I think you are right about the mixed people. And yes that could also work for the Roman Empire too.

Interesting that the word is ‘arab’ though. Could be a huge coincidence. But as I have said before, it makes no sense to me that all the empires were succeeded by the next (in the Beast), except for some reason we should not include the Ottoman.…[Read more]

I think you are right about the mixed people. And yes that could also work for the Roman Empire too.

Interesting that the word is ‘arab’ though. And as I have said before, it makes no sense to me that all the empires were succeeded by the next (in the Beast), except for some reason we should not include the Ottoman. Further that it ruled the…[Read more]

I think you are right about the mixed people. And yes that could also work for the Roman Empire too.

Interesting that the word is ‘arab’ though and still as I have said before, it makes no sense to me that all the empires were succeeded by the next, except for some reason we should not include the Ottoman. Further that it ruled the Eastern Roman…[Read more]

Clay is sometimes a reference to the flesh or our form. God is the potter and we are the clay for example.

Isaiah 64:8
But now, O Lord, you are our Father; we are the clay, and you are our potter; we are all the work of your hand.

Genesis 2:7
Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

I guess I should also add that Rome is the sixth king and the legs of iron. Yet we are told of the seventh king with the eighth coming from the seven. So if Rome is the seventh king, then Rome must be the eight, meaning that Rome is kings 6-8. Try fitting that into history.

Whereas, the conquering Ottoman Empire as the seventh is also the eighth,…[Read more]

I guess I should also add that Rome is the sixth king and the legs of iron. Yet we are told of the seventh king with the eighth coming from the seven. So if Rome is the seventh king, then Rome must be the eight, meaning that Rome is kings 6-8. Try fitting that into history.

If it is Rome, then you have to believe that every kingdom/head that was part of the Beast conquered or succeeded the predecessor EXCEPT for the Ottoman Empire. We have Egypt > Assyria > Babylon > Persia > Greece > Rome > but not the Ottoman Empire that conquered the Roman Empire and reigned for the next 500 years or so. And why?To me that is a…[Read more]

If it is Rome, then you have to believe that every kingdom/head that was part of the Beast conquered or succeeded the predecessor EXCEPT for the Ottoman Empire. We have Egypt > Assyria > Babylon > Persia > Greece > Rome > but not the Ottoman Empire that conquered the Roman Empire and reigned for the next 500 years or so. And why?

To me that is a…[Read more]

http://youtu.be/URzJlSIb124

http://youtu.be/8VUfHzmEzZY