@Proclaimer,

YOU: “Jesus is not mentioned by name in the Old Testament.”

ME: THANK YOU!! Yet somehow he will be found in its writings by modern day “scholars.” And you don’t question this?!?!?

The “word that was with God in the beginning”; BUT what does “word/logos” mean? For you, by the use of circular reasoning, means Jesus. What it really me…[Read more]

@Proclaimer,

Isa 53 being about Jesus is completely false! So using this chapter as your “proof” produces a big, fat zero and is thrown out as evidence to your claim. You have ignored the preceding chapters and are cherry picking a couple verses from 53 to “prove” you found Jesus in the old testament because it sounds like Jesus in the new and…[Read more]

@proclaimer

OK, fair enough.
Let me leave you with my conviction:
A sphere where people on the other side live with their feet above their heads, where rain, snow and hail fall upwards, where trees and crops grow upside-down and the sky is lower than the ground is just an illusion.

God bless

@proclaimer

You called me a simpleton and a low IQ person.

@proclaimer

I did apologize for my false accusations.
Do you apologize for yours?

@proclaimer

There is no man, teacher, prophet or country that can purchase our very lives or healing by dying for us. Only Jesus Christ.

Amen. At least we can agree on something.

@proclaimer

1965 scientist claims the moon is plasma:

@proclaimer

@proclaimer

Planes don’t fly that way.
“Gravity” doesn’t change that FACT!

@proclaimer

End of story.

@proclaimer

If you believe and teach something that is not true, it effects your other teachings, even if they are true.

Right back at you, Proclaimer.

@proclaimer

Hi Proclaimer,

I know this is a different topic but I want to say it one more time.
The lying freemasons are even in our christian circles.
Please note, I’m no longer saying that you are one of them.
What are they doing?
Well, 1 John 2:23 explains it very well:
Whoever denies the Son, the same has not the Father.
Of course, this…[Read more]

@proclaimer

I had to laugh honestly.

l don’t find anything funny about it.
Anyway, “Gravity” doesn’t change the fact that the plane is now upside down.
There are no upside down planes in reality.
Conclusion: We don’t live on a globe.

@proclaimer

@proclaimer

The existing laws of density and buoyancy perfectly explained the physics of falling objects long before knighted Freemason “Sir” Isaac Newton bestowed his theory of “gravity” upon the world.

@proclaimer

@proclaimer

Common sense tells every free-thinking person correctly that there truly is an “up” and “down” in nature, unlike the “everything is relative” rhetoric of the Newtonian/Einsteinian paradigm.

@proclaimer

Hi Proclaimer,

It’s sad that you can’t grasp simple basic things like “up” and “down”.
Sorry, no offence, but come on!

@proclaimer

The best proof is a simple, practical and logical one.

34. If the Earth were a globe, there certainly would be—if we could imagine the thing to be peopled all round—“antipodes:” “people who,” says the dictionary, “living exactly on the opposite side of the globe to ourselves, have their feet opposite to ours:”—people…[Read more]

@proclaimer

Just to be fair, there are many flat earth and geocentric model proofs in this thread as well.