Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 1,721 through 1,740 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68402
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 15 2007,01:29)

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 14 2007,14:21)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 13 2007,20:31)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 14 2007,02:02)
    The Father used Mary as HE used the earth to create life. That's what makes Jesus the second Adam. Born without sin.


    Bro,

    Can you elaborate on this for me? How did he use Mary? Thanks.


    Not3,

    Here's something, and it just recently occurred to me. Read John 3 and keep the virgin birth of Yeshua in mind. Do so with an open mind and heart and I think the Spirit may tell you something.


    Kevin,
    I'm still curious what you found. Will you share it with me, please? Thanks, Mandy


    I must be going soon, but Morningstar is heading in the right direction I think. Just remember that the Gospel of John is very symbolic.

    #68404
    PatBiglane
    Participant

    Not3in1: Mandy, you mentioned that Jesus didn't need to be born again in order to see the kingdom of God, but the he merely instructed others of their necessity. May I encourage you to consider prayerfully – and research wise – what the meaning of the saying Jesus spoke [at a time period WELL AFTER he had been baptized of John] when Jesus said, “I have a baptism to be baptized of, and Oh how I straightened until it be accomplished!”

    #68405
    kenrch
    Participant

    I don't understand how Jesus could be any more than the first Adam and His sacrifice be valid?

    Was Jesus a “supernatural” human? If so then Satan was tempting God? Was the first Adam God?

    Isn't this speaking “after” His resurrection?

    1Co 15:42 So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption; it is raised in incorruption:
    1Co 15:43 It is sown in dishonour; it is raised in glory: it is sown in weakness; it is raised in power:
    1Co 15:44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.

    1Co 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

    1Co 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.

    1Co 15:47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

    1Co 15:48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.

    1Co 15:49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

    The first Adam walked with God the second Adam was filled with God. So Satan tempts the flesh. Unlike the first Adam the second Adam~ the son of MAN~obeyed God and did not submit to His flesh.

    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing! That doesn't sound “supernatural”. If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.

    Hey give me a supernatural body and lets see what I can do?

    If Jesus preexisted then He was Michael the archangel. As far as I know Michael is the only one mentioned in scripture that is close to being a preexisted Jesus.

    God breathed life into the first Adam and Adam became the first living human soul. He wasn't walking mud was he? He became flesh. I the beginning was the Word according to strong Word means “thought”. If you have a thought I believe it is safe to say a plan. So in the beginning God had the thought of the son of man, a second Adam, and we IN HIM.

    Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
    Eph 1:5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,

    Jesus the son of man was the only human walking the earth who had no sin just as Adam walked the earth with no sin before his fall.
    Was the first Adam “a” only son of the Creator? Created with no sin just as Jesus.

    We are forgiven of our sin. That is, our sin is forgotten and IF FORGOTTEN then our sin ceased to exist. The Father gives sin NO THOUGHT.

    God sustains all of us If the Father were to clear His mind of you and I then we would not exist. Just as you have things in your mind that you do not constantly think about BUT is still there in your mind SO it is with the Father HE has everything…the universe and everything in it is in the Father's mind.

    God “calls” things that are not as though they are and once He does that then what ever He calls comes into existence.

    Heb 11:3 By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.

    2Co 4:18 as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.

    Rom 4:17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, [U]and calleth those things which be not as though they were. [/U

    #68409
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Morningstar @ Oct. 15 2007,19:36)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 15 2007,19:14)
    Being born-again flesh counts for nothing, MS.  Flesh gives birth to flesh, and flesh and blood will not inherit the Kingdom.


    I was simply guessing at what Kevin wanted you to see in John 3.


    Gottcha :;):

    Thank you…..

    #68410
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (PatBiglane @ Oct. 16 2007,00:42)
    when Jesus said, “I have a baptism to be baptized of, and Oh how I straightened until it be accomplished!”


    Can you tell me, please, where this is in scripture? Thanks so much for all your insight. I am listening closely…..

    #68411
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 16 2007,00:15)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 15 2007,01:29)

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 14 2007,14:21)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 13 2007,20:31)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 14 2007,02:02)
    The Father used Mary as HE used the earth to create life. That's what makes Jesus the second Adam. Born without sin.


    Bro,

    Can you elaborate on this for me?  How did he use Mary?  Thanks.


    Not3,

    Here's something, and it just recently occurred to me. Read John 3 and keep the virgin birth of Yeshua in mind. Do so with an open mind and heart and I think the Spirit may tell you something.


    Kevin,
    I'm still curious what you found.  Will you share it with me, please?  Thanks, Mandy


    I must be going soon, but Morningstar is heading in the right direction I think. Just remember that the Gospel of John is very symbolic.


    MorningStar's explaination would require that Jesus be preexistent (firstborn) and then born of Mary.

    Kevin, I don't believe this is something you embrace, unless of course you are changing your view (you're allowed to do that :D )

    When you have time, I'd still love to hear what YOU found! You have me on pins and needles waiting to hear. Ha!

    #68412
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8…..> you've totally misunderstood what i was saying. Where did i say I had the Form of God, but if i have the Spirit of God then i have the (Nature) of God in me, like Jesus did. “Let this mind be in you which was in Christ Jesus our Lord”, that mind is the mind of God,”For He (GOD) works in us to WILL and do His Pleasure”, The spirit of God is the Nature of GOD in us. It say's “being transformed by the renewing of you minds.Your nature is the way you think.

    I will even go futher and say if you don't have the nature of God in you, you are none of His. Howsoever has not the Spirit of God is none of His. What do you think the nature of God is if it's not the spirit we recieved. And if we have recieved it then its in Us, or do you think Jesus had a different Spirit then God Gives us.

    No where did i say i preexisted in any form that i know of at lest, except in the forknowledge or predestination of God perhaps, even that i am not sure of.

    You saying i am speaking as a Trinitarian is simply untrue, Infact you are more in line with there thinking then I, because you believe in an incarnated Jesus, I don't, and have expressed that many times here.

    You took what i wrote and changed it to come out the way you wanted it to. If you believe Jesus preexisted in some other form and was incarnated in to flesh thats you right to 99% of christanity does also. I personally do not believe He did.

    I as well a Kejonn, and Ken, and others Have shown direct scriptures that backup our claim that Jesus came into existence through the way the LORD said he would, If you choose to read into scripture what is not spicifially said, then that your problem.

    thats just the way i see it t8…….peace to you…..gene

    #68413
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 16 2007,01:38)
    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing! That doesn't sound “supernatural”. If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.


    Why was his sacrifice not valid?

    Jesus bore in his flesh the totality of our sins, and his body was sacrificed once and for all.

    Here is a question for you, Ken, as I have been following your posts here (some good stuff) – what makes you think that Jesus is just a man? Remember that he had a human for a mother, but his father is God Almighty! What would that combination produce? Thanks.

    #68414
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 15 2007,22:15)
    We go from physical to spiritual and that means that we are not being humbled so to speak, but will be exalted in God's time. For the spiritual body is greater than the physical.

    Christ emptied himself and partook of the flesh. He made himself nothing.


    Hi t8,
    This above quote is of some interest to me because it appears that your first sentences are saying one thing, while your last sentence about Christ seems to say another?   I know that you believe that Jesus preexisted in a spirit form – I am correct to believe this, right?  And if you do hold to this belief, your above quote is misleading.

    You say that the physical comes first, then the spiritual.  But according to your Jesus, the spiritual came first, then the physical, then back to the spiritual again.  It appears there is an extra step in your theory?  I offer that the extra step is the preexistent Jesus.

    1 Corinthians 15:43-46, in part
    …..it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.

    The spiritual did not come first, but the natural, and after that the spiritual.

    It appears to me that the scriptures say the natural came first *then* the spiritual.  While you contend that the spiritual came first *then* the natural (because you say that Jesus existed as a spirit before coming to be a man).  This is an opposite teaching of the above scriptures.  I may be confused, and ask that you clarify for me and others.  Thanks, brother.

    #68416

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,04:36)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 16 2007,01:38)
    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing!  That doesn't sound “supernatural”.  If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.


    Why was his sacrifice not valid?

    Jesus bore in his flesh the totality of our sins, and his body was sacrificed once and for all.

    Here is a question for you, Ken, as I have been following your posts here (some good stuff) – what makes you think that Jesus is just a man?  Remember that he had a human for a mother, but his father is God Almighty!  What would that combination produce?  Thanks.


    Mandy

    God and man!

    Not man and something else.

    :)

    #68417
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Quote
    You still have not addressed Luke 1:35.


    Kejonn;

    Per your request, Luke 1:35 “… and he shall be called the Son of God.” Gabriel is telling Mary the child she is to bear will be called the Son of God. What else would he be called? He is the Son of God.

    I've proposed a few scriptures to you as well, including but not limited to the following;

    John 1:15, 30 “After me cometh a man that is preferred before me because he was before me.”

    John 6 Jesus says he came down from heaven five times. You say don't take this literally. He could have come down in the form of an adult, but for the scripture to be fulfilled he was made of a woman. He was incarnated by the Holy Spirit, just as the Father and Son are incarnate in us by the Holy Spirit. Jesus ends the passage by stating he would ascend up to where he was before.

    Question- If Christ did not pre-exist and he was going back to where he was before, where could he go if he didn't exist?

    Jesus told Mary Magnelene that he was ascending to his Father, but you say he wasn't there before. How is that? Do any of the apostles state when the Lord comes we are going to where we were before?

    Perhaps the truth that could uncloud the issue would be to ask a simple question. How many origins can any person have? The entire book of John has a few themes wolven throughout, so I'll name a few.

    Who sent Jesus Christ? I'm sure we agree the Father sent him. Jesus said he came by commandment to perform the work of God.

    What was the purpose of Christ? Everlasting Life for those who believe.

    Where was Christ going after his work on earth was complete? Back to the Father. He said he knew where he came from. If he didn't pre-exist how would he know that.

    Who was Jesus Christ? I believe that you will agree he is the Son of God.

    Where did he come from? I contend that a person only has one origin. This issue was addressed by Christ many times. He always answered the Father sent him from heaven. He came down from heaven, he is above all, etc. How come he never mentions his virgin birth? I contend it was because that was not his origin. Jesus cannot have more than one origin. On the occasion in John where Jesus' mother tells him they are out of wine, do you remember his response? Woman what do I have to do with you, my hour is not yet come. Why did John believe that this was important to write? I believe it was because with respect to the origin of Christ, Jesus wanted to make it clear his origin was from heaven not from the earth.

    When he came to earth that was not his origin. John the Baptist said he that is of the earth is earthly, but he said he that came from above is above all and speaks the words of God. The only reasonable interpretation of John the Baptist is that he believed Christ pre-existed. There's nothing ambiguous here. Paul writes similar scriptures in Corinthians

    When Jesus spoke in types and parables he gave interpretations to his disciples. When they misunderstood what he meant, the scriptures provide that they understood not. For instance, when they asked him who he was requesting another sign, he responded, “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” The scripture says they understood not that he spoke of the temple of his body. Or, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, they thought it was because they forgot bread. Jesus said the leaven was the hypocrisy of the Pharisees. These issues are clarified in scripture.

    When Jesus said he came down from heaven. They murmered and said we know his mother and father, how is is that he came down from heaven? They understood what he said and posed the same question I have for you, how can he originate from earth and heaven, too. There is no indication in scripture that this was a type not to be taken for truth.

    When he spoke of eating his flesh and blood, he explained the words I speak unto you are spirit and life. What Jesus was teaching was first to believe what he said and to grow by the word.
    He ends the passage by stating he will be returning to where he was before.

    Again, if he wasn't in heaven before where did he return to. If his origin is in Mary, Nicodemus posed a question that is a little amusing, Can a man enter a second time into his mother's womb? You haven't suggested that, but that is the only other option, or the foreknowledge of God. We all existed in the foreknowledge of God, even those who don't believe, but none of the apostles claim that we are returning to where we were before suggesting any of us pre-existed.

    If he did not pre-exist in the bosom of the Father, why does John say he did? Jesus himself says he is the only one that has ever seen God. When was that if he didn't pre-exist? There's no foreknowledge there.

    He's on the right hand of the throne of God now.

    Take Care

    Steven

    #68420
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 16 2007,04:56)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,04:36)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 16 2007,01:38)
    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing!  That doesn't sound “supernatural”.  If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.


    Why was his sacrifice not valid?

    Jesus bore in his flesh the totality of our sins, and his body was sacrificed once and for all.

    Here is a question for you, Ken, as I have been following your posts here (some good stuff) – what makes you think that Jesus is just a man?  Remember that he had a human for a mother, but his father is God Almighty!  What would that combination produce?  Thanks.


    Mandy

    God and man!

    Not man and something else.

    :)


    Your answer is a bit confusing. Do you mean that within Jesus there is God AND man and they are co-existing together? I believe this is the incarnation belief. It is not mine. I don't believe scripture supports this theory either.

    #68427

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,05:11)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 16 2007,04:56)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,04:36)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 16 2007,01:38)
    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing!  That doesn't sound “supernatural”.  If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.


    Why was his sacrifice not valid?

    Jesus bore in his flesh the totality of our sins, and his body was sacrificed once and for all.

    Here is a question for you, Ken, as I have been following your posts here (some good stuff) – what makes you think that Jesus is just a man?  Remember that he had a human for a mother, but his father is God Almighty!  What would that combination produce?  Thanks.


    Mandy

    God and man!

    Not man and something else.

    :)


    Your answer is a bit confusing.  Do you mean that within Jesus there is God AND man and they are co-existing together?  I believe this is the incarnation belief.  It is not mine.  I don't believe scripture supports this theory either.


    Mandy

    You know what I mean.

    You are not being very clear as to what Jesus is. You are arguing that Jesus is not a mere man, but that he is something else. Like t8 you are being vague as to what he is.

    Since God by his Spirit caused Mary to concieve then what part of the conception is God? What does that make Jesus?

    If you say a 'Son of God” then he is no different than us right?

    ???

    #68428
    kejonn
    Participant

    Steve,

    Luke 1:35 is not just “and he shall be called the Son of God”.

    (ESV)  And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy–the Son of God.

    (ISV)  The angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come over you, and the power of the Most High will cover you. Therefore, the child will be holy and will be called the Son of God.

    (KJV)  And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God

    (NASB)  The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.

    (WNT)  The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for this reason your holy offspring will be called 'the Son of God.'

    In each case, the connecting word or phrase, “therefore” or “and for that reason” points back to why he would be called the Son of God: because of the conception of the Holy Spirit and Mary. And before you say that the conception was not mention in Luke, again, you must balance scripture and not form theology in isolation.

    Mat 1:20  But when he had considered this, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, “Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary as your wife; for the Child who has been conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit.

    Luke 1:35 does NOT– nor does Mat 1:20 — say “the Son of God will be injected into Mary”. In Luke 1:35, the angel says that he shall be (future tense because he had not been born yet) called the Son of God, not that he IS the Son of God.

    You are so dead set on believing he was the Son of God before he camse that you won't even read what is plainly written in Luke 1:35.

    #68430
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Hi Kejonn;

    Thank you for your response. It's not that I'm dead set against believing that Jesus was not the Son of God prior. I base my belief upon what I believe to be clearer evidence that Jesus was the Son of God prior based on all the scriptures cited in John by John the Baptist, Jesus, and the apostles.

    Again, if he wasn't in heaven prior, to what state did he return? I believe that's a weightier question that deserves serious consideration because Christ spoke so much about who he was and where he was from and where he was returning.

    Nonetheless, there are many people that contend that Jesus did not come down from heaven, or that he was above all, or that he existed prior as the Son of God, or that he was the Lord from heaven.

    Some do not even believe in worshipping Jesus as the Son of God, or that Christ is our savior because Isaiah says only God is our Savior.

    I contend if he did not exist prior as the Son of God, then he did not exist prior.

    Take Care

    Steven

    #68433
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 15 2007,12:07)

    Quote
    You still have not addressed Luke 1:35.


    Kejonn;

    Per your request, Luke 1:35 “… and he shall be called the Son of God.” Gabriel is telling Mary the child she is to bear will be called the Son of God.  What else would he be called?  He is the Son of God.  

    I've proposed a few scriptures to you as well, including but not limited to the following;

    John 1:15, 30 “After me cometh a man that is preferred before me because he was before me.”


    Already answered.

    Quote
    John 6 Jesus says he came down from heaven five times.  You say don't take this literally.  He could have come down in the form of an adult, but for the scripture to be fulfilled he was made of a woman.  He was incarnated by the Holy Spirit, just as the Father and Son are incarnate in us by the Holy Spirit.  Jesus ends the passage by stating he would ascend up to where he was before.


    No, he was not incarnated, he was conceived. Those two words are not the same. Were you incarnated or conceived?

    And the second part of your explanation is not comparable. Jesus and God are NOT incarnate in us. You speak of this, but you've provided no evidence of them being “incarnate” in us. I really think you are looking for a different word but have yet to find it and are therefore using “incarnate” erroneously.

    Quote
    Question- If Christ did not pre-exist and he was going back to where he was before, where could he go if he didn't exist?


    Already answered. The context of this passage is his resurrection. Even so, you purport that Yeshua was the Son of God beforee his birth. Why then did he specifically choose “Son of Man” in John 6:62?

    Joh 6:62  “What then if you see the Son of Man ascending to where He was before?

    In light of this verse, will you then say that he was “Son of Man” before he was inserted into Mary's womb? But he was “Son of Man” before he died, and he was again “Son of Man” afte the resurrection AND in heaven!

    Mat 26:64  Jesus said to him, “You have said so. But I tell you, from now on you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.”

    Quote
    Jesus told Mary Magnelene that he was ascending to his Father, but you say he wasn't there before.  How is that?  Do any of the apostles state when the Lord comes we are going to where we were before?  


    Already explained many times.

    Quote
    Perhaps the truth that could uncloud the issue would be to ask a simple question.  How many origins can any person have?  The entire book of John has a few themes wolven throughout, so I'll name a few.  

    Who sent Jesus Christ?  I'm sure we agree the Father sent him.  Jesus said he came by commandment to perform the work of God.

    What was the purpose of Christ? Everlasting Life for those who believe.

    Where was Christ going after his work on earth was complete?  Back to the Father.  He said he knew where he came from.  If he didn't pre-exist how would he know that.  


    Well, let's see…the Holy Spirit is of God, God is in heaven…I think that he could have figured it out rather easily, don't you?

    Quote
    Who was Jesus Christ? I believe that you will agree he is the Son of God.

    Where did he come from?  I contend that a person only has one origin.  This issue was addressed by Christ many times.  He always answered the Father sent him from heaven.  He came down from heaven, he is above all, etc.  How come he never mentions his virgin birth?


    Why? Who knows. Why do you avoid his virgin birth? It is part of scripture too. It seems to be the one part of the life of Yeshua that you want to ignore because “conception” is involved, and not “incarnation”.

    Quote
    I contend it was because that was not his origin.  Jesus cannot have more than one origin.  On the occasion in John where Jesus' mother tells him they are out of wine, do you remember his response?  Woman what do I have to do with you, my hour is not yet come.  Why did John believe that this was important to write?  I believe it was because with respect to the origin of Christ, Jesus wanted to make it clear his origin was from heaven not from the earth.


    And it was. Is the Holy Spirit and the Father from earth, or heaven? But you like to neglect Mary being his mother. Do you believe ALL of the Bible, or just the parts that support your theology? Paul doesn't ignore it.

    Rom 1:3  concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh,

    Gal 4:4  But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law

    Quote
    When he came to earth that was not his origin.  John the Baptist said he that is of the earth is earthly, but he said he that came from above is above all and speaks the words of God.  The only reasonable interpretation of John the Baptist is that he believed Christ pre-existed. There's nothing ambiguous here.  Paul writes similar scriptures in Corinthians


    What you mean to say is that in your mind the only reasonable interpretation is this. That is because this is what you are convinced of, so that is what you see. No problem with that. But in doing so, you are still neglecting the whole of the Bible. And since the Holy Spirit and God ARE from above, then being born of the Holy Spirit is from above! I don't know why you struggle with the fact that Yeshua had a human mother but not a human father.

    Quote
    When Jesus spoke in types and parables he gave interpretations to his disciples.  When they misunderstood what he meant, the scriptures provide that they understood not.  For instance, when they asked him who he was requesting another sign, he responded, “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.”  The scripture says they understood not that he spoke of the temple of
    his body.  Or, beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, they thought it was because they forgot bread.  Jesus said the leaven was the hypocrisy of the Pharisees.  These issues are clarified in scripture.


    As they did not understand the John 6 passage. Look:

    Joh 6:60  Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, “This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?”
    Joh 6:61  But Jesus, conscious that His disciples grumbled at this, said to them, “Does this cause you to stumble?
    Joh 6:62  “What then if you see the Son of Man ascending to where He was before?
    Joh 6:63  “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life.

    When was Yeshua given life by the Spirit? Upon resurrection! His Father raised him up on the third day and restored his life. The same word used for “ascend”, “anabaino” is also used when Yeshua came up from the baptismal waters

    Mat 3:16  After being baptized, Jesus came up [“anabaino”] immediately from the water; and behold, the heavens were opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove and lighting on Him,

    Don't forget that baptism is a symbol for death of our own self and resurrection to the new.

    Quote
    When Jesus said he came down from heaven.  They murmered and said we know his mother and father, how is is that he came down from heaven?  They understood what he said and posed the same question I have for you, how can he originate from earth and heaven, too.  There is no indication in scripture that this was a type not to be taken for truth.


    Which passage was this? You are often not forthcoming with scripture references.

    Quote
    When he spoke of eating his flesh and blood, he explained the words I speak unto you are spirit and life.  What Jesus was teaching was first to believe what he said and to grow by the word.
    He ends the passage by stating he will be returning to where he was before.


    Where was his flesh and blood sacrificed? Would this mean anything if Yeshua had not died for our sins and was then resurrected?

    Quote
    Again, if he wasn't in heaven before where did he return to.  If his origin is in Mary, Nicodemus posed a question that is a little amusing, Can a man enter a second time into his mother's womb?  You haven't suggested that, but that is the only other option, or the foreknowledge of God.  We all existed in the foreknowledge of God, even those who don't believe, but none of the apostles claim that we are returning to where we were before suggesting any of us pre-existed.  


    That is because — and I can't understand that you don't see that no other living being has ever been physically conceived of a woman and the Holy Spirit, but ignore to your hearts content — his earthly conception was by the Holy Spirit of God from heaven. Can you name me another who had this type of conception?

    Quote
    If he did not pre-exist in the bosom of the Father, why does John say he did?  Jesus himself says he is the only one that has ever seen God. When was that if he didn't pre-exist?  There's no foreknowledge there.


    John never said that. Here is what he said

    Joh 1:18  No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

    When did John write this? Was Yeshua not already in heaven? It does not say “the only begotten Son, who was in the bosom of the Father”. It is “IS in the bosom of the Father”.

    Quote
    He's on the right hand of the throne of God now.

    Take Care

    Steven


    Yep, but where do you find anywhere in scripture where he was on the right hand of the throne of God before his birth? Only through eisegesis can you even imply this.

    2Ch 18:18 And Micaiah said, “Therefore hear the word of the LORD: I saw the LORD sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing on his right hand and on his left.

    #68434
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 15 2007,13:55)
    Hi Kejonn;

    Thank you for your response.  It's not that I'm dead set against believing that Jesus was not the Son of God prior.  I base my belief upon what I believe to be clearer evidence that Jesus was the Son of God prior based on all the scriptures cited in John by John the Baptist, Jesus, and the apostles.  

    Again, if he wasn't in heaven prior, to what state did he return?  I believe that's a weightier question that deserves serious consideration because Christ spoke so much about who he was and where he was from and where he was returning.

    Nonetheless, there are many people that contend that Jesus did not come down from heaven, or that he was above all, or that he existed prior as the Son of God, or that he was the Lord from heaven.

    Some do not even believe in worshipping Jesus as the Son of God, or that Christ is our savior because Isaiah says only God is our Savior.  

    I contend if he did not exist prior as the Son of God, then he did not exist prior.

    Take Care

    Steven


    Hi Steve,

    But the only issue is that you don't have any scriptural evidence to support that he was the Son of God prior to his birth. That's where the rubber meets the road. In fact, some want to say Proverbs 8:22 is speaking of the pre-existent Yeshua as wisdom, but look closer

    Pro 8:1 Does not wisdom call, And understanding lift up her voice?
    Pro 8:2 On top of the heights beside the way, Where the paths meet, she takes her stand;
    Pro 8:3 Beside the gates, at the opening to the city, At the entrance of the doors, she cries out:

    Can a son be called “she”? Of course, angels don't have sex, nor would other spiritual beings, but “son” is most certainly masculine while wisdom appears to be feminine.

    #68436

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 16 2007,06:55)
    Hi Kejonn;

    Thank you for your response.  It's not that I'm dead set against believing that Jesus was not the Son of God prior.  I base my belief upon what I believe to be clearer evidence that Jesus was the Son of God prior based on all the scriptures cited in John by John the Baptist, Jesus, and the apostles.  

    Again, if he wasn't in heaven prior, to what state did he return?  I believe that's a weightier question that deserves serious consideration because Christ spoke so much about who he was and where he was from and where he was returning.

    Nonetheless, there are many people that contend that Jesus did not come down from heaven, or that he was above all, or that he existed prior as the Son of God, or that he was the Lord from heaven.

    Some do not even believe in worshipping Jesus as the Son of God, or that Christ is our savior because Isaiah says only God is our Savior.  

    I contend if he did not exist prior as the Son of God, then he did not exist prior.

    Take Care

    Steven


    mr steve

    Ah, but then you would have to ditch your understanding of a boat load of scriptures and in my opinion read into them all kinds of things like Jesus was just a thought or a plan with the Father.

    It is true as kejonn has told t8 that to believe in a pre-existent Christ to reconcile all of the scriptures that Yeshua must be God.

    For truly the scriptures declare “God only”, “alone”, “by himself”,  is our Saviour and the creator of all things.

    But rather believe that Jesus is God as scriptures call him in John 1:1 and 20:28 Etc men would rather reason that he did not pre-exist and that he is the “god” of the New heavens and New earth that he is creating.

    Take your pick. Trinitarianism or Unitarianism. But Henotheism has all kinds of holes in it.

    Of course I believe “Unitarainism” does to, for to believe Yeshua is the “god” of the New Heavens and New earth would be Polytheism as well.

    :)

    #68442
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 16 2007,06:15)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,05:11)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 16 2007,04:56)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2007,04:36)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 16 2007,01:38)
    Over and over the son of man said He could do nothing!  That doesn't sound “supernatural”.  If the flesh of the son of man was supernatural and unlike a regular human then His sacrifice is not valid.


    Why was his sacrifice not valid?

    Jesus bore in his flesh the totality of our sins, and his body was sacrificed once and for all.

    Here is a question for you, Ken, as I have been following your posts here (some good stuff) – what makes you think that Jesus is just a man?  Remember that he had a human for a mother, but his father is God Almighty!  What would that combination produce?  Thanks.


    Mandy

    God and man!

    Not man and something else.

    :)


    Your answer is a bit confusing.  Do you mean that within Jesus there is God AND man and they are co-existing together?  I believe this is the incarnation belief.  It is not mine.  I don't believe scripture supports this theory either.


    Mandy

    You know what I mean.

    You are not being very clear as to what Jesus is. You are arguing that Jesus is not a mere man, but that he is something else. Like t8 you are being vague as to what he is.

    Since God by his Spirit caused Mary to concieve then what part of the conception is God? What does that make Jesus?

    If you say a 'Son of God” then he is no different than us right?

    ???


    WJ,

    I'm sorry. I thought that I have been clear all along on who and what I believe Jesus to be. But I will certainly give a little recap here….

    I believe that Jesus is the only literal Son of God, for he was conceived in Mary by God's holy spirit. Therefore, because Jesus underwent a true conception, he is a combination of God and Mary. He is not God, or soley God in nature. He is not soley man in nature. He is a combination of his parents just like you and me. He is a divine man. I've shown this many times, and I'm sure you haven't missed it?

    God+God=God
    God+Man=Divine Man

    #68444
    kejonn
    Participant

    Hi all,

    If Yeshua pre-existed, what does this mean?

    Joh 17:18 “As You sent Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world.

    How can we be sent into the world in the same manner as Yeshua was sent unless (1) we are pre-existent or (2) he was not pre-existent?

Viewing 20 posts - 1,721 through 1,740 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account