Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,641 through 4,660 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #110573
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 17 2008,13:24)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 17 2008,07:34)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 17 2008,05:47)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 17 2008,04:16)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 16 2008,19:24)
    Hi Mandy,
    Yes it says that once.
    Proof requires two witnesses.
    There are two to the Word being WITH GOD.[1jn1, Jn1-2]


    I see.

    Question:  does the dogma of the second coming have two witnesses?  How about other dogma's?  

    Using this rule of thumb would disqualify quite a few teachings, would it not?

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    We are not speaking of truth
    but proof.

    2Cor13.1


    So the “truth” then is that the Word was God.

    Alas, we have come full circle.


    Hi mandy,
    This is truth but because it is not witnessed by other verses it's full understanding is unproveable.


    That is convenient for you. However I believe Keith would say that it IS witnessed to in many scriptures. Where does when go from there?

    Here we go 'round the mulberry bush, the mulberry bush, the mulberry bush…..

    #110574
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Oct. 17 2008,12:58)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2008,18:03)

    Quote (david @ Oct. 16 2008,12:04)
    “Let US make man in our image.”


    David,

    This passage has many explainations (one such explaination is given in the NIV Study Bible).  This is not solid proof of Jesus' preexistence; not at all.  If this one verse convinces you, I would encourage you to rethink your theology.

    Love,
    Mandy


    That is right, on its own it certainly doesn't prove that. But coupled with the idea that God made all things through him and for him, then it starts to become more compelling.

    Add in Jesus own claim, “before Abraham, I am” and the case becomes very strong.

    Then add in the fact that his origins are from ancient times, and the case in now stronger again.

    Then consider that he is the Word of God that was with God in the beginning, that he is called the wisdom of God and the fact that wisdom was the first work of the Father and it all seems a bit of a no brainer, unless of course God intended to give us the wrong impression or there is a conspiracy to give this impression from the translators.


    I would say that the verses you added to give more standing to the preexistence claim are they, themselves, in the same category as the “Lets make man in our image” passage.

    They also can be explained another way that does not have to have preexistence as a qualifier.

    #110576
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Good points you made Mandy.
    People are making 'Word' as 'a god' or a small god. Infact in Greek it is written as 'And God was the word”. That means God and word are one and the same. Now God and Jesus are separate since the word became flesh and called as Jesus. Yes every body is turning round and round around the Mulberry tree. coming to the same point again and again.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

    #110590
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,
    I have a couple responses to you. One is here on page 464 and the other one is in the Trinity2 thread (can't remember what page you'll have to scroll back to find it).

    I know how busy life with kids can be, so I just wanted to put this reminder up that I've addressed some of your posts. I didn't want you to think I overlooked them. Take care, I hope all is well.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #110594
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2008,01:50)
    Hi Kathi,

    It's been a long, long day for me.  I will try to make this short.

    Quote
    My sons were not concevied by the Holy Spirit as was Jesus.


    True.  But my point is that The Father chose to use the concept and reality of conception for a reason.  If all Jesus needed was skin and bones (because he already had his own nature) God could have just popped a shell of a man into being and plopped Jesus inside of it.

    Quote
    When a woman conceives without the help of a human man it is a unique situation and we need not insist they bring about the same result to those who conceive with a human man.


    But she still CONCEIVED.  That word has to mean something.  The Father wanted Jesus' conception to mean something.  It wasn't simply a formality.  

    Quote
    If God wanted the same result, He could have had Joseph conceive with Mary.


    Exactly!  God wanted HIS OWN SON.  God fathered his own son.  It offends so many….

    Quote
    He was different than John the Baptist.  John was conceived by an earthly father and an earthly mother and NO, John didn't pre-exist his conception.  I'm not sure at all why you would ask that.


    Sorry, I wasn't very clear.  The reason I asked if John preexisted his conception was because the angel of the LORD compared Mary's pregnancy to that of Elizabeth's (in so many words).  He sort of said, “Hey Mary, your pregnant now and guess who else is pregnant at the same time – your cousin, Elizabeth!”  We were not privy to one preexisting and the other being a status quo baby – both the pregnacies sounded comparable (and we know John didn't preexist).

    Quote
    You asked if I can seperate my son's nature from his body.  Well I surely can't, once I couldn't even seperate the bubble gum from his hair.:;):   God can do anything necessary though.


    Sure, God can do anything.  But what would be the logic in it?  No logic needed – some may say.  But pray tell, how are we to make sense of anything then?  If we understand conception and birth (a very basic humanistic process) then why would God mess with that and say instead, “If it walks like a duck – and talks like a duck – it's really a dove in a duck's body.”

    Quote
    Quite possibly there are two natures within man.  The nature of the flesh and the nature of the spirit (or innerman).

    Mark 14:38-39
    38 ” Keep watching and praying that you may not come into temptation; the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”
    NASU

    I read that God can seperate the flesh from the spirit.  When we die, the flesh returns to the dust and the spirit returns to the One who gave it.

    So, I think that the innerman of Jesus was of a divine nature and pre-existed His conception within Mary.  The outerman of Jesus was of an earthly nature and did not pre-exist His conception within Mary, IMO.


    With all due respect here, Kathi, I think this is a huge leap within this simple thought process.

    Because you think the spirit and flesh can and are divided, you have concluded that one can preexist the other.  Where is your evidence for this?

    Quote
    For one reason that the Son of God had to be there in existence before creation was to witness the power of the Father and to witness that the Father is indeed the source of all things good.


    God ALMIGHTY needs a witness?
    Is it written anywhere?

    Quote
    One of the purposes of Jesus as a man was to explain the Father.  If He existed since before creation then He was more than qualified for that task.


    Jesus told the disciples that he had bread to eat of that they knew nothing about.  I'm certain he wasn't just referring to the kind of bread you can eat.  I'm sure the Father filled Jesus in adequately.  Jesus didn't need to be there from the beginning for the Father to reveal himself to his Son and get him up-to-speed, so to speak.  

    Quote
    Otherwise, if Jesus didn't exist as a living being until conception in Mary, He really couldn't explain Him any better than John the Baptist.


    Kathi, do you seriously believe this or are you pondering this still?  Jesus needed to preexist to have had on-the-job training?  You don't think that God ALMIGHTY could have closed the gap in the training process for his boy?  Don't you believe that sometimes God brings you along in your understanding sometimes faster than other's?  Couldn't he surely have done this for the Messiah – his own Son?

    Quote
    Being the pre-existent Son within the baby of which the Holy Spirit conceived with Mary truly gave us the Son of God within a man.


    Boy, say this five times fast!  😉  It won't make any more sense if you do, trust me.

    I don't mean to disprespect you, because I certainly DO respect you.  But a son (if language means anything) is the offspring of two parents.  TOGETHER they create a new, unique life.  One does not *just* contribute the nature, and the other *just* the skin and bones.  It doesn't work that way for us, and I'm convinced that it didn't work that way for Jesus either.  God would have told us if he was pulling a fast one on us and changing the rules.  

    Kathi, I sure hope you take this all with the spirit it was given (which is a tired spirit and one that doesn't mean to offend).  I'm glad to have this dialog with you.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    I'm sorry that it took over a day to respond. Thank you for your patience. It is not unusual for me though, so if you don't get a speedy delivery from me it is not because I don't want to respond.

    Regarding the idea that the spirit can be sep
    erated from the body you might look at this passage:
    Heb 4:12-13
    12 For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. 13 And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do.
    NASU

    You can see that the soul and spirit can be divided from the joints and marrow.

    Regarding being born with a spirit that existed before the body's conception you can read this:

    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist. My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him. I do not think it to be a stretch to say that Jesus could have a pre-existent spirit within Him before His birth also.

    Regarding the dove within the duck bit, I would say that the scriptures tell us in many ways that this “duck” is different. In other words, this child is different.
    1. Mary gets visited by an angel telling her that she will conceive as a virgin by the power of the Holy Spirit, without the agency of a human man.
    2. The angel tells Joseph the same.
    3. Elizabeth speaks amazing things to Mary and calls her the Mother of “my Lord”
    4. Joseph believes the angel and takes Mary as his wife
    5. Prophecy is fulfilled.
    6. A host of angels declare His birth and calls Him the Christ on that very day of His birth
    7. The shepherds come to see the baby
    8. Wise men travel by following a star in order to worship the baby. No baby announcements were even sent.
    9. The wise men bring expensive gifts to someone's baby that they had never met.

    If all that doesn't tell you that the “duck” isn't just a normal “duck”, I can't help you.

    If God just popped a shell of a man into being without conception then it wouldn't have fulfilled prophecy. Conception had to be part of it for there to be birth from a virgin with a Jewish bloodline and of a woman betrothed to a Man from the line of David.

    Regarding whether God could have clued Jesus in on who He was so that Jesus could explain Him, I say this:
    A eyewitness is better that second hand knowledge. Did God need a witness, no but a witness is a huge plus isn't it. Ask any court.

    I gotta run, I hope that I have addressed the main concerns here, if not, let me know.

    Love,
    Kathi

    #110596
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,
    That verse in Hebrews shows the spirit can be discerned apart from the soul.
    The spirit of man returns to God.

    #110597
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 14 2008,23:58)
    Hi Mandy and Nick and Irene,
    There are indeed many verses that state that God is invisible for sure.  From man's perspective, the Most High God has remained unseen except by Moses who saw His form and the Son of God who actually has seen Him in a way no man has seen Him including Moses.

    Num 12:5-8
    5 Then the LORD came down in a pillar of cloud and stood at the doorway of the tent, and He called Aaron and Miriam. When they had both come forward, 6 He said,

    “Hear now My words:
    If there is a prophet among you,
    I, the LORD, shall make Myself known to him in a vision.
    I shall speak with him in a dream.
    7 “Not so, with My servant Moses,
    He is faithful in all My household;
    8 With him I speak mouth to mouth,
    Even openly, and not in dark sayings,
    And he beholds the form of the LORD.
    Why then were you not afraid
    To speak against My servant, against Moses?”
    NASU

    Heb 11:27
    27 By faith he (Moses) left Egypt, not fearing the king's anger; he persevered because he saw him who is invisible.
    (from New International Version)

    John 1:18
    18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.  
    NASU

    This next passage gives us a reason why God remains invisible to us:

    Deut 4:15-19

    15 “So watch yourselves carefully, since you did not see any form on the day the LORD spoke to you at Horeb from the midst of the fire, 16 so that you do not act corruptly and make a graven image for yourselves in the form of any figure, the likeness of male or female, 17 the likeness of any animal that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged bird that flies in the sky, 18 the likeness of anything that creeps on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the water below the earth.
    NASU

    He does not want us to make a form of Him to worship as those who made graven images of their gods and then worshiped them.

    Quote
    I see that Nick has given some excellent scriptures for you to look at regarding God's “form”.  This is how God exists normally.  So if Jesus is in God's form, then this rules out Jesus being an angel, the light, or a messenger of any kind.

    We have to look at all the scriptures including the ones at the beginning of this post.
    I do not know how you would know how God exists normally.
    I don't believe that the Son of God can be classified as an angel, a messenger-yes, but not a created angel.
    Just because He is in the form of God doesn't mean that He can't be the light or a messenger, I don't know where you are coming up with this stuff.

    Phil 2:5-6
    Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although HE EXISTED IN THE FORM OF GOD…
    NASU
    John 8:12

    Then Jesus again spoke to them, saying, ” I AM THE LIGHT OF THE WORLD; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.”
    NASU

    Heb 1:1-2
    God, after He spoke long ago to the fathers in the prophets in many portions and in many ways, 2 in these last days has spoken to us in His Son…
    NASU

    In the above three verses we clearly see that the Son of God existed in the “form” of God and that He is the “Light” of the world and that God speaks through Him.  So you see that He can exist in the form of God and be the Light and a messenger.


    Mandy,
    Regarding the comments that you wanted me to address in the trinity thread, you moved the conversation to this thread and you are even making yourself dizzy :D
    This above quote from the pre-existent thread was your response to that I believe. if not then you are going to have to point me to the correct post that you want me to address.

    Have a great day, TGIF
    Love,
    Kathi

    #110598
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 17 2008,13:47)
    Hi LU,
    That verse in Hebrews shows the spirit can be discerned apart from the soul.
    The spirit of man returns to God.


    Hi Nick,
    That's true.
    LU

    #110599
    Tiffany
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 18 2008,05:43)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2008,01:50)
    Hi Kathi,

    It's been a long, long day for me.  I will try to make this short.

    Quote
    My sons were not concevied by the Holy Spirit as was Jesus.


    True.  But my point is that The Father chose to use the concept and reality of conception for a reason.  If all Jesus needed was skin and bones (because he already had his own nature) God could have just popped a shell of a man into being and plopped Jesus inside of it.

    Quote
    When a woman conceives without the help of a human man it is a unique situation and we need not insist they bring about the same result to those who conceive with a human man.


    But she still CONCEIVED.  That word has to mean something.  The Father wanted Jesus' conception to mean something.  It wasn't simply a formality.  

    Quote
    If God wanted the same result, He could have had Joseph conceive with Mary.


    Exactly!  God wanted HIS OWN SON.  God fathered his own son.  It offends so many….

    Quote
    He was different than John the Baptist.  John was conceived by an earthly father and an earthly mother and NO, John didn't pre-exist his conception.  I'm not sure at all why you would ask that.


    Sorry, I wasn't very clear.  The reason I asked if John preexisted his conception was because the angel of the LORD compared Mary's pregnancy to that of Elizabeth's (in so many words).  He sort of said, “Hey Mary, your pregnant now and guess who else is pregnant at the same time – your cousin, Elizabeth!”  We were not privy to one preexisting and the other being a status quo baby – both the pregnacies sounded comparable (and we know John didn't preexist).

    Quote
    You asked if I can seperate my son's nature from his body.  Well I surely can't, once I couldn't even seperate the bubble gum from his hair.:;):   God can do anything necessary though.


    Sure, God can do anything.  But what would be the logic in it?  No logic needed – some may say.  But pray tell, how are we to make sense of anything then?  If we understand conception and birth (a very basic humanistic process) then why would God mess with that and say instead, “If it walks like a duck – and talks like a duck – it's really a dove in a duck's body.”

    Quote
    Quite possibly there are two natures within man.  The nature of the flesh and the nature of the spirit (or innerman).

    Mark 14:38-39
    38 ” Keep watching and praying that you may not come into temptation; the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”
    NASU

    I read that God can seperate the flesh from the spirit.  When we die, the flesh returns to the dust and the spirit returns to the One who gave it.

    So, I think that the innerman of Jesus was of a divine nature and pre-existed His conception within Mary.  The outerman of Jesus was of an earthly nature and did not pre-exist His conception within Mary, IMO.


    With all due respect here, Kathi, I think this is a huge leap within this simple thought process.

    Because you think the spirit and flesh can and are divided, you have concluded that one can preexist the other.  Where is your evidence for this?

    Quote
    For one reason that the Son of God had to be there in existence before creation was to witness the power of the Father and to witness that the Father is indeed the source of all things good.


    God ALMIGHTY needs a witness?
    Is it written anywhere?

    Quote
    One of the purposes of Jesus as a man was to explain the Father.  If He existed since before creation then He was more than qualified for that task.


    Jesus told the disciples that he had bread to eat of that they knew nothing about.  I'm certain he wasn't just referring to the kind of bread you can eat.  I'm sure the Father filled Jesus in adequately.  Jesus didn't need to be there from the beginning for the Father to reveal himself to his Son and get him up-to-speed, so to speak.  

    Quote
    Otherwise, if Jesus didn't exist as a living being until conception in Mary, He really couldn't explain Him any better than John the Baptist.


    Kathi, do you seriously believe this or are you pondering this still?  Jesus needed to preexist to have had on-the-job training?  You don't think that God ALMIGHTY could have closed the gap in the training process for his boy?  Don't you believe that sometimes God brings you along in your understanding sometimes faster than other's?  Couldn't he surely have done this for the Messiah – his own Son?

    Quote
    Being the pre-existent Son within the baby of which the Holy Spirit conceived with Mary truly gave us the Son of God within a man.


    Boy, say this five times fast!  😉  It won't make any more sense if you do, trust me.

    I don't mean to disprespect you, because I certainly DO respect you.  But a son (if language means anything) is the offspring of two parents.  TOGETHER they create a new, unique life.  One does not *just* contribute the nature, and the other *just* the skin and bones.  It doesn't work that way for us, and I'm convinced that it didn't work that way for Jesus either.  God would have told us if he was pulling a fast one on us and changing the rules.  

    Kathi, I sure hope you take this all with the spirit it was given (which is a tired spirit and one that doesn't mean to offend).  I'm glad to have this dialog with you.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    I'm sorry that it took over a day to respond.  Thank you for yo
    ur patience.  It is not unusual for me though, so if you don't get a speedy delivery from me it is not because I don't want to respond.

    Regarding the idea that the spirit can be seperated from the body you might look at this passage:
    Heb 4:12-13
    12 For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. 13 And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do.
    NASU

    You can see that the soul and spirit can be divided from the joints and marrow.

    Regarding being born with a spirit that existed before the body's conception you can read this:

    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist.  My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him.  I do not think it to be a stretch to say that Jesus could have a pre-existent spirit within Him before His birth also.

    Regarding the dove within the duck bit, I would say that the scriptures tell us in many ways that this “duck” is different.  In other words, this child is different.
    1. Mary gets visited by an angel telling her that she will conceive as a virgin by the power of the Holy Spirit, without the agency of a human man.
    2. The angel tells Joseph the same.
    3. Elizabeth speaks amazing things to Mary and calls her the Mother of “my Lord”
    4. Joseph believes the angel and takes Mary as his wife
    5. Prophecy is fulfilled.
    6. A host of angels declare His birth and calls Him the Christ on that very day of His birth
    7. The shepherds come to see the baby
    8. Wise men travel by following a star in order to worship the baby.  No baby announcements were even sent.
    9. The wise men bring expensive gifts to someone's baby that they had never met.

    If all that doesn't tell you that the “duck” isn't just a normal “duck”, I can't help you.

    If God just popped a shell of a man into being without conception then it wouldn't have fulfilled prophecy.  Conception had to be part of it for there to be birth from a virgin with a Jewish bloodline and of a woman betrothed to a Man from the line of David.  

    Regarding whether God could have clued Jesus in on who He was so that Jesus could explain Him, I say this:
    A eyewitness is better that second hand knowledge.  Did God need a witness, no but a witness is a huge plus isn't it.  Ask any court.

    I gotta run, I hope that I have addressed the main concerns here, if not, let me know.

    Love,
    Kathi


    Kathi I want to address what you said how John was a preexisting spirit. You make it sound like that Jesus did too. That is ignoring other Scriptures that I believe all here know which ones they are, have put them up enough times.
    So Mandy and Kathi what are you going to do with those scriptures?
    I always was under the impression that you Kathi knew?
    Was somewhat surprised. Or was that a printing error?
    God wanted a fresh and humble vessel for Baby Jesus. Maria fit, She was a Virgin and pure in heart. How She conceived is second dairy.( I don't knowhow to dairy) We know it was done by God's Holy Spirit and that is all we have to know.

    Peace and Love Irene

    #110600
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    Thanks for getting back with me.

    Quote
    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist. My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him.


    Where does this passage speak of a preexisting spirit for John? I don't see it.

    Quote
    You can see that the soul and spirit can be divided from the joints and marrow.


    Yes, but the scriptures do not show that the spirit preexisted being united with the joints and marrow. This is the thrust of our argument, after all.

    Quote
    If all that doesn't tell you that the “duck” isn't just a normal “duck”, I can't help you.


    LOL, Kathi, what you have explained are the unusual events that took place in order to produce the duck. What you did not address is the fact that the duck is still a duck! We don't want to believe that Jesus is a mere man, however he was indeed a man. We want to believe that what was inside him was a preexistent soul/nature, but how can we embrace what we are given as fact (that Jesus was a man) if we continue in our belief that he was *other* than a man on the inside? I just don't know how to reconcile those two ideas.

    Quote
    Regarding whether God could have clued Jesus in on who He was so that Jesus could explain Him, I say this:
    A eyewitness is better that second hand knowledge. Did God need a witness, no but a witness is a huge plus isn't it. Ask any court.


    Certainly Jesus called on his Father to be one of HIS witnesses, but God does not need a witness. Nor would he create Jesus before he was born for that reason either, imo.

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #110603
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi Kathi,

    I bumped the Trinity2 response from me that I didn't think you've seen yet? Take a peak and see – I may be making myself dizzy, indeed! I've been burning the candle at both ends lately and stay up way tooooo late!

    Take care and have a great weekend! I am waiting to hear about a job that I applied for (Assistant Funeral Director) at a local cemetery.

    Love,
    Mandy

    #110613
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Tiffany @ Oct. 17 2008,14:54)

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 18 2008,05:43)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 16 2008,01:50)
    Hi Kathi,

    It's been a long, long day for me.  I will try to make this short.

    Quote
    My sons were not concevied by the Holy Spirit as was Jesus.


    True.  But my point is that The Father chose to use the concept and reality of conception for a reason.  If all Jesus needed was skin and bones (because he already had his own nature) God could have just popped a shell of a man into being and plopped Jesus inside of it.

    Quote
    When a woman conceives without the help of a human man it is a unique situation and we need not insist they bring about the same result to those who conceive with a human man.


    But she still CONCEIVED.  That word has to mean something.  The Father wanted Jesus' conception to mean something.  It wasn't simply a formality.  

    Quote
    If God wanted the same result, He could have had Joseph conceive with Mary.


    Exactly!  God wanted HIS OWN SON.  God fathered his own son.  It offends so many….

    Quote
    He was different than John the Baptist.  John was conceived by an earthly father and an earthly mother and NO, John didn't pre-exist his conception.  I'm not sure at all why you would ask that.


    Sorry, I wasn't very clear.  The reason I asked if John preexisted his conception was because the angel of the LORD compared Mary's pregnancy to that of Elizabeth's (in so many words).  He sort of said, “Hey Mary, your pregnant now and guess who else is pregnant at the same time – your cousin, Elizabeth!”  We were not privy to one preexisting and the other being a status quo baby – both the pregnacies sounded comparable (and we know John didn't preexist).

    Quote
    You asked if I can seperate my son's nature from his body.  Well I surely can't, once I couldn't even seperate the bubble gum from his hair.:;):   God can do anything necessary though.


    Sure, God can do anything.  But what would be the logic in it?  No logic needed – some may say.  But pray tell, how are we to make sense of anything then?  If we understand conception and birth (a very basic humanistic process) then why would God mess with that and say instead, “If it walks like a duck – and talks like a duck – it's really a dove in a duck's body.”

    Quote
    Quite possibly there are two natures within man.  The nature of the flesh and the nature of the spirit (or innerman).

    Mark 14:38-39
    38 ” Keep watching and praying that you may not come into temptation; the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.”
    NASU

    I read that God can seperate the flesh from the spirit.  When we die, the flesh returns to the dust and the spirit returns to the One who gave it.

    So, I think that the innerman of Jesus was of a divine nature and pre-existed His conception within Mary.  The outerman of Jesus was of an earthly nature and did not pre-exist His conception within Mary, IMO.


    With all due respect here, Kathi, I think this is a huge leap within this simple thought process.

    Because you think the spirit and flesh can and are divided, you have concluded that one can preexist the other.  Where is your evidence for this?

    Quote
    For one reason that the Son of God had to be there in existence before creation was to witness the power of the Father and to witness that the Father is indeed the source of all things good.


    God ALMIGHTY needs a witness?
    Is it written anywhere?

    Quote
    One of the purposes of Jesus as a man was to explain the Father.  If He existed since before creation then He was more than qualified for that task.


    Jesus told the disciples that he had bread to eat of that they knew nothing about.  I'm certain he wasn't just referring to the kind of bread you can eat.  I'm sure the Father filled Jesus in adequately.  Jesus didn't need to be there from the beginning for the Father to reveal himself to his Son and get him up-to-speed, so to speak.  

    Quote
    Otherwise, if Jesus didn't exist as a living being until conception in Mary, He really couldn't explain Him any better than John the Baptist.


    Kathi, do you seriously believe this or are you pondering this still?  Jesus needed to preexist to have had on-the-job training?  You don't think that God ALMIGHTY could have closed the gap in the training process for his boy?  Don't you believe that sometimes God brings you along in your understanding sometimes faster than other's?  Couldn't he surely have done this for the Messiah – his own Son?

    Quote
    Being the pre-existent Son within the baby of which the Holy Spirit conceived with Mary truly gave us the Son of God within a man.


    Boy, say this five times fast!  😉  It won't make any more sense if you do, trust me.

    I don't mean to disprespect you, because I certainly DO respect you.  But a son (if language means anything) is the offspring of two parents.  TOGETHER they create a new, unique life.  One does not *just* contribute the nature, and the other *just* the skin and bones.  It doesn't work that way for us, and I'm convinced that it didn't work that way for Jesus either.  God would have told us if he was pulling a fast one on us and changing the rules.  

    Kathi, I sure hope you take this all with the spirit it was given (which is a tired spirit and one that doesn&#39
    ;t mean to offend).  I'm glad to have this dialog with you.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,
    I'm sorry that it took over a day to respond.  Thank you for your patience.  It is not unusual for me though, so if you don't get a speedy delivery from me it is not because I don't want to respond.

    Regarding the idea that the spirit can be seperated from the body you might look at this passage:
    Heb 4:12-13
    12 For the word of God is living and active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. 13 And there is no creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do.
    NASU

    You can see that the soul and spirit can be divided from the joints and marrow.

    Regarding being born with a spirit that existed before the body's conception you can read this:

    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist.  My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him.  I do not think it to be a stretch to say that Jesus could have a pre-existent spirit within Him before His birth also.

    Regarding the dove within the duck bit, I would say that the scriptures tell us in many ways that this “duck” is different.  In other words, this child is different.
    1. Mary gets visited by an angel telling her that she will conceive as a virgin by the power of the Holy Spirit, without the agency of a human man.
    2. The angel tells Joseph the same.
    3. Elizabeth speaks amazing things to Mary and calls her the Mother of “my Lord”
    4. Joseph believes the angel and takes Mary as his wife
    5. Prophecy is fulfilled.
    6. A host of angels declare His birth and calls Him the Christ on that very day of His birth
    7. The shepherds come to see the baby
    8. Wise men travel by following a star in order to worship the baby.  No baby announcements were even sent.
    9. The wise men bring expensive gifts to someone's baby that they had never met.

    If all that doesn't tell you that the “duck” isn't just a normal “duck”, I can't help you.

    If God just popped a shell of a man into being without conception then it wouldn't have fulfilled prophecy.  Conception had to be part of it for there to be birth from a virgin with a Jewish bloodline and of a woman betrothed to a Man from the line of David.  

    Regarding whether God could have clued Jesus in on who He was so that Jesus could explain Him, I say this:
    A eyewitness is better that second hand knowledge.  Did God need a witness, no but a witness is a huge plus isn't it.  Ask any court.

    I gotta run, I hope that I have addressed the main concerns here, if not, let me know.

    Love,
    Kathi


    Kathi I want to address what you said how John was a preexisting  spirit. You make it sound like that Jesus did too.  That is ignoring other Scriptures that I believe all here know which ones they are, have put them up enough times.
    So Mandy and Kathi what are you going to do with those scriptures?
    I always was under the impression that you Kathi knew?
    Was somewhat surprised. Or was that a printing error?
    God wanted a fresh and humble vessel for Baby Jesus. Maria fit, She was a Virgin and pure in heart. How She conceived is second dairy.( I don't knowhow to dairy) We know it was done by God's Holy Spirit and that is all we have to know.

    Peace and Love Irene


    Hi Irene,

    In your comment to me:

    Quote

    Kathi I want to address what you said how John was a preexisting spirit. You make it sound like that Jesus did too.

    did you mean to say this:

    Kathi I want to address what you said how JESUS was a preexisting spirit. You make it sound like JOHN did too.

    I hope that is what you meant and I will assume that is what you meant and I will clear that up for you hopefully. Geesh!
    Between you and Mandy my head is starting to spin :p

    This quote below is pointing out that John the Baptist was filled with the Holy Spirit while in the womb. The Holy Spirit is from the Father, correct? That Holy Spirit existed before John was conceived, right? So my point was simply that a baby within the womb can have a spirit within him that pre-existed his conception. I am not saying that John's personal spirit pre-existed his conception but the Holy Spirit of God did.

    Quote

    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist. My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him. I do not think it to be a stretch to say that Jesus could have a pre-existent spirit within Him before His birth also.

    I love your spelling BTW. Normally “second dairy” is spelled like this: secondary. Your phonetic spelling always brings a smile to my face. :;):

    So, did I clear that up for you? John the Baptist did not pre-exist his conception, I believe that the Son of God did pre-exist His conception within Mary though.

    Love,
    Kathi

    #110614
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote

    Posted: Oct. 17 2008,15:16

    ——————————————————————————–
    Hi Kathi,

    Thanks for getting back with me.

    Quote
    Luke 1:15
    15 “For he will be great in the sight of the Lord; and he will drink no wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit while yet in his mother's womb.
    NASU

    That speaks of John the Baptist. My point is that even before John's birth, he had a pre-existing spirit within him.

    Where does this passage speak of a preexisting spirit for John? I don't see it.

    Quote
    You can see that the soul and spirit can be divided from the joints and marrow.

    Yes, but the scriptures do not show that the spirit preexisted being united with the joints and marrow. This is the thrust of our argument, after all.

    Quote
    If all that doesn't tell you that the “duck” isn't just a normal “duck”, I can't help you.

    LOL, Kathi, what you have explained are the unusual events that took place in order to produce the duck. What you did not address is the fact that the duck is still a duck! We don't want to believe that Jesus is a mere man, however he was indeed a man. We want to believe that what was inside him was a preexistent soul/nature, but how can we embrace what we are given as fact (that Jesus was a man) if we continue in our belief that he was *other* than a man on the inside? I just don't know how to reconcile those two ideas.

    Quote
    Regarding whether God could have clued Jesus in on who He was so that Jesus could explain Him, I say this:
    A eyewitness is better that second hand knowledge. Did God need a witness, no but a witness is a huge plus isn't it. Ask any court.

    Certainly Jesus called on his Father to be one of HIS witnesses, but God does not need a witness. Nor would he create Jesus before he was born for that reason either, imo.

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    Hi Mandy,
    You think that the duck is just a duck because he looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, swims like a duck and dies like a duck but what you don't realize is that before he was a duck, he was a spirit duck who existed before he got put in the yolk and albumin inside the shell of an egg. I'm laughing at myself here but maybe the analogy helps lighten things up a bit.

    Now, in regards to Jesus, the man, here goes:
    Several may think that even though Jesus was born like a man, looked like a man, ate like a man, spoke like a man, slept like a man, was tempted like a man, died like a man, etc. that indeed He was just a man. What you have to realize regarding the man Jesus, is that He wasn't conceived like a man, existed before He was a man, laid the foundation of the world (not like a man), upholds all things by the power of His Father's word (not like a man), exactly represents His Father's nature (not like a man), existed before Abraham was born (not like a man during Jesus's life on earth), is called the Christ our Lord from birth (not like a man), was sent to die for our sins so that He could give us eternal life (not like a man), was from heaven (not like man), was bread that came down from heaven (not like a man), that was called God's only begotten Son (not like man), etc. etc.

    So, He looked like a man but wasn't just a mere man. He was someone who existed beforehand as the Holy One of God, the Firstborn, that was made in the likeness of man within Mary. He was in the form of God first and had to empty Himself of something before He could take on the form of a bond-servant. I believe that He emptied Himself of His rights of having a divine nature, not the divine nature itself.

    Scriptures say that He emptied Himself and then was made in the likeness of man. In that order.

    Love,
    Kathi

    #110616
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 17 2008,15:23)
    Hi Kathi,

    I bumped the Trinity2 response from me that I didn't think you've seen yet?  Take a peak and see – I may be making myself dizzy, indeed!  I've been burning the candle at both ends lately and stay up way tooooo late!

    Take care and have a great weekend!  I am waiting to hear about a job that I applied for (Assistant Funeral Director) at a local cemetery.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Mandy,
    The response on the previous page addressed to “Mandy, Irene, and Nick” is the response to that post. I hope that you get the job.

    #110621
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ Oct. 18 2008,11:38)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 17 2008,15:23)
    Hi Kathi,

    I bumped the Trinity2 response from me that I didn't think you've seen yet?  Take a peak and see – I may be making myself dizzy, indeed!  I've been burning the candle at both ends lately and stay up way tooooo late!

    Take care and have a great weekend!  I am waiting to hear about a job that I applied for (Assistant Funeral Director) at a local cemetery.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Mandy,
    The response on the previous page addressed to “Mandy, Irene, and Nick” is the response to that post.  I hope that you get the job.


    Oh, gotcha. I'll go check it out.
    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #110649
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 18 2008,07:23)
    Hi Kathi,

    I bumped the Trinity2 response from me that I didn't think you've seen yet?  Take a peak and see – I may be making myself dizzy, indeed!  I've been burning the candle at both ends lately and stay up way tooooo late!

    Take care and have a great weekend!  I am waiting to hear about a job that I applied for (Assistant Funeral Director) at a local cemetery.

    Love,
    Mandy


    Wow! that is amazing Mandy, you want to be a Asst Funeral Director ? I know you visit Cemetry whenever you find time. One time you have shared this experience on this forum.

    Take care and love to you
    Adam

    #110656
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi all,
    When Did the Son of God Begin to Exist?

    Luke had no doubt about the reason and basis for Jesus being entitled to be called the “Son of God.” It was as a consequence of the supernatural miracle wrought in the womb of Mary that Jesus is truly “the Son of God.” “For that reason indeed [dio kai] he will be called the Son of God” (Luke 1:35). Luke/Gabriel did not believe in an eternal or preexisting Son. The Son was supernaturally conceived in history when Mary became pregnant. Matthew was careful to note that what occurred in the womb of Mary was the creation, the coming into existence, the begetting of the Son of God. He was not begotten before that miraculous moment. Matthew 1:20 states that “what is begotten [i.e., describing the Father's procreative act, wrongly rendered “conceived” in many versions] in her is from the holy spirit.” At that moment, and not before, God became the Father of the unique Son, Jesus.

    Luke 1:35 informs us that this creative act of God brought into existence the Son of God. There was therefore no Son of God until the miracle which God performed in Mary. The Son of God was begotten by the Father when Elizabeth, Mary's cousin, was six months pregnant. Professor Caird comments correctly: “What Luke is here concerned to tell us is that Jesus entered upon the status of Sonship at his birth by a new creative act of that same Holy Spirit which at the beginning had brooded over the waters of chaos. It is this new creation which is the real miracle of Jesus' birth and the real theme of Gabriel's annunciation and Mary's wondering awe.”

    Other New Testament writers proclaim the same truth about how God finally spoke in a Son in New Testament times. Jesus is the fulfillment of the greatest of all God’s promises: Paul wrote to Titus (1:2) about “the knowledge of the truth…in the hope of eternal life which God who cannot lie promised long ages ago, but at the proper time manifested, namely his word in the proclamation [Gospel].” Salvation comes to us “according to His own purpose which was granted to us in Christ Jesus from all eternity, but now has been revealed, by the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus” (2 Tim. 1:9).

    Luke and Paul are in perfect agreement about the origin of the Son of God. He is a supernaturally created human being originating in time in the womb of Mary. Thus Paul carefully writes in Galatians 4:4 of the Son, that he “came into existence (genomenos)” of a woman. Paul chooses not to use the normal word for “born” (gennao). He stresses the fact that the Son came into existence at his birth. In the 50s AD Paul was already fending off any notion that the Son did not have his beginning in the womb of his mother. After all, a person who is pre-human is non-human. One is what one is, according to one's origin. The whole point about the Messiah, Son of God, is that he is a member of the human race. As God created Adam, son of God, from the dust (Luke 3:38), Jesus was created in his mother's womb by miracle.

    Please know for sure that the Son of God did not preexist literally prior to his birth except in the plan of God.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #110662
    Tiffany
    Participant

    Kathi! Oh, well I know I know my German Heritage comes into focus at times with my spelling. Glad you at least laugh at it. Ja, I did get something mixed up. Can I blame that on my age?
    I been having these horrible Headaches. For weeks now and I am getting tired of them. To much stress.
    Cindy wants me to go to Her Church tomorrow. And then on Monday at 10A.M. is Her surgery.
    It is going to be rough. On top of all Brian is having so much problems with His Asthma. He is taking some new Medication hopefully that will settle Him down.
    Peace and Love Irene
    A second dairy, lots of milk and Ice cream. Wow

    #111191
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (gollamudi @ Oct. 18 2008,22:51)
    Please know for sure that the Son of God did not preexist literally prior to his birth except in the plan of God.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam


    But he was WITH God and the Logos is preceded with the definite article just as Theos is in John 1:1.

    Identifying Logos as next to God and not as an attribute of God makes it hard to see how it can be a plan.

    Then there are all the other difficult verses that teach of Jesus glory with the Father before the world, and how God made all things through him. It is contradictory to see that God made Jesus last but yet somehow made all creation through him and for him.

    Sorry but the 'plan' idea has way to many hurdles to jump over before it can be considered a candidate. Scripture doesn't seem to support this view and many others here think the same thing.

    #111196
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8…..If scripture says God (ALONE) created the world and everything in, How can you add someone else into the mix. Peter plainly says Jesus was (foreordained) BUT was Manifested in (OUR) time. Don't you think that something so important as Jesus' preexistence would have been explained many times by all the apostles, why is it not even spoke about in scripture. Why is there no preexistence activity of Jesus shown any where. I know you are sincere in your beliefs T8, but i think in this one you are wrong brother.

    love and peace to you and yours………………..gene

Viewing 20 posts - 4,641 through 4,660 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account