Quote (david @ April 23 2013,15:24)Even I understand the fallacy with that last post.  This isn't what evolutionarianists 🙂 believe.Hang on there david. They believe that each of these species had their day in the sun. The graphic highlights a point, that Evolutionists must believe that there were millions of monkeys and then the branch that…[Read more]

IMO we don't need Stu. He only avoided questions rather than answering them, and he never provided one piece of evidence to back up atheistic belief. He just wasted time. I only hope that he is searching the Earth for a man after his own heart but who also happens to be 10 times more intelligent than him. Such a man, I would love to see here. Even…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 20 2013,21:21)To the Son He says, O God, your throne is forever……………Can this equally mean that the sons says, “O God your throne is forever”. I don't have the time right now to check the context. Also, I haven't forgotten about your question in that other thread, although I have forgotten the question. I will…[Read more]

If homosexuality is genetic, how did the genetics get passed on? I have never heard the answer and only ever heard one person ask that question.

It is now legal for same sex marriage in New Zealand. It was voted on about 2 days ago. Here is what one New Zealand politician said and this video went viral. Evidently he has become a rock star politican after that speech. But as it is written: “the whole world is under the sway of the evil one”.

Hi Wake up. I have a very speculative theory on where this Global Finance Crises could be headed. Let me know what you think. Remember I am only speculating. You can read about it here:https://heavennet.net/writings/the-restraining-force/

Here is a very interesting video on the subject.

Quote (david @ April 13 2013,15:14)Everyone thinks they are teaching correctlyEveryone thinks they have truthEveryone thinks they are searching for truth. Everyone thinks they are on the narrow path. Most are wrong, delusional, deceiving themselves.  But I am focusing on the true teachers that apparently teach the truth.  Who are these people?  …[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2013,15:53)t8, why aren't you addressing Hebrews 1:8?Sorry, that one passed me by. I haven't read that scripture, so I don't know what it is saying. Will likely answer later on as it might need additional groundwork and info to answer it.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2013,15:53)Without adding that definite article, you are in the same boat as I, because “qualitatively theos” (not THE Theos) still leaves open the possibility that he is qualitatively a FALSE theos, right?Qualitatively theos describes the nature or essence being of God. You would still need to add the word, 'false' if…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2013,15:53)Quote (t8 @ April 15 2013,19:45)2) Qualitatively God specifies divine nature or same essence as God, thereby solidifying what kind of god.Ah, but look what you've done.  You've opted for BOTH the “qualitative” option AND the definite article option.I am simply accommodating your view. I personally wouldn't…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 16 2013,15:53)Quote (t8 @ April 15 2013,19:45)1) 'a god' is saying that it could be any kind of god. Even a false god could not be ruled out by the sentence structure.Are you saying the rest of scripture isn't enough for us to figure out that Jesus is not a “false god”?  I used the words, 'sentence structure' so that you…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2013,18:16)Quote (t8 @ April 12 2013,00:50)Judas being called a devil is an example.And what exactly is “a devil”, t8?  A devil is a “false accuser”, and a “slanderer” – according to Strong.Was Judas actually a “false accuser”?  If he was, then he was actually “a devil”, right?  So no need to imagine that Jesus really m…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ April 13 2013,17:56)The last two possibilities are really identical, for anyone who is “qualitatively god” is equally “a god”.Agreed. But there is a difference too.1) 'a god' is saying that it could be any kind of god. Even a false god could not be ruled out by the sentence structure.2) Qualitatively God specifies divine nature…[Read more]

Yes I agree with Mike. If we read , “Before Abraham, I am” as saying he existed, then what force are you using to change that meaning?'I am' means I exist, so I am reading this as the default meaning.See that? 'I am' reading this with the default meaning. In other words, me who exists is reading this with the default meaning.So Gene, how are we…[Read more]