Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 11,301 through 11,320 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #256541
    kerwin
    Participant

    Irene,

    Quote
    Kerwin, no the is not what I am saying.

    Then you are not aware of how your words sound to another.

    Quote
    He was not a mediator then.

    The words “by him all things consist” in Colossians1:17 describe his role of mediator.

    Quote
    These verses have nothing to do with the sacrifice of Jesus.

    To my ears they do because “For Jesus Christ were all things created a new, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him is a new statement that other scriptures also make.”

    The account of the old creation does not mention Jesus Christ, though the Anointing Spirit is present under the name Spirit of God. So the account of creation in Genesis does not support your understanding.

    It is written:

    Quote
    James 1:18
    King James Version (KJV)

    18Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.

    And thus it can be discerned because of what we have been taught elsewhere that God is speaking of the creatures of the new covenant and not the old. We also know these “kind of first fruits” are sired with the Word. Even though this passage does not say so we are taught elsewhere that the new creature is sired through the Anointed Jesus.

    Here a second witness from Scripture teaches us:

    Quote
    Romans 8
    King James Version (KJV)

    22For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.
    23And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

    From this witness we learn that it is not only first fruits but the whole that is created a new.

    What part of the words “the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.” Is not true when spoken of the new covenant?

    What part of the new creation is not sealed with Jesus Anointed’s self-sacrifice?

    So Irene given you acknowledge all those things are true of the new covenant then do you believe the whole creation already had them just before being created a new?

    If not then do you believe the whole creation fell away after tasting the good word of God and the powers of the world and now hopes to return even though it is written:

    Quote
    Hebrews 6
    King James Version (KJV)

    4For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,
    5And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,
    6If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.
    7For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:
    8But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

    Since we know what states is true then it is true that such a world will be rejected and its end is to be destroyed.

    Quote
    You quote:

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. [quote]

    To understand this scripture let us look at what is written in:

    [quote]John 1
    King James Version (KJV)

    1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    Since this speaks of the beginning then we shall see what the first account of Scripture that tells of the beginning. It is written:

    Quote
    Genesis 1
    King James Version (KJV)

    1In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    2And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
    3And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.


    ….

    So this scripture bears witness of three being present. They are

    1. God in verse 1,3
    2. Spirit of God in verse 2
    3. Word which was spoken by God in verse 3

    There is no mention of Jesus unless you choose to substitute Jesus as Word. If you did that then verse three would read “And God spoke Jesus, Let there be light and there was light”

    In verse three we have the defining account of who it was that it is true to say “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.”

    So do you believe the name Jesus can be substituted for “the Word” in Genesis 1:3?

    If not the why do you try to plug it into John 1:1+ when the Word itself fits what is written there?

    #256544
    Pastry
    Participant

    Quote

    So this scripture bears witness of three being present. They are

    1. God in verse 1,3
    2. Spirit of God in verse 2
    3. Word which was spoken by God in verse 3

    There is no mention of Jesus unless you choose to substitute Jesus as Word. If you did that then verse three would read “And God spoke Jesus, Let there be light and there was light”

    Kerwin! You choose to interpret that Scripture according to you and not according to what it says…

    Jhn 1:1 ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

    This is the beginning of The Word of God, who became Jesus….because of verse 14

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

    Kerwin, is there any other being that is the only begotten of the Father??? I don't think so…. there are not three present either… but two…. John is not talking about Gods Holy Spirit….

    I don't interpret it either, I see what Jesus was before He became a man…. that is what John is telling us….And that is how He will return as…Rev. 19

    Irene

    #256554
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,10:00)
    To my ears they do because “For Jesus Christ were all things created a new, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,


    Hi Kerwin,

    When is the last time you had your ears checked? I ask because it seems your ears are hearing the word “anew” that wasn't ever said by anyone.

    We cannot just add our own words into the scriptures as we see fit. Nor are we allowed to change the words “ALL creation” to “NEW creation” just because that word fits our doctrine better.

    mike

    #256555
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Pastry @ Aug. 21 2011,10:20)
    Kerwin, is there any other being that is the only begotten of the Father???


    Hi Irene,

    Kerwin's doctrine has now led him to a place where God's only begotten is an unknown entity. ???

    What a mess! Better to just accept that Jesus IS the only begotten of God who was made flesh so that he could be sacrificed on our behalf.

    peace,
    mike

    #256557
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike

    Quote
    The Jews:  What are you talking about, dude?    You are not even 50 years old!  How in the world could YOU, have seen Abraham?

    That is not the what Jesus said but rather words of those of whom Jesus had previously stated:

    Quote
    John 8
    King James Version (KJV)

    43Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

    The point Jesus is making is all through that teaching but I will address what is written in:

    Quote
    John 8
    King James Version (KJV)

    38I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.
    39They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.
    40But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

    And

    54Jesus answered, If I honour myself, my honour is nothing: it is my Father that honoureth me; of whom ye say, that he is your God:
    55Yet ye have not known him; but I know him: and if I should say, I know him not, I shall be a liar like unto you: but I know him, and keep his saying.
    56Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

    As I believe these verses sum it up.

    He stated “I speak that which I have seen with my Father” and we know it is written:

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 2:11
    King James Version (KJV)

    11For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

    Having this knowledge we know that the Spirit of God in the Anointed is revealing the deep things only he knows by the words of Jesus.

    And by his words that go “ye do that which ye have seen with your father” we know that the actions of those objectors that listened to him that day revealed the things of Satan by the spirit of a demon.

    We also know that Jesus is a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God” and that is the “deep things of God” that the Spirit of God within him revealed to him.

    He also teaches us that “this did not Abraham” and so we know that Abraham neither knew or revealed the deep things of God.
    Jesus goes on to teach “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day” and we know anyone who seeks God’s righteousness and his kingdom would rejoice to see the day when the deep things of God are revealed to mankind and through mankind.

    In addition he teaches about Abraham that he saw that day and we know Abraham did not experience it for himself as Jesus previously taught that Abraham neither knew or revealed the deep things of God.  We also know that it is written about Abraham and others that came before Jesus that:

    Quote
    Hebrews 11
    King James Version (KJV)

    39And these all, having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise:
    40God having provided some better thing for us, that they without us should not be made perfect.

    It is thus clear the objectors in 8:57 had misunderstood Jesus’ previous words  and Jesus responded by rephrasing his point in John 8:58.  That point being that he is “he” through and by whom the deep things of God are revealed and Abraham is not. He also reveals that constantly that has been his role as testified by Moses and the prophets and revealed in these later days.

    So in conclusion, before Abraham was made he, Jesus is continuously He.

    #256558
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kerwin,

    You preach a doctrine that I can't even understand.  WHAT exactly did you just say in that post?  ???

    The FACT of the matter is that Jesus said Abraham was happy to see his day.

    The Jews then implied that Jesus couldn't have ever seen Abraham, because he wasn't even 50 years old.

    Then Jesus explained to them that before Abraham ever existed, he himself had already been in existence – thereby telling the Jews they were wrong.

    This is how I understand the VERY CLEAR words of that scripture.  Please explain to me again what YOU think Jesus was telling the Jews about himself before Abraham existed.  I don't understand this “continuously HE” stuff. If you are saying that Jesus continuously existed before, during and after Abraham's existence on earth, then I agree. But I'm not sure if that's what you are saying.

    mike

    #256559
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    Jesus is not a plant, Kerwin.  

    That is easily conferred from other Scripture that calls him a human being instead.  

    I see that you also read inferred teachings in scriptures.

    Quote
    I find it very telling that you recognize that the root of a plant comes BEFORE the trunk, and branch of a plant comes AFTER the trunk.

    It is “an underlying support” as one definition at Merriam Webster’s online dictionary puts it.

    Quote
    But you cannot transfer that simple analogy over to a human teaching and see that Jesus is saying he came both BEFORE David and AFTER David.

    Scripture states Jesus is the offspring of David as of the flesh but not the ancestor.

    On the other hand scripture states an underlying support of David is faith in the coming of Jesus.  

    Quote
    Because of your predisposed belief, you are unwilling to just take the scriptural words as they are written.

    You are the one that is arguing against faith in Jesus being an underlying support of David and not me.  If you believe faith in Jesus is a root of David and since you have already inferred Jesus is not a plant root of David then why don’t you also infer that faith in Jesus is the underlying support of David and an extension of his genotype?

    Quote
    That makes no sense, Kerwin.  How could what Jesus believed 2000 years later be the “root”, or basis for DAVID'S faith?

    I mis-wrote “Jesus” instead of “David”.  I am sorry for the mix-up that I also failed to catch on review.

    Quote
    Here's how it is, Kerwin:  God spoke through Micah about a coming Messiah, whose origins were actually from ancient times.  I take that to mean that our Messiah's origins WERE from ancient times.  YOU, on the other hand, immediately set out to find some other meaning to those words, because the words as they are do not fit in with YOUR OWN predisposed understanding.

    You choose to define origins to fit your preconceptions as you fail to consider that God is the origins of mankind but he is not mankind.   Since that is so, it is clear you are inferring Micah speaks of the start of Jesus’ existence.  

    I believe that you, like me believes that the Word of God is Jesus’ origins’,

    Quote
    How about you join in the “Root and Branch” discussion with Gene and I in the incarnation thread, so I don't have to be answering the same things in two different threads?

    That sounds like a plan.  We can transfer that conversation over to there.   I will look for your response there.

    #256560
    kerwin
    Participant

    Mike,

    Quote
    So now the Holy Spirit IS the Son of Man?     Oh brother!

    It seems you have missed some of what is taught as it is written:

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 2:11
    King James Version (KJV)

    11For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

    Alternately translated

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 2
    Young's Literal Translation (YLT)

    11for who of men hath known the things of the man, except the spirit of the man that [is] in him? so also the things of God no one hath known, except the Spirit of God.

    If you look carefully you will see both versions of this scripture explicitly state no human being but one human being knows the things of man.   It clearly states that human exception is the spirit of the human that it is in.  Other scripture also calls the spirit of a human, a human for it is the old spirit of the man that is put to death and it is the new spirit of the man that rises from the grave in Christ.

    This scripture compares the spirit of God to the spirit of man and since scripture calls the spirit of a human a human then the Spirit of God is called God.  So as the Spirit is called God it should be clear that it can also call the Spirit his offspring because it is “of” him.

    #256561
    Pastry
    Participant

    Kerwin! What you are doing is is ignoring plain written Scriptures, that teaches who The Word of God is, the only begotten of the Father…. Then Jesus said that He came down from Heaven to do the will of His Father that sent Him…. You are calling Jesus a liar if you say anything else to those Scriptures …
    I am with Mike that what you are trying to say about the Spirit makes no sense what soever…
    Eph 4:4 [There is] one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling;

    Eph 4:5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism,

    Eph 4:6 One God and Father of all, who [is] above all, and through all, and in you all.

    There is only one Holy Spirit, and that Spirit is in Jesus and all baptized born again Christians….

    And you have not yet answered the question who is the only begotten of the Father in

    Jhn 1:14 ¶ And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

    I am trying very hard to understand what exactly you are trying to say about the Spirit of man and the Spirit of God…. We as Humans do have a Spirit our mind… and with the Spirit of God we can understand the things of God…which we received at baptism…… but what does that have to do with the preexisting of Jesus???

    #256564
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    Scripture states Jesus is the offspring of David as of the flesh but not the ancestor.

    his God the father the ancestor of anyone ? no ,he is the creator their is a difference,

    Christ as man was from the root of David –but as a spirit he was not his ancestor because Christ was not flesh but became flesh and that is where there is the connection to David,

    Pierre

    #256565
    terraricca
    Participant

    kerwin

    11for who of men hath known the things of the man, except the spirit of the man that [is] in him? so also the things of God no one hath known, except the Spirit of God.

    Jn 3:12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
    Jn 3:13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven—the Son of Man.

    Jn 4:22 You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.
    Jn 4:23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for they are the kind of worshipers the Father seeks.
    Jn 4:24 God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.”

    Kerwin,when you understand those scriptures you will see that the spirit of God can be understood in regards to men ,this is what Christ came to show and to demonstrate and teach it to his disciples

    but not all are willingly to open their mind and heart to the words spoken by the son of God,

    Pierre

    #256566
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    Quote
    The seat of character that comes from above is one that is righteous and holy as is God’s.  Jesus constantly has such a seat of character.

    what is the ? the seat of character that comes from above

    Pierre

    #256567
    terraricca
    Participant

    Kerwin

    what do you think this means? “The Spirit gives life;

    #256568
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 22 2011,05:24)

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 21 2011,11:18)

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Aug. 21 2011,09:22)

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 20 2011,07:38)
    would it not be that Christ came from heaven ?or was Jesus tried to deceit Nicodemus by making up a story ? or was Jesus talking in a allegory way ?you see what i mean ?

    some times you have to believe the words and letters the way they are ,because their are complete the way they are,

    Pierre


    Terricca……….. THE CHRISTOS (DID) COME FROM HEAVEN, but Jesus did not come from heaven he came through a human berth process as a 100% pure human being, He then after that recieved the Christos (anointing) of Holy Spirit from GOD the FATHER So the Christos was GOD (IN) him and was from above, but the Man Jesus was simply a human being who recieved the LOGOS into him This is how the FATHER was (IN HIM)> BY his LOGOS or HOLY SPIRIT. Simple if you understand it right.  Remember, “the father (IN) me (HE) does the WORKS”>  So when are you going to start to believe that the FATHER GOD was truly (IN) Jesus Pierre?

    peace and love……………………………..gene


    gene

    you never answer my question ,but now you telling me that Jesus and Christ are not the same person,

    and that he received the holy spirit at his baptism right ?

    but then what did Gabriel said to Mary ?

    you are confused and try to confuse others

    Pierre


    Terricca………….If you have a good Greek translation look up the word Christ and come and tell us what it means , you will also find that most of the time scripture should render it as Jesus (THE) CHRISTOS, or better Jesus the Anointed one or Messiah. Which also means Anointed ONE. In fact there is confusion even over that word as Paul used it , for instance where it say Christ (IN) YOU , that is saying the anointing in you, not the person Jesus.  And where it say “Christos was the rock following Israel in the wilderness, that was not saying Jesus was following Israel in the wilderness but the anointing Spirit of GOD was.

    Terricca no one is trying to confuse you here, you are already confused enough by yourself and your comrades here. IMO

    peace and love………………………………..gene


    Gene

    Quote
    that is saying the anointing in you, not the person Jesus.

    you have it right but i would like to know what the first part means ;the anointing in you

    so explain this to me

    Pierre

    #256569
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:14)

    Scripture states Jesus is the offspring of David as of the flesh but not the ancestor.  On the other hand scripture states an underlying support of David is faith in the coming of Jesus.


    Let's see if what you say is scripturally correct:

    Revelation 22:16
    “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

    Let's try it your way:  I am the Underlying Support and the Offspring of David……..

    See?  Nothing at all about the FAITH of David there.  Nor does the personal pronoun “I” allow for the “Underlying Support” of David to be anything other than the same exact person who is speaking.  

    So if we add the info from the first sentence to the second, we can conclude:  I, Jesus, am the Underlying Support and the Offspring of David.

    So regardless of whether you add your own word “faith” into the scripture or not, the PERSON Jesus must have existed before David to be the “Underlying Support” OF David.  Because as bad as you WANT it to say that the promise of the Messiah was the undelying support for David's faith in God, it simply does NOT say that.

    Now Kerwin, this is how it works out even when we use your “oddball, out of the norm” definition of “root” that you found.  If we use the most common definition of “root” there is, it becomes even clearer that Jesus existed before David did.  Because then it says:  I, Jesus, am BOTH the Root (came before) AND the Offspring (Branch) of David.

    And only then does Matthew 22:42-45 begin to become clear.  Only then will you understand just why Jesus was teaching the Pharisees that he was NOT, in fact, the literal son of David.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:14)

    You are the one that is arguing against faith in Jesus being an underlying support of David and not me.


    In order for David to have been supported by faith in Jesus, Jesus must have existed. But that is a moot point anyway, because any faith David may or may not have had in Jesus is not mentioned in the scriptures. Nor is the FAITH of David what is mentioned in Rev 22:16.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:14)

    You choose to define origins to fit your preconceptions as you fail to consider that God is the origins of mankind but he is not mankind.


    God is not the “origins” of mankind, Kerwin.  He is the Originator.  In Micah 5:2, it is clear that the coming Messiah did not originate himself, but that HIS origins were from ancient days.  But this is a perfect example of how you've come to do things.  If the scripture CLEARLY says, “I came down from heaven”, you immediately set into action, trying to find some oddball translation, or some dusty, never used definition of one of the words to cast some shadow of doubt on the CLEAR and OBVIOUS meaning of the scriptural words.  

    And anyone anywhere can do that with any scripture, Kerwin.  If you don't believe me, just sit back and watch how Kathi butchers the clear meaning of many scriptures to further her own imagined doctrine.

    The trick is for either of you to come to a sensible understanding of scripture and how they ALL fit together without contradiction, AFTER you've butchered the CLEAR meaning of the words.

    And so far, neither of you have been able to do that once.  For example, you can dig down and find an oddball instance of “ginomai” where it is translated as “married”.  And you can claim that this is the correct translation of “ginomai” in John 1:14…………….against all odds.  But then you can't complete the scriptural teaching AFTER you've done that.  If the Holy Spirit/Word of God MARRIED flesh, then WHO is the only begotten son of God?  And WHO exactly died on the stake for us?  And WHO was raised back to life?

    And then you can point out that it doesn't say “glory OF an only begotten”, but “glory AS OF an only begotten”.  But you can't finish your doctrine, because now you're left with an unknown only begotten of God when Jesus himself says it is HE who is God's only begotten Son.

    I hope you start preparing yourself a little better from now on.  Because my plan is to have you spell out very clearly exactly who and what you are claiming is who and what from now on.  

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:14)

    I believe that you, like me believes that the Word of God is Jesus’ origins’,


    God is Jesus' ORIGINATOR, not his “origins”.  Jesus was not originated BY the Word of God……………he IS the Word of God who was originated by God Himself – the ONLY living being to have come directly from God.

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:14)

    We can transfer that conversation over to there.   I will look for your response there.


    I've changed my mind, Kerwin, if that's okay with you.  Let's keep this discussion separate from the one I'm kind of having with Gene if you don't mind.  That way, I can more clearly focus on what it is you're trying to claim.  Because more often than not, I haven't the foggiest.  :)

    peace,
    mike

    #256570
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,13:59)
    Mike,

    Quote
    So now the Holy Spirit IS the Son of Man?     Oh brother!

    It seems you have missed some of what is taught as it is written:

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 2:11
    King James Version (KJV)

    11For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.

    Alternately translated

    Quote
    1 Corinthians 2
    Young's Literal Translation (YLT)

    11for who of men hath known the things of the man, except the spirit of the man that [is] in him? so also the things of God no one hath known, except the Spirit of God.

    If you look carefully you will see both versions of this scripture explicitly state no human being but one human being knows the things of man.   It clearly states that human exception is the spirit of the human that it is in.  Other scripture also calls the spirit of a human, a human for it is the old spirit of the man that is put to death and it is the new spirit of the man that rises from the grave in Christ.

    This scripture compares the spirit of God to the spirit of man and since scripture calls the spirit of a human a human then the Spirit of God is called God.  So as the Spirit is called God it should be clear that it can also call the Spirit his offspring because it is “of” him.


    Hi Kerwin,

    Please explain that post to me. Make a clear and direct claim so I know whether I agree with you or not.

    Are you saying that God's Holy Spirit IS the Son of Man or not?

    mike

    #256574
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (terraricca @ Aug. 22 2011,05:31)
    Kerwin

    what do you think this means? “The Spirit gives life;


    Pierre,

    It means that if you do as is written in:

    Quote
    Galatians 5

    King James Version (KJV)

    16This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.

    Then you will live.

    #256589
    kerwin
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ Aug. 21 2011,20:25)

    Quote (kerwin @ Aug. 21 2011,01:07)
    Mike,

    You should read more of what he taught to those disciples.

    Quote
    John 6

    New International Version (NIV)

    61 Aware that his disciples were grumbling about this, Jesus said to them, “Does this offend you? 62 Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before! 63 The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you—they are full of the Spirit and life. 64 Yet there are some of you who do not believe.” For Jesus had known from the beginning which of them did not believe and who would betray him. 65 He went on to say, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless the Father has enabled them.”

    I have been making a point of quoting “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing” for Pierre's benefit.  He just happened to quote those after stating “Then what if you see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before”.

    Your focus seems to be on the body and not the spirit just as those in John 6:42 were as they should have known it is not where his body comes from that is important but where his spirit does.


    Hi Kerwin,

    What point are you trying to make?  It often seems to me that you speak in riddles without ever really stating just what it is you believe.

    If you are saying that the spirit BEING Jesus was made flesh, and that only the spirit BEING Jesus came from heaven, as opposed to the flesh body he was “boxed” in on earth, then I can go along with that.

    So…………….IS that what you are saying?  Because flesh or not, it was definitely the BEING of Jesus, complete with the memories of his pre-existence, who came down from heaven, and later ascended to where he was before.

    mike


    Mike,

    Using this Scripture:

    Quote
    Galatians 5

    King James Version (KJV)

    25If we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.

    I will say where the spirit came Jesus walks by is from is that counts and not where the body that housed his inner person at that time.

    #256593
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    But the debate has always been about whether or not there even WAS an “inner person” who pre-existed the flesh.

    Do you now agree there was?

    #256595
    terraricca
    Participant

    kerwin

    Quote
    I will say where the spirit came Jesus walks by is from is that counts and not where the body that housed his inner person at that time.

    are you writhing English ?
    I have no idea what you are saying

    Pierre

Viewing 20 posts - 11,301 through 11,320 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account