Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 4,481 through 4,500 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #106902
    david
    Participant

    Kenrch responded to my statements on page 42 and Mandy “ditto’d” his response.

    Here’s his response:
    “Jesus humbled himself not accepting any special gift as being the Word but rather became as you and I “in sinful flesh born under the law” the likeness of men.”

    Is that what it says?

    I see no mention of “any special gifts” that Jesus could have accepted. It speaks of him existing in the morphe (nature/form/”outward appearance”–BU) of God and of him humbly taking on human form.

    Also, on a side note, Jesus was born “in the flesh” but it was not “sinful flesh” as Kenrch here states. He was “without sin.” (Heb 4:15)

    Then, Kenrch says:
    “2Co 8:9 For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich.
    Was the Word who became flesh rich? YOU BET! But he denied any special treatment and emptied Himself of that privilege becoming in the same circumstances as we were born in.”

    To deny special treatement, you would have to pre-exist. Done. To empty Himself of any privelege as Kenrch states, he would have to pre-exist.

    Kenrch asks this interesting question:
    “Was Jesus the “Son of man” before becoming flesh? What was it that came down from heaven?”
    Whatever or whoever it was, it/he had the ability to “deny” special treatement according to Kenrch. It/he emptied himself of any special privilege, as he says. And, it or he, was humble in doing so.

    As it turns out, Kenrch didn’t actually respond to my post very much. Actually, I’m not sure why he said most of what he said.

    Why is it no one is actually willing to actually discuss what this scripture actually says. Why is it that when someone does attempt to discuss it, they always go off on some unrelated direction, but don't actually discuss what it says?

    #106903
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    I feel that the arguments made for Jesus not pre-existing in some form are quite lame in comparison to what scripture says.

    Ya.  I've felt like addressing this too.  And definitely regarding Phil 2:4-8.  It's like people can't see the words! And often, instead of addressing the scripture, they start talking about the fact that I'm one of JW's or something else. It is quite “lame” as you say.

    #106904
    david
    Participant

    I think David has raised a number of good points lately, none of which appear to have been addressed.–Is 1:18, page 43.

    It's frustrating when someone believes something, but has to ignore or sidestep a scripture to cling to those beliefs.

    Quote
    A plan cannot empty itself.
    Jesus was the Word/Logos before he was born. Once he was born, he was a living man. A man CAN empty himself of privileges that would otherwise be his.

    –p43

    What did he exist as, before he was born? Yes, the Word. But is that a person? What is that? We know that whatever it is, it or he had to have the ability to act with humility, to choose the course he/it did. And we know that it/he existed in God's morphe (nature/form/or if you prefer, “outward appearance.”) All these highly suggest personage.

    And yes, a man can empty himself of privileges. But that's messed up and not what the scripture says. Notice the sequence that Is 1:18 points out:

    Quote
    I think David has raised a number of good points lately, none of which appear to have been addressed. Not3, the point you don't seem to want to face up to is this – there is a clear sequence of events in Phil 2:6-8:. . .
    The sequence is as follows, Yeshua:

    1. Existed in the form of God
    2. Emptied Himself
    3. Took on the form of a bond-servant
    4. Was made in the likeness of men
    5. Was found in appearance as a man
    6. Humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death

    Before he emptied Himself He was in the form (morphe) God.

    Before he found in appearance as a man He emptied Himself….

    Do you now see why this verse so strongly speaks of His preexistence?

    #106909
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    David, this is the thing, OK, I don't believe Jesus preexisted because in the gospels we are told that Jesus was conceived and he was born.  I take this literally.

    –p 44

    I guess this would be another reason some don't believe Jesus pre-existed his human birth.  But is it a good reason?

    Conception: The act of conceiving in the womb.
    Conceive: To become pregnant.
    http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/conceiving

    Of course, I'm guessing you prefer the definition such as:
    Conception:
    1. The union of the sperm and the ovum. Synonymous with fertilization.
    2. The onset of pregnancy, marked by implantation of the blastocyst into the endometrium.

    Here's the thing.  You're looking at too technical a definition.  Joseph had no relations with her, we are told.  Hence, this was not a normal conception, correct?  
    We have to remember that this was a miracle.  It wasn't the normal way things are done.  The physician, luke, could find the closest word “conception” and use it, but that's not really medically what happened, or at least, not as it's defined today.  
    If the Bible condradicts itself, none of this matters.  But if it doesn't, and Joseph “had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son” then in we must understand the word 'conception' in a much more general sense.  Also, over and over, we are told that it was by means of holy spirit that she became pregnant.
    I see no mention of this in any definition of conception.  So, clearly, this was no ordinary conception and we cannot limit it to how humans normally define conception.

    To take the word conception literally and understand it in the technical medical fashion a doctor would, we'd either have to say the Bible is wrong and ignore the fact that Joseph had no intercourse with her, and ignore the fact that it was actually by means of holy spirit, or say the Bible contradicts itself.

    #106914
    david
    Participant

    I'm also going to mark page 49, as a place where we were discussing the fact that Adam was a real human, despite being the result of a man and a woman conceiving him.

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;st=480

    #106916
    david
    Participant

    Quote
    Please let me know specifically which scriptures you would like my thoughts on. I do well with a couple scriptures at a time – not huge lists. When I'm on HeavenNet, I like to spend time reading as much as I post…….so I get overwhelmed with “answering” huge lists of scripture and questions.

    Thanks, David. I do appreciate you and your zeal for Jehovah God.

    —page 53.

    Philipians 2:5-8 And, as you said, “your thoughts.” I'd prefer your thoughts, or your child's thoughts, rather than a website that doesn't really answer any of the questions I've asked.

    #106917
    david
    Participant

    Ok, i've made it to page 57. Very little on Phil 2 so far. It's bed time.

    #106922
    david
    Participant

    Ok, still awake. I found phil 2 again.

    Quote
    Philippians tells us that while Jesus was who he was, he emptied himself of his privileges and did not seek equality with God (as a Son of a King could do). He humbled himself and “took on” the state or full human condition. Did he have to change anything to do that? Change his nature, or change his skin? No. He merely thought of others as more than himself – he humbled himself. He remained a man as we are with no special privileges.

    Why cannot this be true? What is wrong with this theory?

    –page 59

    Let's begin here:

    Quote
    Did he have to change anything to do that? Change his nature, or change his skin?

    “he was existing in God’s form, . . . he emptied himself and took a slave’s form.”
    Or, instead of “form/nature” insert “outward appearance” or whatever you like.

    This DEFINITELY was a change.
    “he was existing in God’s form, . . . he emptied himself and took a slave’s form.”
    How can this not be change?

    Quote
    Philippians tells us that while Jesus was who he was, he emptied himself of his privileges and did not seek equality with God


    He would have to exist for him to “emtpy himself of his privileges.” He didn't do this when he was a man. If you read the scripture, you'll see an extremely clear sequence of events.

    Quote
    He humbled himself and “took on” the state or full human condition.


    He would have to exist for himself to humble himself. If he didn't exist with the will to do this or that, and the choice was not his, then we cannot use the word “humble.” A plan or thought cannot humbly choose a course. I have a thought in my mind right now. Can that thought decide to humble itself? I'm beginning to think this just silly. I can have a thought to humbly MYSELF. But can a thought humble ITSELF?

    #106925
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    It seems that he swapped his nature from divine to human. He existed in the form of God, and then emptied himself and came in flesh.
    Scripture also promises us that as we have a body of flesh, we will receive a spirit body.

    It seems to me that Christ became one of us, so that we can be one of him because it is written that he came in the flesh, and that we will be like him and see him as he is. In addition to this, he will also call us brothers.

    #106934
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 24 2008,19:40)

    Quote
    If you believe Jesus existed prior to his birth, please give your scriptural understanding.  As most of you know, I contend for the Son of God beginning his life – for the first time – at conception.

    –mandy.

    Hi, my name is …. Mumfort..  I do believe he was “existing in God's form” prior to his birth. (Phil 2: 6)  I see you don't.  I'm wondering what your thoughts were on that verse, and the verses surrounding it?

    M


    David,
    What are you doing here? Have you lost your mind….Mumfort?

    Mandy

    #106935
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,15:23)
    It's frustrating when someone believes something, but has to ignore or sidestep a scripture to cling to those beliefs.


    And no doctrine should be built on one passage of scripture or even two or three…… The tenor of all the scriptures should be taken into account.

    #106936
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 24 2008,20:29)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Sep. 16 2008,12:05)
    Not Superman, but it is written that he is from heaven and Adam was from the earth.
    We follow Adam in our nature and being – we are from the earth.

    The difference is not something folks want to recognize and discuss.


    He was tempted as we are. But he kept his eyes on the prize, i.e., to partake of the glory that he had with God before the world began.


    Would something be a “prize” if you were in possession of it prior?

    #106937
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote
    Yet, if Adam wasn't human, what are we, his offspring? Hence, I believe your definition of human does not take God into account.


    David, I am also not arguing that Adam didn't preexist. Adam did not have a prior life. He was dirt, remember? So it's easy enough to believe God breathed like into him and created the first human being. Hey, it had to happen somehow. Which came first the chicken or the egg?

    Quote
    Or maybe I'm missing something. I'll keep reading.


    It looks as if you are taking me on as your pesonal project? Since you are putting so much time and effort into this subject and me, I will do my best to answer you. But first I must know – what is your real name – is it David or Mumfort? :;):

    Mandy

    #106938
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,13:57)

    Quote
    They were simple people – like me.  The message is simple.

    Last night, while laying in bed, I wondered what a child would think if he was given Phil 2:5-8 to read.  I wonder what conclusions he would draw.  I'm thinking, the uncomplicated right conclusions.

    “Keep this mental attitude in YOU that was also in Christ Jesus,

    who,

    although he was existing in God’s form,

    gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.

    No, but he emptied himself

    and

    took a slave’s form and came to be in the likeness of men.

    More than that, when he found himself in fashion as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient as far as death, yes, death on a torture stake.

    Would a child reading this think that Jesus pre-existed?

    Quote
    I see scripture very simply.


    I'm not sure you see this scripture in the most simple way.


    I asked my 9 year old what she thought this passage was saying and she told me that “….we should think like Jesus. He was really important but acted like he wasn't and he died for the people he loved.” Now that is simple. And no, she didn't even give a thought to preexistence. That requires a higher level of thinking (and indoctrination).

    #106940
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote
    Quote
    Trust me. I've hashed it out with the best of them. That's why I'm tired of it. I admire your enthusiasm, David.
    –Mandy.

    Mandy, I don't think you did, not this scripture, Phil 2. Maybe you did, but I can't really find it.
    On page 2 of this thread, you mention Phil 2, but don't actually address what it says. You counter with other thoughts.


    Perhaps you would like to me to cut and paste private conversations I had with Isaiah regarding this passage? Also, David, just writing the scripture down in bold (which is what you are doing time and time again) doesn't count for discussing the scripture in detail. Anyone can “write it down”. But who is qualified to discern what the true meaning of the passage is for everyone? Apparently you think that you are qualified. So I will wait and see what your teaching is on this passage. So far you write it out in bold and declare that it means preexistence. Well, okay, but why?

    Quote
    But, that's not really what I'd call “hashing it out.”


    You're funny, David. I call talking about scripture and sharing ideas about scripture – hashing it out. What do you define “hashing it out” as? So far I haven't seen you do anything different than I've done. Do you have some secrets about the passage that you plan to uncover or something? If so, do it man! 😉

    Quote
    I believe that according to the Philippians passage – Jesus was not using the privileges that he could have as the only begotten of God. In this way, he humbled himself. (Mandy)
    (David) Still, for it to be humility, he would have had to pre-exist to choose whether to 'use the privileges that he could have' or not. If there was no choice, then there was no humility. And if he had the choice, doesn't this mean he had to preexist?


    No. He could have used his privileges as a man – the Son of Man and the Son of God – but he chose not to. He was born a Prince, remember? His Daddy was/is the Almighty. He could have called on thousands of angels, remember? But he chose not to. Humility.

    #106944
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,15:50)
    I'm also going to mark page 49, as a place where we were discussing the fact that Adam was a real human, despite being the result of a man and a woman conceiving him.

    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;st=480


    Yes, I'm glad you marked this page. Go back and review my responses to you – they would be the same responses I would give you now to the same questions. You see, we have hashed this out……

    I really don't see the need to do it again – do you? Honestly, I have given you my opinion on Adam and how God created him versus how Jesus became a Son. I don't have anything further (or new) to say on that topic.

    #106945

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 25 2008,16:23)
    It seems that he swapped his nature from divine to human. He existed in the form of God, and then emptied himself and came in flesh.
    Scripture also promises us that as we have a body of flesh, we will receive a spirit body.

    It seems to me that Christ became one of us, so that we can be one of him because it is written that he came in the flesh, and that we will be like him and see him as he is. In addition to this, he will also call us brothers.


    Hi t8

    So then Yeshua was no longer Divine? So he ceased from being the Word/God?

    WJ

    #106946
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (t8 @ Sep. 25 2008,14:56)

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,14:49)

    Quote
    To humble one self is to start off in a higher place and to go down.
    How could Jesus humble himself [by becoming] a man if he started life as a man?

    –t8, page 39

    My thoughts exactly (now that I've changed the wording).  I feel this question has not been addressed and that it has only been skirted around, and largely avoided throughout this thread.


    I agree.

    I feel that the arguments made for Jesus not pre-existing in some form are quite lame in comparison to what scripture says.

    Jesus said, “before Abraham, I am”.
    Jesus went to the glory that he had with God before the world began.
    God made all things through him and for him.


    Perhaps lame…..

    But those of us who do not see preexistence in the hand-full of scriptures you claim speak of it so clearly – believe that those scriptures have various meanings OR can be interpreted differently. In other words, it's not clear.

    You guys on the other hand take these passages literally. So for you, it's “clear”. To the rest of us it's “clear as mud”.

    #106947
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,15:09)
    Kenrch responded to my statements on page 42 and Mandy “ditto’d” his response.

    Here’s his response:
    “Jesus humbled himself not accepting any special gift as being the Word but rather became as you and I “in sinful flesh born under the law” the likeness of men.”

    Is that what it says?

    I see no mention of “any special gifts” that Jesus could have accepted.


    I'm sure what Ken meant as “special gift” was the fact that Jesus was born a Prince and had at his disposal the very things of God. However Jesus chose not to acknowledge any of that advantage over us……true humility.

    #106948
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (david @ Sep. 25 2008,15:09)
    To deny special treatement, you would have to pre-exist. Done. To empty Himself of any privelege as Kenrch states, he would have to pre-exist.


    I don't see the logic here, sorry.

    AFTER Jesus was born and grew in knowledge he realized who he was…..it was then that he humbled himself and didn't take advantage of his position. He lowered himself. He became poor. HE CHOSE to do this. But he was certainly alive when this revelation came to him.

Viewing 20 posts - 4,481 through 4,500 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account