Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,521 through 4,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #107092
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    But who is qualified to discern what the true meaning of the passage is for everyone?  Apparently you think that you are qualified.  So I will wait and see what your teaching is on this passage.  So far you write it out in bold and declare that it means preexistence.  Well, okay, but why?

    –mandy

    Essentially, this scripture says:

    We are to be humble like Christ,
    who
    although he was existing in God’s form/nature/”outward appearance”
    did not consider equality something to be grasped
    but
    he emptied himself and took a slave’s form and came to be in the likeness of men.

    Verse 8 goes on to say: “More than that” he humbled himself even to death.
    But, no one questions this verse.  
    We're concerned with how he humbled himself by 'not considering equality with God something to be grasped' (how would a plan/thought/whatever try to take anything?)
    We're concerned with the fact that he “existed” in God's morphe.  Mandy, translate morphe any way you like.
    Although he was existing in God's whatever, he didn't let pride take over, but humbly acted in the right way.
    He “emptied himself” (something a plan/thought/whatever can't do.)

    He existed in God's morphe but he humbly took on human form, or morphe or whatever..
    A plan/thought cannot choose to act humbly.  A thought can be a humble thought.  But a thought itself cannot choose what it will do.  
    A person can.
    I have a thought right now (what the next sentence will be)  Can that thought choose to act humbly?  No.  
    A person can.

    Or, as I said before:

    Quote
    He would have to exist for himself to humble himself.  If he didn't exist with the will to do this or that, and the choice was not his, then we cannot use the word “humble.”  A plan or thought cannot humbly choose a course.  I have a thought in my mind right now.  Can that thought decide to humble itself?  I'm beginning to think this just silly.  I can have a thought to humbly MYSELF.  But can a thought humble ITSELF?

    #107094
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    So far I haven't seen you do anything different than I've done. Do you have some secrets about the passage that you plan to uncover or something?

    –Mandy

    Here's the difference mandy:

    Phil 2:6-7. I include those words.

    #107095
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Quote
    I believe that according to the Philippians passage – Jesus was not using the privileges that he could have as the only begotten of God.  In this way, he humbled himself. (Mandy)
    (David) Still, for it to be humility, he would have had to pre-exist to choose whether to 'use the privileges that he could have' or not.  If there was no choice, then there was no humility.  And if he had the choice, doesn't this mean he had to preexist?

    No.  He could have used his privileges as a man – the Son of Man and the Son of God – but he chose not to.  He was born a Prince, remember?  His Daddy was/is the Almighty.  He could have called on thousands of angels, remember?  But he chose not to.  Humility.

    What you're saying does suggest humility.  Jesus washing the feet of his disciples was also humility.  But let's focus on what this scripture actually is talking about:

    PHILIPPIANS 2:5-8
    “Keep this mental attitude in YOU that was also in Christ Jesus,
    who,

    although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.

    No, but he emptied himself and took a slave’s form and came to be in the likeness of men.

    Is the humility here about what Jesus did after he was born a human?  No, definitely not.  

    We are to be humble, like Christ, who “although he was existing in God’s form. . . emptied himself and took a slave’s form . . .

    THAT WAS THE ACT OF HUMILITY we are discussing.  Sure, he was ALSO HUMBLE AFTER he “took a slave's form.”  But it was the act of emptying himself and taking on human form that we are discussing, NOT what happened afterward.

    It seems dishonest to me to try to shift this to a later time, when it is quite clear.

    Quote
    He was born a Prince, remember? His Daddy was/is the Almighty. He could have called on thousands of angels, remember? But he chose not to. Humility.

    Yes, he was humble after he was born. We agree. But we're discussing the time when he was existing in God’s form. . . [and] emptied himself and took a slave’s form . . .

    #107096
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Yes, I'm glad you marked this page.  Go back and review my responses to you – they would be the same responses I would give you now to the same questions.  You see, we have hashed this out……

    I really don't see the need to do it again – do you?  

    Is this thing on?  Yes, we discussed the fact that Adam was a real human despite not being created from a man and woman's sexual intercourse.  (Hence, in special circumstances, standard defininitions do not always fit.)
    But when I spoke of hashing it out, we were speaking of the actual scripture in question.

    Quote
    I have given you my opinion on Adam and how God created him versus how Jesus became a Son. I don't have anything further (or new) to say on that topic.

    I can't remember. Is Adam a real true human according to your definition?

    #107097
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    You guys on the other hand take these passages literally. So for you, it's “clear”.

    Which part would you not take literally?

    #107098
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    I'm sure what Ken meant as “special gift” was the fact that Jesus was born a Prince and had at his disposal the very things of God. However Jesus chose not to acknowledge any of that advantage over us……true humility.


    Yes, again, true humility, but having nothing to do with the verse in question. We're considering the event that happened when
    “he was existing in God’s form,” and “he emptied himself and took a slave’s form.”

    #107099
    david
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Sep. 25 2008,19:03)

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,15:09)
    To deny special treatement, you would have to pre-exist.  Done.   To empty Himself of any privelege as Kenrch states, he would have to pre-exist.


    I don't see the logic here, sorry.

    AFTER Jesus was born and grew in knowledge he realized who he was…..it was then that he humbled himself and didn't take advantage of his position.  He lowered himself.  He became poor.  HE CHOSE to do this.  But he was certainly alive when this revelation came to him.


    Right, but we're talking about something he chose way before he was born on earth.

    See last few posts.

    #107115
    gollamudi
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 25 2008,22:26)

    Quote (gollamudi @ Sep. 25 2008,22:02)
    Sis you are bold enough to face a cloud of preexistence believers.


    Hi Gol. Nice strategy, turning it into a them versus us scenario, instead of reconciling us with scripture as it should be.

    How do you you reconcile the following with your teaching gol?

    Q: Are you older than Abraham?
    A: "Before Abraham, I am"

    "With the glory I had with you before the world began"

    God made all things through him and for him, and not anything was made without him.

    Please do not just jump to the conclusion that this is all about the memory or idea of future things. Just read it for what it says (with no bias). It truly is a no brainer when you read what it says and not what your head is saying.

    At the end of the day, if Jesus didn't pre-exist and that was the truth, then I would embrace it because all that matters is the truth. I don't lose money on Jesus pre-exisiting or not. I only see that he did exist from what is written in scripture.

    In order to prove your case, you need to explain why quite a lot of scriptures seem to say the opposite of what you are saying. So far you and others haven't delivered. Either you and others have made a hash of it, or you just can't prove it because it isn't true. As it stand now, I haven't truly heard a good reason to believe what your view about those scriptures that appear to teach directly or indirectly that Jesus existed with the Father in the beginning.

    I think many of us are still waiting for your smoking gun evidence. But I think I will be waiting the same amount of time for the reason why the Trinity doctrine is true. i.e., it probably will never happen. I have been here for years and no one has given conclusive evidence that the Trinity doctrine is true or that Jesus didn't have glory with the Father before the world began.

    The good thing about these forums is that there is ample opportunity to prove what you are saying. You and others are not censored or banned because of your view on such things. But I think I can speak for quite a few people here and say, “where is the smoking gun?“.


    Hi brother T8,
    I appreciate your concern to my post. In fact there are n-number of times we have debated on this topic also on all those verses you quoted above. Do you think you could prove your preexistence doctrine so far ?

    I only believe what is clear to me from the Bible by understanding God and Jesus in totallity not in fragments. I see there is only One God in this whole universe who created the heavens and earth by His own word(spoken) and by His Spirit(power). Jesus came into picture only when the same word of God has become flesh in man Jesus the Christ. As Paul rightly told “There is only One God and One man-mediator between that One God and men” (1 Tim 2:5). I don't want to confuse people by mystifying Jesus' preexistence before his birth. I see Jesus like first Adam who was created in the imge and nature of God. Forget about Jesus' preexistence how do you see Jesus in his glorified and exalted status sitting with God ? He is only an image of God but not God Himself. God is invisible and immortal He is beyond our understanding therefore He chose to appear in the man Jesus whom He chose as His son and Messiah. If Jesus was really preexisting prior to his birth why not it is written in O.T why the Author of Hebrews says “God spoke to us through His son in these last days” ? Why Jesus' activities are not disclosed to us if at all he was literally preexisting ?

    Please see the logic and not take one or two verses which controdict the whole Bible.

    Thanks and peace to you
    Adam

    #107117
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    If Jesus was really preexisting prior to his birth why not it is written in O.T

    GEN 1:26
    “And God went on to say: “Let US make man in our image, according to our likeness,”

    PROVERBS 8:30
    “then I came to be beside him as a master worker, and I came to be the one he was specially fond of day by day, I being glad before him all the time,”

    Quote
    Please see the logic and not take one or two verses which controdict the whole Bible.


    Hi G.

    It's not one or two verses.  And, there don't seem to be any verses that actually contradict Jesus pre-existence.  None.

    But here are the one or two that speak of his pre-existence:

    JOHN 3:13
    “Moreover, no man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man.”

    JOHN 6:38
    “because I have come down from heaven to do, not my will, but the will of him that sent me.”

    JOHN 6:62
    “What, therefore, if YOU should behold the Son of man ascending to where he was before?”

    JOHN 8:23
    “So he went on to say to them: “YOU are from the realms below; I am from the realms above. YOU are from this world; I am not from this world.”

    JOHN 8:42
    “Jesus said to them: “If God were YOUR Father, YOU would love me, for from God I came forth and am here. Neither have I come of my own initiative at all, but that One sent me forth.”

    G, pretty much always, if a person says: “I have come from [wherever],” that means they existed while they were in [wherever.]
    “I am from Texas.” or “I was in Texas before.”  Everyone understands that this means I existed prior in texas.  

    So, it seems to me that it is up to you to prove that these words are to be understood in a different way than they always are in every other circumstance.

    JOHN 1:30
    “This is the one about whom I said, Behind me there comes a man who has advanced in front of me, because he existed before me.”

    JOHN 8:57-58
    “Therefore the Jews said to him: “You are not yet fifty years old, and still you have seen Abraham?” Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to YOU, Before Abraham came into existence, I have been.””
    (Whether you translate this “I AM” (to mean God) or “I have been,” they would both point to his pre-existence.  
    The context makes extremely plain that they were talking about age.  Jesus response isn't a complicated one.

    JOHN 3:17
    “For God sent forth his Son into the world, not for him to judge the world, but for the world to be saved through him.”

    JOHN 16:28
    “I came out from the Father and have come into the world. Further, I am leaving the world and am going my way to the Father.””

    JOHN 17:24
    “Father, as to what you have given me, I wish that, where I am, they also may be with me, in order to behold my glory that you have given me, because you loved me before the founding of the world.”

    GALATIANS 4:4
    “But when the full limit of the time arrived, God sent forth his Son, who came to be out of a woman and who came to be under law,”

    REVELATION 3:14
    ““And to the angel of the congregation in La·o·di·céa write: These are the things that the Amen says, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation by God,”

    COLLOSIANS 1:15-17, RS:
    “He [Jesus] is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation . . . All things were created through him and for him. He is before all things.”

    HEBREWS 1:2
    “has at the end of these days spoken to us by means of a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the systems of things.”

    GENESIS 1:1,26
    “In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth. . . .And God went on to say: “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness,
    (Who was he talking to?)

    JOHN 1:1-2
    “In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god. This one was in [the] beginning with God.”
    JOHN 1:3
    “All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence. What has come into existence”

    JOHN 1:10
    “He was in the world, and the world came into existence through him, but the world did not know him.”

    JOHN 1:18
    “No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is in the bosom [position] with the Father is the one that has explained him.”

    JOHN 16:27-28
    “For the Father himself has affection for YOU, because YOU have had affection for me and have believed that I came out as the Father’s representative. I came out from the Father and have come into the world. Further, I am leaving the world and am going my way to the Father.””
    What is a representative?  How could he represent his Father if he never knew him….

    1 JOHN 4:10
    “The love is in this respect, not that we have loved God, but that he loved us and sent forth his Son as a propitiatory sacrifice for our sins.”

    LUKE 3:21-22
    “Now when all the people were baptized, Jesus also was baptized and, as he was praying, the heaven was opened up and the holy spirit in bodily shape like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: “You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you.””

    JOHN 17:5
    “So now you, Father, glorify me alongside yourself with the glory that I had alongside you before the world was.”(Is Jesus here talking about being turned back into “a plan” as some think he was before he became flesh?  Comparing this scripture to Phil 2:7, we have to understand that Jesus, who “was existing in God’s form” had glory as such, and the fact that he “emptied himself” and “took on a slaves form” shows great humility.  Which is what Phil 2:5-7 is telling us we should do–be humble.  If Jesus did not exist as a person, how could he possibly have showed humility in this way?)

    A question which you will ignore, obviously.

    PHILIPPIANS 2:5-8
    “Keep this mental attitude in YOU that was also in Christ Jesus, who, although he was existing in God’s form, gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God. No, but he emptied himself and took a slave’s form and came to be in the likeness of men. More than that, when he found himself in fashion as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient as far as death, yes, death on a torture stake.”
    (–We are to have the attitude that Christ who despite “EXISTING IN GOD’S FORM”
    –Emptied Himself
    –Took on a “slaves form,” “the likeness of men,” “in fashion as a man.”)
    He made himself nothing and became a servant. How can you do that if the first time you exist is as an unborn child?
    We who are born as human, cannot say that we humbled ourselves can we?

    #107118
    david
    Participant

    And, I'm back to sifting through these pages….
    The first 100 pages, I've looked through to find comments on Phil 2. the last 50 of those pages really only mention Phil 2 once, very briefly. I'm having trouble finding any actual discussion on it.

    #107119
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    The very commonly held idea that Jesus was alive before his conception raises a number of questions about his nature. Is it possible to be a human being in any meaningful sense if one does not originate in the womb of one's mother?

    This is the opening question of this thread, and I feel I must address it again.

    Is it possible to be a human being in any meaningful sense if one does not originate in the womb of one's mother?

    Adam did “not originate in the womb of one's mother.”

    Yet, Adam was a human being. If Adam isn't human, then none of us are, for we're his offspring.

    Therefore, the answer is:

    YES, in those rare instances where God is involved, (Adam/Jesus) it DEFINITELY IS POSSIBLE for God to make a human.
    I guess if Jesus not being the product of a mother and father's sexual relations means we have to question Jesus' nature, wouldn't that mean we have to question Adam's nature, as well?

    Here's the thing: GOD CAN MAKE HUMANS. It's true. And yes, they're real humans.

    #107120
    Tiffany
    Participant

    David! Thank you for those posts, and I agree with you 100%, now my only wish is that Mandy and Adam will grasp this vital truth. IMO And I am not a J.W.
    Peace and Love Irene

    #107121
    david
    Participant

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ July 15 2007,12:36)
    This is another absurd statement if Yeshua did not preexist:

    Matthew 11:27
    “All things have been handed over to Me by My Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father; nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him.

    No one knows the father except the Son? You would think that one of the hosts of heaven, who are in the company of the Father, would “know” the Father better than Yeshua. It's a very strange declaration if Yeshua did not preexist his incarnation….


    Anyone?
    (It's from page 68. I'm still looking for discussion on Phil 2 and not finding it.)
    But I thought Is 1:18's post was quite interesting.

    #107122
    david
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ July 27 2007,16:34)

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ July 27 2007,12:39)
    Hi not3,
    Christ was not just a son of man born of woman.
    He was the monogenes son first.
    Phil 2 shows he came by his consent.


    Where did Jesus consent?
    ….being found in the image of a man, he humbled himself…”

    That is not a consent.
    Nick, you once told me that there was a meeting in heaven where Jesus agreed to come down…..find those scriptures yet?  Actually, any OT scriptures showing JESUS preexisted will be fine  :)


    Not 3, you repeatedly do this.  Someone is speaking of verse 6 and verse 7, and you respond by talking about verse 8.  
    It's truly like you don't know those other verses are there.

    Nick said Jesus “came by his own consent.”

    Your response was to quote verse 8, which is speaking of Jesus already being a man, humbling himself as far as death.

    But of course, Nick said Jesus “CAME by his own consent.”

    Although existing in God's morphe,
    he emptied himself and took a slave’s form and came to be in the likeness of men
    And since this is all about humility, and since it wouldn't have been humility if he had no choice, then yes, he did agree to do this.

    Mandy, if you bow your head down as someone passes, that might be taken as a sign of humility. If someone physically presses your head down while someone passes, it is not humility, right?

    Since we are told IN VERSES 6 AND 7 that Jesus, although existing in God's form, humbly took on a slaves form, we know that he wasn't forced to do this. If he had been forced, it would not have been an act of humility, right?

    #107133
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 26 2008,18:57)

    Quote (Is 1:18 @ July 15 2007,12:36)
    This is another absurd statement if Yeshua did not preexist:

    Matthew 11:27
    “All things have been handed over to Me by My Father; and no one knows the Son except the Father; nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and anyone to whom the Son wills to reveal Him.

    No one knows the father except the Son? You would think that one of the hosts of heaven, who are in the company of the Father, would “know” the Father better than Yeshua. It's a very strange declaration if Yeshua did not preexist his incarnation….


    Anyone?
    (It's from page 68.  I'm still looking for discussion on Phil 2 and not finding it.)
    But I thought Is 1:18's post was quite interesting.


    In addition to that. Everyone previous to 2000 years ago, including angels didn't know God if that case.

    And surely the fact that God is invisible and no one has seen him only makes it more unlikely that Jesus didn't pre-exist as the visible representation of the invisible God. Otherwise, what have God's creatures done pre-2000 years ago? Did they need faith to believe in the invisible God, or were they in Heaven and able to see the visible image of God who is Yeshua.

    Not only does scripture teach the pre-existence of Yeshua directly and indirectly, but there are also some weird consequences to there being an invisible God with no visible representative since the beginning of creation till 2000 years ago.

    John 6:46
    No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

    And the other weird thing is that Jesus said that he is the only one to have seen God, if so, then he saw God while he was on earth as Jesus hadn't been to Heaven yet according to that theory.

    So lets recap.

    No one has ever seen God.
    2000 years ago, a man was born and while he was on this earth, he saw God.

    If that were the case, I think that Jesus would need to be preaching to not only man, but angels too. Because angels would have existed in a heaven where God was invisible and there was no visible representation of God in visible body form.

    #107157
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Hi everyone,

    I wanted to quickly check in and let you know that I care very much about this topic and your posts directed towards me, I am not ignoring you! I have been so busy the last 48 hours that my head is spinning! This weekend proves to be a busy family time as well. I am hoping to steal some time away soon to address these posts.

    Love to all,
    Mandy

    #107162
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Gotcha, thanks for the clarification.

    Either he was born to be the Savior, or he came on his own accord to be the Savior.  

    Either way………could he have made a different choice?


    -about page 101, or 102, can't remember.

    Yes.  Phil 2:5-8

    Long before Jesus came to earth, the Bible reveals that he felt this way:
    “The things I was fond of were with the sons of men.” (Proverbs 8:30, 31)

    “By this we have come to know love, because that one surrendered his soul for us.” (1 John 3:16; John 15:13)
    His life was not taken from him.  He willingly, and knowingly surrendered his life for us.

    If he had no choice, would it have been an act of love?

    “The love the Christ has compels us, because . . . he died for all that those who live might live no longer for themselves, but for him who died for them and was raised up.” (2 Corinthians 5:14, 15)

    The apostle Paul said: “The Son of God . . . loved me and handed himself over for me.”—Galatians 2:20; Hebrews 2:9; 1 John 4:9, 10.

    But more than anything, Phil 2:5-8 do indicate that he had a choice, that he humbled himself, and therefore willingly took on a slaves form, emptying himself of his divine nature, apparently, or if you prefer Mandy, his Godlike “outward appearance” as your website puts it.  It would not have been an act of humility if he had no choice mandy.

    It didn't have to be him, just someone equal to Adam.

    But,
    “it was fitting for the one for whose sake all things are and through whom all things are, in bringing many sons to glory, to make the Chief Agent of their salvation perfect through sufferings.” (Heb 2:10)

    #107164
    david
    Participant

    GALATIANS 4:4
    “But when the full limit of the time arrived, God sent forth his Son, who came to be out of a woman and who came to be under law,”

    (This is just a scripture I wanted to remember for later.)

    #107170
    david
    Participant

    Just marking page 110 so it's easier to get to the middle of this thread:
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….st=1090

    #107171
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Does this mean God just picked a spiritual son – any son – to come to earth (you know, out of ALL the sons that were in heaven to choose from)?

    This idea is confusing because it also lessons the whole conception/begettal/birth of Jesus. It cheapens the phrase, “ONLY Son of God.”

    –mandy, page 116

    Isn't the expression “only BEGOTTEN son of God”?

    The expression “sons of the true God” occurs at Job 1:6, and here the reference is obviously to spirit sons of God assembled in God’s presence.
    Again at Job 38:4-7 “the sons of God” who ‘shouted in applause’ when God ‘laid the cornerstone’ of the earth clearly were angelic sons and not humans descended from Adam (as yet not even created).
    Again, at Psalm 89:6 “the sons of God” are definitely heavenly creatures, not earthlings.

    The angels are sons of God.
    But Jesus is the “only begotten son of God,” he being the only one created personally by Jehovah, whereas we are told everything else was created through Jesus, who was, if we remember, “came to be beside him [God] as a master worker, and I came to be the one he was specially fond of day by day, I being glad before him all the time,” (Prov 8:30)

Viewing 20 posts - 4,521 through 4,540 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account