Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 2,781 through 2,800 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #90108
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    lightingup…..if you go to a trinitarian Greek translation what do you think you conclusions will be, Their translators were under the persuasions of that ideology. But the further back critical text scholars are going the more there finding that the texts have be altered and words added to the texts to push the trinitarian ideologies. I have two different Greek translations one leans toward the trinitarian view and one does not. They are different translations in several areas.

    We have to remember it's the (SUM) of Gods word is truth. Not just some small area in the scriptures. We have to put it all together, and if there is a contradiction we need to be careful not to ignore it, and assume something
    that is contrary to those contradictions.

    peace to you…………..gene

    #90109
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi Gb,
    ReinCARNation is not relevant.
    Jesus is not said to have a carnal body before one was prepared for him.

    #90110
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Nick………..He said he was (Preferred) before Him, he was talking about RANK. Not a Berth at all. That has been throughly explained to you by me and others, why can't you get it. Even trinitarian Scholars don't us that for their proof's.
    Because they know it talking about Rank not Berth.

    If you are basing the for you belief on Jesus preexistence you have a very weak case.

    IMO…………….gene

    #90111
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    Why do you need to ADD the word PREFERRED to scripture?

    #90113
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2008,13:14)
    Hi GB,
    Why do you need to ADD the word PREFERRED to scripture?


    Nick……….My NKJV…has it as preferred before me, but the margin says ranked. My Greek uses Ranked before me in both places.
    as i told you even scholars don't use that text as a proof text of Jesus preexistence. So how much more proof you need.

    Is truth really important to you or just holding on to you preconceived ideas. It becomes pointless to debate with you sometimes. You wont acknowledge anything no matter how much proof is produced.

    Sorry brother but sometimes you have to admit things……..gene

    #90114
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    Do scholars and scribes always find the truth?

    AFTER it says PREFERRED in Jn 1.30 it says

    WAS

    Jn1
    En
    Number 2258
    Transliteration:
    en {ane}
    Word Origin:
    imperfect of 1510
    Part of Speech:
    verb
    Usage in the KJV:
    was 266, were 115, had been 12, had 11, taught 1321 4, stood 2476 4, misc 41, vr was 1

    Total: 454
    Definition:
    I was, etc.

    #90115
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2008,13:12)
    Hi Gb,
    ReinCARNation is not relevant.
    Jesus is not said to have a carnal body before one was prepared for him.


    Nick….> sorry i meant to say (incarnation) not reincarnated because if it was reincarnated that would mean he was carnal (flesh)before he was born by Mary. As a Fleshly or carnal being.

    Jesus is not said to have (any) body of any kind before He was born By Mary. Because he did not exist. Except in the plan and fore knowledge of GOD< The Father.

    IMO……………Gene

    #90117
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    So you say.
    I disagree believing rather the monogenes son was sent into the world.[1Jn4]

    #90119
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (WorshippingJesus @ May 29 2008,19:09)

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 30 2008,05:18)

    Quote (ptr775 @ May 29 2008,02:06)
    I agree, the greek word Protos does not simply mean that Jesus was created before John the Baptist…

    Protos

    1) first in time or place
     a) in any succession of things or persons

    2) first in rank
      a) influence, honour
      b) chief
      c) principal

    3) first, at the first


    Dear Oneness people:

    I am going to prove to you that this passage is not about a predestined plan as you say in verse John 1:18 and that the Son of God is called the Begotten God.

    Here is the passage in question, John 1:14-18.  I have included the Greek below two of the verses.

    14. And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.

    15. John *testified about Him and cried out, saying, “This was He of whom I said, 'He who comes after me has a higher rank than I, for He existed before me.' ”

    Iwannhv marturei (5719) peri autou kai kekragen (5754) legwn, (5723) Outov hn (5713) on eipon, (5627) O opisw mou erxomenov (5740) emprosqen mou gegonen, (5754) oti prwtov mou hn. (5713)

    16. For of His fullness we have all received, and grace upon grace.

    17. For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ.

    18. No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.

    qeon oudeiv ewraken (5758) pwpote; monogenhv qeov o wn (5752) eiv ton kolpon tou patrov ekeinov echghsato.

    Here goes:

    Now, referring to v. 15 and the words “He existed”

    The Greek word “hn” (Strong's#2258) is an imperfect form (or a past tense form) of the root word “eimi” (Strong's # 1510-to be, to exist, to happen, to be present)

    To be in conjugated as : is, am are, was, were, be, being, been.  As in the word “to exist” it would be: exist, existed, will exist.  In this verse “existed” is used because of how it is written in the Greek.  Now, because of how it is written and the context, we know that:

    This Greek word “hn” (He existed) acts as a verb in this sentence.

    Is written in the 3rd Person-that is why it says “He” and not me or you

    Is in the IMPERFECT TENSE which means PAST tense
    which is why it says existed and not exists.

    Is in the ACTIVE voice meaning the SUBJECT IS DOING THE ACTION and not written in the passive voice which would mean that the action is being done to the subject.  This is VERY IMPORTANT.  IF HE EXISTED AS A PLAN THEN THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN IN A “PASSIVE VOICE.”  You see, a plan cannot do its own existing, it has to be put into existence by someone.  A plan exists or existed in a passive way.

    It is in the Indicative mood. The indicative mood is a simple statement of fact. If an action really occurs or has occurred or will occur, it will be rendered in the indicative mood.

    And is Singular and relates to the singular subject-the Son of God.  

    Context is very important when trying to understand this verse.  The context tells us that John is speaking about Jesus as the “Begotten God” in verse 18 and again the “Only Begotten from the Father” in verse 14.

    Notice the Greek in verse 18
    “monogenhv qeov” this means only begotten God not merely only begotten as in a heavenly son or human son.  qeov transliterated is theos which means god or God.

    So, to sum up…

    John is talking about the Son of God who actively, not passively as a mere plan, but actively existed before him (John the Baptist, who was actually conceived before Jesus).  Yes, the Son of God actually existed in an active way before His conception in Mary.  He existed as the ONLY BEGOTTEN GOD and still is the ONLY BEGOTTEN GOD.

    You can view this info at:

    http://www.studylight.org/isb&#8230;.5&nt=na

    http://www.studylight.org/isb&#8230;.5&nt=na

    http://www.studylight.org/isb&#8230;.&ol=grk

    This is alot of info but it is important to settle this and to settle alot of the debating on this thread.

    God bless,
    LU


    LU

    Excellent post.

    We are very close in our beliefs. However when I have some real time I would like to go in depth with you concerning your bold post (I mean that in a positive way) in acknowledging Yeshua is God. I still have some questions for you?

    Blessings to you and keep up the good fight. You are an asset here.

    :)


    Hi WJ,
    Thank you for your great encouragement. I look forward to going more in-depth with you when you find the extra time.

    I am short on time for a few days since I am planning, decorating and doing all the cooking for a graduation bbq on Sunday. I wish all at Heaven Net could come by for some pork bbq, swimming in the lake and volleyball on the coolest race horse farm around. Wouldn't that be fun…everyone could bring their families…yes that would be nice.

    Till then,
    God bless,
    LU

    #90125
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2008,14:14)
    Hi GB,
    So you say.
    I disagree believing rather the monogenes son was sent into the world.[1Jn4]


    Nick………No Jesus was one of a kind in berth, who was born like that?, no one, so indeed He is uniquely born, that not the point, your saying He preexisted as a being before he was born by Mary.

    I am saying He existed only in the Plan and fore Knowledge of God, Like Jeremiah and Cyrus, and King David. And even we were foreordained before the foundation of the world also. But all of us came into existence as a being when we were born even though we were in the mind of God from the beginning.

    peace to you……………..gene

    #90126
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    So monogenes relates to conception?
    His conception was not different-scripture uses the same greek words used for the conception of John.

    #90128
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2008,14:38)
    Hi GB,
    So monogenes relates to conception?
    His conception was not different-scripture uses the same greek words used for the conception of John.


    Ncik any berth where God is involved is nonogenes so whats your point. Remember John berth was also unique if you remember scripture. My son was the same way I tried for years to have a son and finally I prayed and ask God for a son and even Ask the he would have a good heart, that very month My wife became pregnet and we had a Son and to this day He is known for His good and loving Heart. I call that unique and also nonogenes.

    IMO…..gene

    #90130
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    Would you define the greek word according to your opinion?
    hmmm

    #90132
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 29 2008,16:32)
    Kathi,

    It makes sense to me that if Jesus is God's Son through the conception with Mary, that he would be considered “God”.  He is from his Father, and his Father is God.  

    Growing up in the Assembly of God church, I heard many refer to Jesus as the “God-man”.  Of course this was their way of inferring that Jesus was both puny man and God Almighty at the very same time.  Keeping that straight perserved the trinity dogma.

    However you are not saying that Jesus is another “God” to be worshipped in his own God-right, you are merely stating that God refers to his son as “God” – meaning that Jesus is his boy.  Correct?  I realize you say it better, but I'm just trying to clarify.

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    Hi Mandy,

    You are coming along but not quite getting what I am saying yet. Very soon, I hope:)

    Can we pretend we are sitting at Starbuck's with our cappucinos and we are having a nice conversation-no kids, just the two of us? If that's okay with you, I will carry-on our conversation with you in mind:

    I ask:

    Mandy, would the Most High God need to have existed before anything else to have a title like “Most High God”?

    If your answer is yes, then my next question:

    If that Most High God asexually reproduced ONLY ONE TIME and gave birth to His own child, could that child be considered His only begotten Son and His Firstborn and only born?

    If your answer is yes, then Mandy, here is my next question:

    Could God begat another of His kind?

    If the answer is yes, then my next question:

    So, God could begat another God?

    If your answer is yes, and Mandy, I think so too!

    Would that only begotten son also then be an only begotten God?

    If you say yes then…

    Could that only begotten God ever be the Most High God or equal to the Most High God?

    If you say no, then Mandy you are doing well and following along quite nicely.

    Is that a no because He did not exist before anything else and existing before anything else happens to be a requirement for one to hold the title of the Most High God?

    This is where you would say yes.

    Okay then so far so good…We then get interrupted by our kids calling on the cell phone and we have to hurriedly rush home but wishing we could continue soon. We agree to another cappacino in the near future.

    Well, ok, I know that you would have ALOT more to say than yes or no (considering your 4000 and some posts) but I wanted to stay on topic:)

    So, how did you like our conversation, Mandy?? LOL

    I hope this gives you an idea of what I am thinking in a light hearted sort of way. More Starbuck's later if you can make it because I truly have to go for now.

    I realize that I may have answered for you incorrectly. Let me know.

    I thoroughly enjoyed our time together!!

    God bless and God's love,
    Kathi

    #90133
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    Quote (Nick Hassan @ May 30 2008,14:01)
    Hi GB,
    Do scholars and scribes always find the truth?

    AFTER it says PREFERRED in Jn 1.30 it says

    WAS

    Jn1
    En
    Number 2258
    Transliteration:
    en {ane}
    Word Origin:
    imperfect of 1510
    Part of Speech:
    verb
    Usage in the KJV:
    was 266, were 115, had been 12, had 11, taught 1321 4, stood 2476 4, misc 41, vr was 1

    Total: 454
    Definition:
    I was, etc.


    Nick……..your asking me that question, i know more then most people on this site they don't always have it right. But you don't either Nick.

    AS i told you even Scholars don't use what your trying to us to prove preexistence. Because it obliviously won't support you theory.
    But that doesn't matter you have it in your head and thats the way it is TO YOU>

    IMO…………gene

    #90140
    gsilva72
    Participant

    Hi Lu,

    I don't like the term “only begotten God, Because God did not have a begining. “only begotten Son is a more accurate term when referring to the man Christ Jesus. But when the fulness of the time had come, God sent forth his son born of a woman, born under the law. Gal 4:4

    :)

    #90141
    Not3in1
    Participant

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 30 2008,15:41)
    If that Most High God asexually reproduced ONLY ONE TIME and gave birth to His own child, could that child be considered His only begotten Son and His Firstborn and only born?


    Hi Kathi,

    Can you show me where in the OT God tells us that he asexually reproduced and gave birth to his own child?

    Thanks,
    Mandy

    #90142
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi GB,
    “He was before me..”

    #90152
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 30 2008,16:48)

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 30 2008,15:41)
    If that Most High God asexually reproduced ONLY ONE TIME and gave birth to His own child, could that child be considered His only begotten Son and His Firstborn and only born?


    Hi Kathi,

    Can you show me where in the OT God tells us that he asexually reproduced and gave birth to his own child?

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    God is the Father of all spirits.

    It wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say that he is also the Father of the Angels, as they are all ministering spirits.

    He has Fathered many. But he has a begotten son too.

    God created sex for male and female to reproduce. God doesn't need to reduce himself to a creature if he wants to have a son. He can do what he wants even outside of his own processes. He is beyond creation itself and not subject to it.

    #90156

    Quote (t8 @ May 30 2008,18:50)

    Quote (Not3in1 @ May 30 2008,16:48)

    Quote (Lightenup @ May 30 2008,15:41)
    If that Most High God asexually reproduced ONLY ONE TIME and gave birth to His own child, could that child be considered His only begotten Son and His Firstborn and only born?


    Hi Kathi,

    Can you show me where in the OT God tells us that he asexually reproduced and gave birth to his own child?

    Thanks,
    Mandy


    God is the Father of all spirits.

    It wouldn't be too much of a stretch to say that he is also the Father of the Angels, as they are all ministering spirits.

    He has Fathered many. But he has a begotten son too.

    God created sex for male and female to reproduce. God doesn't need to reduce himself to a creature if he wants to have a son. He can do what he wants even outside of his own processes. He is beyond creation itself and not subject to it.


    t8 I know what you are saying is true, but you do not give Mandy any prove as how Jesus preexisted before the world was. I given all the scriptures, but still it makes no sense to Her. So what else can you come up with to maybe convince He of that very important doctrine of Jesus being with the Father before all creation. After all firstborn means first in all and preeminence also means first in all. So what is the problem that some don't see what some do?
    Peace and Love Mrs.

Viewing 20 posts - 2,781 through 2,800 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account