Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 15,621 through 15,640 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #336676
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 22 2013,09:09)
    It had to be a EXACT and IDENTICALLY same Being as all HUMAN BEINGS are, Subject to the EXACT Same pulls of the flesh and influences of sin as we are, in order to be a TRUE SACRIFICE for sins


    Gene,

    Your point fails immediately because no other human being was born of woman – WITHOUT the input of a human man.  So right there, we know Jesus was never “EXACTLY” and “IDENTICALLY” the same as the rest of us.

    Jesus had to BE MADE like us in every way.  He had to BECOME a partaker in our humanity.  In this way, he would become a more sympathetic mediator on our behalf.

    Luke 16:8
    The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light.

    Jesus was a “person of the light”.  He was made to taste humanity so that he would have first hand knowledge of why we behave the way we do.  That first hand knowledge enables him to be a better mediator between us and God.

    #336677
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 22 2013,13:10)
    T,

    Quote

    Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.

    I have not looked at the Greek behind these words but this version does noes not support the claim that Jesus was the first created by Jehovah.  “over” gives the context


    The Greek words are “pasa ktisis” – in the genitive form.  It is correctly translated into English as “firstborn of all creation”, or “firstborn of every creature”.

    The Trinitarians change the “OF” to “OVER” because they don't want anyone to make the obvious connection that Jesus was the first being ever created.

    The non-preexisters follow suit with the Trinitarians on this verse, because they also don't want Jesus to have been the first being ever created.

    But the actual words:  “firstborn OF every creature” spell it out quite clearly – if you allow yourself to see it without blinders.

    #336678
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 22 2013,13:13)
    T,

    Quote
    Jn 1:30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’

    “A man”, not an angel.


    And? ??? No one here denies that Jesus was, at that time, a man.

    #336680
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,01:50)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 21 2013,22:59)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 22 2013,06:06)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 21 2013,14:00)
    T8,

    If Jesus came in the flesh then he did not transform to flesh.


    The spirit being Jesus Christ was transformed by God into the flesh being Jesus Christ.

    That being the case, we can say Jesus BECAME flesh.  We can say Jesus WAS MADE flesh.  We can say Jesus “has come in the flesh”.  And we can say Jesus was transformed from spirit to flesh.

    Your point is a non-point, Kerwin.


    Mike,

    I hear you tell us that you both believe the caterpillar was made a butterfly and that the caterpillar comes in a butterfly.

    The bottom line is that teaching makes “comes in” equivalent to “was made”.


    Kerwin,

    You are playing word games, because that is all you have.  Please answer the following questions honestly and DIRECTLY:

    IF you were to accept that Jesus existed as a spirit being (in the form of God) BEFORE being made in the likeness of a human being, could the following things be said of him:

    1.  The spirit entity Jesus BECAME flesh?  YES or NO?

    2.  The spirit entity Jesus WAS MADE flesh?  YES or NO?

    3.  The spirit entity Jesus HAS COME IN THE FLESH?  YES or NO?

    4.  The spirit entity Jesus WAS TRANSFORMED FROM SPIRIT BEING TO FLESH BEING?   YES or NO?

    If you are a man in search of truth, just answer all four with a simple YES or NO.  If, however, you are a man more interested in his own personally conceived doctrine than in truth, post a bunch of crap designed to avoid answering those direct questions.

    (Which choice will Kerwin make?)


    Mike,

    I do not accept that claim but you do. According to you 1,2,and 4 are basically stating the same thing. 3 is speaking about Jesus' soul coming in his body.

    Answering yes to all four simply does not work.

    The following is not my belief. It is only reasoning using your belief in Jesus' preexistence.

    Don't you find it is more reasonable to believe that an messenger soul was breathed into the flesh of Jesus just as Adam came in the flesh.

    #336681
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Even if you ignore the contradictions and answer yes to all four you are supporting the claim that “made flesh” is equivalent to “in the flesh”. A claim you previously found odious.

    #336683
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,02:08)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 22 2013,13:13)
    T,

    Quote
    Jn 1:30 This is the one I meant when I said, ‘A man who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.’

    “A man”, not an angel.


    And?  ???  No one here denies that Jesus was, at that time, a man.


    Mike,

    He is calling Jesus “one”

    and then stating he is:

    The human that comes after him
    The human that surpassed him
    The human that was before him.

    Trinitarians bias this translation as well as surpassed and before can be translated with rank in mind instead of time.

    #336684
    2besee
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 24 2013,05:46)
    2besee………Yes the Gnostioc's believed Jesus was a Ghost who desgusied himself as a Human being, but really was a God who was sent out into the earth from the place of the Gods to straighten out the mess here. This was the First major false teaching that was infecting the Church and John and Paul fought against it and kept it in bay until their deaths and it took root in the church and finally became the main church teaching at the council of Necia in 325 AD>

    It was so important that all true Beliver understood Jesus came into being as a Flesh and Blood Person and was not some God from some past existence desgusied as a human being, they fought it vigioresly, but in the end they died and the church lost the battle completely in 325 AD When emerged full blown this concept, of a “PREEXISTENT” God  Jesus, sent to straighten out the earth. Paul said this “Mystery of Iniquity” was alread in their Midst and would emerge when the restrainers were taken away, those restrainers were the true Christians and apostles Like Paul and John and early church Fathers.

    John defenitly meant that Jesus came into His only existence ,as a flesh and blood Man, and all who did not believe that were and are Antichrists.  IMO

    2besee………I am glad you are researching this better, it will help you come to see I believe more, what i was talking about in 2Ths 2 , about the Man of Sin not being a real Man but a “LIE” about Jesus Himself being a GOD. I believe you will come to see there is no real Man of Sin,  but only a false  IMAGE of Jesus created by the Gnostic's And others,This is the LIE Paul was talking about, I know you don't see that now brother but i do believe the Spirit will lead you to see it in time.

    Peace and Love to you and yours………………………………………..gene

    Gene,
    Mike seems to be ignoring this fact. He seems instead to be FORCING the verse to make it mean what He wants it to say. But it obviously means that Jesus came in the flesh and was risen in the flesh against the so called Gnostics (knowledge falsely so called) that the early church fought against.

    Teh JWs today make the same claim (that Jesus was risen as a spirit being that APPEARED to be flesh only.)
    Is this what Mike believes?
    Mike, is this what you believe?

    And thanks Gene I will post what I find out about “Gnostics” and other early similar beliefs as I find them out, when I have the time.
    I am trying to limit my posting as I have a project that I will be working on in my spare time for quite a while.

    Peace to you, Gene.

    #336685
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,01:41)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 21 2013,18:36)
    Hebrews 2:14
    King James Version (KJV)

    14 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;


    The scripture you posted compliments the OP scripture I started the thread with, Kerwin.

    The green “are partakers” in your scripture is the Greek word “koinoneo” – which refers to people sharing a common thing.  Ie:  Human beings all naturally share a flesh and blood nature.

    The maroon words “took part”, on the other hand, are the Greek word, “metecho” – which means “to BECOME a partaker”.

    There is a reason Paul used two different words – one that refers to a common thing that all people share, and another one that refers to someone who was not naturally a partaker in that thing, but BECAME a partaker.

    Think about how perfectly your scripture aligns with John's words, “has COME in the flesh”.


    Mike,

    You are claiming that the Greek “took part” has connotations that the Greek “partakers” does not and that these connotation do not translate from Ancient Greek to English.

    I have my doubts.

    #336689
    2besee
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 24 2013,08:32)
    so be good to me ;and show me ONE SINGLE SCRIPTURE THAT SAYS THAT CHRIST JESUS ” HIS “” THE HOLY SPIRIT ???

    OR SHOW ME ONE SINGLE SCRIPTURE THAT SAYS “” THE SON OF GOD /MAN “”HIS THE HOLY SPIRIT “”

    IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ONE SINGLE CLUE TO BACK YOU UP ,YOU ARE IN ERROR AND SO YOUR BELIEVE WOULD BE WRONG ,

    Hi T,

    You ask me to show you one single verse that proves what I beleive, otherwise you say it is wrong.

    Show me one single verse that shows us all straight out that Jesus Christ pre-existed as an Angel or as another god.

    —————

    Here are a few verses for what I believe:

    1st Corinthians 12

    3For this reason I want you to be aware that no one who is speaking by God’s Spirit can say, “Jesus is cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy Spirit.

    4Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit, 5and there are varieties of ministries, but the same Lord. 6There are varieties of results, but it is the same God who produces all the results in everyone.

    7To each person has been given the ability to manifest the Spirit for the common good. 8To one has been given a message of wisdom by the Spirit; to another the ability to speak with knowledge according to the same Spirit; 9to another faith by the same Spirit; to another gifts of healing by that one Spirit; 10to another miraculous results; to another prophecy; to another the ability to distinguish between spirits; to another various kinds of languages; and to another the interpretation of languages. 11But one and the same Spirit produces all these results and gives what he wants to each person.

    12For just as the body is one and yet has many parts, and all the parts of the body, though many, form a single body, so it is with the Messiah. 13For by one Spirit all of us—Jews and Greeks, slaves and free—were baptized into one body and were all privileged to drink from one Spirit.

    2nd Corinthians 3

    12Therefore, since we have such a hope, we speak very boldly, 13not like Moses, who kept covering his face with a veil to keep the people of Israel from gazing at the end of what was fading away. 14However, their minds were hardened, for to this day the same veil is still there when they read the old covenant. Only in union with the Messiah is that veil removed. 15Yet even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. 16But whenever a person turns to the Lord, the veil is removed. 17Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Lord’s Spirit is, there is freedom. 18As all of us reflect the glory of the Lord with unveiled faces, we are becoming more like him with ever-increasing glory by the Lord’s Spirit.

    1st Corinthians 2

    10But God has revealed those things to us by his Spirit. For the Spirit searches everything, even the deep things of God.

    11Is there anyone who can understand his own thoughts except his own inner spirit? In the same way, no one can know the thoughts of God except God’s Spirit. 12Now, we have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who comes from God, so that we can understand the things that were freely given to us by God. 13We don’t speak about these things with words taught us by human wisdom, but with words taught by the Spirit, as we explain spiritual things to spiritual people. 14A person who isn’t spiritual doesn’t accept the things of God’s Spirit, for they are nonsense to him. He can’t understand them because they are spiritually evaluated. 15The spiritual person evaluates everything but is subject to no one else’s evaluation. 16For

    “Who has known the mind of the Lord
    so that he can advise him?”
    However, we have the mind of the Messiah.

    #336690
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 23 2013,14:28)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,13:26)

    Quote (terraricca @ Feb. 23 2013,06:46)

    K

    you do not see what you are saying ,and do not understand it neither ,

    that what you say his false;

    Mt 28:18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.

    and you have the reason for him to send the comforter to his disciples wrong ;

    the comforter was send to them in replacement of him going away and so that they would not feel lost being alone ;this was the true reason


    T,

    Quote
    It is expedient for you that I go away.

    Jesus' death and ascension is important.

    Quote
    for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you;

    If Jesus didn't die and ascend then no Comforter would have come.

    Quote
    but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

    Only when Jesus departs is he able to send the Comforter.

    After Jesus departed he told the Eleven that all authority in heaven and on earth was given to him.

    When Jesus is given the authority he gains the ability to send the Comforter.


    K

    do you not feel that you have to lie to explain your opinion ???

    you do not show scriptures because you know you twisting and lie,or are you testing me if you gamble on my ignorance of the scriptures ???

    I do hope you bring your view into the truth ,

    Jn 14:16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;
    Jn 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
    Jn 15:26 But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me:
    Jn 16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

    and NO,it is not his dead that means his “going away “”read the last verse I quoted Jn 16;7 Jesus says specifically THAT HE WILL SEND INTO THEM ” CAN YOU READ THAT ??? YES  

    AND HE DID NOT SEND IT BEFORE THE PENTECOST,WEN THEY ALL WERE INSIDE THE UPPER ROOM RIGHT ??? YES


    T,

    There is no lie in what I wrote.

    I used two scriptures which are John 16:7 and Matthew 28:18.

    I paraphrased parts of John 16:7 in hopes of making their meaning clear.

    I am of the belief that his going away started with his self sacrifice and accumulates with his sitting on his throne that is in heaven.

    As you write, Jesus did not use his authority to send the Spirit until after he was siting on his throne in heaven.  Never the less he states he has the authority to do so after his resurrection but before his ascension.

    #336692
    2besee
    Participant

    So from the above we can see that:

    Jesus is the Lord.
    The Lord is the Spirit.
    The Spirit is the Holy Spirit.
    The Spirit is the one who knows the deep things of God.
    The Spirit is not some other God, but is God's own Spirit.

    #336693
    2besee
    Participant

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 24 2013,10:08)
    So from the above we can see that:

    Jesus is the Lord.
    The Lord is the Spirit.
    The Spirit is the Holy Spirit.
    The Spirit is the one who knows the deep things of God.
    The Spirit is not some other God, but is God's own Spirit.


    My apologies Kerwin, I was meaning the post above as in page 15. (my post to T)!

    #336694
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 23 2013,10:22)
    Now you come up with this garbage we never Produced ONE.


    Don't get confused, Gene.

    I'm asking for a published statement from anywhere and any time in the history of the world, where someone has used the phrase, “has come in the flesh” to convey the thought that the person was just a normal human being like the rest of us.

    Can you show us one?

    #336696
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Feb. 23 2013,15:59)

    Quote
    None of you has yet to produce one.


    Is this true. Why is that? At least give an explanation as to why others are never mentioned as coming in the flesh. If you cannot, then at least look into your own heart and mind and ask why.


    T8,

    Did you look up “in the flesh”?

    You really do not need to as you already know each and every human being comes in the flesh when they come into this world.

    #336697
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 24 2013,03:10)

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 24 2013,10:08)
    So from the above we can see that:

    Jesus is the Lord.
    The Lord is the Spirit.
    The Spirit is the Holy Spirit.
    The Spirit is the one who knows the deep things of God.
    The Spirit is not some other God, but is God's own Spirit.


    My apologies Kerwin, I was meaning the post above as in page 15. (my post to T)!


    2beesee,

    I accept your apologies.

    #336699
    2besee
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,10:15)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Feb. 23 2013,10:22)
    Now you come up with this garbage we never Produced ONE.


    Don't get confused, Gene.

    I'm asking for a published statement from anywhere and any time in the history of the world, where someone has used the phrase, “has come in the flesh” to convey the thought that the person was just a normal human being like the rest of us.

    Can you show us one?

    That is so ridiculous Mike!!

    What is this supposed to prove?

    Gnostics believed that Jesus was a Spirit or a god rather than a man of flesh and blood, and that He came in appearance only, and not only whilst on the earth but also once risen.

    This is what John was meaning by “came in the flesh”
    Nothing at all to do with pre-existance etc.

    #336701
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,14:24)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 24 2013,01:50)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 21 2013,22:59)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Feb. 22 2013,06:06)

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 21 2013,14:00)
    T8,

    If Jesus came in the flesh then he did not transform to flesh.


    The spirit being Jesus Christ was transformed by God into the flesh being Jesus Christ.

    That being the case, we can say Jesus BECAME flesh.  We can say Jesus WAS MADE flesh.  We can say Jesus “has come in the flesh”.  And we can say Jesus was transformed from spirit to flesh.

    Your point is a non-point, Kerwin.


    Mike,

    I hear you tell us that you both believe the caterpillar was made a butterfly and that the caterpillar comes in a butterfly.

    The bottom line is that teaching makes “comes in” equivalent to “was made”.


    Kerwin,

    You are playing word games, because that is all you have.  Please answer the following questions honestly and DIRECTLY:

    IF you were to accept that Jesus existed as a spirit being (in the form of God) BEFORE being made in the likeness of a human being, could the following things be said of him:

    1.  The spirit entity Jesus BECAME flesh?  YES or NO?

    2.  The spirit entity Jesus WAS MADE flesh?  YES or NO?

    3.  The spirit entity Jesus HAS COME IN THE FLESH?  YES or NO?

    4.  The spirit entity Jesus WAS TRANSFORMED FROM SPIRIT BEING TO FLESH BEING?   YES or NO?

    If you are a man in search of truth, just answer all four with a simple YES or NO.  If, however, you are a man more interested in his own personally conceived doctrine than in truth, post a bunch of crap designed to avoid answering those direct questions.

    (Which choice will Kerwin make?)


    Mike,

    I do not accept that claim but you do.  According to you 1,2,and 4 are basically stating the same thing.  3 is speaking about Jesus' soul coming in his body.

    Answering yes to all four simply does not work.

    The following is not my belief.  It is only reasoning using your belief in Jesus' preexistence.

    Don't you find it is more reasonable to believe that an messenger soul was breathed into the flesh of Jesus just as Adam came in the flesh.


    I guess we got our answer to the supersized query above. :)

    Kerwin, it seems you are for some reason taking offense to #3. Please tell me exactly WHY we couldn't say, “Jesus has come in the flesh” to convey the thought that Jesus was a NON-flesh being who later “CAME in the flesh”.

    #336703
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,14:25)
    Mike,

    Even if you ignore the contradictions and answer yes to all four you are supporting the claim that “made flesh” is equivalent to “in the flesh”.   A claim you previously found odious.


    What I find odious is your attempt to ADD the word “IN” into 1:14.

    “The Word BECAME flesh” refers to a being who was with God in the beginning BECOMING flesh.

    “Jesus Christ HAS COME in the flesh” refers to a being who was at one time NOT flesh, COMING IN the flesh.

    They both say the same thing – but in different ways. It's really not that hard, Kerwin.

    #336704
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Feb. 23 2013,14:33)
    Mike,

    He is calling Jesus “one”

    and then stating he is:

    The human that comes after him
    The human that surpassed him
    The human that was before him.


    Correct on all counts. What point are you trying to make with this?

    #336706
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (2besee @ Feb. 23 2013,14:35)
    The JWs today make the same claim (that Jesus was risen as a spirit being that APPEARED to be flesh only.)
    Is this what Mike believes?
    Mike, is this what you believe?


    No, I don't agree with the JWs, who believe Jesus was raised immediately from the dead as a spirit being. Luke 24:39 proves this not to be the case.

    I believe Jesus was raised from the dead in the very body in which he died, and then, upon his ascension into heaven, that body was transformed into the glorious, new spiritual body he now has. (Cf Phil 3:21)

    I agree with what Gene has said the Gnostics believed:

    1. Jesus was a god who was with THE God in the beginning.

    2. Jesus was transformed from spirit being to flesh being – meaning that he “has come in the flesh”.

    You guys keep talking about Gnostics as if it is a cuss word, and claiming that it was they to whom John referred in 1 John 4:2-3.

    But it is obvious from what Gene said about the Gnostics that they DID believe Jesus “has come in the flesh”, right? So how then could they be the antichrists John warned against?

    Please explain.

Viewing 20 posts - 15,621 through 15,640 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account