Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,581 through 4,600 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #110147
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Thanks for that understanding Sis Kathi on Hebrews 9:23-28 that no pre-existence of Jesus was required for offering himself once for all for sins of all mankind. As for the other arguments on preexistence they are all as old as we have debated all these days for almost 460 pages in this forum. Let us wait and see whether any new thoughts can be added here.

    Thanks and love to you
    Adam

    #110157
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Here are few thoughts on Pre-existence of Logos and Jesus our Messiah taken from a Jewish website. Please gothrough with open mind.

    The Nature of Pre-existence in the Hebraic Mind and the “Logos”:

    I wish to point out 2 basic facts that are ESSENTIAL to a proper understanding of Scripture, particularly the gospel of John.  Indeed, they are essential to properly understand the entire New Testament!  The almost universal failure to acknowledge these 2 facts can be traced to the general and intentional anti-Hebraic approach Christian leaders take in their study of the New Testament and to the ignorance of Hebraic things among sincere Christians.  It is likely at least one of these 2 facts will be something you did not realize; however, I am convinced many of the leaders of Christianity DO realize it but purposely conceal it because of the damage it would cause to their Trinitarian teachings as well as many other orthodox dogmas of Christianity.  These 2 facts are presented below followed by discussion of each.  I am going to merely touch the fringes of the subjects.  Entire books could and have been written on these 2 subjects alone.  FAR more detailed discussion can be found in numerous publications among which is the outstanding book, The Doctrine of the Trinity – Christianity's Self-Inflicted Wound, by Sir Anthony Buzzard and Charles Hunting.  Now to the 2 basic facts.

    The Hebraic understanding of “pre-existence” DOES NOT necessarily imply a LITERAL, PHYSICAL pre-existence.
    The term logos has other renderings that are FAR more logical and understandable than the common mystical and VERY BIASED rendering of “Word”.

    PRE-EXISTENCE IN THE HEBRAIC MIND
    I wish I could convey the enormous importance of this topic.  The need to understand scripture from the context in which it was written is underscored by this issue.  Please pause and truly consider as you read how crucial it is for us to understand what was written from the context of those that wrote it.  Furthermore, please recognize the irrefutable fact that ALL the authors were Jews that thought, lived, and wrote entirely within a Hebraic framework.  As you continue reading this remember it is critical to interpret Scripture in the proper context and that task is just as relevant to the pre-existence issue as it is to anything else.

    The pre-existence topic is especially applicable to the gospel of John; however, it finds application throughout the entire New Testament.  There is no better example of the tragic breakdown in communicating Hebraic writings to the Westernized world than has occurred with the concept of “pre-existence”.  The typical understanding of John's writings is the result of a failure (I believe premeditated misrepresentation) to properly describe the Hebraic concept of this crucial issue.  The common Christianized concept of the pre-existence of Messiah, in particular, has been divorced from the purely Hebraic mind set of the New Testament authors.  Two of the many catastrophic outcomes of abandoning this Judaic context are the Trinity and the belief that Yahshua is God.  I distinguish them as 2 separate outcomes because in fact they are, and many reject the Trinity yet still cling to the belief that Yahshua is “God” because of confusion over the question of pre-existence.  At the very least the gospel of John has been grossly misinterpreted because of the failure to apply the proper context to it's interpretation.

    I need only reference a single Hebraic source to clarify the issue. The clarity of the reference leaves no misunderstanding and removes the veil of deceit so long used by the church to conceal truth.  Below is a quote from Everyman's Talmud – The Major Teachings of the Rabbinic Sages, by Abraham Cohen.  Everyman's Talmud is an excellent little book (if you call almost 400 pages little) that summarizes many of Judaism's primary teachings – a book every sincere student of Scripture should have on their bookshelf.  It should be realized this is the GENERAL, STANDARD HEBRAIC understanding of this issue.  The following quote is on page 347 and is taken from the section which discusses the Messiah in the chapter on the Hereafter.

    The belief was general that the sending of the Messiah was part of the Creator's plan at the inception of the Universe.  “Seven things were created before the world was created: Torah, repentance, the Garden of Eden (i.e.Paradise), Gehinnom, the Throne of Glory, the Temple, and the name of the Messiah” (Pes. 54a).  In a later work there is the observation: “From the beginning of the creation of the world king Messiah was born, for he entered the mind (of God) before even the world was created” (Pesikta Rab. 152b)
    So, here we see how the “pre-existence” of Messiah (christ) was understood by the Hebraic mind. Remember that ALL THE BIBLE'S WRITERS WERE HEBRAIC!  Messiah was “born” in the MIND (thought, motive, plan) of YHVH (God) before creation but did NOT literally exist!  The concept of a PHYSICAL literal pre-existence is arrived at by most Christians only because they have unknowingly (or knowingly) abandoned the Hebraic concept.

    I must press this issue.  It's importance is unequaled.  It must be noted how the pre-existence of the Messiah is defined in terms of his (Messiah's) existence in the MIND of G-d since before Creation.  There is absolutely no literal pre-existence assumed at all!

    You see, the Hebraic mind is so overwhelmed and awed by the magnificence, power, splendor, and infinite nature of YHVH that it assumes to “exist” whatever is in YHVH's mind long before His “thought” actually physically manifests itself.  The certainty of YHVH's plan (thought) makes it as though the “thought” had already happened.  YHVH's intent or thought or motive or plan is so certain that it is said to “exist” despite its absence in the physical world!  Obviously, since the “intent” or “plan” or “motive” of YHVH has always included the coming Messiah, the Hebraic mind assumes him (Messiah) to have “existed” (in the Mind of YHVH) since before creation!  However, this “pre-existence” was NOT considered literal or physical!

    This concept is witnessed from the New Testament.  In Paul's epistle to the Messianic community in Rome we find the following:

    Romans 4:17 (NASB)
    17 (as it is written, “A father of many nations have I made you” ) in the sight of Him whom he believed, even God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist.
    The phrase, “calls into being that which does not exist.” has as its literal rendering, shown in the center column reference of the NASB, “calls the things which do not exist as existing”.  The New King James Version renders this phrase as, “calls those things which do not exist as though they did.”  These phrases present PRECISELY the same idea as the Hebraic concept just discussed.  And no wonder, since Paul was a “Hebrew of Hebrews.”

    So, in his epistle Paul provides STRONG evidence that supports the traditional Hebraic meaning of Pre-existence in his description of YHVH as a “God who … calls those things which do not exist as though they did.”  Therefore, for those that wish proof from the New Testament, you now have it!  Better yet, it comes from the very epistle and the very apostle Traditional Christianity most exalts!  For those of you that prefer the King James Version, it is even more clearly stated as:

    Romans 4:17 (KJV)
    17 (As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.
    For additional contributions to the New Testament evidence I present regarding the fact that preexistence is not literal, consider the following verses:

    1 Peter 1:19-20 NKJV
    19 but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot. 20 He inde
    ed was foreordained (foreknown, destined) before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you
    Revelation 13:8 (KJV)
    8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
    If we apply the logic of those promoting a literal preexistence of Messiah to this verse we would have to conclude that Messiah was slain upon the execution stake long before Creation!  Obviously, the Lamb (Yahshua Messiah) was not slain until long after “the foundation of the world”.  Trinitarians and others promoting the anti-messiah of the Beast hate this verse because of the damage it causes to their incorrect preexistence doctrine.  So, we see hear just one more verse from the New Testament that buttresses my argument that preexistence in the Hebraic, SCRIPTURAL context is NOT a literal preexistence.  Instead it is to be understood as the state of existence in the mind, thought, plan, or motive of God.  God's divine plan included the Lamb (Messiah) before the foundation of the world; however, that Lamb did NOT literally exist until it/he was manifested at his appointed time!

    Note also that the context from which Revelation 13:8 was taken discusses the Beast and how he will deceive virtually the entire world.  It is this very Beast that is promoting the anti-messiah (replacement Messiah), “other gods”, and rebellion against YHVH's eternal instructions (Torah or Law)!  Sadly, most “that dwell upon the earth” DO worship that Beast – traditional Christianity!

    Finally, Hebraic tradition has the understanding that ALL souls are preexistent and await the time when they will be placed within mortal beings.  With this in mind, ALL of us could be said to be “preexistent”, which would of course include the MAN, Yahshua.  However, even within this belief, the LITERAL, PHYSICAL preexistence is not present and Yahshua's “preexistence” would not be unique.  The notion is that every soul that will ever live was created in the beginning and, upon their appointed time, enters into the physical body.  It is more of a “spiritual” form of preexistence.

    Why do most Messianic “rabbis” choose to conceal the TRUE Hebraic concept of preexistence as they supposedly attempt to educate others regarding Hebraic roots?  Could it be for the same reason as Traditional Christian theologians?  Could it be their death-grip on the Trinity will not allow them to accept Truth?  Could it be they will promote ONLY (often with distortions, such as their Kabbalistic Trinity) those Hebraic foundations that support their biased orthodox Christian foundational beliefs?
    Unfortunately most “Messianic” groups are little more than traditional evangelical organizations dressed in Judaic garb and promoting a little Torah.  Most people do not realize that the majority of Messianics are simply traditional Christians that decided to add Jewish liturgy to their services and that embrace – to varying degrees – Torah.  Besides that, they are generally no different than Traditional Christians; therefore, the Trinity and many other false doctrines are carried-over into their Messianic organizations.  Unfortunately, many of these groups are composed of people that have a cult-like attraction to “Jewishness” more than to Truth.  Every time I read in Revelation the verse that mentions “those that say they are Jews but are not”, I think of the standard Messianic group.  More often than not, their beliefs do not originate from Judaic roots, but, instead, actually originate from the Traditional Christian organizations from which they came.  The Pope can parade around with a Torah scroll and wear a tallit, but he is still the Pope!  These “Messianic” believers have never left Babylon.  They've simply changed neighborhoods; one a bit more liturgically “Jewish” but still well within the city!
    I will be more specific in the application of this FUNDAMENTAL BIBLICAL CONCEPT in those verses where it needs to be remembered; however, its use should be obvious in the gospel of John.  I will most assuredly show due diligence in applying this Hebraic truth as it is encountered.

    LOGOS AND THE PRE-EXISTENCE ISSUE
    Interestingly, the term logos dovetails perfectly with the previous sure Biblically Hebraic fact.  Why do I say this?  Well, if the translators had not been so biased in passages such as the famous ones of John 1 where they render the term as “Word”, it would be obvious; however, since they were I will explain.  The translators even expanded upon their bias in John 1 by rendering the term “Word” with a capital “W” – a totally unsubstantiated and blatant show of bias!

    Let's look at the possible Greek meanings of the term logos. The New Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible defines among the various meanings the following:
    Motive
    mental faculty
    Reasoning
    Intent
    Thought
    Divine Expression
    What is really illuminating is the fact that, according to the Strong's Concordance I referenced, a Greek philosopher named Heraclitus first used the term logos around 600 B.C. to designate the divine reason or plan which coordinates a changing universe.  Thus, we have a historic precedent which shows the proper understanding of logos is as the “Divine Plan, thought, or motive” of the Almighty Creator.  Furthermore, when this corrected rendering is applied to John 1:1-3 the term logos can be shown to not be referring specifically to Messiah (much less some mysterious “Word-man”) but, instead, refers to the Divine Plan from (or through) which YHVH created all things and which included Messiah as the crowning achievement!  As a side note, the use of the personal pronouns “he” and “him” are NOT concrete and early versions of Scripture – Tyndale's original translation for example – used the term “it”.  The article entitled, “What does John 1:3-4 REALLY Say?” discusses this in more detail.

    John 1:1-3
    In the beginning was the Divine plan/motive/thought, and the Divine plan/motive/thought was with God, and the Divine plan/motive/thought was God.  The same (Plan) was in the beginning with God. All things were made by it and without it was not any thing made that was made.
    This makes perfect sense!  In the beginning YHVH had a Divine Plan.  This Divine Plan was, of course, with YHVH since it was His master plan conceived in His Divine Mind.  The only information mankind has available to understand God is His Torah (instructions) – His Divine Plan.  Through study of that Plan one can grasp aspects of God.  There is nothing else available with which the characteristics of YHVH God can be understood.  Therefore, His Divine Plan – being the very manifestation of YHVH's Divine thought and Mind – is YHVH!  Yahshua the Messiah, as the perfect servant and emissary of God, revealed the character of God more than any other man; however, everything he did and preached was accomplished within the sphere of God's Plan.  Thus, the Plan of God is still the only way we have of understanding God.  Of course, since YHVH (God) is Spirit, the use of terms such as “mind” are anthropomorphic so that we can grasp basic concepts.

    Anthropomorphism: attribution of human characteristics or to nonhumans: the attribution of a human form, human characteristics, or human behavior to nonhuman things such as deities in mythology and animals in children's stories.
    The concept that the Torah or Mind (thought, Plan) of YHVH is inseparable from YHVH is a long standing, traditional Hebraic understanding of the Creator!  It is comparable to you and your mind (mental faculty, reasoning) being inseparable.  It can be said that you ARE your mind; thus, you ARE your “logos” (thought, mind).  (It does seem, however, that Traditional Christian and counterfeit Messianic leaders may have somehow become separated from their mental faculties – or “lost their minds”.)  So, just as a human can be said to be his/her mind, YHVH can anth
    ropomorphicly be said to be His mind (logos).  Later verses could be correctly construed to interject the sublime and ultimate ingredient of His Plan, which is Messiah.  However, this “Plan” or intent for a future Messiah was only in the Mind of YHVH and did not physically and literally get “begotten” until Yahshua the Messiah physically appeared upon earth 2000 years ago.

    There is no argument that “word” is one possible rendering; however, why would the translators choose the most nebulous possible rendering of the term logos in areas such as John 1?  The rendering of “word” is completely illogical in the first chapter of John unless one is already predisposed to belief in the Trinity and intentionally biases the translation to support a “mysterious” inner meaning.  The historic precedent mentioned earlier and the more clear rendering of Divine “plan” or “motive” or “thought” or “intent” makes far more sense and removes all mystery!  So what we have in crucial verses of the New Testament is an intentionally ambiguous and biased translation done in such a way so as to hide the far clearer translation of the Greek word logos!

    Additional support for the opinion that “intent” or “motive” or “thought” is the better rendering of logos in John 1 is its clear agreement with the standard Hebraic understanding of the pre-existence of the Messiah which we covered earlier!  JOHN WAS A HEBREW – A JEW – A MAN WITH A JUDAIC/HEBRAIC MIND THAT THOUGHT AND WROTE FROM A THOROUGHLY HEBRAIC MINDSET!  In order to believe the common rendering of logos as “word” is correct or that the common notion of the literal pre-existence of Messiah is correct one must TOTALLY EJECT from the basic Hebraic foundation of ALL the writings of the Scriptures!  Unfortunately, since Christianity was originally invented in the 4th century to do that very thing we now have a typical orthodox Christian understanding of extremely critical passages that is completely wrong and violates basic Hebraic concepts!  Without doubt, Messiah WAS in the mind of YHVH before Creation and this “thought” or “intention” was “manifested in the flesh” much later when the “Plan” for Messiah materialized.  So, the logos was, indeed, “manifested in the flesh”; however, when properly translated what we see is that “the plan/intent was manifested in the flesh.”

    So, in summary, the doctrine of the Trinity and the deity of Messiah rides largely upon a grossly incorrect understanding of “pre-existence” and an intentionally ambiguous and “mysterious” translation of the Greek term logos.

    May God bless you all
    Adam

    #110158
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GM,
    Is this the THOUGHT that John said he saw and touched?

    #110164
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 11 2008,19:03)
    Hi GM,
    Is this the THOUGHT that John said he saw and touched?


    Hi Nick:

    I'll post the scriptures to which you refer by your comment. I believe that they are self-exlanatory:

    Quote
    1Jo 1:1 ¶ That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

    1Jo 1:2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;)

    #110171
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi all,
    It can't be a thought, plan or intent as the meaning of logos because the state of being verb “was” and “was with” are written in the Greek as in the active voice where the subject does the action as opposed to the passive voice where the subject receives the action. If “word” meant thought, plan or intent the action of being with God would be in the passive voice since thoughts, plans or intents don't do the actions, they receive the actions by the one who thinks the thoughts, plans or actions.

    LU

    #110172
    Tiffany
    Participant

    Of course it makes sense, if Jesus created all it is something that He is doing. If it is only a plan, it is in the mind of that person.
    We have other Scriptures that prove the preexisting. When I said He is the Firstborn of all creation, how can that mean anything else? If I would only have one Scriptures, maybe I could understand. But we have several Scriptures, let me put them down just one more time.
    John 1:1
    John 17:5
    Col. 1:15-187
    Rev.3:14
    Mandy please open your mind.
    Love and Peace Irene

    #110188
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 12 2008,01:37)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 11 2008,19:03)
    Hi GM,
    Is this the THOUGHT that John said he saw and touched?


    Hi Nick:

    I'll post the scriptures to which you refer by your comment.  I believe that they are self-exlanatory:

    Quote
    1Jo 1:1 ¶ That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

    1Jo 1:2  (For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;)


    Hi brother 942767,
    Thanks for your response to brother Nick. Yes you have quoted the appropriate verse on his query. John heard about the word(plan) as an attribute of God but he had also seen that plan of God fulfilled in person Jesus who is now the living word of life that was spoken by John but that word never was a separate person from God in the beginning. God foresaw every thing in His plan and He created every thing by His word (an attribute) not by another person called Jesus.

    Hope this will answer our brother Nick.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #110189
    Tiffany
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 12 2008,01:37)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 11 2008,19:03)
    Hi GM,
    Is this the THOUGHT that John said he saw and touched?


    Hi Nick:

    I'll post the scriptures to which you refer by your comment.  I believe that they are self-exlanatory:

    Quote
    1Jo 1:1 ¶ That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

    1Jo 1:2  (For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;)


    942767 You are taking that scripture out of context. You really have to look at the whole story and all that John is teaching us. 1 John which is the epistel but also is the continued story of Johns Gospel. IMO. or visa versa.
    In the Gospel of John He tells that in the beginning there was the Word and the Word was God or the Son of God. He was the Spokesperson of the O.T. Nobody has heard or seen the Father. So when it speaks of God it is Jesus speaking.
    verse 10 shows that He created or made all the World. This is besides all other Scriptures that speak of the preexsisting of Jesus.  So tell me could He do that if He was only in a plan?  
    verse 11 He came to His own and His own did not receive Him.
    But as many as did receive Him, He gave the right to become children of God. He was alive in the Spirit, He emptied himself and became a man to save all mankind. And the Word became flesh.
    Peace and Love Irene
    I wanted to say one more thing, look at this tread, we are on page 460 WOW

    #110200
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Tiffany @ Oct. 12 2008,18:55)

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 12 2008,01:37)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 11 2008,19:03)
    Hi GM,
    Is this the THOUGHT that John said he saw and touched?


    Hi Nick:

    I'll post the scriptures to which you refer by your comment.  I believe that they are self-exlanatory:

    Quote
    1Jo 1:1 ¶ That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

    1Jo 1:2  (For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;)


    942767 You are taking that scripture out of context. You really have to look at the whole story and all that John is teaching us. 1 John which is the epistel but also is the continued story of Johns Gospel. IMO. or visa versa.
    In the Gospel of John He tells that in the beginning there was the Word and the Word was God or the Son of God. He was the Spokesperson of the O.T. Nobody has heard or seen the Father. So when it speaks of God it is Jesus speaking.
    verse 10 shows that He created or made all the World. This is besides all other Scriptures that speak of the preexsisting of Jesus.  So tell me could He do that if He was only in a plan?  
    verse 11 He came to His own and His own did not receive Him.
    But as many as did receive Him, He gave the right to become children of God. He was alive in the Spirit, He emptied himself and became a man to save all mankind. And the Word became flesh.
    Peace and Love Irene
    I wanted to say one more thing, look at this tread, we are on page 460 WOW


    Hi Mrs:

    I have given my understanding on this subject which happens to agree with what Adam has stated. Of course, there is always a possibility that I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

    As you say, we have gone over this topic over a multiple of pages, and I personally do not believe that I will make any more posts to this topic. I know that Jesus exists now, and that he is coming for the church. That I know for a fact.

    God Bless

    #110203
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi 94,
    1Jo 1:1 ¶ That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life;

    1Jo 1:2 (For the life was manifested, and we have seen [it], and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us;)

    Certainly the man Jesus Christ was not the ETERNAL LIFE as that was IN HIM.

    He was the WORD OF LIFE.

    That Spirit life cannot be touched.

    The WORD OF LIFE, Jesus Christ, could be touched.
    He became the source for us of this life.

    #110214
    942767
    Participant

    Hi Nick:

    You say:

    “That Spirit life cannot be touched.

    The WORD OF LIFE, Jesus Christ, could be touched.
    He became the source for us of this life.”

    That is precisely the point, the spirit cannot be touched, but the plan of God was to send His Only Begotten Son into the world at precisely the right time so that we through him might have eternal life.
    It was only after Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost and became flesh that he could be touched.  

    Quote
    1Jo 5:10  He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
    1Jo 5:11  And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
    1Jo 5:12  He that hath the Son hath life; [and] he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

    God Bless

    #110224
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    “Seven things were created before the world was created: Torah, repentance, the Garden of Eden (i.e.Paradise), Gehinnom, the Throne of Glory, the Temple, and the name of the Messiah” (Pes. 54a). In a later work there is the observation: “From the beginning of the creation of the world king Messiah was born, for he entered the mind (of God) before even the world was created” (Pesikta Rab. 152b)


    Gollimudi, I don't know where to begin with the things that are simply wrong with this statement.

    God did not create Gehinnom “before the world was created.”

    Quote
    Gehinnom is mentioned in the Torah. One typical reference is from the writings of the Prophet Jeremiah:
    And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of … Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; WHICH I COMMANDED THEM NOT, NEITHER CAME IT INTO MY HEART. (7:31).

    http://www.beki.org/life.html

    gollimundi, if burning such ones in fire was something that had not come up into his heart, certainly he did not create such a place before he created the world.

    Burning their sons and daughters in the fire alive was, according to these various translations:
    “something [God] did not command, nor did it enter [His] mind,”
    “a shocking perversion of all that I am and all I command,”
    “I have never commanded such a horrible deed; it never even crossed my mind to command such a thing!”
    “I would never think of telling you to do this.”
    “a thing I did not command; I never entertained the thought.”
    “It did not even enter my mind.”

    Jeremiah 7:31 (New International Version)
    They have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom to burn their sons and daughters in the fire—something I did not command, nor did it enter my mind.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (The Message)
    They've constructed Topheth altars for burning babies in prominent places all through the valley of Ben-hinnom, altars for burning their sons and daughters alive in the fire–a shocking perversion of all that I am and all I command.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (Amplified Bible)
    And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the Valley of Ben-hinnom [son of Hinnom], to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire [in honor of Molech, the fire god]–which I did not command, nor did it come into My mind or heart.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (New Living Translation)
    They have built the pagan shrines of Topheth in the valley of the son of Hinnom, where they sacrifice their little sons and daughters in the fire. I have never commanded such a horrible deed; it never even crossed my mind to command such a thing!

    Jeremiah 7:31 (King James Version)
    And they have built the high places of Tophet, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my heart.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (Contemporary English Version)
    At Topheth in Hinnom Valley you have built altars where you kill your children and burn them as sacrifices to other gods. I would never think of telling you to do this.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (Young's Literal Translation)
    And have built the high places of Tophet, That [are] in the valley of the son of Hinnom, To burn their sons and their daughters with fire, Which I did not command, Nor did it come up on My heart.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (Holman Christian Standard Bible)
    They have built the high places of Topheth (A) [a] in the Valley of Hinnom (B) [b] in order to burn their sons and daughters in the fire, a thing I did not command; I never entertained the thought.

    Jeremiah 7:31 (New International Reader's Version)
    The people have built the high places of Topheth in the Valley of Ben Hinnom. There they worship other gods. And there they sacrifice their children in the fire. That is something I did not command. It did not even enter my mind.

    The Hebraic mind should understand that God did not create such a place, ever. Humans did, and Jesus used that as a fitting symbol of everlasting destruction. But, if such a thing as actually literally burning people had never come up into Jehovah's heart, certainly he did not create such a place before the world.

    Anyway, I believe that Hebraic thought became distorted after time. They were not following God, but were following man made rules, the mishnah. It was such things that Jesus denounced.
    Obviously, modern Hebraic thought is wrong. Either that, or Christ and all who follow him are wrong. Which is it?

    Quote
    2 facts can be traced to the general and intentional anti-Hebraic approach Christian leaders take in their study of the New Testament and to the ignorance of Hebraic things among sincere Christians.


    Modern Jewish thought and Jewish thought of the time when God was leading the Israelites are two very separate things.
    Modern Jews today view the pronouncing of God's name as wrong.
    The Jews that were inspired by God to write the hebrew scriptures wrote God's name some 7000 times.
    Which should we follow?

    #110225
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 13 2008,10:27)
    Hi Nick:

    You say:

    “That Spirit life cannot be touched.

    The WORD OF LIFE, Jesus Christ, could be touched.
    He became the source for us of this life.”

    That is precisely the point, the spirit cannot be touched, but the plan of God was to send His Only Begotten Son into the world at precisely the right time so that we through him might have eternal life.
    It was only after Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost and became flesh that he could be touched.  

    Quote
    1Jo 5:10  He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
    1Jo 5:11  And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
    1Jo 5:12  He that hath the Son hath life; [and] he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

    God Bless


    Hi 94,
    So conception and birth to you is being sent into the world?
    Was it the same for you?

    #110227
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 13 2008,13:18)

    Quote (942767 @ Oct. 13 2008,10:27)
    Hi Nick:

    You say:

    “That Spirit life cannot be touched.

    The WORD OF LIFE, Jesus Christ, could be touched.
    He became the source for us of this life.”

    That is precisely the point, the spirit cannot be touched, but the plan of God was to send His Only Begotten Son into the world at precisely the right time so that we through him might have eternal life.
    It was only after Jesus was conceived of the Holy Ghost and became flesh that he could be touched.  

    Quote
    1Jo 5:10  He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.
    1Jo 5:11  And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.
    1Jo 5:12  He that hath the Son hath life; [and] he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

    God Bless


    Hi 94,
    So conception and birth to you is being sent into the world?
    Was it the same for you?


    No Nick:

    I said that Jesus could not be touched until he was conceived of the Holy Ghost.  He was not sent into the world until he was anointed as God's Christ and began his public ministry.

    Quote
    Jhn 17:3  And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.

    Is it the same for me?  You ask.  Well, I am not “The Christ”, but Jesus states:

    Quote
    Jhn 17:18  As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.

    Quote
    Luk 2:25 ¶ And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name [was] Simeon; and the same man [was] just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
    Luk 2:26  And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ.
    Luk 2:27  And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law,
    Luk 2:28  Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said,  Luk 2:29  Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word:
    Luk 2:30  For mine eyes have seen thy salvation,
    Luk 2:31  Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people;

    #110228
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi 94,
    Could not be touched?
    The Spirit was not touched but poured out on men.

    #110229
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 13 2008,14:12)
    Hi 94,
    Could not be touched?
    The Spirit was not touched but poured out on men.


    Hi Nick:

    What does that have to do with the pre-existence of Jesus?

    Have you ever touched the Spirit of God?

    #110231
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi 94,
    No.
    But that Spirit has touched me.

    #110232
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi 94,
    The things of the Spirit cannot be reached and touched in the material realm.
    But that Spirit can reach out and touch us.
    So any reference to touching must be in regards to the vessel, the man Jesus Christ.

    #110234
    942767
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ Oct. 13 2008,14:47)
    Hi 94,
    The things of the Spirit cannot be reached and touched in the material realm.
    But that Spirit can reach out and touch us.
    So any reference to touching must be in regards to the vessel, the man Jesus Christ.


    Hi Nick:

    True. I agree.

    #110236
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi 94,
    So the vessel existed but was not filled till the Jordan.

Viewing 20 posts - 4,581 through 4,600 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account