Clay is sometimes a reference to the flesh or our form. God is the potter and we are the clay for example.

Isaiah 64:8
But now, O Lord, you are our Father; we are the clay, and you are our potter; we are all the work of your hand.

Genesis 2:7
Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

Also, one other possibility came to me the other day, but forgot to mention it. I don’t think anyone has ever mentioned this before, but I only throw it out there because I am searching. So please do not make out that I am teaching this. Just as idea.

Rome had two legs, an eastern leg and western leg. The Eastern leg was succeeded by the Ottoman…[Read more]

I guess I should also add that Rome is the sixth king and the legs of iron. Yet we are told of the seventh king with the eighth coming from the seven. So if Rome is the seventh king, then Rome must be the eight, meaning that Rome is kings 6-8. Try fitting that into history.

Whereas, the conquering Ottoman Empire as the seventh is also the eighth,…[Read more]

I guess I should also add that Rome is the sixth king and the legs of iron. Yet we are told of the seventh king with the eighth coming from the seven. So if Rome is the seventh king, then Rome must be the eight, meaning that Rome is kings 6-8. Try fitting that into history.

If it is Rome, then you have to believe that every kingdom/head that was part of the Beast conquered or succeeded the predecessor EXCEPT for the Ottoman Empire. We have Egypt > Assyria > Babylon > Persia > Greece > Rome > but not the Ottoman Empire that conquered the Roman Empire and reigned for the next 500 years or so. And why?To me that is a…[Read more]

If it is Rome, then you have to believe that every kingdom/head that was part of the Beast conquered or succeeded the predecessor EXCEPT for the Ottoman Empire. We have Egypt > Assyria > Babylon > Persia > Greece > Rome > but not the Ottoman Empire that conquered the Roman Empire and reigned for the next 500 years or so. And why?

To me that is a…[Read more]

http://youtu.be/URzJlSIb124

http://youtu.be/8VUfHzmEzZY

http://youtu.be/URzJlSIb124

I agree that many theories out there look like drawing at straws or connecting dots that should not be connected. This happens because people subscribe to a view, and most views have difficulties, so they think hard how to overcome them. Finally, they have invested so much time in making the theory water tight, that when signs come along that…[Read more]

I agree that many theories out there look like drawing at straws or connecting dots that should not be connected. This happens because people subscribe to a view, and most views have difficulties, so they think hard how to overcome them. Finally, they have invested so much time in making the theory water tight, that when signs come along that…[Read more]

I agree that many theories out there look like drawing at straws or connecting dots that should not be connected. This happens because people subscribe to a view, and most views have difficulties, so they think hard how to overcome them. Finally, they have invested so much time in making the theory water tight, that when signs come along that…[Read more]