And thus fulfilling John 1:14..
Edj,
Quote Jesus is “The Son” YES! BUT AS A SPIRIT HE WAS, the WORD, WHO WAS WITH GOD, AND WAS GOD! AND BECAME FLESH SUSBSTANCE FIRST AS MARY THROUGH CREATION IN ORDER TO PERFECT THE ONLY CARNAL BEING BORN OF BOTH MALE AND FEMALE, MAN AND WOMAN!!! JOACHIN AND ANN.
SATAN WAS CONVINCED THAT THIS WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO HAPPEN.
SO JESUS'SPIRIT THROUGH THE POWER OF THE HOLY GHOST,FIRST SANCTIFIED THE MARRIAGE BETWEEN MAN AND WOMAN THROUGH HIMSELF WHENN HE WAS BORN AS FLESH OF THE WOMAN!!! THE ONLY WAY TO TOPPLE EVE'S EVIL FLESH SUBSTANCE FIRST! SATAN'S SUBSTANCE.
THAT'S WHY HE IS THE FIRSTBORN OF EVERY KIND OF CREATURE. SO HE HIMSELF, HIS SPIRIT, HAD TO BE THE FLESH OF THE FIRSTBORN WOMAN WITHOUT SIN THROUGH NATURE,CREATION!!!
THIS WAS VITAL FOR THE REDEMPTION OF THE WOMAN, IT IS A PROOF THAT GOD THROUGH JESUS' SPIRIT FROM CORRUPTED NATURE WITH SATAN'S SPIRIT IN IT,STILL PURIFIED A WOMAN FOR HIMSELF ALONE,HIS SPOUSE, SYMBOLICALLY MOTHER EARTH, MOTHER OF ALL THE LIVINGS,THE WHOLE CREATION IN MARY'S FLESH BODY!!!
Genesis 3:15 I ( GOD,THROUGH THE HOLY GHOST)will put enmities between thee and the woman, ( MARY)and thy seed and her/HIS seed: ( JESUS' SPIRIT AS THE FLESH OF MARY)she/HE shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her/HIS heel
Colossians 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that IN ALL THINGS HE MAY HOLD THE PRIMACY:
Quote who is composed of
“The Spirit of Christ”NO, THE SPIRIT OF CHRIST IS THE FRUIT BY THE HOLY GHOST FROM THE FATHER,WHO CONCEIVED MARY,EX WORD'S SPIRIT,THE SON'S,AND PRODUCED
JESUS' FLESH SUBSTANCE, OBVIOUS FROM MARY,
AND JESUS' SOUL,OBVIOUS THE HOLY GHOST HIMSLEF,
IN ORDER FOR THE FATHER TO ABIDE IN HIS FULLNESS WITHIN!!!
Quote and was baptized with
the “HolySpirit” at Jordan. …(See Acts 10:38)
And thus fulfilling John 1:14.NO! HE WAS BAPTIZED BY JOHN THE BAPTIST,IN ORDER FOR THE HOLY GHOST TO REMOVE SATAN'S SPIRIT FROM JESUS' SOUL,SINCE HE WAS BORN IN ALL THINGS LIKE HIS BRETHREN.
Matthew 3:14 But John stayed him, saying: I ought to be baptized by thee, and comest thou to me?
NOTICE JOHN SAID TO JESUS I OUGHT TO BE BAPTIZED BY YOU THIS TO BE AWARE THAT JOHN THE MOST PERFECT MAN EVER PURPOSELY BORN OF A WOMAN BAPTIZED JESUS NOT THE HOLY GHOST.
UP TO THAT MOMENT IN TIME, BECAUSE GOD IS JUST AND PERFECT,AND HE WAS NOT CONFIRMED AS GOD IN FLESH THROUGH THE DEATH OF JESUS YET,ONLY MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL HAD ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY OVER SATAN, AND HE HAD TO REMOVE HIM FROM JESUS' SOUL, AND ALSO FROM ALL THOSE WHO REPENT!!!
JESUS'SPIRIT WAS AND IS ETERNALLY IN THE FULL POWER OF GOD, EVEN IN THAT MOMENT IN TIME HE LEFT HIS FATHER TO CREATE ALL,BUT SINCE HE WAS ALWAYS HIDDEN IN LUCIFER'S SPIRIT,HE HAD TO BE BORN AS MAN FIRST IN ORDER TO JUSTIFY HIS DOMINION OVER SATAN, AND REMOVE THROUGH BAPTIZM THE EVIL SPIRIT FROM HIS SOUL AND ESTABLISH HIMSELF AS GOD/MAN.ON SATAN'S HOME GROUND:LUCIFER'S DREAM AMBITION TO BECOME LIKE THE MOST HIGH!!!
Mark 3:27 No man can enter into the house ( THE WORLD)of a STRONG MAN (SATAN) and rob him of his goods,( SOULS) unless he first bind ( IN HELL)the strong man, and then shall he plunder his house.
John 15:1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman.
2Every branch in me that beareth not fruit
HOW COME THE SON OF GOD HAVE BRANCHES THAT BEAR NO FRUIT?, OBVIOUS, SATAN'S SPIRIT IN HIS SOUL!!!
he taketh away: ( THROUGH THE HOLY GHOST)
and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
OBVIOUS AGAIN THROUGH THE UNIFICATION OF HIS FLESH BODY WITH THE HOLY GHOST AND GLORIFIED AS ONE BEING BOTH SPIRIT AND FLESH,after His resurraction.
Luke 24:39 See my hands and feet, that it is I myself; handle, and see: for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as you see me to have.
Peace and love in Jesus
Charles
Quote (carmel @ Jan. 27 2013,17:46) terraricca,Jan. wrote:[/quote]
Quote the fact that there his no more female and male in Christ is because before under the law it was only the man that was the leader ; Terraricca,
I appreciate your EFFORT, but I'm afraid it has nothing to do regarding the male and female in Genesis 1:26
BUT PERSEVER AND AT THE END YOU WILL SUCCEED???
Peace abd love in Jesus
Charles
charlesI watching last night a documentary on “our guts” how it works and what it does,it was very interesting ;but I have already lived 72 years before I could now understand that part ,so my question is ;did it matter if i know or not how my guts works
no ,not really ,it is only one more info,AND THAT IS WHAT I THINK ABOUT YOUR INFO ON MALE AND FEMALE IN GENESES ,IT LOOKS MORE TO ME THAT YOU TRY TO ANALYZE YOU TRAIN TICKET COMPOSITION MORE THAN THE TRIP THAT YOU ARE ON THE WAY TO TAKE ,
Quote (carmel @ Jan. 27 2013,22:54) Edj, I am waiting for yours!
Don't forget this post
Edj,
(1) You concluded that Jesus was 50% son of man and 50% son of God!
(2) Now I asked whether the MALE is 100% human and the FEMALE is 100% human in Genesis 1:26!
I started from there purposely to establish if what you stated is true!
So:
IS THE MALE FULLY MAN
IS THE FEMALE FULLY WOMAN
AFTER ALL THAT IS THE MAN GOD CREATED NO???
Hi Charles,1) Please pay attention:
“Son of man” means his mother was of Mankind.
“Son of God” means his father was of Godkind.
Note: I made up the term “Godkind” for your understanding.
2) Jesus could not be 100% human, since God(HolySpirit) was his father.
God bless
Ed J (Joshua 22:34)
http://www.holycitybiblecode.org
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
