Flat Earthers gather in New Zealand

Flat Earthers hold a conference in Auckland, with speakers from around the globe.

Flat Earth celebrities have flown across the globe to speak at the Flat Earth Expo in Auckland, New Zealand. Flat Earthers believe that we live on a flat plane rather than the accepted globe model. Flat Earthers also believe that most evidence to the contrary is controlled by a giant conspiracy of which NASA is at the forefront.

The Flat Earth model has the north pole in the centre of a flat circular disc and the South Pole as not existing at all. Instead, they believe that Antarctica is a giant encircling ice wall that hems in the world’s oceans. They point out that nearly all of us have never visited Antarctica, thus we rely on the testimony of a few who claim to have visited the frozen continent, and who are mostly lying to us and are part of the conspiracy. Flat Earthers are quick to point out that it is illegal to visit Antarctica. Whether this is true or not, the fact is, it is illegal to do a number of things in any protected wilderness areas of the world of which Antarctica is a special one.

This conference in Auckland comes with a huge opportunity. Flat Earthers flying to New Zealand from the Northern Hemisphere have a unique opportunity to prove to themselves that the Earth is not flat and instead the mostly accepted globe. They only need to travel via South America to New Zealand and note the hours spent getting there will be way less than their Flat Earth model would have you believe. You see, the Flat Earth disc with no south pole has New Zealand, Australia, South America, and Africa many times apart in distance from each other as the globe suggests, simply because, instead of reducing down to a single point we call the South Pole, the area of land in the Southern Hemisphere expands out to the giant ice wall circumference of the whole disc. This projection is similar to how we view Canada, Russia, or even Antarctica on most world maps where they are many times larger on these maps than they are in reality . This is because maps have difficulty projecting a 3D globe onto their 2D canvas. In essence, the Flat Earth model is a 2D construct as it is a flat surface albeit disc shape, so it has the Southern Hemisphere as being much larger in area than it really is.

Sitting in an isolated spot in the Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand gives these Flat Earthers travelling to Auckland the unique opportunity to debunk their own belief. But how many will actually test this out? I am thinking perhaps a few, but most of these guys will just be looking forward to rubbing shoulders with their Flat Earth brothers when they get here and on-route looking out toward the flat horizon because they are simply not flying high enough to see the curve.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,421 through 1,440 (of 6,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #829912
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Dig4truth,

    I have no problem with the creation happening in six days. I don’t believe that the earth went into orbit until day 4 though. It may have rotated before then.

    #829914
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kathi:  Can you admit that the earth would not be directly overhead to the Apollo landing site?

    Of course.  When I said the earth would be directly above anyone on the moon, I was speaking about the middle of the side of the moon that faces us.  You have discovered that Apollo 17 landed 20 degrees off center, so I’ll have to change 90 degrees to 70 degrees.  Here’s what that looks like…

    The purple earth (#1) is 90 degrees above the astronaut (red X).  The royal blue earth (#2) is 70 degrees above him.  The baby blue earth (#3) is where the earth is in the wet flag image… a little less than 45 degrees tangent to the astronaut.  Your claim is that he could get the flag in the shot… and the #2 earth just barely above the flag pole.  I think that is far fetched.

    Here is part of my camera set-up.  The green and white thing is an equatorial wedge, to help you align with stars.  Since Phoenix is at 33 degrees north latitude, I have it set there to align with Polaris, which allows the program to follow any heavenly object I aim the camera at…

     

    In this one, I set it to 70 degrees.  This is the angle the Apollo 17 astronaut would have had to shoot… just to get earth #1 in the very top of the photo! It surely wouldn’t have gotten the earth just over the tip of the flag pole, where earth #2 is in my drawing…

    A little more to come…

     

     

    #829918
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    Kathi, these are just an alternate view of the 33 versus 70 degree angle I showed in the last post…

     

     

     

    That’s a lot of angle on that second one, huh?  And remember that he would have had to aim even higher to get the earth where it shows in that wet flag image… because where my equipment is pointing would barely capture the earth.  It would be at the very top of the image.  So do you think he aimed his camera at an even higher angle than that (to get the earth down low) and also got the horizon in the same image?  I think it is impossible.

    Okay finally, you mentioned that the photographer was holding the camera down by his feet, right?  This is the same wet flag image, zoomed in on the guy’s face shield, so you can see what I assume is the other guy in the reflection.  Doesn’t look to me like he’s even holding the camera – let alone down by his feet.  What do you think?

     

     

    #829924
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  Common sense should tell you that 24 hour day without the sun has problems. It is more likely that either the sun appeared in the firmament and was part of the heavens or a day is not necessarily 24 hours long.

    Genesis 1…

    14 And God said, “Let there be lights in the firmament…

    15 and let them be lights in the firmament to give light on the earth…

    And it was so. 

    16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 

    17 God set them in the firmament to give light on the earth…

    18 And God saw that it was good. 

    19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.

    I’m fairly certain your “common sense” is no match for what God Himself conveyed about creation through his faithful servant Moses.  And what’s worse, it’s not even common sense at all.  No T8, what you’re using here is indoctrination – not common sense.  500 years ago, nobody would have read Genesis 1 and thought the days were long periods of time, or that the sun was created before day four.  People only read it that way today because godless men have filled their gullible minds with nonsensical stories that go directly against God’s written word.

    I’ve been listening to Mike Riddle for years, but he just released this 5 minute teaching today.  Very timely and topical.  He’s a heliocentrist, but listen to his argument for the sun being created on day four…

     

    #829925
    Dig4truth
    Participant

    T8: “Not my theory at all. I believe 7 stages which could have been 7 minutes or 7 million years. It doesn’t give us the exact unit.”

     

     

    Yes it it does give us the exact unit – a day. But your 7 million years might give enough time for the earth’s evolution. That is if your into that evolution stuff.

     

     

    #829926
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    T8:  I imagine the atmosphere is included in the rotation of the Earth, thus everything is moving in sync bulge or not, so do not see an issue with it myself. And the altitude of the sea is sea level, whether it is on the bulge or not makes no difference to the atmosphere as it starts from there up.

    Well, as long as you don’t see an issue with a 21 Km high mountain of water around the equator, then I guess everything’s okay.  I love how you guys use the phrase “sea level”, when there couldn’t be any such thing on a ball. Don’t laugh at this image, T8, because you actually believe it…

    And you guys call me the wack job.  🙂

    Btw, you didn’t address D4T’s point about why the waters of the world don’t all pull to the equator.  Or for that matter, why not the clouds?  Shouldn’t every cloud on earth just be a single line of clouds around the entire equator?  Any mass on a spinning ball will move to the equator of that ball due to centrifugal force.

    #829928
    mikeboll64
    Blocked

    I’ll be back tomorrow or Saturday to catch up.  In the meantime, I finally took the time to create my top-down eclipse video, and I hope you’ll all check it out.  It’s 6 minutes long.  I look forward to your explanations…

     

    Btw, the I took the title shot myself.  I overexposed the moon last week to show that we can see the unlit part, even at night.  Of course that is impossible in the heliocentric model, because the moon is 238,000 miles away in pitch black outer space.  The only part we should be able to see at all is the part being lit by the sun.  The unlit part should be the blackest of black… exactly like the black sky surrounding the moon in my photo.  It should look like this, no matter how much I try to overexpose it…

    The fact that we can see the entire moon, and even the designs on it, tells us that the heliocentric model is wrong.  Anyway, enjoy the video.

     

     

    #829932
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi Mike,

    Do you know what the position of the moon was in it’s orbit of the earth? That would also be a key indicator for the picture of Apollo 17 flag/astronaut shot. Did you even look at the site that I linked for you and the time frame to go to where you can see for yourself exactly when the astronauts were taking the pictures of the flag? I spent a long time trying to find that for you and to write the time frame down to make it easy for you to find. There are two pictures of the different astronauts with the flag and the earth in the background.

    Also Mike, the landing site is 20 degrees north of the moon equator and 30 degrees east of the moon’s meridian. I don’t think you have that reflected correctly.

    One more thing…the camera is held more at his knee level. He isn’t looking through it, just aiming it up to the earth with the flag and astronaut in the foreground.

     

    #829933
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Mike,

    I liked your video about the sun and days of creation. The earth doesn’t need the sun to make a 24 hour rotation. I just wrote that to Dig4truth a few hours ago. The guy did mention that God is Light, he needs to be clued in on Jesus being the Light, ha.

    #829934
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,

    While Jesus walked the earth he was the light of the earth

    because in him was light and

    eternal life.

     

    We too are to be the light by the same Spirit of God in us.

    #829935
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    And you guys call me the wack job.

    I don’t call you a wackjob, but yes my view is I think you are wacky with some things, particularly the Flat Earth.

    That picture you posted is a misrepresentation. Gravity starts from the centre and moves out. The universe doesn’t have an up so to speak or a force of gravity that means you can jump off the edge of the world and go down.

    I think there is an up and down in a spiritual sense as in closeness and distance to God’s throne that is.

    #829936
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Here is a video showing the lunar eclipse of 12/10/11 from Singapore.

    #829937
    Lightenup
    Participant

    Hi Nick,

    When the Father indirectly made the earth through Jesus who created it directly, Jesus was the Light of the world. Jesus never stops being the Light of the world.

    #829938
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The Dig Rule

    T8 said: “Not my theory at all. I believe 7 stages which could have been 7 minutes or 7 million years. It doesn’t give us the exact unit.”
    Dig said: Yes it it does give us the exact unit – a day. But your 7 million years might give enough time for the earth’s evolution. That is if your into that evolution stuff.

    Okay, let’s run with your hypothesis and see how far it gets us. You have established that because the word ‘day’ is mentioned, it then is specifically referring to a 24 hour period. So you take an absolute literal sense. Let’s call this the Dig Rule as you are the one who floated it first in this discussion or at least are the one pushing it the hardest. So the Dig Rule simply states that everything is literal including measurements of time in scripture. If for example it says ‘day’ it means a 24 hour day. So let the fun begin.

    Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour.

    So according to the Dig Rule, John was talking about the very 60 minutes when he wrote this. Do you really believe that?

    “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy. Know therefore and understand, [that] from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince [shall be] seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built again, and the wall, even in troublous times.

    Okay, so seventy weeks or 490 days there would be the bringing in of everlasting righteousness. And a mere seven weeks or 49 x 24 hour days is the time between the command to restore Jerusalem unto the messiah. Seventy literal weeks was not be enough time to accomplish these things and nor was 7 literal weeks. Dog, your rule fails. Then we have prophecies about 1260 days, 42 months etc and while they may be literal, any decent bible student needs to be open to what these really mean. Many actually think a day or a week can mean a year.  Take Ezekiel for example. He is told to:

    “Lie thou also upon thy left side, and lay the iniquity of the house of Israel upon it: according to the number of the days that thou shalt lie upon it thou shalt bear their iniquity. For I have laid upon thee the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days: so shalt thou bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day for a year”

    We then have these:

    “But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day…”

    “Lord, you have been our dwelling place throughout all generations…You turn men back to dust, saying, “Return to dust, O sons of men.” For a thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night.”

    And this idea is open for debate, but will add it in just in case it relates.

    “In the day you eat of the fruit of this tree you shall surely die.”

    Is it a coincidence that those who lived before the Flood died just short of a 1000 years of age. Of course it could also mean that they started to die from that moment.

    Clearly, the Dig Rule fails scripture and fails prophecy. No serious bible student would apply the Dig Rule right?

    And finally, the reason why everything is not literal is to stop the wicked from understanding the meaning. It takes a patient and truthful person to seek out what everything means.

    #829939
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    The Dig Rule Part II

    And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.

    And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

    And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

    Let’s apply the Dig Rule. Well I will just let a picture do that to save myself typing out a thousand words. This is what you are literally looking for in regards to the scripture:

    So as you can see, this is what you need to watch out for, If you see anything resembling this, then you know it is the Beast.

    And as mentioned more than once, the Dig Rule is looking for a return of Jesus who has a literal sword coming from his mouth.

    And out of his mouth came a sharp sword, so that with it he could strike the nations. And he will shepherd them with an iron rod, and he stomps the winepress of the wine of the furious wrath of God,

    So if a being appears out of the sky and doesn’t have a sword coming from his mouth, then we are free to attack it right? Because it is not the Jesus in the Bible because that one has a literal sword coming from his mouth right?

    Seriously, I think you can now see the Dig Rule for what it is.

    #829942
    NickHassan
    Participant

    Hi LU,

    He is the light in the same way as we are the light.

    While he is in the world he is the light of the world.

    Then he is the light of the new Jerusalem. Rev 21.23

    #829943
    david
    Participant

    #829944
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Thanks David.

    #829946
    david
    Participant

    #8 in that video, has it been addressed?  That being, people at the bottom of South America seeing the moons image upside compared to people in Canada?

    #829947
    Proclaimer
    Participant

    Not verified in this topic. But I think the FEers have an answer to this. The second light (moon) appears like that on a FE too. So a person looking at the moon on one side sees a different orientation to someone on the other side of the moon. However, yes there is probably a problem because a person in South America shouldn’t see the moon at all if citizens of Canada can see the moon.

    Would be a good experiment to do. Are you on the West Coast of Canada? If so, we could do this observation I think.

Viewing 20 posts - 1,421 through 1,440 (of 6,414 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 1999 - 2024 Heaven Net

Navigation

© 1999 - 2023 - Heaven Net
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

or

Create Account