Although I do not necessarily agree with your statement, I will run with what you said for now because yes a name is a name and isn't necessarily saying that he is an angel/malak. However, if I give you proof that a son of God is called by the title malak/angel/messenger will you admit that it is possible then? And if I prove it to you, what is…[Read more]

Your posts/topics are still there charity. You might need to to the last topic and work forward from there. Make sure you are also in the right forum.

KJ. Thanks for setting up this topic.It is your turn to reply in that topic.I have supplied clear proof that Jesus is not the God in this verse. I am waiting for you to reply.https://www.heavennet.net/cgi-bin….2;st=50

KJ, I noticed that you are posting around the place and adding in those laughing icons etc.So why haven't you posted here?Is this tantamount to admitting that you are wrong with your interepetation of 1 John 5:20?I just need an answer as to whether you are defeated here or if you have a come-back and I just need to wait a bit longer.Please reply.

Now back to the topic WJ.Do you acknowledge that Malachi the prophet is a man, who must be a son of God, due to contributing scripture to the bible. And that Malachi is actually the word for angel. So this man was called mal'ak.A simple nod or a yes will do. We can then move on.

WJ, as you have probably read before.There is a difference between avoiding a question and not reading a question.The latter happens because we do not read every post in the forums and thus questions do get missed.However, questions will eventually be noticed if you ask it often, but you do have the power to bring a question to our attention…[Read more]

Back to the topic.Why do you not call God, THEM or THEY as your doctrine dictates?

WJ, you complained in the Hot Seat forum that I was being hypocritical on this.That is the point I was making.But I wasn't being hypocritical on this. The exact opposite.I think you owe me an apology. But I will leave that up to your conscience as to whether you give me one.

WJ, we are happy to answer all your questions.But it should be understood that a person is not going to read every topic and post and therefore some questions will go unanswered. In that case, you can bring things to attention if they are being missed. Often a question might be asked a few times and and answer will follow.The Hot Seat is for…[Read more]

Your point about the source not being able to exist without its image is unscientific and not logical either.And your point about the hammer shows you have learned nothing.You should give this subject up. It is way above your understanding as proven by your last post.

You err in this WJ.The Father is the one true God.Jesus is THE image of God.We are made in the image of God and are being perfected and will be like Christ.So, if Jesus is the image and we are images, then that shows that we are like him and God is still the source. In the words of Jesus himself, (not my words):“Do not hold on to me, for I have…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 30 2011,06:13)Sure I am and in my time I will answer.All I was doing is pointing out how you and Mike whined about others not answering questions when more than once you and Mike have avoided answering questions yourself. That seemed a little hypocritical of you guys, don't you think? I will show you soon what it is…[Read more]

Quote (Kangaroo Jack Jr. @ Mar. 30 2011,06:08)t8 said:Quote There are many lords. Have you ever had a landlord?This is the best intellect HN can offer?KJSometimes it is the simple things that confound the self-confessed wise.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 30 2011,06:05)”THERE IS NO GOD BUT ONE!”.Yes and yet you cannot guess who that one is can you.Hint:John 6:29Jesus answered, “The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.”John 17:3Now this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.Why argue against…[Read more]

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 30 2011,06:05)t8Yes I have had a landlord,As you have said. Jesus being lord has not negated that you had a landlord who is also a lord, but not Lord of all.There is something in that for you of you wish to see it.

Quote (WorshippingJesus @ Mar. 30 2011,05:43)Quote (t8 @ Mar. 28 2011,19:42)Feel free of course to highlight any questions I have missed so far. I have no problem answering your questions.Really?We will see.  WJYes really.So long as you don't bog me down with too many questions at once. I can take them one or two at a time. No problem. This has…[Read more]

Not word games KJ.Ask yourself if you have ever told a lie.Then ask yourself if you are a liar.If the answer is yes, ask yourself where you will end up when you die.Revelation 21:8But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars—they will be consigned to t…[Read more]

Stu.You are welcome to point out any stats that say that scriptural teaching is being believed by less.It is prophesied that such a thing will happen because wickedness is said to increase as we approach the end of the age.

Quote (Stu @ Mar. 27 2011,06:30)In Japan christianity has remained at 1% for the past 450 years.What is the point here?They don't believe in God and they have had greater exposure to radiation and more earthquakes than anyone.My point is that regardless of why, what makes them right? Do they enjoy a greater quality of life? Is that what you are…[Read more]

Stu's god is probably gravity.His prophet told him it was gravity and he probably backs that option more than any other. Although he doesn't have a clue about what was first, he knows without a doubt that there is no intelligent creator God and that gravity is a better god because gravity has the IQ of zero and therefore cannot judge him.Although…[Read more]