I always ask here where from this so called formula of “One God the Father and One Lord Jesus” obtained by these writers especially Paul the Hellenistic Jew.

One God is a theme in the Old Testament. The New Testament is a revelation that this God made Jesus both Lord and Christ. while you reject Jesus as both Lord and Christ, it is not unc…[Read more]

The Son is the reflection of the glory of the Father, the very imprint of HIS PERSON.
WHICH MEANS AMONG OTHER THINGS THAT HE SHARES THE ATTRIBUTES OF HIS FATHER: OMNIPOTENCE OMNISCIENCE OMNIPRESENCE….

He is the image of the invisible God. We are also images of God. Simple. except he is the full expression of God whereas we reflect God in part. A…[Read more]

Trinity, Binity, Zeroinity have this in common. Jesus Christ is not truly the son of God. The bible applies a term to people who deny the Son.

But for us, there is one God the Father and one Lord, the Lord Jesus Christ. And it was God that made him Lord.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion and you are sovereign over your own choices. the messiah is there for us to choose or reject. You have chosen.

Your posts are all the same gadam. You are so predictable.

Old Testament good, New Testament bad. Because Jesus is not the Christ. Lol.

And i can see why you want to discredit the New Testament.

Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.

I disagree. I think the dead know they are dead.

The most shocking part of Durham report
A filing from Special Counsel John Durham alleging the Clinton campaign paid money to penetrate Trump’s servers.

God does not say that He restored a destroyed earth which needed restoration but that He created from scratch the earth which did not exist before. What you are suggesting is totally wrong. It is our present earth that needs to be purified by fire and recreated, and we know that God is going to do this especially by Peter, John and Isaiah 2Peter…

[Read more]

Gene has no biblical source to say such things. As far as I’m concerned, I don’t care about science until it goes along with THE WORD OF GOD.

What I think you are really saying.

As far as I’m concerned, I don’t care about science until it goes along with my interpretation which is the stance that the SDA takes regarding this passage in THE WOR…[Read more]

Look at the creation event as seen from the surface of earth. Coinedently or not, you have everything on scientific order.

If you look at it from outside the universe which is what many do, it doesn’t align with science.

I favor the first option myself.

1 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but rested the seventh day; therefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and consecrated it.

The word sea gives it away however. Because it mentions that, it is simply talking about land, sea, and sky. It is from the point of view of where we dwell. Not from outs…[Read more]

Proclaimer: See how the first day ends when all that has already taken place?

Mike: I already addressed your misunderstanding in this very thread about an hour ago. I also addressed it in the private thread. Quote how I addressed it, and THEN make an argument. It’s not a “discussion” if you just keep posting the same drivel as if other peopl…

[Read more]

Berean, there is not enough in the text to state what you said as a fact. And I think gene is saying that the text can support his view. Let’s not get all dogmatic about it. Just look at the possibilities that the scriptures allow and do not let personal bias toward a doctrine get in the way.

God created the heavens and earth and the earth was…[Read more]

If you are going to copy things from the private thread and bring them here to discuss, great!  I want everyone to see you get exposed.  In fact, there wouldn’t even be a private thread if you would have just responded to my posts in a manner befitting a respectable adult discussion among peers.

Keep pushing the narrative Mike. In reality, you are…[Read more]

We actually do know.  It was WITHIN the six days of creation – which occurred about 6000 years ago.

Who is we? The Flat Earth community?

Gene, Mike has fallen into the trap of fighting for a narrative despite the evidence. This sort of behaviour forces people to ignore good arguments and evidence. In effect, they make themselves blind because their ability to reason is impaired.

Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD…

Some today believe and teach that the entire universe was created in six 24 hour periods because yō·wm has been translated as ‘day’ in English.

While I am not saying this is an incorrect translation, what I am saying is that yō·wm / has two meanings as I will demonstrate and the rule applies for English. The meanings are:

1. 24 hours (So…

[Read more]

PROCLAIMER, DO YOU AGREE WITH GOD HIMSELF IN THE SCRIPTURES ABOVE THAT THE VERY CREATION OF THE HEAVEN AND EARTH IS INCLUDED IN THE SIX DAYS OF CREATION, AND NOT EXCLUDED FROM THOSE SIX DAYS AS YOU’VE PREVIOUSLY CLAIMED?

I agree that it says “in six days the LORD made heaven and earth” in multiple places in the bible.

But I am not sure if thi…[Read more]

For example, God didn’t make heaven until the second day.

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and…[Read more]