Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 8,041 through 8,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #203361
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Irene,
    Jesus is indeed with God alive forever in the Spirit he shares with God.
    This is our hope too.

    #203363

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,12:00)
    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,


    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.

    Ignatius also spoke these words…

    There is only one physician, who is both flesh and spirit, BORN AND UNBORN, God in man, true life in death, both from Mary and from God, first subject to suffering and then beyond it, Jesus Christ our Lord. 7:2

    It is clear by his words that he did not believe that Jesus was “born” from an asexual God by some procreation process.

    As far as Eusebius, he signed off on the Nicene Creed in 325 which states…

    [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'—they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

    But Mike continues to misrepresent their interpretation of the words “firstborn” and “begotten” for no early Church Father who was a Trinitarian believed Jesus had a beginnig before he came in the flesh!

    The Hebrew word “yachiyd” is the equivalent of the Greek word “monogenes”. The Hebrew word for begotten which is “Yalad” is the equivalent of the Greek word “gennaō” which is the same word the writers of Hebrews and Acts used when they quoted Psalms 2:7. (Acts 13:33 – Heb 1:5 -5:5)

    These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    Paul also uses the same word here…

    For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten (gennaō) you through the gospel. 1 Cor 4:15

    And here…

    I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten (gennaō) in my bonds: PHM 1:10

    These scriptures also prove the use of the word to mean A begetting without procreation!

    WJ

    #203364
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    So the Word of God begets sons.
    The Spirit of Christ is that Word

    #203365

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 12 2010,15:34)
    Hi WJ,
    So the Word of God begets sons.
    The Spirit of Christ is that Word


    Yes, many that already existed but not as sons until they were begotten of him!

    WJ

    #203368
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi WJ,
    Yes men exist and have access to maybe 100 years of life before the cord breaks and the bucket falls to the bottom of the well[ecc12].
    The anointing of the Eternal Spirit of the Eternal God gives them eternal life.
    Come to the fountain for men of eternal life [Jn7]

    #203374
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 13 2010,07:21)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,12:00)
    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,


    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.

    Ignatius also spoke these words…

    There is only one physician, who is both flesh and spirit, BORN AND UNBORN, God in man, true life in death, both from Mary and from God, first subject to suffering and then beyond it, Jesus Christ our Lord. 7:2

    It is clear by his words that he did not believe that Jesus was “born” from an asexual God by some procreation process.

    As far as Eusebius, he signed off on the Nicene Creed in 325 which states…

    [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'—they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

    But Mike continues to misrepresent their interpretation of the words “firstborn” and “begotten” for no early Church Father who was a Trinitarian believed Jesus had a beginnig before he came in the flesh!

    The Hebrew word “yachiyd” is the equivalent of the Greek word “monogenes”. The Hebrew word for begotten which is “Yalad” is the equivalent of the Greek word “gennaō” which is the same word the writers of Hebrews and Acts used when they quoted Psalms 2:7. (Acts 13:33 – Heb 1:5 -5:5)

    These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    Paul also uses the same word here…

    For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten (gennaō) you through the gospel. 1 Cor 4:15

    And here…

    I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten (gennaō) in my bonds: PHM 1:10

    These scriptures also prove the use of the word to mean A begetting without procreation!

    WJ


    Keith,

    Mike knows that trinitarians define “firstborn of every creature” to mean that Jesus is preeminent. He even quoted a JW source in our first debate.

    On page 8 Mike said:

    Quote
    I'll let the Witnesses answer for me:

     
    Trinitarians say that “first-born” here means prime, most excellent, most distinguished; thus Christ would be understood to be, not part of creation, but the most distinguished in relation to those who were created. If that is so, and if the Trinity doctrine is true, why are the Father and the holy spirit not also said to be the firstborn of all creation? But the Bible applies this expression only to the Son. According to the customary meaning of “firstborn,” it indicates that Jesus is the eldest in Jehovah’s family of sons. Before Colossians 1:15, the expression “the firstborn of” occurs upwards of 30 times in the Bible, and in each instance that it is applied to living creatures the same meaning applies—the firstborn is part of the group. “The firstborn of Israel” is one of the sons of Israel; “the firstborn of Pharaoh” is one of Pharaoh’s family; “the firstborn of beast” are themselves animals. What, then, causes some to ascribe a different meaning to it at Colossians 1:15? Is it Bible usage or is it a belief to which they already hold and for which they seek proof?


    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=70

    On March 26 Mike outright accused trinitarians of “doctoring the scriptures” for the last 1800 years and “flat out lying” about Colossians 1:15:

    Quote
    “My point to all this is that the Trinitarians have been doctoring the Scriptures and changing the meanings of clearly written Scriptures for 1800 years.  Lately, they just keep getting more and more blatant about it.  The NIV is the most prominent translation in America today, at least with the younger, post-King James readers, and they are flat out lying about Rev 3:14 and Col 1:15.”

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=70

    Mike quoted the JW's who say that trinitarians say that “firstborn of all creation” means that Jesus is “supreme” and that He is “not a part of creation”. Mike even said that trinitarians have been “doctoring” Colossians 1:15 and “flat out lying” about it for the last 1800 years.

    But now Mike wants us to believe that they were anti-trinitarians all along about Colossians 1:15.

    No one here buys Mike's nonsense!

    Jack

    #203375
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (Kangaroo Jack @ July 13 2010,08:50)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 13 2010,07:21)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,12:00)
    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,


    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.

    Ignatius also spoke these words…

    There is only one physician, who is both flesh and spirit, BORN AND UNBORN, God in man, true life in death, both from Mary and from God, first subject to suffering and then beyond it, Jesus Christ our Lord. 7:2

    It is clear by his words that he did not believe that Jesus was “born” from an asexual God by some procreation process.

    As far as Eusebius, he signed off on the Nicene Creed in 325 which states…

    [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'—they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

    But Mike continues to misrepresent their interpretation of the words “firstborn” and “begotten” for no early Church Father who was a Trinitarian believed Jesus had a beginnig before he came in the flesh!

    The Hebrew word “yachiyd” is the equivalent of the Greek word “monogenes”. The Hebrew word for begotten which is “Yalad” is the equivalent of the Greek word “gennaō” which is the same word the writers of Hebrews and Acts used when they quoted Psalms 2:7. (Acts 13:33 – Heb 1:5 -5:5)

    These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    Paul also uses the same word here…

    For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten (gennaō) you through the gospel. 1 Cor 4:15

    And here…

    I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten (gennaō) in my bonds: PHM 1:10

    These scriptures also prove the use of the word to mean A begetting without procreation!

    WJ


    Keith,

    Mike knows that trinitarians define “firstborn of every creature” to mean that Jesus is preeminent. He even quoted a JW source in our first debate.

    On page 8 Mike said:

    Quote
    I'll let the Witnesses answer for me:

     
    Trinitarians say that “first-born” here means prime, most excellent, most distinguished; thus Christ would be understood to be, not part of creation, but the most distinguished in relation to those who were created. If that is so, and if the Trinity doctrine is true, why are the Father and the holy spirit not also said to be the firstborn of all creation? But the Bible applies this expression only to the Son. According to the customary meaning of “firstborn,” it indicates that Jesus is the eldest in Jehovah’s family of sons. Before Colossians 1:15, the expression “the firstborn of” occurs upwards of 30 times in the Bible, and in each instance that it is applied to living creatures the same meaning applies—the firstborn is part of the group. “The firstborn of Israel” is one of the sons of Israel; “the firstborn of Pharaoh” is one of Pharaoh’s family; “the firstborn of beast” are themselves animals. What, then, causes some to ascribe a different meaning to it at Colossians 1:15? Is it Bible usage or is it a belief to which they already hold and for which they seek proof?


    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=70

    On March 26 Mike outright accused trinitarians of “doctoring the scriptures” for the last 1800 years and “flat out lying” about Colossians 1:15:

    Quote
    “My point to all this is that the Trinitarians have been doctoring the Scriptures and changing the meanings of clearly written Scriptures for 1800 years.  Lately, they just keep getting more and more blatant about it.  The NIV is the most prominent translation in America today, at least with the younger, post-King James readers, and they are flat out lying about Rev 3:14 and Col 1:15.”

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=70

    Mike quoted the JW's who say that trinitarians say that “firstborn of all creation” means that Jesus is “supreme” and that He is “not a part of creation”. Mike even said that trinitarians have been “doctoring” Colossians 1:15 and “flat out lying” about it for the last 1800 years.

    But now Mike wants us to believe that they were anti-trinitarians all along about Colossians 1:15.

    No one here buys Mike's nonsense!

    Jack


    I hate to say it but I agree with WJ and Roo in some of what they say. Jesus did not preexist his birth to mary.

    #203377
    terraricca
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 13 2010,07:21)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,12:00)
    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,


    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.

    Ignatius also spoke these words…

    There is only one physician, who is both flesh and spirit, BORN AND UNBORN, God in man, true life in death, both from Mary and from God, first subject to suffering and then beyond it, Jesus Christ our Lord. 7:2

    It is clear by his words that he did not believe that Jesus was “born” from an asexual God by some procreation process.

    As far as Eusebius, he signed off on the Nicene Creed in 325 which states…

    [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'—they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

    But Mike continues to misrepresent their interpretation of the words “firstborn” and “begotten” for no early Church Father who was a Trinitarian believed Jesus had a beginnig before he came in the flesh!

    The Hebrew word “yachiyd” is the equivalent of the Greek word “monogenes”. The Hebrew word for begotten which is “Yalad” is the equivalent of the Greek word “gennaō” which is the same word the writers of Hebrews and Acts used when they quoted Psalms 2:7. (Acts 13:33 – Heb 1:5 -5:5)

    These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    Paul also uses the same word here…

    For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten (gennaō) you through the gospel. 1 Cor 4:15

    And here…

    I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten (gennaō) in my bonds: PHM 1:10

    These scriptures also prove the use of the word to mean A begetting without procreation!

    WJ


    JW

    why is it you tell others that they twist the scriptures and do not see what you do??

    this is your written words;;These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    how you explain then that those words were spoken on his baptism in the Jordan river by John the baptist;Mt 3:17 And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”

    in these words God the father begotten his son Jesus Christ;

    is there any other son what God as approved that you know of???

    Pierre

    #203380

    Quote (terraricca @ July 12 2010,17:04)

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 13 2010,07:21)

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 11 2010,12:00)
    Ignatius was thought to have been taught by the Apostle John himself and he said:
    Glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who by Him has given you such wisdom, that He was the Son of God, “the first-born of every creature,” God the Word, the only-begotten Son, and was of the seed of David according to the flesh, by the Virgin Mary;

    He thought Jesus was the firstborn of all creation AND also was born of Mary in the flesh.  He further emphasizes this belief in a letter to the Ephesians,
    Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin.

    It is clear that Ignatius thought Jesus pre-existed his flesh.  Eusebius was an early church father who was thought to be “the greatest Greek teacher and most learned theologian of his day” wrote this around 325 A.D.,
    We believe in One God, the Father Almighty, the Maker of all things visible and invisible. And in One Lord Jesus Christ, the Word of God, God from God, Light from Light, Life from Life, Son Only-begotten, first-born of every creature, before all the ages, begotten from the Father,


    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.

    Ignatius also spoke these words…

    There is only one physician, who is both flesh and spirit, BORN AND UNBORN, God in man, true life in death, both from Mary and from God, first subject to suffering and then beyond it, Jesus Christ our Lord. 7:2

    It is clear by his words that he did not believe that Jesus was “born” from an asexual God by some procreation process.

    As far as Eusebius, he signed off on the Nicene Creed in 325 which states…

    [But those who say: 'There was a time when he was not;' and 'He was not before he was made;' and 'He was made out of nothing,' or 'He is of another substance' or 'essence,' or 'The Son of God is created,' or 'changeable,' or 'alterable'—they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic Church.]

    But Mike continues to misrepresent their interpretation of the words “firstborn” and “begotten” for no early Church Father who was a Trinitarian believed Jesus had a beginnig before he came in the flesh!

    The Hebrew word “yachiyd” is the equivalent of the Greek word “monogenes”. The Hebrew word for begotten which is “Yalad” is the equivalent of the Greek word “gennaō” which is the same word the writers of Hebrews and Acts used when they quoted Psalms 2:7. (Acts 13:33 – Heb 1:5 -5:5)

    These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    Paul also uses the same word here…

    For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten (gennaō) you through the gospel. 1 Cor 4:15

    And here…

    I beseech thee for my son Onesimus, whom I have begotten (gennaō) in my bonds: PHM 1:10

    These scriptures also prove the use of the word to mean A begetting without procreation!

    WJ


    JW

    why is it you tell others that they twist the scriptures and do not see what you do??

    this is your written words;;These scriptures prove Jesus was begotten after his resurrection!

    how you explain then that those words were spoken on his baptism in the Jordan river by John the baptist;Mt 3:17 And a voice from heaven said, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.”

    in these words God the father begotten his son Jesus Christ;

    is there any other son what God as approved that you know of???

    Pierre


    T

    If you would read with comprehension you might understand what I am saying.

    I am not saying the word “begotten” (gennaō) does not apply to Jesus before the ressurection, but I am saying the word “begotten (gennaō) is not given to Jesus before he came in the flesh and that the Forefathers disagree with mikes interpretation of the text!

    WJ

    #203383
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi,
    Jesus is not spoken of till his conception in Mary has occurred.[Mt1]

    #203384
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 10 2010,16:49)

    Quote (942767 @ July 10 2010,06:59)
    Hi Mike:

    The scripture states that Jesus is a man.  My guess you are saying that he is a spirit being because the Word of God states that he was made a life-giving spirit.  Where is the scripture that states that Jesus is a spirit being.


    Hi Marty,

    Joh 20:26
    Eight days later the disciples were again together in the house, and Thomas was with them. Although the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!”

    How did Jesus get in the room?  How about this one,
    Luke 24:15
    15As they talked and discussed these things with each other, Jesus himself came up and walked along with them; 16but they were kept from recognizing him.

    24:30-31
    30When he was at the table with them, he took bread, gave thanks, broke it and began to give it to them. 31Then their eyes were opened and they recognized him, and he disappeared from their sight.

    How can a flesh and blood man walk through walls, transform his appearance and disappear into thin air?  Paul explains here,
    1 Cor 15:25
    35But someone may ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body will they come?”

    15:42-44
    42So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; 43it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; 44it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body.  If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body.

    Marty, read all of 1 Cor 15 and it is all explained how Jesus now has a spiritual body.  Now if you add that to the facts we know about the Son of Man coming FROM heaven, ascending to where he was BEFORE, and being restored to his previous glory then it is not hard to surmise that Jesus was spirit, then flesh, then spirit again.

    mike


    Hi Mike:

    Jesus appeared to his disciples after his resurrection.

    Quote
    Luke 24:35-41 (King James Version)

    35And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.

    36And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

    37But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit.

    38And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?

    39Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see;FOR A SPIRIT HATH NOT FLESH AND BONE, as ye see me have.

    40And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.

    Also, Mike Jesus said that he was going to ascend where he was before, but he did not say anything about being restored to his former glory. You are adding the word “restored” to what he said.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty

    #203387
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (martian @ July 12 2010,07:59)
    I will not deal with things you pull out of context. The statement you quote is explained further on.

    You know what forget the post. I am not interested in debating philosophy with the Greeks. I would actually like to walk with God using Christ as my example.  You have heard of that have you not?
    Just answer a few questions.
    1.  How does your doctrine help me become more like Christ?
    2. How does it make Christ more of a perfect example for me?
    3. What happened to the memories and experences of the Christ in the prior life?
    4. How did his preexistence effect his ability to walk with God on Earth?


    Hi Martian,  

    1.  “This means eternal life, their taking in knowledge of you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you HAVE SENT”.  You must take in accurate knowledge of both, Martian.  The Son of Man came FROM heaven – that knowledge is in the scriptures, why won't you take it in?

    Let's say I didn't believe the transfiguration on the mountain was real, but you did.  Your question #1 is like me asking you, “How does me believing the transfiguration really happened help me to become more like Christ?”  It is a moot point.    

    2.  That he was willing to leave the “comforts” he had and give up everything, including his life, to the glory of his God.  Remember the rich man who walked away from Jesus sad because he had much wealth?  Jesus didn't just suggest others do it, he led by example.

    3.  I imagine the same thing that happens to ours when we die.  God puts them in a “data storage bank” or something to be returned to us when we are resurrected, IMO.

    4.  Sorry, but this question is also moot.  I couldn't say how things would have been different had he not already existed before he came in the flesh, because that's not how it happened.

    Btw, I showed you my 1st and 3rd century proof of how “firstborn of all creation” and “only begotten” was understood – not just by any old body off the street – but by men who were renowned for their understanding of the scriptures.   I'm still waiting on your proof that those Greek terms mean something different than what they say.

    mike

    #203388
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (942767 @ July 12 2010,13:20)
    Hi Mike:

    With this statement, I do agree.  Jesus is still a man who now has a spiritual body, and that means that he is alive forever more.  Death has no dominion over him.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hi Marty,

    I'm glad two people actually agree about something on HN!  :D

    It is not the spirituality that makes Jesus immortal.  It was God's will that he now be eternal.  To say God couldn't end the life of a being just because that being was spirit is to limit what God can and can't do, IMO.  Now if God created angels and other spirit beings and told them they were immortal, then God cannot lie and end their life.  This MIGHT be the case with Satan, for his punishment will be everlasting torment, not death.  I don't know that the Bible actually says spirits are immortal, does it? I think a lot of people assume that…..maybe I missed something in scripture?

    peace and love,
    mike

    mike

    #203389
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (martian @ July 13 2010,01:44)
    Come on this is your chance before I write your doctrine off as another cultish philosophy.


    I wasn't ignoring you. I spent 7 hours Sunday working on my debate with KJ. (Lot's of research)

    I'm just now seeing your posts on Monday night.

    mike

    #203390
    Arnold
    Participant

    Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 13 2010,11:14)

    Quote (942767 @ July 12 2010,13:20)
    Hi Mike:

    With this statement, I do agree.  Jesus is still a man who now has a spiritual body, and that means that he is alive forever more.  Death has no dominion over him.

    Love in Christ,
    Marty


    Hi Marty,

    I'm glad two people actually agree about something on HN!  :D

    It is not the spirituality that makes Jesus immortal.  It was God's will that he now be eternal.  To say God couldn't end the life of a being just because that being was spirit is to limit what God can and can't do, IMO.  Now if God created angels and other spirit beings and told them they were immortal, then God cannot lie and end their life.  This MIGHT be the case with Satan, for his punishment will be everlasting torment, not death.  I don't know that the Bible actually says spirits are immortal, does it?  I think a lot of people assume that…..maybe I missed something in scripture?

    peace and love,
    mike

    mike


    Mike! Since God has created all and also Satan who was Lucifer a beautiful Angels until iniquity was found in Him, whatever God created He also can destroy.  The Lake of Fire is the second death, and all wicked man also Satan and His Demon will be thrown into it.  It will burn up and that is the second death.  Destroying that is what I believe all those that will be in the Lake of Fire.  It says that Death is the last enemy that will be destroyed.  That is Satan since He is that cause all…….. Irene

    #203391
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ July 13 2010,01:56)
    Mike…………martian is right on this one brother. the doctrine of Preexistence of Jesus is every bit as bad as the doctrine of the Trinity both are connected with each other, both separate our likeness of Jesus both are false teachings. IMO

    peace and love to you and yours………………………gene


    Hi Gene,

    I disagree and haven't seen any answers to Irene's very simple points that clearly say Jesus was the Word, who we know all things came into being thorugh, and who we know is a real live person AGAIN in heaven.

    Why would Jesus say “in your presence” twice?

    Father glorify me IN YOUR PRESENCE with the glory I had IN YOUR PRESENCE before the creation of the world.

    peace and love,
    mike

    #203392
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 13 2010,06:48)
    Hi Irene,
    Jesus is indeed with God alive forever in the Spirit he shares with God.
    This is our hope too.


    Hi Nick,

    My hope is to be a separate being who shares in God's spirit and worships God along with my King Jesus Christ. Apparently your hope is to become a part of God by being absorbed into His spirit.

    Isn't that what you think happened to Jesus?

    mike

    #203393
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi MB,
    The Word was with God.
    The word was not made flesh till the Jordan

    #203394
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi MB,
    The hope of Jesus was expressed by him in Jn 17.20-23

    #203395
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ July 13 2010,07:21)
    Hi all

    The above is mikes continued insistence in misrepresenting the Forefathers words and their intended meaning.


    Tsk, tsk WJ,

    Always running from post to post with your drivel, and always stalling and crying in our debate threads (that's right, 2 of them) when I try to force you to prove your drivel. :D

    mike

Viewing 20 posts - 8,041 through 8,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account