The earlier conviction, which I think started with Martin Luther, was that the Pope and Catholicism were the beast of Revelations. What was the fruit of that belief?

Still a contender I think, although I think Mystery Babylon fits the bill better. She wears purple and crimson and made the whole world drunk on her wine. Certainly sounds like a city…[Read more]

Unless the beast encroaches in the territory covered in the prophesy then there is no room for it in the area as the kingdoms in that area are covered. Unless it has some unity with the Roman Empire Isis will fail in its endeavors to unify the kingdoms of that area. The Secularist that are also attempting to unify the area will also fail though…

[Read more]

Nick, I think this went over your head.

We all know that God the Father is in Heaven. No one is arguing against that. But scripture says that Jesus mission is to redeem/renew creation so God can dwell in all and by his spirit I imagine. So how is that. Well I postulate that he could be inside the smallest building block of the atom, thus he could…[Read more]

Nick, I think this went over your head.

We all know that God the Father is in Heaven. No one is arguing against that. But scripture says that Jesus mission is to redeem/renew creation so God can dwell in all and by his spirit I imagine. So how is that. Well I postulate that he could be inside the smallest building block of the atom, thus he could…[Read more]

Jesus return ushers in the Millennial reign. There is no Beast during that time. If Islam is the seventh king and eighth too, then Jesus hasn’t returned.

Oh yeah, I forgot that Ed J believes that Jesus has already returned.

Do you still think he was the angel of God?

Another false conclusion Nick.

I started a topic called “The Angel of the LORD“. I never conclusively said that he was, but that Jesus was clearly called a messenger in scripture and that the Messenger of God in the Old Testament had much in common with Jesus Christ. It was a topic of discovery to see…[Read more]

Do you still think he was the angel of God?

Another false conclusion Nick.

I started a topic called “The Angel of the LORD“. I never conclusively said that he was, but that Jesus was clearly called a messenger in scripture and that the Messenger of God in the Old Testament had much in common with Jesus Christ. It was a topic of discovery to see…[Read more]

Hi t8,

Jesus was made a little lower than the Angels.heb 2.9

But you think otherwise?

Please pay attention so that you do not have to repeatedly come to erroneous conclusions.

He existed in the form of God, emptied himself, and came in the flesh. 

I see being made a little lower than the angels as being complimentary to what I believe and…[Read more]

Hi t8,

Jesus was made a little lower than the Angels.heb 2.9

But you think otherwise?

Please pay attention so that you do not have to repeatedly come to erroneous conclusions.

He existed in the form of God, emptied himself, and came in the flesh. 

I see being made a little lower than the angels as being complimentary to what I believe and…[Read more]

Hi t8,

Jesus was made a little lower than the Angels.heb 2.9

But you think otherwise?

Please pay attention so that you do not have to repeatedly come to erroneous conclusions.

He existed in the form of God, emptied himself, and came in the flesh. 

I see being made a little lower than the angels as being complimentary to what I believe and…[Read more]

Hi t8,

You misquoted it because you omitted CHRIST in your post.

Without the Christos anointing he was a godfearing carpenter born of Mary.

Correct, it denies that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.

But you are actually teaching that the Word or Spirit came in the flesh, not Jesus Christ coming in the flesh. That is what you are saying.

To you…[Read more]

Hi t8,

You misquoted it because you omitted CHRIST in your post.

Without the Christos anointing he was a godfearing carpenter born of Mary.

Correct, it denied that Jesus Christ came in the flesh.

But you are actually teaching that the Word or Spirit came in the flesh, not Jesus Christ coming in the flesh. That is what you are saying.

To you…[Read more]

Hi t8,

Do you agree that the powers and teaching Jesus gave were all the result of the Holy Spirit in him?

Or do you think they were his own work?

Did flesh contribute anything?

Jesus did what the Father did and said what the Father said. He came in his Father’s name, not his own. So yes, Jesus represented his Father perfectly.

But you say…[Read more]

I remember you said the anointing at the Jordan was just the opportunity to go public about it.

This is false teaching to deny the Holy Spirit.

You are mistaken Nick. It is not good to come to erroneous conclusions. Once you can forgive and even a few times. But when it is a pattern, it is probably time to change the habit.

What I said was…[Read more]

You say we cannot follow him in all respects?

Probably better if I said that we cannot be like him in all respects. Yes we are encouraged to be like him, but we will never be equal to him as he is the head and we are not.

Alright so you are saying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. But you are actually teaching that Christ came in the flesh, and the union became Jesus Christ. If that were true Nick, then Jesus (flesh) and Christ came in the flesh, but you deny that Jesus came in the flesh, and say that only Christ did. But Jesus Christ came in the…[Read more]

Alright so you are saying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. But you are actually teaching that Christ came in the flesh, and the union became Jesus Christ. If that were true Nick, then Jesus (flesh) and Christ came in the flesh, but you deny that Jesus came in the flesh, and say that only Christ did. But Jesus Christ came in the…[Read more]

Alright so you are saying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. But you are actually teaching that Christ came in the flesh, and the union became Jesus Christ. If that were true Nick, then Jesus (flesh) and Christ came in the flesh, but you deny that Jesus came in the flesh, and say that only Christ did. But Jesus Christ came in the…[Read more]

Alright so you are saying that Jesus Christ came in the flesh. But you are actually teaching that Christ came in the flesh, and the union became Jesus Christ. If that were true Nick, then Jesus (flesh) and Christ came in the flesh, but you deny that Jesus came in the flesh, and say that only Christ did.

Further, if we deny that Jesus is the…[Read more]