Quote (Wakeup @ Sep. 27 2013,11:43)Hi T8.No one can fit the third person in John 1:1In the biginning was the WORD,and the word was with GOD.There are just two entities.GOD and his WORD.I'm sure you'll agree.wakeup.Absolutely right wakeup. People say that John 1:1 teaches the Trinity. It absolutely does not. It teaches about God and the Word.

There is a bit about Newton's rejection of the Trinity about half way through the video. If you have the time watch the whole thing. I thought it was very interesting.

There is a bit about Newton's rejection of the Trinity about half way through the video. If you have the time watch the whole thing. I thought it was very interesting.

I love this video.

Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 27 2013,11:49)i wander why people still use and claim the perfection of that corrupted AKJV,but it seems imbedded in the mind of those people ;The scriptures were denied for centuries, so men believed as they were taught by the gate keepers. And once a weed is established, it is harder to pull out by the roots. And with a…[Read more]

Quote (terraricca @ Sep. 27 2013,11:49)i wander why people still use and claim the perfection of that corrupted AKJV,but it seems imbedded in the mind of those people ;The scriptures were denied for centuries, so men believed as they were taught by the gate keepers. And once a weed is established, it is harder to pull out by the roots. And with a…[Read more]

Quote (2besee @ Sep. 26 2013,14:19)Kerwin, Good topic.Obviously Jesus was flesh. The antichrist denies the flesh, Jehovah's Witnesses deny the flesh, as do some here.My question is: What is Jesus now?Jesus is here in spirit, do you agree?Yes the antichrist spirit denies that he came in the flesh.And our brother Paul taught us the following:”The…[Read more]

Did you know that Sir Isaac Newton didn't believe in the Trinity and just assumed that most in his time were too easily deceived. Denying the Trinity was heretical, and so Newton remained extremely cautious about his views.  His beliefs on the Trinity, and his notes on it were not found until after his death.Newton wondered why a metaphysical…[Read more]

Did you know that Sir Isaac Newton didn't believe in the Trinity and just assumed that most in his time were too easily deceived. Denying the Trinity was heretical, and so Newton remained extremely cautious about his views.  His beliefs on the Trinity, and his notes on it were not found until after his death.Newton wondered why a metaphysical…[Read more]

The Father is the God in the bible. There are over 1300 verses that mean the Father when speaking of God. There are around 9 verses that use the word God as Jesus. Some of them can be read in another way to agree with the rest of scripture if you move the comma, some are corruptions such as 1Tim 3:16 (AKJV only) and 1 John 5:7–8 (AKJV only), and o…[Read more]

Quote (4Thomas @ Sep. 19 2013,19:08)Question, we know Satan is called THE God of this World in scripture but surely you would NOT call him or any other angel (fallen or not) your God?Absolutely not. But to those that belong to him, they could. YHWH is the God of the living not the dead.

I just replied to a comment on the website and used these words about Isaac Newton. It is about his view on the Trinity. Although this thread is not about that, it is about the man himself and thus I include it to give you an idea about what sort of person he was.

Newton also didn’t believe in the Trinity and just assumed that most were to easily d…

[Read more]

If I taught that the Word was a god, then I would have to allow for the Word was THE God too.Because neither are in the original text, therefore it would be a matter of bias as to which one we chose.

Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 07 2013,05:19)And the fact you are able to go against the 20th century teachings of men (who aim to protect the Bible from itself) when it comes to Satan, makes me even more curious about why you stop only at Satan.  What is so special about him that he alone is a god other than Jehovah, when his spirit brothers are not?…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 07 2013,05:19)In that way, you have aligned yourself with the scriptures, which simply call Satan a god – WITHOUT ever saying he is “false”, or “so-called”.If you don't like the term false god, then I will use other god as in we should have no other gods before him.Satan is THE God of this age. Not a god of this age…[Read more]

Quote (mikeboll64 @ July 07 2013,05:19)Tell me WHY you think His counsels are called theos only “by reason of their office”. What “office” does Satan hold in the hierarchy of Jehovah that enables him ALONE to be a god other than Jehovah, while none of the other angels are.Satan is literally a God, THE God of this age. He is not theos by any…[Read more]

I find opening up 2 browsers or tabs is good. You can copy and paste pertinent parts and quote each one using the Quote Button in the toolbar. The other option which is the one you use I think, is to copy that which you want to directly reply to, then quote the post, and then paste over all the text in the quoted text box.That way it automatically…[Read more]

Oh I see. You were saying something kinda different Mike.Still a good time to bring this up because I was reading in this very topic some pages back and gave up because 90% of the page was quotes with a few relevant lines underneath.