Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 6,081 through 6,100 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #166980
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 30 2009,04:44)
    Roman Emperor's went by the title ‘Lord’ (kurios), Are the equal to the trinity?


    Huh what? The “kurios” who saved the people out of Egypt in verse 5 is the same “kurios of verse 4 and is explicitly identified as Jesus Christ.

    thinker

    #166981
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Dec. 30 2009,04:48)

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 29 2009,12:24)

    Quote (thethinker @ Dec. 29 2009,09:15)
    Gene said:

    Quote
    [The] SPIRIT of GOD that was the ROCK guiding the Childern of Israel in the wilderness, not JESUS the MAN,


    Gene,
    Who said that it was Jesus the man who followed them? It was Jesus BEFORE He became a man that followed them. It doesn't help your case to put words in people's mouths. Jude verse 5 says that it was Jesus who saved them out of Egypt.

    5 “Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe.” ESV

    Again, it was not the man Jesus who followed them. It was Jesus BEFORE He became flesh who followed them.

    thinker


    Ὑπομνῆσαι δὲ ὑμᾶς βούλομαι, εἰδότας ἅπαξ πάντα ὅτι κύριος λαὸν ἐκ γῆς Αἰγύπτου σώσας τὸ δεύτερον τοὺς μὴ πιστεύσαντας ἀπώλεσεν,

    Word is Kurios not “Jesus”.


    The context proves that 'Kurious” here is Jesus!

    But you choose to ignore the context to support you false doctrine!


    WJ,

    They're not interested in context.

    thinker

    #166984

    κύριος (transliterated: kurios) is a Greek word used extensively in the New Testament.

    It occurs 717 times in various forms.

    In most English versions of the Bible it is translated “lord” or “master.”

    It is used in the following ways:

    As a title for Yahuweh
    As a title for Yashuw'ah
    Referring to masters of slaves
    Referring to the head of a household
    Referring to a chief or leader

    The core meaning of kurios is “one who commands.”

    #166987
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Constitutionalist said:

    Quote
    The core meaning of kurios is “one who commands.”


    All you need to do now is put the “core” meaning in its context and you will do well.

    4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and the only One who commands, Jesus Christ.

    5Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the One who commands, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

    What have you proven? The “one who commands” and saved them out of Egypt is Jesus. Or does the “core” meaning mystically change in verse 5?

    thinker

    #166988

    English translations tend to use “lord” when referring to Yahuweh but “master” or “ruler” when referring to men.

    This creates some confusion in the mind of many since the average person will not be aware that the two words refer to a single concept and so they will often miss the connection between the two.

    Quote
    You cannot be the slave of two masters! You will like one more than the other or be more loyal to one than the other. You cannot serve both Yahuweh and money. (Mat. 6:24, CEV)

    Not everyone who calls me their Lord will get into the kingdom of heaven. Only the ones who obey my Father in heaven will get in. On the day of judgment many will call me their Lord. They will say, “We preached in your name, and in your name we forced out demons and worked many miracles.” But I will tell them, “I will have nothing to do with you! Get out of my sight, you evil people!” (Mat. 7:21-23, CEV)

    The words in bold are translations of the same word kurios.

    To be accurate we should say that the first example is the plural form κυρίοις while the others are singular.

    But all the same these are essentially the same word.

    As English speakers we have an intuitive idea of what a master is.

    A master in most of our minds is principally the owner of slaves.

    That is a pretty close depiction of the New Testament conception of kurios.

    But I believe our understanding differs from those of the first century simply because they had a more intimate acquaintance with this concept.

    In associating the term kurios with owning of slaves, a Greek speaker of the first century would have associated this term with other concepts as well:

    A kurios is wealthy
    A kurios is the head of a large household
    A kurios is in charge of others
    A kurios is responsible for the welfare of his slaves

    There are all sorts of implications for us as followers of Yashuw'ah when we think of him as our kurios.

    These include:

    Because Yashuw'ah is our kurios, we are his slaves
    Because Yashuw'ah is our kurios, he is responsible to take care of us

    We tend to internalize that first concept without the second.

    We are willing to concede in general terms that Yashuw'ah is our master although we probably metaphorize this more than we should.

    Yashuw'ah is our master!

    His will determines our destiny not our own.

    We are owned by him and our energy is devoted to serving him for his benefit.

    Ouch!

    The second truth is equally important.

    When Yashuw'ah is our master he controls our lives and actions but he also takes upon himself the welfare of his slaves.

    We are his to command.

    But we are also his to be clothed, and fed, and provided for in every way.

    This is the secret to understanding Yashuw'ah’ teaching about serving two masters.

    It is not merely a case of being a slave to money, but rather choosing the preferred option which is to be under the care of our benevolent kurios.

    And the second passage quoted above should chill our souls.

    Yashuw'ah is talking to us.

    You can call him “Lord” or “Master” or whatever you want but you can be guilty of not hearing his commands and obeying him.

    All our service can turn out to be “self-service” and we find out at the Judgement Day that we were never serving the Lord at all.

    I invite you to prayerfully consider the issue of what “Lord” really means to us today.

    My prayer is that we may all learn to serve our Master more faithfully.

    #166989
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 30 2009,05:16)
    English translations tend to use “lord” when referring to Yahuweh but “master” or “ruler” when referring to men.

    This creates some confusion in the mind of many since the average person will not be aware that the two words refer to a single concept and so they will often miss the connection between the two.

    Quote
    You cannot be the slave of two masters! You will like one more than the other or be more loyal to one than the other. You cannot serve both Yahuweh and money. (Mat. 6:24, CEV)

    Not everyone who calls me their Lord will get into the kingdom of heaven. Only the ones who obey my Father in heaven will get in. On the day of judgment many will call me their Lord. They will say, “We preached in your name, and in your name we forced out demons and worked many miracles.” But I will tell them, “I will have nothing to do with you! Get out of my sight, you evil people!” (Mat. 7:21-23, CEV)

    The words in bold are translations of the same word kurios.

    To be accurate we should say that the first example is the plural form κυρίοις while the others are singular.

    But all the same these are essentially the same word.

    As English speakers we have an intuitive idea of what a master is.

    A master in most of our minds is principally the owner of slaves.

    That is a pretty close depiction of the New Testament conception of kurios.

    But I believe our understanding differs from those of the first century simply because they had a more intimate acquaintance with this concept.

    In associating the term kurios with owning of slaves, a Greek speaker of the first century would have associated this term with other concepts as well:

    A kurios is wealthy
    A kurios is the head of a large household
    A kurios is in charge of others
    A kurios is responsible for the welfare of his slaves

    There are all sorts of implications for us as followers of Yashuw'ah when we think of him as our kurios.

    These include:

    Because Yashuw'ah is our kurios, we are his slaves
    Because Yashuw'ah is our kurios, he is responsible to take care of us

    We tend to internalize that first concept without the second.

    We are willing to concede in general terms that Yashuw'ah is our master although we probably metaphorize this more than we should.

    Yashuw'ah is our master!

    His will determines our destiny not our own.

    We are owned by him and our energy is devoted to serving him for his benefit.

    Ouch!

    The second truth is equally important.

    When Yashuw'ah is our master he controls our lives and actions but he also takes upon himself the welfare of his slaves.

    We are his to command.

    But we are also his to be clothed, and fed, and provided for in every way.

    This is the secret to understanding Yashuw'ah’ teaching about serving two masters.

    It is not merely a case of being a slave to money, but rather choosing the preferred option which is to be under the care of our benevolent kurios.

    And the second passage quoted above should chill our souls.

    Yashuw'ah is talking to us.

    You can call him “Lord” or “Master” or whatever you want but you can be guilty of not hearing his commands and obeying him.

    All our service can turn out to be “self-service” and we find out at the Judgement Day that we were never serving the Lord at all.

    I invite you to prayerfully consider the issue of what “Lord” really means to us today.

    My prayer is that we may all learn to serve our Master more faithfully.


    What do you prove?

    4For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and the only One who commands, Jesus Christ.

    5Now I desire to remind you, though you know all things once for all, that the One who commands, after saving a people out of the land of Egypt, subsequently destroyed those who did not believe.

    What have you proven? The “one who commands” and saved them out of Egypt is Jesus. Or does the “core” meaning mystically change in verse 5?

    thinker

    #166991

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Dec. 29 2009,13:04)
    κύριος (transliterated: kurios) is a Greek word used extensively in the New Testament.

    It occurs 717 times in various forms.

    In most English versions of the Bible it is translated “lord” or “master.”

    It is used in the following ways:

    As a title for Yahuweh
    As a title for Yashuw'ah
    Referring to masters of slaves
    Referring to the head of a household
    Referring to a chief or leader

    The core meaning of kurios is “one who commands.”


    Actually Strong's G2962 – kyrios for Lord is found 748 times in the NT AV and the definition of the word is…

    1) he to whom a person or thing belongs, about which he has power of deciding; master, lord

    a) the possessor and disposer of a thing

    1) the owner; one who has control of the person, the master

    2) in the state: the sovereign, prince, chief, the Roman emperor

    b) is a title of honour expressive of respect and reverence, with which servants greet their master

    c) this title is given to: God, the Messiah

    Almost invariably the word refers to Jesus in the the NT however the Arians like to play word games with it when it is convienient to their doctrine!

    Scriptures says there is “only one Lord and Master”!

    Deut 6:4, Eph 4:5, 1 Cor 8:6, Tit 1:4

    But we have a whole lot of professing believers following more than “One Lord and master”.

    WJ

    #166993
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    WorshippingJesus said:

    Quote
    Almost invariably the word refers to Jesus in the the NT however the Arians like to play word games with it when it is convienient to their doctrine!

    Scriptures says there is “only one Lord and Master”!

    WJ,
    Yes indeed. All Con is doing is playing games with words. He will not comment on “kurios” in its context of Jude 4-5.

    thinker

    #167695
    banana
    Participant

    I don't think that anybody is playing on this site.  The word Lord is in the New and Old Testaments.  If you notice that in the Old T. LORD is mostly in Capital letters and it is God the Father. While Lord it is Jesus mostly. In Ancient times lord was used for all kinds of man in charger just like God is used for other then our God.  I don't have to know Hebrew or Greek to know that.  It is the translators that were had so much respect for our God that they did not want to misspell His name.  
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.  They are one in their believes and the Holy Spirit is God's Holy Spirit which is not even mentioned.  Neither is it mentioned in any of the books in the Bible.  There are several Scriptures that tell us that the Spirit is God the Fathers Spirit and not a Person.
    We have 5 Bibles and in each one of them it says the same.  Even our German Bible.  We know by Ephesians 4:6 …one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all and in us all.”  Sometimes I think people think to highly of them and can't humble themselves.  
    Peace and Love Irene
    Peace and Love Irene

    #167724
    martian
    Participant

    Quote (banana @ Jan. 02 2010,08:47)
    I don't think that anybody is playing on this site.  The word Lord is in the New and Old Testaments.  If you notice that in the Old T. LORD is mostly in Capital letters and it is God the Father. While Lord it is Jesus mostly. In Ancient times lord was used for all kinds of man in charger just like God is used for other then our God.  I don't have to know Hebrew or Greek to know that.  It is the translators that were had so much respect for our God that they did not want to misspell His name.  
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.  They are one in their believes and the Holy Spirit is God's Holy Spirit which is not even mentioned.  Neither is it mentioned in any of the books in the Bible.  There are several Scriptures that tell us that the Spirit is God the Fathers Spirit and not a Person.
    We have 5 Bibles and in each one of them it says the same.  Even our German Bible.  We know by Ephesians 4:6 …one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all and in us all.”  Sometimes I think people think to highly of them and can't humble themselves.  
    Peace and Love Irene
    Peace and Love Irene


    That's right Irene

    #167778
    banana
    Participant

    what I find amazing is that when you put down a post that they can not explain no answer. So W.J. and thinker what about the post that I made, you agree or disagree, if you disagree why?
    otherwise forever hold your peace. Irene

    #168324

    Quote (banana @ Jan. 01 2010,16:47)
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.


    Irene

    Because Jude 1:4, 5 says that Jesus is our “ONLY Master and Lord” and that he is the one that saved the children of Israel, (verse 5), which is proof he is YHWH!

    What does “ONLY” mean to you?

    Is he your “ONLY Master and Lord”?

    WJ

    #168335
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (martian @ Jan. 02 2010,10:41)

    Quote (banana @ Jan. 02 2010,08:47)
    I don't think that anybody is playing on this site.  The word Lord is in the New and Old Testaments.  If you notice that in the Old T. LORD is mostly in Capital letters and it is God the Father. While Lord it is Jesus mostly. In Ancient times lord was used for all kinds of man in charger just like God is used for other then our God.  I don't have to know Hebrew or Greek to know that.  It is the translators that were had so much respect for our God that they did not want to misspell His name.  
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.  They are one in their believes and the Holy Spirit is God's Holy Spirit which is not even mentioned.  Neither is it mentioned in any of the books in the Bible.  There are several Scriptures that tell us that the Spirit is God the Fathers Spirit and not a Person.
    We have 5 Bibles and in each one of them it says the same.  Even our German Bible.  We know by Ephesians 4:6 …one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all and in us all.”  Sometimes I think people think to highly of them and can't humble themselves.  
    Peace and Love Irene
    Peace and Love Irene


    That's right Irene


    Irene and Martian,

    Ron is indeed playing games with words. What does it matter how many “lords” there may be or whom may be “lords?” Nick too say that there are many “lords.” But Jude verse 4 says that OUROnly Master and Lord is Jesus Christ.”

    If Jesus Christ is not YOUROnly Master and Lord” then the Father is NOT your God!

    Pretty simple isn't it?

    thinker

    #168361

    Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 03 2010,02:34)

    Quote (martian @ Jan. 02 2010,10:41)

    Quote (banana @ Jan. 02 2010,08:47)
    I don't think that anybody is playing on this site.  The word Lord is in the New and Old Testaments.  If you notice that in the Old T. LORD is mostly in Capital letters and it is God the Father. While Lord it is Jesus mostly. In Ancient times lord was used for all kinds of man in charger just like God is used for other then our God.  I don't have to know Hebrew or Greek to know that.  It is the translators that were had so much respect for our God that they did not want to misspell His name.  
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.  They are one in their believes and the Holy Spirit is God's Holy Spirit which is not even mentioned.  Neither is it mentioned in any of the books in the Bible.  There are several Scriptures that tell us that the Spirit is God the Fathers Spirit and not a Person.
    We have 5 Bibles and in each one of them it says the same.  Even our German Bible.  We know by Ephesians 4:6 …one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all and in us all.”  Sometimes I think people think to highly of them and can't humble themselves.  
    Peace and Love Irene
    Peace and Love Irene


    That's right Irene


    Irene and Martian,

    Ron is indeed playing games with words. What does it matter how many “lords” there may be or whom may be “lords?” Nick too say that there are many “lords.” But Jude verse 4 says that OUROnly Master and Lord is Jesus Christ.”

    If Jesus Christ is not YOUROnly Master and Lord” then the Father is NOT your God!

    Pretty simple isn't it?

    thinker


    They all see who is playing in here.

    #168370
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi TT
    ,
    Jude 1:1 Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and a brother of James,

    To those who have been called, who are loved by God the Father and kept by Jesus Christ:

    Jude 1:2 Mercy, peace and love be yours in abundance

    They are godless men, who change the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.

    it seems you have difficulty to understand this

    #168425
    kerwin
    Participant

    I am curious what definition those who believe in preexistence ascribe to the word “conceived”. If any would volunteer that information it would be interesting to hear.

    #168438
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Kerwin……….an idea can be conceived as when a architect conceives plans of a building and goes about to produce it, but it is not a reality until it is built. Peter said Jesus was foreordained, (he was in the plan of GOD) conceived by GOD in the beginning, (BUT) was (MANIFESTED) (became a reality) in His time. Another words He was (NOT) manifested or (existed) Before His time of berth. IMO

    #168449
    terraricca
    Participant

    hi KW

    in the case of Christ he was not conceived before the time he should have to appear as written in the prophets

    #168537

    Quote (kerwin @ Jan. 03 2010,17:33)
    I am curious what definition those who believe in preexistence ascribe to the word “conceived”.   If any would volunteer that information it would be interesting to hear.


    Kerwin

    Is man only flesh?

    Does the natural conception also included the Spirit/Soul of the person? Or was that the part that the Father imparted by his breath?

    That which is flesh is flesh, and that which is Spirit is Spirit.

    Why is it so hard to understand that the “Spirit of Jesus”, the Word that was with God and was God came in the likeness of sinful flesh?

    If God can dwell in human bodies who have a Spirit, then why can't God be the Spirit in a human body?

    WJ

    #168538
    KangarooJack
    Participant

    Quote (Constitutionalist @ Jan. 04 2010,04:31)

    Quote (thethinker @ Jan. 03 2010,02:34)

    Quote (martian @ Jan. 02 2010,10:41)

    Quote (banana @ Jan. 02 2010,08:47)
    I don't think that anybody is playing on this site.  The word Lord is in the New and Old Testaments.  If you notice that in the Old T. LORD is mostly in Capital letters and it is God the Father. While Lord it is Jesus mostly. In Ancient times lord was used for all kinds of man in charger just like God is used for other then our God.  I don't have to know Hebrew or Greek to know that.  It is the translators that were had so much respect for our God that they did not want to misspell His name.  
    And what does Jude 4-5 have to do with anything.  It says about God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ.  They are one in their believes and the Holy Spirit is God's Holy Spirit which is not even mentioned.  Neither is it mentioned in any of the books in the Bible.  There are several Scriptures that tell us that the Spirit is God the Fathers Spirit and not a Person.
    We have 5 Bibles and in each one of them it says the same.  Even our German Bible.  We know by Ephesians 4:6 …one God and Father of all, who is above all, through all and in us all.”  Sometimes I think people think to highly of them and can't humble themselves.  
    Peace and Love Irene
    Peace and Love Irene


    That's right Irene


    Irene and Martian,

    Ron is indeed playing games with words. What does it matter how many “lords” there may be or whom may be “lords?” Nick too say that there are many “lords.” But Jude verse 4 says that OUROnly Master and Lord is Jesus Christ.”

    If Jesus Christ is not YOUROnly Master and Lord” then the Father is NOT your God!

    Pretty simple isn't it?

    thinker


    They all see who is playing in here.


    Con,

    I Jesus Christ YOUR “only master and Lord?”

    This is not a trick question.

    thinker

Viewing 20 posts - 6,081 through 6,100 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account