Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 1,661 through 1,680 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68232
    kenrch
    Participant

    Do you not know that if we were not in the Father's thoughts we would not exist? Nor would any of the angels or worlds OR anything.

    #68233
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Oct. 13 2007,09:28)
    Jesus became a Man after He was the Son of God. John 1;1


    Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
    Joh 1:14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    Maybe I'm using the wrong Bible translation, but I don't see “Son of God” anywhere in John 1:1. in fact, the first time “Son of God” is used in GoJ, its here

    Joh 1:34 “I myself have seen, and have testified that this is the Son of God.”

    Was this said of a pre-existent being? Nope, it was said by John the Baptist AFTER he saw the Holy Spirit descend upon Yeshua like a dove.

    So how do you get “Son of God” out of John 1:1-18? Luke 1:35 tells us why he is called the Son of God (no one wants to acknowledge this verse for some odd reason)

    Luk 1:35 The angel answered and said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; and for that reason the holy Child shall be called the Son of God.

    What was the reason he would be called the Son of God? Its right there.

    #68234
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (IM4Truth @ Oct. 13 2007,09:24)
    I took the previous Post from t8
    Thank you t8
    I hope you will study this with an open mind. I have been in the background reading all of your Post and I must say you are really denying scriptures that t8 has given.

    Peace and Love Mrs.


    Who is this addressed to? If you'll look, I addressed all of the scripture t8 supplied. Believe me, I don't ignore a single verse. But you can't pull verses out of context nor can you use 1 book of the Bible to deny the other 65.

    #68235
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    All I am going to say to you again, study t8 post, all the answers are in there. But you both just do not want to see it, and that is your problem.

    Peace and Love Mrs.

    #68236
    kenrch
    Participant

    The word in first in John 1 means “thought”.
    That word~thought~ became flesh the son of man.

    I believe we were all in the Father's thought.

    Rom 8:29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

    Rom 8:30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

    All tings exist in His thoughts and without HIS thoughts nothing would exist.

    #68237
    kenrch
    Participant

    We are forgiven of our sins, that is our sin is “forgotten”. When God forgets something “it does not exist”. :)

    #68238
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    To all….> Jesus had to be just like us in (every) was, or his life would not prove anything, he had to be tempted by sin just like us. The difference was God upheld Him and keep him from his iniquity.And when he was born he was a son of God, just like it say's Adam was a son of God, both born by the same Spirit and same God.
    God was demenstrating through Jesus how He could live in Us and perfect Us, Just like He did Jesus.

    By giving Jesus all these untrue supernatural advantages that He did not have (IS DENYING) the work of God The Father who was in Him.

    It puts the focus on the man Jesus rather then on the ONE AND ONLY TRUE GOD, who was in Him .

    I agree with Ken and Kejonn explanations so far. I see Jesus as a pure human man in every way and Antoher Adam without any advantage orther then God was with Him.
    And thats the same advantage we who have God's Spirit in us have also, Its the same Spirit that was in Jesus the Annointed Man.

    Satan wants this Idology of Jesus having advantages over us in order to cause us to push Jesus away from our exact likeness, why becauses it weakens our Faith in God's ability to do the same with us as He did with Jesus.
    Thats Satans perpose behind these false teachings, it to eliminate God The Father from the picture.

    Go check out any Trinitarian or incarnation teaching church it all about Jesus and you hardly ever hear About God the Father. The focus is all on Jesus, But Jesus' focus was all about the Father.

    peace to all ……>Gene

    #68240
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    not3in1…..> to answer your questions about us being already adopted. It say's we (Have) recieved the Spirit of Adoption all ready which goes into our hearts crying ABA Father.

    1 John 3:1-2 ..> Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called the childern of God! Therefore the world does not know us, because it did not know Him.
    2> Beloved, (now) we are childern of God and it has not yet been revealed what we shall be, but we know when He is revealed we shall be like Him, for we shall see Him as (or the way) He is.
    I believe while we don't yet have our new bodies, we are still childern of God (now).

    Hope this clearfied what i was saying.
    peace and love to you and yours…..gene

    #68241
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Quote
    That's not incarnation, that's indwelling. BIG difference. Incarnation is “A bodily manifestation of a supernatural being.” To say we are filled with the Spirit of God in no ways compares with incarnation.

    However, when you propose that Yeshua was the Son of God (or a Son of God) before he was born, you provide not a shred of evidence.

    Kejonn;

    Get a second opinion of what I wrote and see if others see that I have provided a shread of evidence. Try to find someone objective. Perhaps, one among us can comment on my post and give you his or her perspective.

    Is not Christ incarnate in us? Does he not dwell in us by the spirit? You say that I pick and choose but haven't you chose only one definition of incarnate?

    Why would you want to see an incarnation in the Old Testament? Melchizedek did not have beginning of days according to Paul. If he had no beginning of days he must of been some form of an incarnation. Paul likens Melchizedek to Christ, who is our priest after his order. There's your incarnation in the Old Testament. Something tells me though that you will argue that was not an incarnation or that it was not remotely the same. You have what is called a fixation. It doesn't matter what the word of God says you will not believe it.

    Steven

    #68242
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 13 2007,13:41)

    Quote
    That's not incarnation, that's indwelling. BIG difference. Incarnation is “A bodily manifestation of a supernatural being.” To say we are filled with the Spirit of God in no ways compares with incarnation.

    However, when you propose that Yeshua was the Son of God (or a Son of God) before he was born, you provide not a shred of evidence.

    Kejonn;

    Get a second opinion of what I wrote and see if others see that I have provided a shread of evidence. Try to find someone objective. Perhaps, one among us can comment on my post and give you his or her perspective.

    Is not Christ incarnate in us? Does he not dwell in us by the spirit? You say that I pick and choose but haven't you chose only one definition of incarnate?

    Why would you want to see an incarnation in the Old Testament? Melchizedek did not have beginning of days according to Paul. If he had no beginning of days he must of been some form of an incarnation. Paul likens Melchizedek to Christ, who is our priest after his order. There's your incarnation in the Old Testament. Something tells me though that you will argue that was not an incarnation or that it was not remotely the same. You have what is called a fixation. It doesn't matter what the word of God says you will not believe it.

    Steven


    Whatever the case, “dwell” and “incarnate” ARE two different words. So no, Christ is not “incarnate” in us.

    Can you show me another definition of incarnate that fits what you'd like it to mean?

    And the second opinions you are looking for will come from others who do not think “objectively” but believe in a similar manner as you.

    You still have not addressed Luke 1:35.

    As to Melchizedek, look at any commentary and you'll find you are way off on trying to represent him as some form of incarnate entity. From bible.cc for Heb 7:3

    Wesley's Notes

    7:3 Without father, without mother, without pedigree – Recorded, without any account of his descent from any ancestors of the priestly order. Having neither beginning of days, nor end of life – Mentioned by Moses. But being – In all these respects. Made like the Son of God – Who is really without father, as to his human nature; without mother, as to his divine; and in this also, without pedigree – Neither descended from any ancestors of the priestly order. Remaineth a priest continually – Nothing is recorded of the death or successor of Melchisedec. But Christ alone does really remain without death, and without successor.

    Keep searching :;): .

    #68243

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 14 2007,03:28)
    The word in first in John 1 means “thought”.
    That word~thought~ became flesh the son of man.

    I believe we were all in the Father's thought.

    Rom 8:29  For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

    Rom 8:30  And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

    All tings exist in His thoughts and without HIS thoughts nothing would exist.


    kenrch

    You say…

    Quote

    The word in first in John 1 means “thought”.

    Can you prove that is what John meant?

    Are you a scholar. Where is your Greek and Hebrew credentials?

    Why didnt the 100s of translators translate it “Thought”?

    Here is some examples where the “Logos” is not just a thought…

    Matt 12:36
    [36] But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account [logos]thereof in the day of judgment.

    Matt 18:23
    “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts [logos] with his servants”

    Rom 14:12
    So then, each of us will give an account [logos] of himself to God.

    Matt 5:32
    [32] But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause [logos]of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

    Acts 8:21
    Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter [logos]: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.

    Acts 10:29
    Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent [logos] ye have sent for me?

    So as you can see the word “Logos” is not always a saying or speech.

    So the argument that the “Logos” in john 1:1 has to be interpreted that way is fallacious.

    And also because of this…

    With God (prov ton qeon). Though existing eternally with God the Logos was in perfect fellowship with God. Prov with the accusative presents a plane of equality and intimacy, face to face with each other. In 1 John 2:1 we have a like use of prov: “We have a Paraclete with the Father” (paraklhton exomen prov ton patera). See proswpon prov proswpon (face to face, 1 Corinthians 13:12), a triple use of prov. There is a papyrus example of prov in this sense to gnwston thv prov allhlouv sunhqeiav, “the knowledge of our intimacy with one another” (M.&M., Vocabulary) which answers the claim of Rendel Harris, Origin of Prologue, p. 8) that the use of prov here and in Mark 6:3 is a mere Aramaism. It is not a classic idiom, but this is Koin‚, not old Attic. In John 17:5 John has para soi the more common idiom.
    (source)

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….375;st=

    In fact the following is proof that the word is not just a thought….

    Rev 19:
    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
    20 And the armies [which were] in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
    21 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

    Notice the “Sharp Sword”, it is the 'Word of God” proceeding out of his mouth. Heb 4:12.

    Jesus is not a thought of God. Jesus speaks the “thoughts and plan” of God!

    :O

    #68244
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 13 2007,13:41)
    You have what is called a fixation. It doesn't matter what the word of God says you will not believe it.

    Steven


    Oh, and as to this: you have what is called an insulting attitude. Those who do not believe as you do are objects of your insults. I've seen you say similar things to WJ.

    Like the fruit that has been sitting too long at the local market, I find your fruit unappealing.

    #68250
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Mr.Steve ……> what does exaulting, Jesus over His brothers and sisters do. And in order for you to do that your have got to ignore nearly all the OT scriptures the show what Jesus' origin he would come from, so in essence you are calling God a lier. And have joined with the rest of those who say Jesus preexisted as a super being and might as well say He was an incarnated being also. So in your beliefe you have it this way..> God…then super being….then Man. Your super Jesus is not really one of Us is He, so He was just conning Us, because we could never become exactly like Him Could we.

    Mr. Steve your views on the preexistence seems to be a fixsation that your are unwilling to even concered others thoughts……. we are all in a learnning process here, so give some consideration to other……peace …..gene

    #68252
    david
    Participant

    Hi Kejonn.

    Quote
    Poor answer. I've read many of your posts but don't recall responding to any because we weren't posting in common threads until now. So…

    Your answer with a question is not comparable. The “why do anything” type question has no answer but mine does IMHO.

    What I'm getting at is this: what purpose was the conception, the birth, childhood, and 30 years of no ministry if God could have just created another flesh tent from the dust and placed this angelic (or god) being inside of it? Why all of the wasted years? Why did he choose to wait until Yeshua was 30 (as many assume, is that verifiable?) to have him start his ministry? The idea of some celestial being possessing a flesh tent and walking around basically living a human life with very little record of events is preposterous.

    This then begs another question: what died at calvary? The flesh tent? Did the celestial or divine being inhabiting the flesh tent die too? Trinitarians say no.

    IOW David, why would God find it necessary to place a celestial or divine being inside of the body of a human when He plainly stated in the Tanakh that the Messiah would be like one of us, like Moses? Was Moses inhabited by an angel? Or a god? Is that why God said that Moses would be a god to Pharaoh?

    The fact of the matter is, that by placing some eternal, or at least very, very ancient celestial or divine being inside of a human body calls into question God's promises. I, for one, cannot accept that God would lie to His chosen people for 4000 years. If you do not think it is a lie, show me in the OT where God says the Messiah will be inhabited by a celestial or divine being. Remember as I've already pointed out, Yeshua himself said

    Joh 5:39 “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me;

    So now you have another dilemma. If God in the OT told us that the Messiah would be man like Moses, like us, and Yeshua says that the OT testified about him — thus agreeing with all God said about him therein — then you must accuse both Father and Son of lying.

    –Kejonn.

    Yes, it is a poor answer. It was a poor question. Much like yours. That was my point.
    Just because “you” can't see a purpose for Jesus pre-existence in no way means anything about whether he pre-existed or not.

    Quote
    what purpose was the conception, the birth, childhood, and 30 years of no ministry if God could have just created another flesh tent from the dust and placed this angelic (or god) being inside of it? Why all of the wasted years?

    Why all the wasted years, you ask? I don't know. Why all the “wasted” years of God not creating humankind? Who said they were “wasted”? You could just as easily ask why God “wasted” all that time without us existing–why did he wait those eons of time?
    The purpose of Jesus existence at all is much the same as the purpose of the angels existence and of ours–love.
    And the purpose of Jesus being put in that role as a human to vindicate Jehovah's sovereignty, to sanctify his name, to prove the devil a liar, to bring about salvation to mankind–no one would have wanted this more than his own Son, his “only begotten son.”

    Quote
    Why did he choose to wait until Yeshua was 30 (as many assume, is that verifiable?) to have him start his ministry?


    I don't see how this is at all connected to what you are saying.

    Quote
    The idea of some celestial being possessing a flesh tent and walking around basically living a human life with very little record of events is preposterous.


    Oh, you think Jesus would have been miracle boy. I see. Jesus purpose wasn't primarily to go around healing people or to be a politician for Satan's world and bring about reform or anything like that. It was primarily the ransom sacrifice–to regain or buy back what adam lost. Only a perfect human (like adam) could do that. Jesus was “made flesh” and became a human (although perfect) without the stain of sin.
    And it is not my belief that Jesus was born with the mind or memory of his pre-existence. When the “heavens opened up to him” at his baptism, I believe is when all this came back to him.

    Quote
    what died at calvary? The flesh tent? Did the celestial or divine being inhabiting the flesh tent die too?


    Jesus, the whole person, Jesus himself, all Jesus is, died. (Jehovah has a pretty good memory. If he created him in the first place, he could resurrect him, bring him back to life, just as before, whether in human form or spirit.

    Quote
    David, why would God find it necessary to place a celestial or divine being inside of the body of a human when He plainly stated in the Tanakh that the Messiah would be like one of us, like Moses?


    Kejonn, he was like one of us. I'm not arguing that at all. He truly was “made flesh” human, as scripture says plainly. He suffered trials, pain, temptations, etc. And as I said before, more than anyone else, Jesus, the only begotten son of God wanted to sanctify or clear his Father's name of any reproach and put an end to sin, and eventually, Satan, and to prove Satan a liar. More than anyone, Jesus as the beloved Son of God, would have wanted this. For so long, to see his Father's name reproached, to see the lies told about him–more than anyone, he would have gladly stepped forward to accomplish this.

    Quote
    The fact of the matter is, that by placing some eternal, or at least very, very ancient celestial or divine being inside of a human body calls into question God's promises. I, for one, cannot accept that God would lie to His chosen people for 4000 years. If you do not think it is a lie, show me


    Um. No thanks. If it is a lie, why don't you show me.
    Your logic is wierd here. When something simply isn't stated, and then it happens, that doesn't mean it is a lie. If God had said: “He won't be a celestial being” then it would be a lie. So, go ahead, show me that sentence in the Bible.

    Quote
    So now you have another dilemma. If God in the OT told us that the Messiah would be man like Moses, like us, and Yeshua says that the OT testified about him — thus agreeing with all God said about him therein — then you must accuse both Father and Son of lying.

    Again, HE WAS LIKE US, in every way. So where exactly is the lie, exact
    ly? Please tell me.

    I've notice that you've included several phrasings like:
    “this beggs the question”, and “this raises this delema” when in fact no such delema or begging of questions exists.

    I would much rather actually be discussing the scriptures that say Jesus' origins are from early times, etc.

    david.

    #68254
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    David….> again another assumption, you assume it say Jesus' existence as a (being) was from early times, when in fact it does not spicifically say that.
    It can just as easly be said His origns were of the Father in early times. Just like ours were.

    Your forcing the text to come out the way you want it……Peace…..gene

    #68255
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Your forcing the text to come out the way you want it……Peace…..gene

    I'm not forcing the text. I'm combining it with all the other scriptures that say he is the “firstborn of creation” the “beginning of the creation of God”

    PROVERBS 8:22
    ““Jehovah himself produced me as the beginning of his way, the earliest of his achievements of long ago.”
    (Jehovah has always had wisdom, so there was no need to “produce” wisdom. It's speaking of wisdom personified, as Jesus)

    Or this, translate it however you want:

    JOHN 8:58
    “Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”” (or I am, or whatever.)

    If Jesus were just a plan or a thought of God, it doesn't make sense. They were speaking about his age: You are not yet 50 years old yet. Then, he responded with the words above.

    Here's the thing. I guess I existed years before I really did. My grandparents knew they'd have grandchildren. My parents planned on having children. Maybe they even knew my name years ahead.
    So, if someone says to me:

    You are not yet 50, you didnt' exist before me, I could say (with your reasoning):
    “No, but I did exist before you, because I existed as a plan of God, so you see, I'm much older than you.”

    I feel the burden is definitely on you to interpret this any other way. You argue that it doesn't say that Jesus existed as a person. Well it doesn't say he existed as a plan either.
    One has to think that since Jehovah created all the sons of God (the angels) well in advance of humans, that Jesus, the “only begotten son” (the only one created directly by Jehovah) would actually be a person, and that the burden would be on anyone to prove otherwise.

    david.

    #68257
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Oct. 14 2007,07:09)

    Quote (kenrch @ Oct. 14 2007,03:28)
    The word in first in John 1 means “thought”.
    That word~thought~ became flesh the son of man.

    I believe we were all in the Father's thought.

    Rom 8:29  For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

    Rom 8:30  And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

    All tings exist in His thoughts and without HIS thoughts nothing would exist.


    kenrch

    You say…

    Quote

    The word in first in John 1 means “thought”.

    Can you prove that is what John meant?

    Are you a scholar. Where is your Greek and Hebrew credentials?

    Why didnt the 100s of translators translate it “Thought”?

    Here is some examples where the “Logos” is not just a thought…

    Matt 12:36
    [36] But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account [logos]thereof in the day of judgment.

    Matt 18:23
    “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts [logos] with his servants”

    Rom 14:12
    So then, each of us will give an account [logos] of himself to God.

    Matt 5:32
    [32] But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause [logos]of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

    Acts 8:21
    Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter [logos]: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God.

    Acts 10:29
    Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent [logos] ye have sent for me?

    So as you can see the word “Logos” is not always a saying or speech.

    So the argument that the “Logos” in john 1:1 has to be interpreted that way is fallacious.

    And also because of this…

    With God (prov ton qeon). Though existing eternally with God the Logos was in perfect fellowship with God. Prov with the accusative presents a plane of equality and intimacy, face to face with each other. In 1 John 2:1 we have a like use of prov: “We have a Paraclete with the Father” (paraklhton exomen prov ton patera). See proswpon prov proswpon (face to face, 1 Corinthians 13:12), a triple use of prov. There is a papyrus example of prov in this sense to gnwston thv prov allhlouv sunhqeiav, “the knowledge of our intimacy with one another” (M.&M., Vocabulary) which answers the claim of Rendel Harris, Origin of Prologue, p. 8) that the use of prov here and in Mark 6:3 is a mere Aramaism. It is not a classic idiom, but this is Koin‚, not old Attic. In John 17:5 John has para soi the more common idiom.
    (source)

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….375;st=

    In fact the following is proof that the word is not just a thought….

    Rev 19:
    And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God.
    20 And the armies [which were] in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean.
    21 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

    Notice the “Sharp Sword”, it is the 'Word of God” proceeding out of his mouth. Heb 4:12.

    Jesus is not a thought of God. Jesus speaks the “thoughts and plan” of God!

    :O


    Word,3056

    G3056
    λόγος
    logos
    log'-os
    From G3004; something said (including the thought); by implication a topic (subject of discourse), also reasoning (the mental faculty) or motive; by extension a computation; specifically (with the article in John) the Divine Expression (that is, Christ): – account, cause, communication, X concerning, doctrine, fame, X have to do, intent, matter, mouth, preaching, question, reason, + reckon, remove, say (-ing), shew, X speaker, speech, talk, thing, + none of these things move me, tidings, treatise, utterance, word, work.

    #68261
    kenrch
    Participant

    Everything that has a beginning started with a thought BUT you believe Jesus to be God so end of story.
    Did the first Adam preexist? :)

    #68266
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 13 2007,16:18)
    Heres a question: If Yeshua was totally dependent on God the Father, why the need to be pre-existent?


    Preexistence or the idea of preexistence isn't derived or inferred from this. It has no bearing on prexistence or not.

    Even angels who are prexist the birth of the messiah are totally dependent on God.

    #68267
    kejonn
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Oct. 13 2007,15:26)
    –Kejonn.

    Yes, it is a poor answer. It was a poor question. Much like yours. That was my point.


    The point of my question was to get people to think outside of preconceived notions.

    Quote

    Just because “you” can't see a purpose for Jesus pre-existence in no way means anything about whether he pre-existed or not.


    No it doesn't. But I combine this with an overwhelming lack of evidence that he did indeed pre-exist. The majority of the idea of pre-existence springs from the Gospel of John, a very symbolic and figurative book. If one takes everything in GoJ with the same literal sense, what would you have? Perhaps people need to reread GoJ and see how much of it is NOT literal, and then balance it with the Synoptics.

    Quote

    Quote
    what purpose was the conception, the birth, childhood, and 30 years of no ministry if God could have just created another flesh tent from the dust and placed this angelic (or god) being inside of it? Why all of the wasted years?

    Why all the wasted years, you ask? I don't know. Why all the “wasted” years of God not creating humankind? Who said they were “wasted”? You could just as easily ask why God “wasted” all that time without us existing–why did he wait those eons of time?
    The purpose of Jesus existence at all is much the same as the purpose of the angels existence and of ours–love.
    And the purpose of Jesus being put in that role as a human to vindicate Jehovah's sovereignty, to sanctify his name, to prove the devil a liar, to bring about salvation to mankind–no one would have wanted this more than his own Son, his “only begotten son.”

    Quote
    Why did he choose to wait until Yeshua was 30 (as many assume, is that verifiable?) to have him start his ministry?


    I don't see how this is at all connected to what you are saying.

    Quote
    The idea of some celestial being possessing a flesh tent and walking around basically living a human life with very little record of events is preposterous.


    Oh, you think Jesus would have been miracle boy. I see. Jesus purpose wasn't primarily to go around healing people or to be a politician for Satan's world and bring about reform or anything like that. It was primarily the ransom sacrifice–to regain or buy back what adam lost. Only a perfect human (like adam) could do that. Jesus was “made flesh” and became a human (although perfect) without the stain of sin.


    Bingo. Only a perfect human, like Adam. Was Adam inhabited by an angelic or divine being then? You yourself admit that he had to be like Adam, and indeed he is called the second Adam. Yet Adam was not inhabited by another pre-existing being.

    Quote
    And it is not my belief that Jesus was born with the mind or memory of his pre-existence. When the “heavens opened up to him” at his baptism, I believe is when all this came back to him.


    In abscence of evidence, one can believe anything I suppose.

    Quote

    Quote
    what died at calvary? The flesh tent? Did the celestial or divine being inhabiting the flesh tent die too?


    Jesus, the whole person, Jesus himself, all Jesus is, died. (Jehovah has a pretty good memory. If he created him in the first place, he could resurrect him, bring him back to life, just as before, whether in human form or spirit.


    Well, at least we agree here.

    Quote

    Quote
    David, why would God find it necessary to place a celestial or divine being inside of the body of a human when He plainly stated in the Tanakh that the Messiah would be like one of us, like Moses?


    Kejonn, he was like one of us. I'm not arguing that at all. He truly was “made flesh” human, as scripture says plainly. He suffered trials, pain, temptations, etc. And as I said before, more than anyone else, Jesus, the only begotten son of God wanted to sanctify or clear his Father's name of any reproach and put an end to sin, and eventually, Satan, and to prove Satan a liar. More than anyone, Jesus as the beloved Son of God, would have wanted this. For so long, to see his Father's name reproached, to see the lies told about him–more than anyone, he would have gladly stepped forward to accomplish this.


    I don't agree with all of this, because of the pre-existing ideas, but I do believe that the Son of God (Luke 1:35 for why he is called that) would do as you say.

    Quote

    Quote
    The fact of the matter is, that by placing some eternal, or at least very, very ancient celestial or divine being inside of a human body calls into question God's promises. I, for one, cannot accept that God would lie to His chosen people for 4000 years. If you do not think it is a lie, show me


    Um. No thanks. If it is a lie, why don't you show me.
    Your logic is wierd here. When something simply isn't stated, and then it happens, that doesn't mean it is a lie. If God had said: “He won't be a celestial being” then it would be a lie. So, go ahead, show me that sentence in the Bible.


    And now we get to the infamous “position from silence”. That is, since it is not said, it can then be believed. Since Jesus said nothing against Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, why don't you believe in those?

    The “position from silence” is the weakest of defenses.

    Quo
    te

    Quote
    So now you have another dilemma. If God in the OT told us that the Messiah would be man like Moses, like us, and Yeshua says that the OT testified about him — thus agreeing with all God said about him therein — then you must accuse both Father and Son of lying.

    Again, HE WAS LIKE US, in every way. So where exactly is the lie, exactly? Please tell me.


    Was he? Are we inhabited by pre-existing celestial beings?

    Quote
    I've notice that you've included several phrasings like:
    “this beggs the question”, and “this raises this delema” when in fact no such delema or begging of questions exists.

    I would much rather actually be discussing the scriptures that say Jesus' origins are from early times, etc.

    david.


    The word used for “origin” means “family descent”. Since Luke traces his lineage all the way back to Adam, his family descent IS from ancient times.

    Mic 5:2 (CEV) Bethlehem Ephrath, you are one of the smallest towns in the nation of Judah. But the LORD will choose one of your people to rule the nation– someone whose family goes back to ancient times.

    The purpose of my question was to get people to think. There is no purpose whatsoever to incarnate a celestial or divine being to be the Messiah. Since he was like us in every way outside of his virgin birth, then there IS no purpose.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,661 through 1,680 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account