Did Jesus pre-exist before his birth on Earth?

Where did Jesus come from?

John 6:38-40
For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me; and this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up at the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him should have eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.

The first verse suggests that Jesus came down from Heaven. This seems to contradict that belief which suggests he first existed as a man when he was born into this world. For if Jesus came into existence for the first time when he was conceived through Mary, how could he come down from Heaven? We (Man) came into existence when we are born into this world, but would it be correct to say that we came down from Heaven too? If a verse said that we came down from Heaven, would you think that we pre-existed in Heaven? If so, then why not Jesus?

John 3:17 is another verse that provides support that Jesus came down from Heaven or was sent rather than created.

For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.

The word ‘send’ is the Greek word ‘apostello’.

apostello {ap-os-tel’-lo}
1) to order (one) to go to a place appointed
2) to send away, dismiss
2a) to allow one to depart, that he may be in a state of liberty
2b) to order one to depart, send off
2c) to drive away

To be sent surely implies existence otherwise you would just say born or created. In fact this word (sent) is similar in meaning and sound to the word Apostle (apostolos), which means “one sent forth with orders”. To be sent forth with order, you must exist.

John 6:62
What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before?

Jesus is clearly stating here that he came from above since he eventually ascended into Heaven to be at the right-hand of God.

How old is Jesus?

John 1:15
15 John testifies concerning him. He cries out, saying, “This was he of whom I said, ‘He who comes after me has surpassed me because he was before me.‘ “

John the Baptist was six months older than Jesus Christ. So it is physically impossible for Christ to be before him in age. If this verse is referencing age, then it shows preexistence. Jesus existed before  John the Baptist in the least.

John 8:58
“I tell you the truth,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!

Jesus claimed to exist before Abraham, the father of the Jews. The words ‘I am’ mean ‘I exist’. So Jesus claimed existence before Abraham. We can see that Jesus is getting older as we explore the scriptures. But how old?

Jude 1:25
to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.

Here we can see that majesty, power, and authority through Jesus Christ is before all ages (all worlds) and forever more into the future. This strongly implies that Jesus existed even before all things. But can we substantiate this?

Did Jesus exist before all creation?

Colossians 1:17
He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.

Colossians answers the question outright. It states that “He is before all things“.  But are there other verses that support this idea?

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus being there. This verse alone answers the question because the universe, angels, and men were made and Jesus was present when they were created according to these verses. In case that is not enough to convince you, I also add another clear verse that says the same thing.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways,
2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Is Jesus the Word of God?

But some say that this is talking about the Word and not all believe that Jesus is the Word of God. They argue that Jesus came from the Word, but is not the Word itself that was with God in John 1:1. If you believe this, then please explain the next two verses within their wider context:

Revelation 19:13
He is dressed in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God.

Colossians 1:15-18
The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy.

Okay, if you are honest, this is a closed case. God created all things through the Word. Jesus is called the Word of God and also the son of God. We are also told that God created all things through the son of God. Even if you do not believe that Jesus is the Word, then you still have to believe that Jesus pre-existed on account of him being the son of God. But what we know from scripture is that Jesus existed as the Word of God before he came as a man called Jesus. We know that the Word became flesh.

More proof verses

If Jesus pre-existed, then you might expect that even though the above verses are clear, there would be more verses that teach or at least imply that he pre-existed. So let’s see if this is the case.

Revelation 22:16
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.”

Here we see that Jesus is the offspring of David, yet he is also the root of David, which at appears to show existence before King David. He also claims to be the bright Morning Star and we read in Job how the Morning Stars were present when God created the Earth.

Job 38:6-7
“On what were its bases sunk? Or who laid its cornerstone, When the morning stars sang together And all the sons of God shouted for joy? 

Luke 10:18
He replied, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.

Comparing Luke 10:18 with Revelation 12:1-10, some say that Satan and his angels fell to the earth before the birth of Christ as a man. If this was the case, then Jesus saw an event that took place before he was born as a man. However, others argue that Satan hasn’t fallen to the Earth yet, or that he has, but Jesus saw this in a vision. Regardless, it certainly doesn’t contradict that Jesus pre-existed.

Micah 5:2
“But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me one who will be ruler over Israel, whose origins are from of old, from ancient times.”

The above verse talks about someone who will rule Israel and whose origin is from ancient times. Who but Jesus could fit that description?

John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God/Divine.

John 1:14
The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only,[ 1:14 Or the Only Begotten] who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.

Clearly, Jesus was with God in the beginning as the Word of God. This places his existence as before all things and thus comes as no surprise that he was there when God created all things.

The Angel of YHWH

We know from certain scriptures that Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath and many assume that Jesus gave the Law of God. We are told in Acts:7:30-39 for instance that an Angel of the Lord appeared to Moses through whom God spoke and this is the same Angel who spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and passed on the living words (The Law) to Moses.

30 “After forty years had passed, an angel appeared to Moses in the flames of a burning bush in the desert near Mount Sinai.
31 When he saw this, he was amazed at the sight. As he went over to look more closely, he heard the Lord’s voice:
32 ‘I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.’Moses trembled with fear and did not dare to look.
33 “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Take off your sandals; the place where you are standing is holy ground.
34 I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groaning and have come down to set them free. Now come, I will send you back to Egypt.’
35 “This is the same Moses whom they had rejected with the words, ‘Who made you ruler and judge?’ He was sent to be their ruler and deliverer by God himself, through the angel who appeared to him in the bush.
36 He led them out of Egypt and did wonders and miraculous signs in Egypt, at the Red Sea and for forty years in the desert.
37 “This is that Moses who told the Israelites, ‘God will send you a prophet like me from your own people.’
38 He was in the assembly in the desert, with the angel who spoke to him on Mount Sinai, and with our fathers; and he received living words to pass on to us.
39 “But our fathers refused to obey him. Instead, they rejected him and in their hearts turned back to Egypt.

So is this Angel of the Lord, Jesus? Well it seems possible. Perhaps the correct model to look at is the one mentioned in Revelation 1:1

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John,

Here we can see that the order of the Revelation started with the Originator which is God. He then passed the message to Jesus Christ who in turn sent it to his Angel and then to John. So perhaps it is possible that the angel in Revelation is the same angel mentioned in Acts:7:30-39.

But the Angel of YHWH or Angel of the LORD is described as one like the son of gods.

Daniel 3:24-25
Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astounded and stood up in haste; he said to his high officials, “Was it not three men we cast bound into the midst of the fire?” They replied to the king, “Certainly, O king.” He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”

The idea that a preincarnate Jesus was this Angel of the LORD is a popular one. We know that this Angel of the LORD is never mentioned while Jesus is walking the earth which supports this idea. But it could also be a coincidence. One connection that can be made with Jesus being this messenger is found in Judges 13:18.

Manoah said to the angel of the LORD, “What is your name, so that when your words come to pass, we may honor you?” But the angel of the LORD said to him, “Why do you ask my name, seeing it is wonderful?”

Now read what Isaiah prophesied in Isaiah 9:6 .

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Clearly, Isaiah was speaking of Jesus Christ and note that he was called Wonderful Counselor. Is there a connection here? Perhaps. What we do know is the word ‘angel’ is the same word messenger in the Old Testament, and while it is held that Jesus is not an angel in kind, we know he certainly was a messenger of YHWH and would be fair to say even ‘The Messenger of YHWH’.

So the idea that he may be this angel is not that far fetched. Some vehemently oppose this idea, but they are not aware that both Jesus and John are called angels in the messenger sense.

More to come here……

More proof that Jesus pre-existed

Rev 3:14
And unto the angel of the church of the Laodiceans write; These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God.

Moving on we read the following in Philippians 2:5-11
5 Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
7 but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death even death on a cross!
9 Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name,
10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth,
11 and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

Surely the above verses assumes preexistence.  Look at verse 7: ‘but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness’. This verse points out that Jesus humbled himself to become a (or like a) human and also a servant. So this suggests to us that he preexisted in a higher state because to humble oneself is to become lower. If he started life in this humbled state, then it would be incorrect to say that he humbled himself. Further, he “found himself in appearance as a man” is a weird statement to make if he first existed as a human baby.

This verse is often used in support of the trinity doctrine because of the word ‘equal’. But if you are equal to something it means that you are not that thing, rather you are like that thing. This scripture is also very clear about the following: The Father is God and Jesus is Lord and that God exalted Jesus to the highest place.

A closer look at verse 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: Now I am not sure if Jesus was exalted higher than he was before he came to this world or whether he was exalted to the exact position that he had before. But if we look at John 17:5 again we can see that Jesus asked to return to his former glory.

John 17:5
And now, Father, glorify me in your presence with the glory I had with you before the world began.

The above verse is clear about Christ’s pre-existence in glory before the world began. Just to prove this is not an isolated scripture here is a similar verse:

John 16:28
I came from the Father and entered the world; now I am leaving the world and going back to the Father.”

The next verse also confirms that Jesus pre-existed in Heaven.

John 3:12-15
12 I have spoken to you of earthly things and you do not believe; how then will you believe if I speak of heavenly things?
13 No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man.
14 Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up,
15 that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.

Ezekiel 8:1-3
1 In the sixth year, in the sixth month on the fifth day, while I was sitting in my house and the elders of Judah were sitting before me, the hand of the Sovereign LORD came upon me there.
2 I looked, and I saw a figure like that of a man. From what appeared to be his waist down he was like fire, and from there up his appearance was as bright as glowing metal.
3 He stretched out what looked like a hand and took me by the hair of my head. The Spirit lifted me up between earth and heaven and in visions of God he took me to Jerusalem, to the entrance to the north gate of the inner court, where the idol that provokes to jealousy stood.

This verse is interesting in the sense that the description is very similar to the description of Jesus Christ in Revelation 1:12-18,

12 I turned around to see the voice that was speaking to me. And when I turned I saw seven golden lampstands,
13 and among the lampstands was someone “like a son of man,” dressed in a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest.
14 His head and hair were white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire.
15 His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters.
16 In his right hand he held seven stars, and out of his mouth came a sharp double-edged sword. His face was like the sun shining in all its brilliance.
17 When I saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. Then he placed his right hand on me and said: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last.
18 I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold I am alive for ever and ever! And I hold the keys of death and Hades.

Have a look at the next verse. 1 Corinthians 11:3 (English-NIV)
Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.

Now the word head in the Greek is ‘kephale’ which can mean head, source or master. Now if we notice the order in a time sense, we have to admit that God is the first as he is the only one who has existed for all eternity with no beginning. We also know from scripture that the man came first and the woman came from the man. So that part is correct if we use a timeline. That just leaves Christ. Did he come between God and Man. I think so, as I believe that all things came from him and this opinion does fit perfectly into this model in a time sense at least. Anyway the word Christ here is ‘Christos’ which means “anointed”. So the anointed is the head of Man.
God > Christ > Man > Woman

If God created all things for his Son and his Son was the channel for that creation to come into being, then we can only assume that Christ existed at this point. As Genesis says: Let us make Man in our image. God was talking to Christ at this point and we know that Christ is the image of God and we are the image of Christ. Therefore the image of the image of God (man) is still the image of God. But Christ is the original and first image and we can only assume again that that image existed before the image of the image. A bit like a mirror that reflects a mirror, the original mirror has to exist in order to reflect the second mirror.

So we know that Christ preexisted before creation and now we will look at some more scriptures that show that he was born before creation itself?

Colossians 1:15-16
15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.
16 For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him.

The above verse is quite clear that ALL things were created by or through Jesus.

John 1:3
Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

So again, there is nothing that was made that didn’t involve Jesus/The Word being there. Only the Father and Son were not made. God has always existed and the Son was born from God before the creation of the universe, before anything was made. The next verse describes clearly who/what was the first of God’s works.

Proverbs 8:22-30
22 “The LORD brought me forth as the first of his works, {[22] Or ; or } {[22] Or ; or } before his deeds of old;
23 I was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
24 When there were no oceans, I was given birth, when there were no springs abounding with water;
25 before the mountains were settled in place, before the hills, I was given birth,
26 before he made the earth or its fields or any of the dust of the world.
27 I was there when he set the heavens in place, when he marked out the horizon on the face of the deep,
28 when he established the clouds above and fixed securely the fountains of the deep,
29 when he gave the sea its boundary so the waters would not overstep his command, and when he marked out the foundations of the earth.
30 Then I was the craftsman at his side. I was filled with delight day after day, rejoicing always in his presence,

This verse is talking about Wisdom, whom many believe is Christ. This scriptures compliments other scriptures that that teach that Jesus was given birth by God and then created all THINGS though him.

So from this verse we can see the following points.

Wisdom was brought forth as the first of Gods works.
Wisdom was appointed from eternity, from the beginning, before the world began.
Wisdom was given birth before creation.
Wisdom was the craftsman at his side and rejoiced in his presence before creation.
Some say that Wisdom isn’t Christ, rather this is just wisdom in a conceptual sense and it is true that wisdom is being spoken of in that way. But from verse 22 onward it changes tempo. With terms like I was given birth, I was the craftsman at his side and I was filled with delight, we have to admit that it seems to be talking about a person. Now have a look at the following verses:

1 Corinthians 1:24 (English-NIV)
but to those whom God has called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

1 Corinthians 1:30 (English-NIV)
It is because of him that you are in Christ Jesus, who has become for us wisdom from God–that is, our righteousness, holiness and redemption.

Let’s look at some other concepts that Jesus personifies:

Jesus is the Truth. Yet truth is also a concept.
Jesus is the Way. Yet the way is also a concept.
Jesus is the Life. Yet life can also be a concept.
Now look at the following mystery:

1 Corinthians 2:6-9
6 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing.
7 No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.
8 None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.
9 However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”

Ephesians 3:8-10
8 Although I am less than the least of all God’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ,
9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things.
10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms,

Perhaps another scripture alluding to Jesus being the Wisdom of God.

Finally I leave you with the following OT scripture that suggests that God had a Son before the birth Of Jesus Christ on earth.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has gone up to heaven and come down? Who has gathered up the wind in the hollow of his hands? Who has wrapped up the waters in his cloak? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is his name, and the name of his son? Tell me if you know!


Discussion

Viewing 20 posts - 2,041 through 2,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #69322
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,09:25)

    Quote
    Ok let me see if I'm understanding you.  The Son of God had the Holy Spirit (God's Spirit) then when conceived in Mary God gave the Son of God an additional Human spirit.  So Jesus was born with the Spirit of God AND the spirit of man.

    So if Jesus was born having the Spirit of God what was it that HE received when HE was baptized?  Did the Spirit leave then come back?

    Steve I'm not being “smart” far from it I'm just trying to understand.

    God bless,

    Ken

    Ken;

    The miracle of the Holy Spirit conceiving Christ was certainly that of a body.  A body thou hast prepared for me.  As human beings we have a spirit given to us from God.  He lights every man that comes into the world.  When a person is born again the human spirit is joined with the Lord and he that is joined with the Lord is one spirit according to Paul.  The infilling of the Holy Spirit as taught by many is subsequent to being born again with the evidence of speaking in tongues, etc.  

    Christ was given the Spirit without measure and that may have occurred at his baptism, but the scriptures are silent as just to when it occurred.  Just as the scriptures are silent with regards to when exactly got lights up an unborn in the womb.  I do not claim to have an answer for when it occurs.  

    The whole point of my post was to show that God lights every man so why would it be so difficult for God to incarnate his son by the spirit in Mary.  The exact whys and hows which you are attempting to understand is beyond the scope of my post.

    Steven


    So if Jesus was born having the Spirit of God what was it that HE received when HE was baptized? Did the Spirit leave then come back?

    So you don't know?

    #69330
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Ken;

    At the baptism of Christ may have been when Christ received the spirit without measure. That does not mean the spirit ever left him. We only have the spirit by measure, that's why we have gifts of the spirit, not the fullness.

    Steven

    #69331
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Ken;

    On another note, Christ definitely had his own spirit. Remember, when he was on the cross he said Father into thy hands I commend my spirit. He was given up the holy spirit, it was the spirit that was given to him as a man when he came into the world. The Father lights every man, even his own son, that comes into the world.

    Steven

    #69332
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Quote
    He was given up the holy spirit…

    Should have read, “He was not giving up the Holy Spirit”

    #69333
    kenrch
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,12:11)
    Ken;

    At the baptism of Christ may have been when Christ received the spirit without measure.  That does not mean the spirit ever left him.  We only have the spirit by measure, that's why we have gifts of the spirit, not the fullness.

    Steven


    Then Jesus was born with the “Spirit” He had before as the Son of God in heaven AND a human spirit as you and I?

    #69370
    david
    Participant

    comments?

    Quote
    Ok, I looked up that word myself. I'm not used to strong's concordance, but it is #3784 for those who care or know what that means.

    Hbr 2:17 Wherefore [3606] in [2596] all things [3956] it behoved him [3784] (5707) to be made like [3666] (5683) unto [his] brethren [80],

    That number or word apparently means:
    1. to owe
    1. to owe money, be in debt for
    1. that which is due, the debt
    2. metaph. the goodwill due

    How can a plan “owe” or how could a plan be “behooved” to do this?

    A person can be obligated or behooved to do something.

    this is the way NAS translates that word in various places:
    had 1,
    have 1,
    indebted 2,
    must 1,
    obligated 3,
    ought 15,
    owe 4,
    owed 4,
    owes 1,
    responsible 1,
    should 2

    And, here's how the KJ translates that word in various places:
    ought 15,
    owe 7,
    be bound 2,
    be (one's) duty 2,
    be a debtor 1,
    be guilty 1,
    be indebted 1,
    miscellaneous 7

    How can a plan “ought” to do anything? How can it be obliged or behooved to do something? How can it be bound or responsible to do anything?

    A person can be any of these things. A plan cannot.

    #69375
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Not3in1 @ Oct. 25 2007,08:46)
    The Word was made flesh…..the Word became Jesus. It wasn't already Jesus. This is where the confusion comes in for me.

    Jesus did not come on the scene until he was conceived. So, JESUS couldn't have been with the Father prior to his earthly birth. So what was with the Father? The “spirit” of Jesus? Curious….


    In other words Jesus is just a man (albeit a perfect man).
    If that is the case, then he is lower than the angels.

    i.e., under this hypothesis, angels are spirit beings who are older than men and higher than men and that would have to include Jesus.

    I guess if Satan is a fallen angel, then he might think he has a chance against a mere man.

    But in actual fact the Jesus who defeated the enemy is greater than all the angles, even the archangels.

    God created all things through him and for him. He is the firstborn of all creation, not just among men, and he is the image of the invisible God and only he can see him and declare him.

    So if Jesus didn't preexist as the Logos that was with God or at least if he wasn't the first of God's works, then no one could no about the invisible God pre-2000 or so years ago.

    Scripture says that he existed, this is the mystery. To believe otherwise means to throw out some scripture and it also doesn't make sense if he is the only one who can declare the invisible God.

    1 Timothy 6:15-16
    15 which God will bring about in his own time, God, the blessed and only Ruler, the King of kings and Lord of lords,
    16 who alone is immortal and who lives in unapproachable light, whom no one has seen or can see. To him be honor and might forever. Amen.

    John 6:46
    No one has seen the Father except the one who is from God; only he has seen the Father.

    Luke 20:41-44
    41 Then Jesus said to them, “How is it that they say the Christ is the Son of David?
    42 David himself declares in the Book of Psalms:
    ” 'The Lord said to my Lord:
    “Sit at my right hand
    43 until I make your enemies
    a footstool for your feet.” '
    44 David calls him 'Lord.' How then can he be his son?”

    #69376
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 22 2007,10:50)
    You can't even see what you are supporting. By separating Unitarians from Christians, you are saying that they are not Christians, and by implication, lost.


    Incorrect kejonn.

    They call themselves Unitarians and Trinitarians and they have these names because they wish to be separate in identity with other Christians because of their unique beliefs.

    I am only accepting that reality and working with it. I know it is not perfect, but that is what men have done.

    I didn't create this or do it myself.

    What you say I imply is incorrect. I know it is incorrect, because I know why I said what I said, and your reason was certainly not it.

    #69377
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 22 2007,10:50)
    You say you don't like to be labeled but if you choose to label others, can you not see your own hypocrisy? T8, this may hurt, but you are giving yet another example of why people are fleeing Christianity in droves: hypocrisy.


    Kejonn.

    I don't label myself, but others like to label me so as to put me in a box.

    Trinitarians and Unitarians have labelled themselves. I am addressing this as a reality and showing them that I think labels, denominations, are futile because they put themselves in a box.

    What is it then, if I point out the box and call them by the label that they have given themselves. Am I not really trying to set them free by showing them the cage that they sit inside?

    After all, Jesus called the Pharisees and Sadducees by their name and then also pointed out to them a few woes because of what they held to and practiced.

    #69378
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 22 2007,10:50)
    In my experience, Arians are considered heretics right next to Unitarians. Welcome to the club. Too bad you think that your arian ways are superior and more deserving of the appellation of “Christian” than those who do not believe as you.


    That may be so, but I am not an Arian.

    Because most contemporary written material on Arianism was written by its opponents, the nature of Arius' teachings is difficult to define, so therefore how can I be a follower of someone who's teachings are not fully known?

    I understand that Arius did say “We are persecuted, because we say that the Son has a beginning, but that God is without beginning.”

    I do agree with that statement, but that surely doesn't make me an Arian.

    #69379
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 22 2007,10:50)
    Your “truth” is highly subjective and personal. I have been around many boards on the Net and the bulk of Unitarians do not match your suppositions. You are reading an opinion of me into the typical Unitarian. I would ask that you not do that. I am not a Unitarian. I am something totally different as you may see one day.


    Not sure what suppositions you are referring too.

    Also I have never said you were a Unitarian, but I did note that you sounded like one. i.e., that your posts were similar in content and spirit. But I never said you were a Unitarian.

    In fact Kejonn, I thought you started off so well here and your attitude was equally great with your approach to learning the truth. You even questioned whether you would become greater than thou for respecting the Sabbath like some groups or people you met do. How many people consider such things? I thought you were wise with the steps you took.

    Then as quick as anything you came here and starting teaching that Jesus didn't preexist and competed against the views that said he did, with what appeard to be a better than thou attitude. I am being honest, that is how it looked.

    So what did you expect? That people would just roll over and accept a new doctrine? I was also a bit surprised that you took this stance so quickly, but then again I knew it was possible. I have seen it before.

    This website contains writings that prove to some people that the Trinity is a load of rubbish. But waiting in the wings are the Unitarians hoping to pluck up some of these people for themselves. But then again, every man has a free will and if he wants to become a Unitarian, then he is entitled to such, but what has such a person learned? All he has done is swapped one
    problem for another.

    Anyway Kejonn, you were challenged and rightly so, because if the elementary teachings of Christ are wrong, then building on that is vain. Also when plucking up the Trinity doctrine, the enemy will not take that defeat lightly and will seek to plant another tree in is place. Sometimes when a stronghold of the enemy is destroyed, then what can take its place can even be worse. This the LORD has shown me and that is why I believe that it must be followed up by a planting of the LORD.

    Your posts were very similar to the posts that Unitarians make. I noted that much and admit that this is what I perceived.

    But hey, you said it, “I am not a Unitarian.”

    Great I am happy about that. I will take your word. I did wonder though. I am being honest. It was hard to tell the difference.

    #69380
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (kejonn @ Oct. 22 2007,11:37)
    Then stop using labels of others, unless you are willing for others to categorize you.


    kejonn.

    The difference is that some people label themselves, so I am talking to people with labels on their forehead. It stands to reason that if I wish them to remove the label, that I should give them a good reason why.

    I belong to no denomination or label. So if a man labels me, then he has in effect, judged me. But if I call a Catholic a Catholic, or a Trinitarian a Trinitarian, then I am only calling them by the name/authority that they teach and I am allowed to challenge them and their authority/name.

    But I come in the name of Yeshua/Jesus. That doesn't mean that I am perfect or that I am infallible, but it does mean that I claim to be under his authority because I do what I do in his name. Therefore if you call me a follower of Christ, or a believer then that is apt. But calling me an Arian is also saying that the authority I teach with is in the name and authority of a man.

    You seem to be all worked up about this, but the reality is that you call me an Arian, and in truth I didn't call you a Unitarian. So why keep going on this. It is you who needs to apologise if that is why you are carrying on with this.

    #69381
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,12:14)
    Ken;

    On another note, Christ definitely had his own spirit. Remember, when he was on the cross he said Father into thy hands I commend my spirit. He was given up the holy spirit, it was the spirit that was given to him as a man when he came into the world. The Father lights every man, even his own son, that comes into the world.

    Steven


    Hi Steve.

    You are right. Christ has/had a spirit.

    We do too.

    Romans 8:14
    The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children.

    So we have a spirit and God's Spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are God's children.

    In fact this is how we commune with God, in spirit. Our spirit is connected with God's Spirit. This is how we are one. This is how we can be in each other. It is how Christ and God are in us.

    Now men who do not have the Spirit of God, do have a spirit or the breath of God. That is why they are alive. God breathed into Adams nostrils and he lived.

    But when we are baptised in the Spirit of God, it is a continual baptism. His Spirit is like a river that refreshes us. A river of life.

    I also like to think of spirit like water. A drop of water dropped into a pool of water becomes one. As water can become one, spirit can too. Jesus said that he had living water, and drinking from it would mean that you would never thirst. And what do we suppose this water was?

    #69413
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Quote
    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,12:11)
    Ken;

    At the baptism of Christ may have been when Christ received the spirit without measure. That does not mean the spirit ever left him. We only have the spirit by measure, that's why we have gifts of the spirit, not the fullness.

    Steven

    Then Jesus was born with the “Spirit” He had before as the Son of God in heaven AND a human spirit as you and I?

    Jesus pre-existed with the Father so it is reasonable to conclude that many of the characteristics of his person were the same as in heaven, but the scriptures are only absolutely conclusive on one point – He was the Son of God prior.

    It is interesting to note that Christ had certain powers on earth that he didn't manifest publicly or teach, but manifest privately to certain disciples. On the Mount of Transfiguration his garment turned whiter than any natural color a fuller could whiten them. This was probably the glory of God that penetrated his garments. These are all just hints as to how Christ was different. He even appeared walking on the water and was thought to be a spirit. The bible doesn't say he looked like a spirit or just that the disciples reasoned that he was a spirit. The central truth to hold is that he was the Son of God prior.

    If he was not the Son of God prior then he was not the Son of God because that's exactly what he said and if he lied than he could not be the Son of God.

    Many are holding that he did not pre-exist, which would make Christ a liar because he was with the Father before the foundation of the world.

    Some hold that he was the Word before, which is just another way of stating he did not pre-exist because the Word is God, not the Son of God. If he was God and became the Son of God, this would make Jesus a liar, too, because he said the Father sent him from above, not that he was God and became the Son of God. Ifr a person holds that he was God and became the Son of God their holding God came himself, not that God gave his only begotten Son. What's really amazing are the anti-pre-existers that claim to be trinitarian when trinitarians hold that all three eternally co-exist. Eternal co-existence of the three in one view also denies Christ sonship because if Christ is eternal he had no beginning so he could not be a Son of God, he would have to be God.

    When you understand the truth, you can almost instantly capsize any of these false claims.

    Take care

    Steven

    #69414
    Mr. Steve
    Participant

    Quote
    Hi Steve.

    You are right. Christ has/had a spirit.

    We do too.

    Romans 8:14
    The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children.

    So we have a spirit and God's Spirit bears witness with our spirit that we are God's children.

    In fact this is how we commune with God, in spirit. Our spirit is connected with God's Spirit. This is how we are one. This is how we can be in each other. It is how Christ and God are in us.

    Now men who do not have the Spirit of God, do have a spirit or the breath of God. That is why they are alive. God breathed into Adams nostrils and he lived.

    But when we are baptised in the Spirit of God, it is a continual baptism. His Spirit is like a river that refreshes us. A river of life.

    I also like to think of spirit like water. A drop of water dropped into a pool of water becomes one. As water can become one, spirit can too. Jesus said that he had living water, and drinking from it would mean that you would never thirst. And what do we suppose this water was?

    T8;

    Thank you for your response.

    Take care

    Steven

    #69415
    Morningstar
    Participant

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 26 2007,07:08)

    Quote
    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,12:11)
    Ken;

    At the baptism of Christ may have been when Christ received the spirit without measure.  That does not mean the spirit ever left him.  We only have the spirit by measure, that's why we have gifts of the spirit, not the fullness.

    Steven

    Then Jesus was born with the “Spirit” He had before as the Son of God in heaven AND a human spirit as you and I?

    Jesus pre-existed with the Father so it is reasonable to conclude that many of the characteristics of his person were the same as in heaven, but the scriptures are only absolutely conclusive on one point – He was the Son of God prior.

    It is interesting to note that Christ had certain powers on earth that he didn't manifest publicly or teach, but manifest privately to certain disciples.  On the Mount of Transfiguration his garment turned whiter than any natural color a fuller could whiten them.  This was probably the glory of God that penetrated his garments.  These are all just hints as to how Christ was different.  He even appeared walking on the water and was thought to be a spirit.  The bible doesn't say he looked like a spirit or just that the disciples reasoned that he was a spirit.  The central truth to hold is that he was the Son of God prior.  

    If he was not the Son of God prior then he was not the Son of God because that's exactly what he said and if he lied than he could not be the Son of God.

    Many are holding that he did not pre-exist, which would make Christ a liar because he was with the Father before the foundation of the world.

    Some hold that he was the Word before, which is just another way of stating he did not pre-exist because the Word is God, not the Son of God. If he was God and became the Son of God, this would make Jesus a liar, too, because he said the Father sent him from above, not that he was God and became the Son of God.  Ifr a person holds that he was God and became the Son of God their holding God came himself, not that God gave his only begotten Son.  What's really amazing are the anti-pre-existers that claim to be trinitarian when trinitarians hold that all three eternally co-exist.  Eternal co-existence of the three in one view also denies Christ sonship because if Christ is eternal he had no beginning so he could not be a Son of God, he would have to be God.

    When you understand the truth, you can almost instantly capsize any of these false claims.

    Take care

    Steven


    Yes, God had a Son and sent him.

    Not really that hard to see once you remove the metaphorical glasses of man made doctrines that most of us in the past have unfortunately been given a prescription for by Dr. Tradition.

    #69433

    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 26 2007,07:08)

    Quote
    Quote (Mr. Steve @ Oct. 25 2007,12:11)
    Ken;

    At the baptism of Christ may have been when Christ received the spirit without measure.  That does not mean the spirit ever left him.  We only have the spirit by measure, that's why we have gifts of the spirit, not the fullness.

    Steven

    Then Jesus was born with the “Spirit” He had before as the Son of God in heaven AND a human spirit as you and I?

    Jesus pre-existed with the Father so it is reasonable to conclude that many of the characteristics of his person were the same as in heaven, but the scriptures are only absolutely conclusive on one point – He was the Son of God prior.

    It is interesting to note that Christ had certain powers on earth that he didn't manifest publicly or teach, but manifest privately to certain disciples.  On the Mount of Transfiguration his garment turned whiter than any natural color a fuller could whiten them.  This was probably the glory of God that penetrated his garments.  These are all just hints as to how Christ was different.  He even appeared walking on the water and was thought to be a spirit.  The bible doesn't say he looked like a spirit or just that the disciples reasoned that he was a spirit.  The central truth to hold is that he was the Son of God prior.  

    If he was not the Son of God prior then he was not the Son of God because that's exactly what he said and if he lied than he could not be the Son of God.

    Many are holding that he did not pre-exist, which would make Christ a liar because he was with the Father before the foundation of the world.

    Some hold that he was the Word before, which is just another way of stating he did not pre-exist because the Word is God, not the Son of God. If he was God and became the Son of God, this would make Jesus a liar, too, because he said the Father sent him from above, not that he was God and became the Son of God.  Ifr a person holds that he was God and became the Son of God their holding God came himself, not that God gave his only begotten Son.  What's really amazing are the anti-pre-existers that claim to be trinitarian when trinitarians hold that all three eternally co-exist.  Eternal co-existence of the three in one view also denies Christ sonship because if Christ is eternal he had no beginning so he could not be a Son of God, he would have to be God.

    When you understand the truth, you can almost instantly capsize any of these false claims.

    Take care

    Steven


    mr steve

    You say…

    Quote

    If he was not the Son of God prior then he was not the Son of God because that's exactly what he said and if he lied than he could not be the Son of God.

    Where did Jesus say he was the Son of God before he was born a son? ???

    You say…

    Quote

    Some hold that he was the Word before, which is just another way of stating he did not pre-exist because the Word is God, not the Son of God.

    If the Word was God and not Yeshua then you are saying the Word was the Father. Therefore you are saying the Father was with the Father. Jn 1:1,2

    Jn 1:2
    The same (Father) was in the beginning with God.

    Then that means you are saying that the Father was made flesh. Jn 1:14

    Jn 1:14
    And the Word (Father) was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

    Plus John who wrote John 1:1 also wrote Rev 19:13 before he wrote the GoJ which I believe is where he borrowed the name “Word” from and used it speaking of Yeshua in Jn 1:1.

    Not to mention the first chapter of John is talking about the “Word” not the Father with over 40 pronouns.

    John also confirms who the Word is in John 20:28 and 1 Jn 1:1-3 and 1 Jn 5:20.

    And if this is not enough for you then look at the folowing concerning the Greek translation and the evidence that the Word is God and Yeshua.
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….75;st=0

    You say…

    Quote

    Ifr a person holds that he was God and became the Son of God their holding God came himself, not that God gave his only begotten Son.

    Look at your previous statement…

    You say…

    Quote

    Some hold that he was the Word before, which is just another way of stating he did not pre-exist because the Word is God, not the Son of God.

    However you are saying the Father was made flesh.

    The Word/God did come in the flesh, Yeshua. And he will come again according to Zech 14:3-9.

    Unless you believe the that the Father who is the Invisible God has feet and is the King who sets on the throne for all to see.

    Ah yes but he iwill set on the throne for all to see for Yeshua is the “Image of the invisible God”. The Word/God has come in the flesh.

    Or maybe you believe that the Father was pierced according to Zech 12:10 and John 19:33-37….
    https://heavennet.net/cgi-bin….;t=1311

    1 Tim 3:16
    And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

    Thomas knew who he was in John 20:28.

    Yeshua is the Word. Spoken of in Rev 19:13 and 1 John 1:1-3 and 1Jn 5:20. He is and was the “Eternal life” that was with the Father in the beginning and is and shall be with the Father forever.

    :)

    #69453
    IM4Truth
    Participant

    AND SO WILL WE, AMEN.
    1 CORINTH. 15:28

    Peace and Love Mrs. :D :D :D

    #69454
    GeneBalthrop
    Participant

    T8….>I left a post for you on the trinity thread Ill try to post it here

    Basically If you hold to the scripture that God created all things through and for Christ. And use that as one of your proof text of Jesus' prexistence, then what do you do with this.

    Isa 44:24 ..> Thus saith the Lord, thy Redeemer and He that formed you From the (womb), I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretches forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth abroad the earth (BY MYSELF).

    you either have to say we have a conunterdiction in scripture or Beleive WJ explanation of Jesus being God. But you can not believe He preexisted as some super being or as Michael the arch angle, as David say's.

    The problem as i see it is that the scripture you used does not Say Jesus but Christ and Jesus may be the annointed but is not Himself the annointing, the annointing is the Spirit oF God.

    So i submitt to you that your scripture you used was saying that it was God's Spirit which is the (Christo's) or annointing
    that's is what God created all things through, and not Jesus.

    The same applies to the rock that followed the childern of Israel in the wilderness, the rock was the Christo's or Spirit and that was what was following them in the wilderness.

    You either have to accept the trinitarian idology or reject the who idea that Jesus preexisted as a person before He was born or the scriptures are counterdicting them selves.

    IMO…..peace gene

    #69458

    Quote (Gene Balthrop @ Oct. 26 2007,15:31)
    T8….>I left a post for you on the trinity thread Ill try to post it here

    Basically If you hold to the scripture that God created all things through and for Christ. And use that as one of your proof text of Jesus' prexistence, then what do you do with this.

    Isa 44:24 ..> Thus saith the Lord, thy Redeemer and He that formed you From the (womb), I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretches forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth abroad the earth (BY MYSELF).

    you either have to say we have a conunterdiction in scripture or Beleive WJ explanation of Jesus being God. But you can not believe He preexisted as some super being or as Michael the arch angle, as David say's.

    The problem as i see it is that the scripture you used does not Say Jesus but Christ and Jesus may be the annointed but is not Himself the annointing, the annointing is the Spirit oF God.

    So i submitt to you that your scripture you used was saying that it was God's Spirit which is the (Christo's) or annointing
    that's is what God created all things through, and not Jesus.

    The same applies to the rock that followed the childern of Israel in the wilderness, the rock was the Christo's or Spirit and that was what was following them in the wilderness.

    You either have to accept the trinitarian idology or reject the who idea that Jesus preexisted as a person before He was born or the scriptures are counterdicting them selves.

    IMO…..peace gene


    GB

    You quote..

    Quote

    Basically If you hold to the scripture that God created all things through and for Christ. And use that as one of your proof text of Jesus' prexistence, then what do you do with this.

    Isa 44:24 ..> Thus saith the Lord, thy Redeemer and He that formed you From the (womb), I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretches forth the heavens (ALONE); that spreadeth abroad the earth (BY MYSELF).

    I have asked this of him many times. He says he has answered it, however I must be missing it because it seems that he always resorts back to “ye must be gods” or YHWY is the God of gods etc.

    When I last pressed for an answer then he insinuated I wanted to crucify him so I let it go.

    As far as I can tell he never addresed the scripture you refer to or these…

    Gen 1:1
    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

    Gen 1:26
    And God said, Let *us* make man in *our* image, after *our* likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth

    Isa 37:16
    O LORD of hosts, God of Israel, that dwellest [between] the cherubims, thou art the God, even thou alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth: thou hast made heaven and earth.

    Isa 45:18
    For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; *and there is none else*.

    Job 9:8
    Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.

    :)

Viewing 20 posts - 2,041 through 2,060 (of 19,165 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2026 Heaven Net

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account