@t8 I have noticed that you say the eighth king is of the seventh, when scripture actually says that the eighth king is of the seven. Your wording implies that the eighth king is directly of the seventh king when scripture says the eighth king is of kings 1-7 (all of them)…not just of the seventh king. I found these commentaries on biblehub, c…

[Read more]

@t8 I have noticed that you say the eighth king is of the seventh, when scripture actually says that the eighth king is of the seven. Your wording implies that the eighth king is directly of the seventh king when scripture says the eighth king is of kings 1-7 (all of them)…not just of the seventh king. I found these commentaries on biblehub, c…

[Read more]

I think two things are happening here in this conversation, so I would like to add my 2 cents worth. (1 cent for each point, lol) )

No man is saved by the Law because we all fall short of it. We have all broken God’s commandments at some point.

However, this does not mean that all under the Law are condemned to destruction. No way. Was Moses pe…[Read more]

I think two things are happening here in this conversation, so I would like to add my 2 cents worth. (1 cent for each point, lol) )

No man is saved by the Law because we all fall short of it. We have all broken God’s commandments at some point.

However, this does not mean that all under the Law are condemned to destruction. No way. Was Moses pe…[Read more]

I think two things are happening here in this conversation, so I would like to add my 2 cents worth. (1 cent for each point, lol) )

No man is saved by the Law because we all fall short of it. We have all broken God’s commandments at some point.

However, this does not mean that all under the Law are condemned to destruction. No way. Was Moses pe…[Read more]

I think two things are happening here in this conversation, so I would like to add my 2 cents worth.

No man is saved by the Law because we all fall short of it. We have all broken God’s commandments at some point.

However, this does not mean that all under the Law are condemned to destruction. No way. Was Moses perfect? No. Was he condemned to…[Read more]

I think two things are happening here in this conversation, so I would like to add my 2 cents worth.

No man can be saved by the Law because we all fall short of it. We have all broken God’s commandments at some point.

However, this does not mean that all under the Law are condemned to Hell. No way. Was Moses perfect? No. Was he condemned to…[Read more]

Yeah terraricca, the soul that sins will die, BUT the free gift of God is eternal life. This is God’s grace as you say.

The first birth is destined for death. The second birth is from above and from the Spirit of God, it is life eternal.

We must be born again.

Christians are once again targeted by ISIS
ISIS kidnap at least 90 people from Christian villages in Syria, human rights watchdog reveals

• Islamic State militants launched dawn raid on Syrian villages, reports claim
• Sources say at least 90 have been abducted – mainly women and children
• Up to 3,000 people are said to have been ‘displaced’ as a…

[Read more]

The rapid rise of ISIS sees the self-named Caliphate now reaching into an area from Algeria to Afghanistan

The interesting thing about the speed at which this group have spread reminds me of the description of the Beast in Revelation.

Revelation 13:2
The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of…[Read more]

@genebalthrop

T8…….THEY were GOD POSSESIONS he was there heavenly FATHER, the same as we are, we belong to him, just as it says he sent his word to HIS OWN, it is said in a possessive sense, not that they were themselves a God of anykind. IMO

Then quit debating me over this. I am not saying that we go around calling men, angels, earthquakes, or…[Read more]

@genebalthrop

T8…….THEY were GOD POSSESIONS he was there heavenly FATHER, the same as we are, we belong to him, just as it says he sent his word to HIS OWN, it is said in a possessive sense, not that they were themselves a God of anykind. IMO

Then quit debating me over this. I am not saying that we go around calling men, angels, earthquakes, or…[Read more]

kerwin, yes it is written, but in what sense were they gods though. As mighty or great ones, as the offspring of God who share his nature like Adam being the man of men for example, or what?

T8……WHERE DID I ADMIT A CITY CAN BE A EHOLIM OF ANY KIND? You are still not getting what i said, i did not say an earthquake OR A CITY was a god, the word god is describing a “relationship” to something, it is not a person place or thing , it is THE RELATIONSHIP THE WORD GOD IS DESCRIBING. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DESCRIBING THE OBJECT ITSELF.…

[Read more]

T8……WHERE DID I ADMIT A CITY CAN BE A EHOLIM OF ANY KIND? You are still not getting what i said, i did not say an earthquake OR A CITY was a god, the word god is describing a “relationship” to something, it is not a person place or thing , it is THE RELATIONSHIP THE WORD GOD IS DESCRIBING. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DESCRIBING THE OBJECT ITSELF.…

[Read more]

T8……WHERE DID I ADMIT A CITY CAN BE A EHOLIM OF ANY KIND? You are still not getting what i said, i did not say an earthquake OR A CITY was a god, the word god is describing a “relationship” to something, it is not a person place or thing , it is THE RELATIONSHIP THE WORD GOD IS DESCRIBING. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DESCRIBING THE OBJECT ITSELF.…

[Read more]

T8……WHERE DID I ADMIT A CITY CAN BE A EHOLIM OF ANY KIND? You are still not getting what i said, i did not say an earthquake OR A CITY was a god, the word god is describing a “relationship” to something, it is not a person place or thing , it is THE RELATIONSHIP THE WORD GOD IS DESCRIBING. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DESCRIBING THE OBJECT ITSELF.…

[Read more]

Thanks kerwin.